Creative Screenwriting Magazine: Alien

Thursday, January 1st, 2004

The recent Creative Screenwriting Magazine (Volume 10, #5) revealed some amazing history on how Alien came to be:

The largest change the project underwent happened before it was even scripted — converting it from a World War II horror film to a sci-fi thriller. In the summer of 1976 Dan O’Bannon took the opening of his screenplay Memory and stitched it onto the second half of his WWII story Gremlins, which featured lethal gremlins infiltrating a B-17 bomber during a bombing run. O’Bannon then changed the B-17 into a spaceship and wrote a treatment titled Space Beast, which he then expanded into the first Alien script.

Addendum: I took a photo of the physical artifact:

Creative Screenwriting Magazine Alien

Creative Screenwriting Magazine: By Crom, Conan Lives Again!

Thursday, January 1st, 2004

Before going “home” for Christmas, I picked up a few magazines, including Creative Screenwriting Magazine — which had more than a few interesting articles:

By Crom, Conan Lives Again!

Word is, John Milius’s King Conan script is exactly what you’d expect from Milius: lots of battles, loppings, and meditations on the ways of the aging warrior. But while Warner Bros waits for the Wachowski brothers to shout “Action!” on that epic, Swordplay Entertainment, Inc. has scooped up the rights to create three feature-length animated Conan direct-to-video films, all to be written and produced by Swordplay’s Steve Gold. “This is the project I’ve always wanted,” Gold enthused to Buzz. “Conan is the James Bond of fantasy, only better.” Gold started his writing life as Hal Ashby’s writing assistant, adapting properties by William Gibson and Michael Moorcock before becoming the sworn protector of novelist Robert E. Howard’s vision of the barbarian. “This is going to be the real Conan, very faithful to the source material,” said Gold. “We’re going to give the audience the Conan they’ve been waiting for, a Conan most people have never had a chance to see.”

Milus’s script sounds excellent, of course — even though the first Conan script, also by Milius, wasn’t true to Howard’s Conan stories, it was true to Howard’s Conan ethos — but I don’t know if I would have chosen the Wachowski brothers to direct. Greg’s Previews points out that Arnold is no longer free to play the role, now that he’s the Governator. Milius has suggested Paul Michael Levesque (aka Triple H).

As for the direct-to-video animated movies — by Crom, Steve Gold is saying all the things I want to hear: Conan is the James Bond of fantasy, only better. This is going to be the real Conan, very faithful to the source material. Of course, there’s something a bit contradictory — in a Yogi Berra kind of way — about his last statement: We’re going to give the audience the Conan they’ve been waiting for, a Conan most people have never had a chance to see.

Heinlein

Wednesday, December 31st, 2003

On their 2blowhards.com blog, Michael (blowhard 1, not a SF fan) asks Friedrich (blowhard 2) about SF author Heinlein — best known for Starship Troopers and Stranger in a Strange Land:

A few of the things I’ve learned from hanging out online:
  • How many people identify themselves as libertarians.
  • How many people have gone through serious Ayn Rand phases.
  • How many bright people read and enjoy sci-fi as adults.
  • The immense cultural importance of Robert Heinlein.

I think I’ve managed to semi-understand the first three of those phenomena. The fourth still eludes me.

Friedrich’s response:

Heinlein created a revolution in S.F. around 1940. He turned the genre from something along the lines of “Buck Rogers” into a vehicle for commenting on politics, religion, sociology, etc. His most influential stuff (on the development of S.F.) was his early work, which all fit together into a coherent view of about 200 years of ‘future history.’ His writing style owes quite a bit to hard-boiled detective fiction, but without the pessimistic social vision; several of his first person heros sound an awful lot like Archie Goodwin of the Nero Wolfe stories. So much for his place in ‘literary’ history.

I like him because he seemed to come from the world of pre-Depression America: self-confident, can-do attitude, big believer in free markets and the necessity for kicking ass now and then. I read him all the time at Our Lousy Ivy University as an antidote to Marxism, feminism, identity politics, and political correctness generally. One quote, obviously written in response to the expansion of ‘rights’ and ‘entitlements’ during the 60s and 70, sort of sums him up in my mind: “Nobody really has any rights, but everybody has plenty of opportunities.”

I don’t know if he ever heard of sociobiology, but he would have been a big fan. I recall that he was a big believer in heredity and masculinity at the exact moment that all right-thinking people disparaged them. A number of his books for teenagers show an intelligent, capable, hard-working kid facing an oppressive social situation and figuring a way to get out from under. They seemed intended for smart kids who hadn’t found their place in the world yet; they were intended to empower, and they did.

Friedrich’s aren’t the only interesting comments though. I enjoyed many, but Steve Sailer‘s in particular:

I reread Heinlein’s books every four years. To my taste, he was the most interesting sociological novelist of the 20th Century, but he was not a literary artist. He had a serviceable style, influenced by the best stuff of 1939, the year he started publishing: Raymond Chandler and screwball comedy dialogue. But he never let artistry slow down the flow of analysis of How The World Works.

Tom Clancy is his best known modern disciple. The team of Larry Niven & Jerry Pournelle are probably his most sympatico heirs in hard sci-fi.

Heinlein means different things to different people in large part because he published three major cult novels between 1959 and 1966, each of which appeals to a completely different cult. Starship Trooper is the first book on the official U.S. Marine Corps reading list. Stranger in a Strange Land was extremely popular with the 1960s drug crowd. The Moon is a Harsh Mistress is a favorite of libertarians.

Many would argue, however, that the core of his achievement was his 1950s juvenile novels, perhaps culminating in “Have Space Suit, Will Travel.”

Others would point to his astonishing burst of creativity from 1939-1941. For example, his 1940 short story “Solution Unsatisfactory” was the farthest anyone thought through the strategic implications of atomic weapons (which would not exist for another five years) until the later 1940s. In this pulp magazine story, the U.S. brings WWII to an end in 1945 by use of atomic weapons, then quickly falls into a global struggle with Russia. After WWIII, which lasts 4-days, world government is tried, but that quickly turns into a dictatorship run by the man in charge of the atomic weapons. The story ends in despair.

Others might like his bestsellers from the 1970s after his major illness, although some may feel he was past his peak.

His 1964 fantasy novel Glory Road is not recommended. Heinlein had an immensely practical mind and really couldn’t take the genre seriously.

Fear of Book Assassination Haunts Bibliophile’s Musings

Sunday, December 21st, 2003

In Fear of Book Assassination Haunts Bibliophile’s Musings, André Bernard reviews Nicholas Basbanes’ A Splendor of Letters: The Permanence of Books in an Impermanent World, a book that “examines the bonfires that have consumed entire centuries of man’s musings on matters great and small”:

In 1562, a Franciscan friar who had accompanied Spanish troops to Mexico ordered the burning of thousands of Mayan hieroglyphic books, in an attempt to eradicate the repository of local spiritual beliefs and to pave the way for Christianity. In one afternoon, practically the entire record of a civilization had been turned to ashes; only four codices are known to have survived. In 1914, the German Army invaded the Belgian city of Louvain, a treasure house of Gothic and Renaissance architecture. In an act of no military significance whatsoever, Louvain’s magnificent library of 300,000 volumes, which included nearly a thousand irreplaceable illuminated manuscripts, was burned to the ground. (“At Louvain,” said a man who watched it happen, “Germany disqualified itself as a nation of thinkers.”) More recently, during its psychopathic reign in Cambodia in the mid-1970′s, Pol Pot’s regime destroyed nearly all of ancient Cambodia’s manuscripts and monuments. In its rage against modernity and civilization, the Khmer Rouge went so far as to examine ordinary citizens for marks on the bridge of the nose, the telltale sign of reading glasses — which was enough to bring down a death sentence.

I’m surprised there are extant references to damnatio memoriae…

If books are not the most perishable products of human civilization, they have, throughout recorded history, attracted the homicidal attentions of every conquering army. In large-scale versions of the penalty the Romans called damnatio memoriae, a punishment for individuals found guilty of committing crimes against the state which involved erasing every reference — whether on stone, in a monument or on parchment — to the person in question, invaders have settled not just for mass murder of the local citizenry, but have indulged in the wholesale disappearance of every written trace of a culture (as the Taliban did to non-fundamentalist Afghans), a language (as the Normans did to the Saxons), a people (as the Romans did to the Etruscans). Early Christian and medieval monks attacked the memory of non-Christian culture with zealous efficiency.

Ooh, “bibliophilic tidbits”:

And, of course, there’s time for many bibliophilic tidbits. Here’s a quick sample. The great English politician William Gladstone read an average of 250 books a year as an adult, and wrote an essay on how to design and arrange a home library. The Lindisfarne Gospels, the 10th-century Beowulf codex, the sole surviving copy of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, and the unique copy of William Langland’s The Vision of Piers Plowman were all saved from destruction by the same man, 17th-century antiquarian Sir Robert Cotton. Not one literary or historical document of Etruscan origin has survived, not even in Greek or Roman translation. There is no known original manuscript of any work by Molière, nor have any poetry manuscripts by Edmund Spenser or Andrew Marvell ever been found. Charles Lamb included in his catalog of “books which are not books” — and therefore not readable — scientific treatises and almanacs. Norway has established a book repository in a series of tunnels hollowed deep into a mountainside in the Arctic Circle, where every book written in Norwegian is frigidly preserved, secure from the predations of the outside world.

Prospect Magazine – Albert Camus

Saturday, December 20th, 2003

Paul Barker discusses Albert Camus‘s life:

Camus’s first and best-known novel, L’Étranger, written in his twenties, is a short moral tale, in the tradition of Voltairean contes, about a meaningless (‘absurd’) murder. Its flat short sentences have a permanent appeal to adolescent angst.

L’Étranger is one of the few novels I’ve read in French. “Its flat short sentences” didn’t appeal so much to my adolescence as to my limited French comprehension.

I wouldn’t expect these conditions to spawn a famous writer:

Camus was himself an outsider. Like the philosopher Jacques Derrida, he was Algerian-born. But Derrida was middle-class Jewish; Camus’s background was humbler: the white working class of Algiers. His father was a wine company foreman, killed on the Marne in 1914, eight months after his son’s birth. His mother, Spanish by origin, was illiterate and partly deaf. With her husband dead, she worked as a cleaner. Camus took his baths in a zinc tub, in a home without books.
[...]
For the settlers, in a province which was then administratively part of metropolitan France, Algeria was a Mediterranean California. Camus’s early writings are suffused with the charms of sun, sea and sand. The Algerians — meaning the settlers — were, he wrote in his early twenties, “a race without a past, without tradition and yet not without poetry.” The poetry largely consisted in “the cult of an admiration of the body.” Algiers was then a colonists’ city, with only 50,000 Arabs out of 220,000 inhabitants. Camus wrote dreamily about “the flowers and sports stadiums, the cool-legged girls.” When he began to write seriously he worried about keeping a “fragile” balance between work and sun-worship.

It’s hard to imagine Algeria as a Mediterranean California these days.

In 1957, Camus was offered and accepted the Nobel prize. He retained the frugality of his youth, never travelling first class on trains. For the Stockholm ceremony, he borrowed a dinner jacket; Francine borrowed a mink stole. At a question and answer session with students, he was asked about Algeria. He saiid, “I believe in justice, but I will defend my mother before justice.” From the left, Le Monde was delighted to give prominence to the quote.
[...]
Camus spent some of his Nobel money on a farmhouse in Provence, where he began a new novel, Le Premier Homme (The First Man). In 1959, after Christmas in the farmhouse with his family, he wrote fond letters to his current mistresses — two actresses and a Balmain model — saying he’d soon be back. On 3rd January 1960, he accepted a lift in his publisher Michel Gallimard’s high-performance Facel Vega. The next day, after lunch, the car hit a roadside tree on the N5. Camus was killed instantly. In his briefcase were 144 pages of his draft novel, which was eventually published as he’d left it. It is about growing up as a poor white in Algeria.

I guess it’s ironic that an obsessively frugal, consumptive, existentialist writer died in flashy car crash.

Waiting for Antar

Friday, December 19th, 2003

In Waiting for Antar, Charles Paul Freund explains how Saddam presented himself as a courageous Arab redeemer, but he did not live up to the standard set by heroes like Antar:

The historic and cultural model of the courageous Arab redeemer could hardly stand in greater contrast. That figure is fearless, whether in face of the enemy or of death itself. He is magnanimous in victory, pious before God, noble, generous, and just to his own people. His soul is as filled with poetry as his sword is stained with the blood of the unworthy. There is a long line of fictional and historical figures who embody this role in Arab cultural artifacts, both traditional oral epics and modern TV serials, from Abu Bakr to Haroun al Rachid to Saladdin. For that matter, the fearless but noble Arab warrior even turns up in medieval European literature, appearing, for example, in Boccaccio. The original model, however, appears to be a black pre-Islamic Bedouin warrior known as Antar.

Note to self: read Boccaccio.

Antar is a remarkable character; his saga was recited in Arab squares and coffeehouses for centuries, absorbing Islamic values despite predating the coming of Islam. Among the rousing adventures of this poet-warrior was saving the Rome of the Caesars from attack by Byzantine Greeks, enemies of the Arabs. He was so noble that even the Prophet Muhammad is reported to have expressed a wish to have known him. When Westerners first encountered the Antar epic in the 19th century, they swooned, proclaiming the work to be the Arabic Iliad. The saga itself has shrunk in recent years; Westerners have nearly forgotten him, and Arabs now are likely to treat Antar’s adventures as children’s literature. Antar’s monomythic shadow, however, is a long one, and has fallen across the shallow myth of Saddam repeatedly.

Note to self: read Antar epic too.

Antar’s own death, by the way, is worth pausing over, because in one bizarre detail it actually overlaps Saddam’s ignominious capture. Here’s Antar’s death: Antar is killed by an old enemy whom he long ago blinded, but who has learned to shoot arrows by sound. This enemy attacks Antar when the hero is vulnerable: when Antar exits a feast to urinate. Though severely wounded, Antar silently tracks his blind enemy and kills him. As Antar is leading his band to safety, however, they are again attacked. To save his men, he asks to be set one last time on his horse, with his lance in his hand. The enemy attackers, spying him, don’t dare approach. At length, however, they come near, and seeing that Antar is dead, they bury him respectfully.

The screenplay practically writes itself. Hmm…

Here’s where that story ties in with Saddam’s capture:

What has this to do with Saddam? Time magazine has published a report about Saddam’s first interrogation, and it reveals the one thing that Saddam might have picked up from the whole Antar saga: a concern about urinating. According to Time, “When asked ‘How are you?’ said the official, Saddam responded, ‘I am sad because my people are in bondage.’ When offered a glass of water by his interrogators, Saddam replied, ‘If I drink water I will have to go to the bathroom and how can I use the bathroom when my people are in bondage?’”

How can I pee when my people need me? You’ll find a way, Saddam.

The Second Coming of Philip K. Dick

Saturday, December 13th, 2003

The Second Coming of Philip K. Dick examines how Philip K. Dick’s science fiction stories have practically taken over Hollywood:

Like the babbling psychics who predict future crimes in Minority Report, Dick was a precog. Lurking within his amphetamine-fueled fictions are truths that have only to be found and decoded. In a 1978 essay he wrote: “We live in a society in which spurious realities are manufactured by the media, by governments, by big corporations, by religious groups, political groups. I ask, in my writing, What is real? Because unceasingly we are bombarded with pseudorealities manufactured by very sophisticated people using very sophisticated electronic mechanisms. I do not distrust their motives. I distrust their power. It is an astonishing power: that of creating whole universes, universes of the mind. I ought to know. I do the same thing.”

It didn’t start off quite so auspiciously:

Dick’s career in movies did not begin with a bang. It was 1977, and a small-time actor named Brian Kelly wanted to option the 9-year-old novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? For a mere $2,500, he got it. “The works of Philip K. Dick were not exactly in demand,” recalls the writer’s New York literary agent, Russell Galen, “and for Phil” — then 49 and living in suburban Orange County — “that was enough to make the difference between a good year and a bad year.” Kelly’s partner wrote a screenplay and shopped it around. Eventually it landed on the desk of Ridley Scott, who’d just directed Alien. Scott brought in a new writer and sent it to Alan Ladd Jr., one of the top players in Hollywood.

Just a few months before [Blade Runner]‘s release, Dick suffered a massive stroke. [...] Before Dick died, Shusett bought the film rights to “We Can Remember It for You Wholesale,” a story about a nebbishy clerk with dreams of going to Mars. He retitled it Total Recall and took it to Dino De Laurentiis, who put it into development.

This part is pure Hollywood:

Total Recall languished for years before all the elements — producer, director, star — came together. At one point, Richard Dreyfuss was attached. At another, David Cronenberg was going to direct and wanted William Hurt for the lead. “I worked on it for a year and did about 12 drafts,” Cronenberg recalls. “Eventually we got to a point where Ron Shusett said, ‘You know what you’ve done? You’ve done the Philip K. Dick version.’ I said, ‘Isn’t that what we’re supposed to be doing?’ He said, ‘No, no, we want to do Raiders of the Lost Ark Go to Mars.’” Cronenberg moved on. Arnold Schwarzenegger wanted to star, but De Laurentiis refused: Even in an overamped Hollywood bastardization, he couldn’t see Schwarzenegger in the part. Instead, it went to Patrick Swayze, with Bruce Beresford directing. They were building sets in Australia when De Laurentiis’ company went bankrupt.

This gave Schwarzenegger his chance. He got Carolco, the high-flying mini-studio behind the Rambo series, to buy the property, and Paul Verhoeven to direct it. The henpecked clerk named Quail became a muscle-bound construction worker named Quaid, and a new ending was written to make up for what many filmmakers see as the problem with Dick’s short stories: their lack of a third act that will take a movie to 90 minutes or more. But while Verhoeven’s film was an interplanetary shoot-’em-up that bore little resemblance to Dick’s story, it did retain the tale’s essential ambiguity: At the end, we’re not sure whether the main character actually went to Mars or only thought he did, thanks to some memory implants he bought. “This was extremely innovative, coming from a Hollywood studio,” says Verhoeven. “To dare to say, Everything you see could be a dream, or everything you see could be reality, and we won’t tell you which is true — I thought that was pretty sensational.”

It sounds like Verhoeen hasn’t seen a little cult classic from the late 1930′s…called The Wizard of Oz.

Enjoyment

Friday, December 12th, 2003

Enjoyment examines a number of writers and the drugs they used — and concludes with this:

Drugs provided a marvellously adaptable and popular subject matter for authors — as sexy, sensational or sordid as they wanted. It has been a more mixed story for literary drug users. Although authors who took drugs for pure pleasure were the most criticised, they usually did the least harm to themselves. Druggy authors trying to turn themselves into transcendental voyagers virtually always made fools of themselves. And some writers who used substances both to cope and to unwind, found they couldn’t handle the stuff, and did themselves harm. Others took the pills and went on working fine. Overall, then, authors were pretty much like everyone else.

I’ll stick to caffeine. In small doses.

Why the Sky Was Red in Munch’s ‘The Scream’

Friday, December 12th, 2003

When I read the title of Why the Sky Was Red in Munch’s ‘The Scream’, I assumed it would be about some obscure neurological condition. I didn’t expect it to report that Munch’s locale actually experienced red skies the year he painted ‘The Scream’:

For those who have ever wondered why the sky was a lurid red in ‘The Scream’ — Edvard Munch’s painting of modern angst — astronomers have an answer. They blame it on a volcanic eruption half a world away.

In the first detailed analysis of what inspired the painting, an article published on Tuesday in Sky and Telescope pinpointed the location in Norway where Munch and his friends were walking when the artist saw the blood-red sky depicted in the 1893 painting, and offered an explanation for why the sky seemed to be aflame.

Donald Olson, a physics and astronomy professor at Texas State University, and his colleagues determined that debris thrown into the atmosphere by the great eruption at the island of Krakatoa, in modern Indonesia, created vivid red twilights in Europe from November 1883 through February 1884.

The local newspaper in what is now Oslo reported that the phenomenon was widely seen, the astronomers said.

“One of the high points of our research trip to Oslo came when we rounded a bend in the road and realized we were standing in the exact spot where Munch had been 120 years ago,” Olson recalled in a statement.

“It was very satisfying to stand in the exact spot where an artist had his experience,” he said. “The real importance of finding the location, though, was to determine the direction of view in the painting. We could see that Munch was looking to the southwest — exactly where the Krakatoa twilights appeared in the winter of 1883-84.”

Secrets and Thighs

Thursday, December 11th, 2003

Secrets and Thighs, by Ed Halter, offers “A history of celebrity sex tapes, real and fake, from Joan Crawford to Paris Hilton” — all in a very serious journalistic tone:

The distant seeds of celebrity porn took root in 19th-century literary erotica attributed to famous authors, such as the mock-epic Don Leon, claimed to have been penned by Lord Byron as a record of his notorious exploits, or the explicitly homosexual Victorian novel Teleny, long said to have been written by Oscar Wilde. After Hollywood invented the movie star in the early 20th century, Tijuana Bibles satisfied a new desire to see screen deities stripped bare. These crudely drawn comic-book leaflets depicted stars like Jean Harlow, Greta Garbo, and Clark Gable in various farcical trysts.

Hardcore porn films have existed at least since the teens, circulated through private clubs and wealthy collectors. Ancient Hollywood gossip has it that Joan Crawford acted in several early stag films, including some with lesbian scenes. But one of the earliest star-attributed films to circulate widely was a nameless one-reel nudie loop purporting to depict a young Marilyn Monroe, who would have shot it around 1948, prior to her posing nude for the inaugural issue of Playboy. In the film, a lone young woman does a striptease, rolls an apple across her chest, and then sips a soda. Later dubbed The Apple Knockers and the Coke, it was distributed to colleges and cinemas in the early ’70s by Grove Films, packaged in a collection of vintage erotic shorts and experimental works like Carolee Schneemann’s Fuses. Today, it’s recognized that Apple Knockers and several other so-called Monroe porn films depict another early Playboy model named Arline Hunter.

One Monroe stag film remains in dispute, however. Also dated from 1948, this unnamed 16mm hardcore short shows a Monroe-ringer screwing a mustached man on a couch. According to a 1980 Penthouse cover story, a print was discovered that year by a Swedish photographer and subsequently publicized in adult magazines and tabloids worldwide. “Here, in grainy celluloid,” Penthouse wrote next to copious frame-enlargements, “may well be the still unglamorized sex goddess the public never knew, before plastic surgeons, stylists, and designers transformed her into the mythical Marilyn Monroe. It’s a thought to fire the imagination of every man who ever dreamed of her, a fantasy come to fruition.” Another print of probably the same film garnered headlines in industry trades when it surfaced at a Spanish festival for film collectors in 1997. Those who argue the actress is Monroe point to declassified FBI files from 1965 detailing that Joe DiMaggio offered $25,000 for a print of a “French-type” movie depicting Monroe “in unnatural acts with an unknown male.” Its authenticity seemed likely enough for Hollywood’s Erotic Museum to purchase a print, now kept in its collection alongside artwork by Picasso and Tom of Finland.

About Last Night

Thursday, December 11th, 2003

About Last Night makes a sad point:

I see that Master and Commander has tanked. Not in absolute terms: a $67.5 million gross in the first three weeks of release would be perfectly respectable under normal circumstances. Unfortunately, Master and Commander cost $135 million, stars Russell Crowe, and got hysterically enthusiastic reviews. So why isn’t it doing better? A whole lot better? The answer is to be found in The Wall Street Journal‘s post-Thanksgiving report on this year’s holiday films, which declared with blunt finality that ‘the adult-skewing audience it is pitched toward hasn’t responded strongly enough.’

That rumble you hear in the middle distance is the sound of doom for big-budget adult movies, which were already sick unto death and have now officially straight-lined. If a film with all the advantages of Master and Commander can’t do any better than $67.5 million after three weeks, don’t expect any remotely similar project to get the green light. Expensive movies, like Trix, are for kids.

I hope it makes plenty of money on DVD. I definitely agree with this point:

Especially now that large-screen TVs are making it easier to watch films at home under more visually advantageous circumstances, I doubt that over-30 moviegoers will continue to subject themselves to the unpleasantries of trips to the local gigaplex. Intimate films like Lost in Translation and The Station Agent gain little or nothing when you view them in a theater, surrounded by cell-phone addicts and other freaks and morons.

‘Rings’ Director Wants to Bring ‘Hobbit’ to Screen

Wednesday, December 10th, 2003

I can’t imagine he’ll have any trouble getting the money. ‘Rings’ Director Wants to Bring ‘Hobbit’ to Screen:

Despite his exhaustion, Jackson is not resting on his laurels and said if complex rights issues can be resolved he would like to direct ‘The Hobbit,’ J.R.R. Tolkien’s prequel to the ‘Rings’ trilogy set some 50 years earlier.

Commanding Heights on PBS

Tuesday, December 9th, 2003

I never caught Commanding Heights on PBS, but it sounds excellent:

The social and economic catastrophe left in the ashes of World War I ignited an intellectual and political struggle that would last most of the 20th century — a battle between the powers of government and the forces of the marketplace over who would control the economies of the world’s great nations.

“The Battle of Ideas” tells the story of how, for half a century, the world moved toward more government control — from the centrally planned economies of the communist world to the “mixed economies” of Europe and the developing world to the United States’ regulated capitalism — and then began to move away.

The ideas of two economists lay at the center of that struggle: John Maynard Keynes, the elegant Englishman who advocated government intervention to control the booms and busts of capitalist economies, and Friedrich von Hayek, the Austrian emmigrant who argued that government intervention in the economy would erode human freedom and was doomed to failure.

In western democracies, Keynes’s ideas would dominate for decades, until the economic crises of the 1970s forced political leaders to look for new ideas, and rediscover Von Hayek’s theories. In the 1980s, the simultaneous emergence of the conservative governments of Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan, who both embraced Hayek’s free-market ideas, set the stage for a worldwide capitalist revolution.

Harry Potter: The new Atlas Shrugged?

Tuesday, December 9th, 2003

The Libertarian Party website includes a feature entitled Harry Potter: The new Atlas Shrugged?:

I’m not the first person to point out that the Harry Potter books have a libertarian flavor. The wizarding world in the series has a private banking system and no apparent zoning laws. Wizards have the right to carry a wand — more dangerous than any firearm — at all times for the express purpose of self-defense. The schools are largely independent (until this book). Dumbeldore, the most powerful wizard alive, actively avoids a position in government. Independent action is celebrated. Notably absent is any mention of a system of taxation.

There is a formal government, but its purpose has been primarily to hide the wizarding world from muggles (i.e. you) and to control abuse of magic that could harm others. Until now, the high-ranking government ministers in the tales have generally been either pompous jerks or bumbling fools. With the exception of the time when the Minister of Magic knowingly put an innocent man in prison as a public-relations stunt, the authorities have almost been comic relief.

In this book, they cross the line into being dangerously corrupt.

Wormtalk and Slugspeak

Wednesday, December 3rd, 2003

On his blog, Wormtalk and Slugspeak, an “English professor, medievalist, Anglo-Saxonist and J.R.R. Tolkien scholar natters on about” the upcoming Return of the King movie that he managed to see before its wide release:

[L]et me say that as a movie this one manage[s] easily to top the other two. I could come up with all kind of picky criticisms (and I have some larger ones, as well), but on the whole this just blew me away — and I actually quite disliked Two Towers. The sheer spectacle, the visuals, the landscape, the special effects (seamlessly integrated)…

The audience was made up of jaded film critics and theater owners, and had only about 50 people in attendance. But spontaneous applause and cheering broke out three times and I myself got misty in more than one place.

On the down side…

Ok, you probably want me to wear my Tolkien-critic hat: the treatment of Denethor is even worse than that of Faramir and shows that the critique of Tolkien for having ‘black and white’ characters is incredibly off the mark. Tolkien treats Denethor with great subtlety; Jackson does not — it’s over the top, in fact. The editing of the movie is odd: some things are very rushed, while we get image after image of catapults firing, many slow motion scenes, etc.

I expect to agree with him.

On the good side…

I said that I didn’t think the scale of the battle of the Pelennor Fields being ten times larger than Helm’s Deep would really make that much of a difference. I was really wrong.

Gimli’s comic relief wasn’t heavy-handed and worked in this film.

You’ve never seen such an amazing volcanic eruption.

And, finally, and most importantly to my students, I think: EOWYN RULES!