Back to Basics

Thursday, March 4th, 2004

Back to Basics reviews Joe Eszterhas’s autobiography, Hollywood Animal:

Jozsef Eszterhas was born in Hungary in 1944. His father, István, was a writer, heavy and short, with a pronounced limp. (“My father had surgery eleven times on his hip without anesthetic.”) Little Jozsi’s mother, Mária, was a tavern keeper’s daughter, “her dark hair highlighted by slanted, deeply brown Eurasian eyes.” At moments like this, you realize why Eszterhas was fated to become a screenwriter. He is a helpless fabulist. Even when he tells the truth, it sounds made up. As American planes attack Nazi-held Hungary at the end of the war, two of their targets are, naturally, the Eszterhas home (“a direct hit”), and the Steir car that is being driven by Jozsi’s father toward the Austrian border: “They machine-gunned us, but my father roared the Steir over a ditch and into the trees.” One thing we know about dads: only in movies do they roar their automobiles. The rest of the time, they drive.

NPR : ‘Robot Stories’ Director Greg Pak

Thursday, March 4th, 2004

When I caught NPR : ‘Robot Stories’ Director Greg Pak on the radio last night, I didn’t realize that Greg Pak was a friend of a friend of a friend. His movie sounds like something I might’ve done — unlike some of his earlier works:

Pak is an award-winning writer and director who has made his first feature film, Robot Stories. It tells four stories of love between humans and robots. The film has been received warmly by critics, winning more than 23 awards. Previously Pak made a number of very short films including Asian Pride Porn, Cat Fight Tonight, Fighting Grandpa and Mr. Lee.

Actor Mortensen Saddles Up for Movie ‘Hidalgo’

Thursday, March 4th, 2004

I have fairly high hopes for Hidalgo, so I read Actor Mortensen Saddles Up for Movie ‘Hidalgo’ and discovered a few things:

Mortensen, 45, had been admired by movie critics since the 1980s, but was relatively unknown to mass audiences until “Rings” and Aragorn thrust him into the spotlight.

Viggo Mortensen’s 45? I had no idead.

Mortensen is something of a Renaissance man. He paints, writes and co-owns publisher, Perceval Press. He speaks Spanish, Danish and English, and for “Hidalgo” learned some of the language of the Lakota Native Americans.

Interesting guy. Incidentally, he was “born in New York of a Danish father and American mother.” I should have noticed that his name ended in “sen” — Danish names tend to do that.

I decided to look up Perceval Press. They’re fairly left wing. Some product description excerpts:

  • Dedicated to Noam Chomsky and using William Blake, Jonathan Swift, and Rumi’s prescient wordplay as its point of departure, Pandemoniumfromamerica is a sonic snapshot of 21st century disorientation and dissent.

  • Now that the Bush administration’s occupation of Iraq has become more about enforcing the economic and political objectives of a corporate elite and less about disarming a dictator that used to be an American ally and had nothing to do with the tragedies of 9/11, a spirited and informed analysis is needed more than ever.
  • Born in Guanabacoa and living in Regla, both religious centers in Cuba, Pupo has a long association with Santeria (Regla de Ocho), and voodoo. Through photography the artist rediscovers his religion from a new perspective, as a philosophy about life where the visions of the individual serve as doors to access the real world, and provide the true way to “see” what is around us.

Disney tale based on true story? Hold your horses

Thursday, March 4th, 2004

I suspect I’ll enjoy Hidalgo — as a work of fiction. From Disney tale based on true story? Hold your horses:

On Friday, Disney-owned Touchstone Pictures releases Hidalgo the movie based on “the incredible true story” of Frank T. Hopkins’ 1890 race across the Arabian desert on his trusty mustang.

Trouble is a host of scholars say they haven’t found a shred of evidence that this so-called “Ocean of Fire” race existed. Nor that Hopkins rode in any of the 400 endurance races that he claimed to have won, including one from Galveston, Texas, to Rutland, Vt.
[...]
Hopkins claimed to be a half-Sioux known as the “Laramie Kid,” who became a government dispatch rider in 1877 at age 12. He said he witnessed the 1890 massacre of Lakota Indians at Wounded Knee, won 400 endurance races, rode with Teddy Roosevelt’s Rough Riders and appeared in Buffalo Bill’s Wild West Show.

“We have now been working on the research for more than a year, during which time nearly 80 experts from five countries have demolished every single one of Hopkins’ claims,” Long Riders founders CuChullaine and Basha O’Reilly said in an e-mail.

Singleton to Unleash Black Superhero "Cage"

Wednesday, March 3rd, 2004

Singleton to Unleash Black Superhero “Cage”:

John Singleton is in negotiations to develop and direct ‘Luke Cage,’ a superhero drama based on Marvel Comics’ first black crimefighter.

Many people know that Nicholas Cage was born Nicholas Coppola. (Francis Ford Coppola is his uncle.) What most don’t know is that he named himself after Luke Cage, Hero for Hire, the 1970s blaxploitation comic-book hero.

Incidentally, it’s not clear that Luke Cage was Marvel’s first black crimefighter. If I may geek out for a moment, I believe Luke Cage was Marvel’s first black superhero to get his own title (in 1972). Black Panther appeared in 1966 in Fantastic Four #52 (according to the Museum of Black Superheroes). You can find anything on the Net.

"Chronicles of Narnia" to be film

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2004

The Lord of the Rings meets The Passion of the Christ? From “Chronicles of Narnia” to be film:

Following collaborations on “Holes,” “Ghosts of the Abyss” and the upcoming “Around the World in 80 Days,” the Walt Disney Co. has struck a deal with Denver billionaire Philip Anschutz’ Walden Media to co-finance and distribute The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe.

Budgeted at more than $100 million, according to sources, the film is scheduled to begin shooting in the summer, with “Shrek” director Andrew Adamson at the helm.

The film, the first installment of Walden’s “Chronicles of Narnia” franchise based on the series of children’s fantasy books by C.S. Lewis, will be released at Christmas 2005 by Walt Disney Pictures. Under the deal, which includes worldwide distribution rights, merchandising and all ancillary rights, Disney retains the option to release future films in the series, Walt Disney Studios chairman Dick Cook said.

Really, it is a no-brainer.

Gene Roddenberry Original Star Trek NBC story outline

Monday, March 1st, 2004

I’m actually not a tremendous Star Trek fan, but I enjoyed reading Gene Roddenberry’s original Star Trek NBC story outline:

Before Gene Roddenberry could boldly launch the Starship Enterprise into history as the most famous space vessel in history, he had to pull off a minor miracle — he had to sell Star Trek to television!

From the pitch:

Star Trek is a “Wagon Train” concept — built around characters who travel to worlds “similar” to our own, and meet the action-adventure-drama which becomes our stories.

I’d actually heard that before, that Start Trek was pitched as “Wagon Train in space”. The pitch doesn’t quite match the final product though:

Their transportation is the cruiser S.S. Yorktown, performing a well-defined and long-range Exploration-Science-Security mission which helps creater our format.

Yorktown? It gets better:

Robert M. April — The “skipper”, about thirty-four, Academy graduate, rank of captain. Clearly the leading man and central character. This role is designed for an actor of top repute and ability.

Captain April? (An actor of top repute and ability?)

It looks like “Number One” become “Captain’s Yeoman”:

The Executive Officer — Never referred to as anything but “Number One”, this officer is female. Almost mysteriously female, in fact — slim and dark in a Nile Valley way, age uncertain, one of those women who will always look the same between years twenty to fifty.
[...]
The Captain’s Yeoman — Except for problems in naval parlance, “Colt” would be called a yeowoman; blonde and with a shape even a uniform could not hide. She serves as Robert April’s secretary, reporter, bookkeeper, and undoubtedly wishes she could also serve him in more personal departments. She is not dumb; she is very female, disturbingly so.

Shooting Go Tigers!

Sunday, February 29th, 2004

I caught a bit of Go Tigers!, the high-school football documentary, on IFC the other day. Shooting Go Tigers! explains how it was made:

The documentary film Go Tigers! takes the viewer on a journey to Massillon, OH, a small town where football means everything to its residents.The behind-the-scenes chronicle follows three star high school football players through a season. The film captures the town’s enormous infatuation with the Massillon Tigers high school foot-ball team. Roughly 80 percent of Go Tigers! was shot on HDCAM, 15 percent on miniDV, with the remaining 5 percent on Super 16mm film. The resulting 300 hours of footage was eventually edited into a 103-minute motion picture.Go Tigers! screened at the 2001 Sundance Film Festival, where IFC Films picked it up.

To be honest, it did not look like 80 percent of Go Tigers! was shot on HDCAM. It didn’t look high-def at all. It looked like a typical documentary.

Like other documentaries, however, Go Tigers! was burdened with a limited budget — roughly $350,000.

I guess a third of a mil doesn’t go as far as it used to…

To obtain personal perspectives from the football players themselves, team stars Dave Irwin, Ellery Moore, and Danny Studer were given a Sony DV-6 one-chip miniDV camera to shoot practically anything they wanted, anytime they wanted. They ended up delivering a great deal of fascinating personal footage that furthered storylines.The Sony miniDV cameras were set to their built-in 16:9 aspect ratios to maintain consistency with the HD widescreen footage. Although it wasn’t the best 16:9 image the producers had seen, they felt the quality compromise was worth it to get the personal footage. In fact, the Go Tigers! crew added a DV-6 camera to their own kit and used it extensively throughout the shoot. Much of the players’ footage made it into the finished film.

Maybe I just caught a lot of the cheap DV-6 footage when I tuned in.

From News Hound to Hollywood Animal

Friday, February 27th, 2004

In From News Hound to Hollywood Animal, Ellen E. Heltzel interviews screenwriter Joe Eszterhas, best known Basic Instinct and Flashdance. Before becoming a screenwriter though, Eszterhas started as a journalist:

In my first job, at the Dayton Journal-Herald, mostly I drove around listening to the police radio. One night I heard there’d been a shooting in a suburban neighborhood. I got there before the police did, and I heard someone crying in the house, so I walked in. I moved toward where I heard the crying, and in the first room I saw blood and tissue all over the wall, and a dead body on the floor. I kept going, and there was another body, and more blood and tissue. And then, in the next room, I found an old lady with white hair, and the surreal thing was that she was crying and talking in Hungarian, which is my native tongue. Her son-in-law had shot her daughter and himself. In terms of everything I covered, this really moved me. But I never used it in a movie.

Creepy:

I’d recently come out from Cleveland, and he and I went to some party, where Hunter [Thompson] took out this gigantic needle and proceeded to shoot himself in the navel. I said, “—–, what was that?” He said, “Ether. Would you like some?” I declined.

Eszterhas has described screenwriters as the “discarded whores” of the business:

They cheat and steal from all screenwriters, including me. [...] When I sold “Basic Instinct” for $3 million — mind you, the director still got $8 million and the star got $15 million — immediately after that, Jeff Katzenberg wrote a very famous memo saying we can’t keep paying these prices to screenwriters, because if we do, it’s going to affect the amount we have to pay directors and actors.

I’ve heard other screenwriters make this point before:

My problem with film critics is that they never read the screenplays. They see the movie, and if they don’t like the movie, they tee off on the screenwriter — even if the screenwriter’s work has been mutilated by other people the director brought in to “fix” whatever he thinks is wrong.

"Passion" Revives Hope for Dying Language

Sunday, February 22nd, 2004

With all the hype surrounding Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ, I’m surprised I never caught this factoid. From “Passion” Revives Hope for Dying Language:

Some linguists, who fear the language spoken by Jesus could vanish within a few decades, hope for a boost from Mel Gibson’s new film, “The Passion of the Christ,” opening Wednesday in U.S. theaters. It is performed entirely in Aramaic and Latin.
[...]
Gibson’s film, depicting Christ’s final hours, uses subtitles. The script was translated into first-century Aramaic for the Jewish characters and “street Latin” for the Roman characters by the Rev. William Fulco, director of ancient Mediterranean studies at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles.

While I recognized Aramaic as an ancient, biblical language, I didn’t realize it was the language spoken by Jesus and friends. I also didn’t realize that Aramaic wasn’t quite dead yet:

Among the few places in the world where Aramaic is still familiar is a small Syrian Orthodox church in Jerusalem, though even here it is little more than an echo these days. [...] Today, the Syrian Orthodox community in Jerusalem offers Aramaic in summer school, but there is little interest and fewer than half the 600 members speak the language.
[...]
Just a half-million people around the world, mostly Christians, still speak Aramaic at home.
[...]
Today, a few people speak it in parts of Iraq, Syria, Turkey, Lebanon, India, Europe, Australia and some U.S. cities, including Chicago.

In Syria, once the core of indigenous Christian Aramaic speakers, the language is still heard among 10,000 people in three villages perched on cliff sides in the Qalamoun Mountains north of Damascus.
[...]
A few thousand Israelis who immigrated from other Middle East countries still speak Aramaic, but few pass it on to their children.

A short history lesson on Aramaic:

Aramaic is one of the few languages that has been spoken continuously for thousands of years. It first appeared in written records around the 10th century B.C. although it was likely spoken earlier.

It is a Semitic language and has similarities with Hebrew and Arabic. Carpenter, for instance, is “nagouro” in Aramaic, “nagar” in Hebrew and “najar” in Arabic.

Aramaic reached its widest influence when it was adopted by the Persian empire around 500 B.C. Written in a 22-letter alphabet — similar to Hebrew’s square-shaped letters — it was a relatively simple language, and scribes and intellectuals helped spread it in a largely illiterate world, Bar-Asher said.

Aramaic texts have turned up as far apart as India and Egypt. Jews returning from exile in Babylon around 500 B.C. helped spread the language to the eastern Mediterranean, where it largely supplanted Hebrew.

Scholars believe Jesus might have known Hebrew — which by that time was reserved mainly for use in synagogues and by upper classes — and some Greek, but Aramaic was the language of his native Galilee.

The New Testament records Jesus’ last words on the cross in Aramaic: “Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani?” St. Mark, most likely writing in Greek, adds, “… which means, ‘My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?’” (Mark 15:34).

Michael Sokoloff, a professor of Hebrew and Semitic languages at Bar-Ilan University near Tel Aviv, said it is believed that parts of the Gospels were originally written in Aramaic, but only Greek writings have been found.

Aramaic was largely replaced by Arabic during the Islamic conquest of the 7th century.
[...]
However, the Talmud and other Jewish religious texts are written in Aramaic. It appears in the Kaddish, the Jewish prayer for the dead, and in Israeli marriage and divorce contracts.

New Stir in the Shire: ‘Hobbit’ Rights Fight

Monday, February 16th, 2004

According to New Stir in the Shire: ‘Hobbit’ Rights Fight, MGM still holds the distribution rights to The Hobbit — and is effectively holding New Line hostage:

Mr. Tolkien, an Oxford professor who dreamed up the idea of the hobbits while marking exam papers, sold the rights to his Middle-earth tales, including ‘The Hobbit,’ to MGM’s United Artists in 1969 for an estimated $10,000 to pay off a tax bill. MGM subsequently sold most of the film rights to Hollywood producer Saul Zaentz, who made an often-derided animated ‘Lord of the Rings’ in 1978.

After a series of twists and turns that included settling a lawsuit with United Artists, Mr. Zaentz eventually sold the rights to New Line after approving a treatment put forward by Mr. Jackson. However, MGM retained the distribution rights for “The Hobbit.” It’s unclear what rights Mr. Zaentz has going forward; he declined to discuss the matter.

MGM is no “shireling” when it comes to negotiating such deals. Owning one of the biggest film libraries in Hollywood, MGM often has found itself at the center of disputes over movie rights, including an eight-year legal battle over “Spider-Man,” which it eventually settled. This time, the rights to “The Hobbit” present a potential gold mine at a moment when the studio may be looking for a merger partner.

Quis Custodiet Ipsos Bloggers?

Friday, February 13th, 2004

In Quis Custodiet Ipsos Bloggers?, Julian Sanchez comments on Alan Moore’s Watchmen:

The comics you liked as a kid typically seem preposterous a few years later — unless, of course, you liked Alan Moore comics. Jim Henley looks at what emerges on rereading Moore’s justly venerated Watchmen in a fine short essay.

An excerpt from that essay:

The core question of the superhero story might be phrased as What do we owe other people? The problem is that comics have typically answered the question before they’ve barely asked it: “With great power must come great responsibility!” Really? Are you sure about that? And how much is “great,” anyway? What part of my life can I keep back for myself?

You may have noticed that these questions are salient whether you wear tights or not. They apply to you. Because most of us, certainly most of us in the developed world, have more power, wealth or wherewithal than somebody. Certainly almost everybody reading this blog item could, in principle, quit their present jobs and work pro bono for an African AIDS clinic while subsisting on donated food, or maintain a couple of homeless people instead of taking vacation, or — join the Volunteer Fire Department. Depending on your politics, you may believe that people like yourself or people like Bill Gates really do owe some non-trivial portion of time, wealth, influence or attention to — something or someone. The poor, the ill, the frightened, alienated, the “doomed, damned and despised” as Jesse Jackson once put it.

And having had the thought, you’ve got more problems. Which will it be, first of all — the poor, the ill or the frightened? Just how should you help them? And when, if ever, do you get off-duty?

Best non-fiction books of the twentieth century

Friday, January 30th, 2004

Best non-fiction books of the twentieth century reports on some recent “100 Best” book lists:

Here is a left-wing list. Here is a National Review list, with Hayek and Robert Conquest near the top. Here are two Random House lists. The critics elevate Henry Adams, William James, and Booker T. Washington. The readers favor Ayn Rand, L. Ron Hubbard, and John Lott. The readers’ list has all kind of libertarian books, including David Boaz and Tibor Machan.

I find it deeply amusing that the top two books on the Random House reader’s list are The Virtue of Selfishness, by Ayn Rand, and Dianetics, by L. Ron Hubbard. As a rule, the reader’s list is full of highly ideological texts — a surprisingly large number of libertarian texts, many left-wing texts, and a few conservative texts. Naturally, the National Review list is full of conservative texts, including many Christian works. The left-wing list seems almost laughable — at least to me.

NPR : Ricky Gervais, a Hit at ‘The Office’

Tuesday, January 27th, 2004

Every once in a while, I find myself at NPR.org, and I realize all the NPR stories I missed. Anyway, I recently got the first season of The Office, a BBC comedy, on DVD, and I enjoyed it immensely — in a darkly, comic, Curb Your Enthusiasm kind of way. NPR’s Liane Hansen interviews the star in NPR : Ricky Gervais, a Hit at ‘The Office’:

In The Office, British comedian Ricky Gervais plays David Brent, a buffoonish, self-involved but affable office manager at a dismal paper supply company called Wernham Hogg, in the London suburb of Slough. Gervais created the faux documentary and co-writes and directs the series, which appears on the BBC and has a small cult following on BBC America.

The 61st annual Golden Globe Awards ceremony is tonight, and Gervais is up for a Golden Globe award in the Lead Actor category. He speaks with NPR’s Liane Hansen.

The Ring and the Rings

Tuesday, January 6th, 2004

In The Ring and the Rings, Alex Ross examines Howard Shore’s score to Peter Jackson’s film version of Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings trilogy. Having no musical education, I skimmed most of it and gleaned little. It certainly seemed insightful though. Then I came to the parts I could grasp:

Tolkien refused to admit that his ring had anything to do with Wagner’s. “Both rings were round, and there the resemblance ceased,” he said. But he certainly knew his Wagner, and made an informal study of “Die Walküre” not long before writing the novels. The idea of the omnipotent ring must have come directly from Wagner; nothing quite like it appears in the old sagas. True, the Volsunga Saga features a ring from a cursed hoard, but it possesses no executive powers. In the “Nibelungenlied” saga, there is a magic rod that could be used to rule all, but it just sits around. Wagner combined these two objects into the awful amulet that is forged by Alberich from the gold of the Rhine. When Wotan steals the ring for his own godly purposes, Alberich places a curse upon it, and in so doing he speaks of “the lord of the ring as the slave of the ring.” Such details make it hard to believe Tolkien’s disavowals.

Both Wagner and Tolkien were writing in times of great technological progress — “progress” that would be turned toward war:

It is surely no accident that the notion of a Ring of Power surfaced in the late nineteenth century, when technologies of mass destruction were appearing on the horizon. Pre-modern storytellers had no frame of reference for such things. Power, for them, was not a baton that could be passed from one person to another; those with power were born with power, and those without, without. By Wagner’s time, it was clear that a marginal individual would soon be able to unleash terror with the flick of a wrist. Oscar Wilde issued a memorable prediction of the war of the future: “A chemist on each side will approach the frontier with a bottle.” Nor did the ring have to be understood only in terms of military science. Mass media now allowed for the worldwide destruction of an idea, a reputation, a belief system, a culture. In a hundred ways, men were forging things over which they had no control, and which ended up controlling them.

(I love that Oscar Wilde scenario, by the way.)

The Götterdämmerung of Tolkien’s elves is peaceful:

Tolkien began “The Lord of the Rings” in the wake of the First World War, whose carnage he experienced firsthand, and he finished it in the wake of the Second. In both wars, he witnessed the wedding of Teutonic mythology to German military might. He bemoaned how the Nazis had corrupted “that noble northern spirit.” You could see “The Lord of the Rings” as a kind of rescue operation, saving the Nordic myths from misuse — perhaps even saving Wagner from himself. Tolkien tried, it seems, to create a kinder, gentler “Ring,” a mythology without malice. The “world-redeeming deed,” in Wagner’s phrase, is done by the little hobbits, who have no territorial demands to make in Middle-earth and wish simply to resume their gardening. In the end, the elves give up their dominion, just as, in Wagner, the gods surrender theirs. Yet it is a peaceful transfer of power, not an apocalyptic one. The story ends not with the collapse of Valhalla but with the restoration of a wasted world.

I love the way Ross handles this “heretical” notion (bound to attract geek wrath):

It is probably heretical to suggest that the “Lord of the Rings” films surpass the books on which they are based. (Correspondence on this subject may be addressed to Alex Ross, The North Pole.)