China is running the most systematic effort by any outside power to convert the Ukraine war’s lessons into military advantage:
The first offensive lesson is economic. In March 2025, the PLA Daily treated as settled fact the claim that a single reconnaissance-strike drone costs less than 1 percent of a modern fighter while achieving more than 90 percent of its battlefield coverage. While these are rough figures, the Central Military Commission’s newspaper states them without qualification. The professional literature provides supporting evidence. More than one million small drones were purchased by Ukraine and Russia in 2024 alone, which a Chinese naval academy analyst depicted as an average of two drones hanging over every frontline soldier’s head. For Chinese planners, mass is not an ad hoc wartime improvisation, but the economic structure of drone war itself.
The second lesson is speed. According to the National Defense University’s Joint Operations College, Russian forces can strike a detected target within three to five minutes—compared to hours in earlier wars. A survey by researchers at a PLA unit attributes this to Russia’s reconnaissance-strike complex, in which a low-cost reconnaissance drone pushed deep into the enemy rear serves as the observer and guides another drone’s strike, with Orlan-10s cueing Kub and Lancet loitering munitions. The copying target is not any single platform but rather the connection between them: drones wired directly into artillery and command networks.
The third lesson is overcommunication and connectivity. Chinese analysts treat electronic warfare as the deciding factor of the drone war, recording heavy losses on both sides to jamming and countermeasures. They registered Russia’s answer—the fiber-optic first-person-view (FPV) drone steered through a thin cable that jamming cannot touch—almost immediately. The PLA Daily flagged the shift in May 2024 within weeks of the technique’s operational debut, and by April 2025, state media were weighing its trade-offs in detail.
[…]
The analytical corpus runs deepest on defense, organizing lessons around two Ukrainian methods that Chinese analysts consider previews of potential attacks on China. The first is the sea drone. In the journal of the state shipbuilder’s underwater-warfare institute, a team from the Naval University of Engineering tallied repeated Ukrainian strikes on Russian ships, ports, and the Kerch Bridge and found more than 10 large naval vessels damaged. They concluded that a systematized sea drone offensive must be met by counter–sea drone equipment that also fights as a system. A researcher at a sister combat-systems institute proposed countering suicide boats with interceptor swarms, in skirmishes devoid of humans entirely.
The second preview is the airfield raid. After Ukraine’s Operation Spider’s Web reached Russian bomber bases on June 1, 2025, the Chinese foreign ministry’s magazine estimated Russian losses at 11 strategic bombers and identified the raid’s novelty in being launched from inside Russia, at close range. The PLA’s training system answered within four and a half months. In an October 2025 exercise, a brigade defended against a drone attack team of more than 20 operators, using detection gear that locates drones by their radio emissions and matches them against a catalog of more than 800 commercial models, paving a path for Chinese response to a Spider’s Web–style drone infiltration.
The economics of defense received the same treatment as the economics of attack. According to a Global Times analysis of Ukraine’s interceptor drones, “the cost of procuring one man-portable air-defense missile buys several hundred air-defense FPV drones.” Every missile the defender fires costs more than the drone cost the attacker, so the conclusion in the Chinese press is that the best weapon against a drone is another drone. Chinese analysts draw a second conclusion from the same numbers: Any enemy China fights will have cheap drones in mass, so China must learn to shoot them down.
[…]
For Chinese analysts, a drone war is won by the side that can build more, and no country builds more drones than China.
[…]
The fullest Chinese study of Starlink’s battlefield role—written jointly by the state rocket academy, a satellite launch center, and a PLA unit in 2022—traced how Ukrainian firing units depended on intelligence moving through the constellation and concluded that China must develop and build its own low-orbit constellation.
The side with better PPP is always more militarily dangerous than the side with better GDP. We’re going to learn that hard lesson very soon, but what do you expect? We’re ruled by bankers and merchants, while Russia and China are ruled by spies and engineers.
The first country to fully re-embrace rule by warriors is going to be hellacious to deal with for a few years.