Naked Came The Stranger

Monday, April 5th, 2004

I can’t believe I never heard of Naked Came The Stranger before:

Newsday columnist Mike McGrady was convinced that standards of literary and artistic taste were plummeting rapidly in the United States, driven down by a relentless flood of media sensationalism that catered to the lowest common denominator. So he decided to design an experiment to test the depths of the American cultural morass. He would commission the writing of a novel lacking in any redeeming features: no plot or character development, no social insight, and definitely no verbal skill. It would possess only one feature that could possibly hold a reader’s attention: lots of kinky sex scenes. In fact, it would have a minimum of two sex scenes per chapter (which sounds a bit low by current standards). If the book was a success, it would prove that the American public completely lacked all standards of taste.

The plot of the novel, such as it was, involved a suburban housewife who hatched a plan to sleep with all the married men in her neighborhood in order to get back at her husband for having an affair. McGrady recruited twenty-four fellow Newsday staff members to help him with the writing. Each of them took a separate chapter. They gave the resulting hodge-podge the suggestive title Naked Came the Stranger.

The book went on sale in 1969. It was heavily promoted and given a sexy cover featuring a naked woman. McGrady’s attractive sister-in-law was enlisted to play the role of the book’s fictitious author, Penelope Ashe. She played it to the hilt, appearing in interviews wearing low-cut dresses and crooning phrases about the joys of sexual liberation.

To no one’s surprise, the book sold well. But soon some of the collaborators began to feel guilty about the money they were making from the deception and leaked the story to the press. The resulting publicity, of course, just made the book an even bigger seller.

(Hat tip to Reason‘s “Hit and Run” article, Return of the Naked Stranger.)

Every Disney Villain Dies by Falling

Thursday, April 1st, 2004

David C. Smith’s A Critical Appreciation of Conan the Barbarian cites Quentin Tarantino making an excellent point in an interview with Dennis Hopper:

As far as I’m concerned, the minute you kill your bad guy by having him fall on something, you should go to movie jail. You’ve broken the law of good cinema.

Every Disney villain dies by falling, right?

A Critical Appreciation of Conan the Barbarian

Thursday, April 1st, 2004

The Barbarian Keep introduces A Critical Appreciation of Conan the Barbarian with these words:

Presented here is one of the most interesting and in-depth articles ever written on the film, Conan the Barbarian. This article is well researched, informative, and best of all … insightful. Using the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche as the framework for his exploration, David C. Smith exposes the central, overarching themes that has made Conan the Barbarian an enduring classic and one of the best heroic fantasy films yet made.

By all means, read the whole essay.

An Un-Funny Valentine

Thursday, March 25th, 2004

Black Spongebob MisprintAn Un-Funny Valentine describes how a printing error turned an amusing cartoon character into…what most old cartoon characters, like Mickey Mouse and Felix the Cat, always looked like:

Somehow, boxes of SpongeBob SquarePants Valentine’s Day cards are popping up in local Wal-Mart stores — but the popular cartoon character found inside isn’t his traditional yellow color.

He’s black. And with his trademark big teeth and wide eyes, this SpongeBob seems similar to offensive images of African Americans portrayed in minstrel shows decades ago.

Cabin Fever

Tuesday, March 23rd, 2004

Rotten Tomatoes interviews Eli Roth about his film, Cabin Fever:

At the end of the 1970′s, horror films were written around the basic premise: what is horrifying? By the end of the 1980′s, horror films were written around the premise: how can we kill this group of kids?

The movie’s genesis scares me:

The initial idea for Cabin Fever came while I was working on a horse farm in Iceland when I was 19 years old. I had been cleaning out a barn and got a skin infection on my face. I woke up in the middle of the night scratching my cheek, thinking I had a mosquito bite. I looked down at my hand and saw chunks of skin. The next morning I attempted to shave and literally, shaved half my face off. The strangest part was not only did it not hurt — it actually satisfied some strange itch underneath my skin. I went to see a dermatologist, who, judging by the horrified and puzzled look on her face, had never seen anything like it before. She gave me steroid creme and luckily, my face cleared up.

The Joy of Gore

Tuesday, March 23rd, 2004

The Joy of Gore interviews Eli Roth, writer/director of the horror film Cabin Fever, Lions Gate’s highest grossing film of 2003:

Nobody wanted to make it so we had no money. We made Cabin Fever for a million and a half dollars. Last Samurai was made for 170 million. Master and Commander was 150 million. It was literally made for one hundredth the cost of the big blockbusters. But once it was made [the distributors] were all fighting for it.

When you’re making a movie, it’s an abstract idea in your head. So, you hope first of all that the movie turns out well and then you hope that people like it. It’s an incredible thing to be literally told by eveybody you’ve ever met — these so-called professionals — that your movie won’t work and that no one wants to see it. Everybody. I just knew they were wrong.

I saw how much money low-budget horror movies make and knew that you can make the movie for a million bucks. You don’t need stars — you need good actors. It doesn’t have to have slick production value. It can be well crafted and well made.

Any time you make an independent movie, there’s no guarantee it’ll ever go anywhere other than a shelf. It was a scary thing and it was pretty incredible to risk everything on a project. But I knew it would work. I just knew that there was such a void of low-budget, really violent horror movies that were fun.

Ka-Pow! Comics Fight Their Way Into the Mainstream

Tuesday, March 23rd, 2004

Somehow I missed Ka-Pow! Comics Fight Their Way Into the Mainstream when it was first published a few weeks ago:

A scene in the movie ‘American Splendor’ takes place inside the Cosmic Comics store in Baltimore. Joyce (protagonist Harvey Pekar’s future wife) is having a mini-meltdown as she vainly looks for the latest installment of Mr. Pekar’s work — the autobiographical comic of the movie’s title. Her greasy, tremulous co-worker flees the store after one too many head-clutching outbursts, leaving Joyce alone in the shabby little shop where comics are arranged in disorganized piles and papered over the windows.

It’s vintage Hollywood, which routinely sees the comic-book culture in terms of two stereotypes: the bag-of-neuroses-brimming-with-spleen (Joyce and Harvey Pekar) or the bloated ubergeek — a pompous misfit with a mind for sci-fi and a body for whaling — exemplified by the Comic-Book Guy in “The Simpsons.”

A truer picture can be found in Portland, Ore., at Excalibur Books and Comics. Located in one of the city’s blue-collar hipster neighborhoods, it is the Rick’s Cafe Americain of comic-book retailing. Thanks to its proximity to three comics publishing houses (Dark Horse Comics, Oni Press and Top Shelf), the store counts a disproportionate number of writers, artists and editors among its customers. But Excalibur also caters to kids and eccentrics, regular-guy readers and collectors.

Excalibur was founded in 1974 by Peter Fagnant, 50, a bespectacled, bearded, ponytailed Yoda figure who still runs it with Debbie, his 28-year-old daughter, and two other employees.

I’m not sure the article has convinced me that the stereotypes are wrong. The store is run by a bespectacled, bearded, ponytailed Yoda figure.

While I wouldn’t say that comics have gone mainstream, they aren’t all superhero comics these days:

Every Wednesday is “New Comics Day” at Excalibur, when fresh material comes in — and the denizens of the comics culture come out. On a typical day, 70 or 80 customers will leaf through the new titles. This particular “New Comics Day” began as it always does, at 10 a.m. with the delivery of a pallet containing 2,000 to 3,000 new issues and other merchandise — total retail value about $6,000 to $9,000. What might surprise the uninitiated is how many of the week’s new comics have nothing to do with superheroes. Indeed, these days DC and Marvel find themselves sharing shelf space with big challengers like Dark Horse and Image — plus a host of smaller studios, upstarts and self-publishers ranging from genuinely talented independents to hopelessly deluded hacks. Fully a third are anthologies of daily newspaper strips (“The Norm,” “Liberty Meadows,” “Li’l Abner”), adaptations of TV shows (“Powerpuff Girls”), slice-of-life autobiography (Robert Crumb’s “Dirty Laundry”) and works showcasing New-York-cool art cartoonists (“Blab!”).

I hadn’t thought about this aspect of the business:

The staff will spend the next hour sheathing over 2,000 comics in poly bags. This caters to collectors — Excalibur’s core customers — and, equally important, it lengthens shelf life. Unlike other retailers, comic-shop proprietors can’t return their unsold inventory. Nothing is on consignment. They must buy all their books outright, usually through wholesaler Diamond Comics Distributors, which controls the bulk of the comics-distribution market.

The fact that nothing is on consignment practically creates a collectors’ market; store owners don’t want to buy more issues of any one comic than they can sell, but any they can’t sell become collectible back issues.

Some “fascinating” comic-store-employee philosophy:

Meanwhile, Excalibur employee Shawn Brooks is holding forth on the genre. “A comic book is a bundle of contradictions,” he says. “It’s a book, but it’s not; it’s a magazine, but it’s not; it’s art, but it’s not; it’s reading, but it’s not.”

A part of me wants to read Seduction of the Innocent, just to see how bad it really is:

On the shelf behind him is a copy of “Seduction of the Innocent,” the 1953 book by Frederic Wertham that led to congressional hearings on the deleterious effects that comics were having on teenagers. According to a 1998 article by Kenneth A. Paulson of the Freedom Forum, “Wertham’s ‘findings’ included his assessments that Batman and Robin represented a homosexual fantasy, Wonder Woman glorified bondage and crime comics led to juvenile delinquency.”

Amusingly, the second of those three findings is basically true.

Behind the Music: Aerosmith

Sunday, March 21st, 2004

I could have sworn I’d seen Behind the Music: Aerosmith multiple times, but I just saw it for the first time today. A few things I didn’t realize:

  • Joe Perry came up with the guitar lick for “Walk This Way,” and Steven Tyler, playing around on the drums, immediately came up with the drums to go with the guitar — but he couldn’t think off any lyrics to go with the music. Then the band took a break and caught a showing of Young Frankenstein. When Igor (“No, it’s prounounced eye-gor.”) said “Walk this way,” they had their lyric.
  • I knew that the band broke up when their drug use got out of control. I didn’t realize that when they finally got back together again and started fresh, with a new producer and a new manager, they were all still on drugs. Their new manager did eventually get them all off drugs, but it took years. Then he started micro-managing their lives, and they fired him.

When I looked up Young Frankenstein Trivia on IMDB, I found a few amusing items:

  • When Victor finds his grandfather’s private library, he finds a book titled “How I Did It.” This is actually a joke for those people who have read Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. In the book, Frankenstein, Shelley never reveals how Victor reanimated dead flesh. The screenwriter obviously knew this and inserts the “How I Did It” book as a joke.
  • The original cut of the movie was almost twice as long and was considered by all involved to be an abysmal failure. It was only after a marathon cutting session that they produced the final cut of the film, which both Wilder and Brooks considered to be far superior to the original product. At one point they noted that for every joke that worked, there were three that fell flat. So they went in and trimmed all the jokes that didn’t work.
  • The experiment the medical student mentions, where Darwin preserved a worm in fluid until it came to life, is mentioned in Mary Shelley’s foreword to the novel “Frankenstein”. The Darwin in question was Erasmus Darwin, grandfather of the famous Charles Darwin.

When I read Frankenstein in college, no one else in class noticed that Shelley never explains how Dr. Frankenstein creates the monster. In fact, everyone thought I was crazy for suggesting that it was left to our imagination. They all “knew” the monster was sewn together from corpses.

How Do You Keep the Public Shopping? Just Make People Sad

Friday, March 19th, 2004

How Do You Keep the Public Shopping? Just Make People Sad shares some fascinating studies in behavioral economics:

Some behavioral economists are now turning to the role of emotions, too, investigating how heart strings affect purse strings. Last year, researchers found that anger makes people assess situations more optimistically, downplaying risks and overestimating potential benefits (which may explain why one chronically grouchy investor I know loads up on junk bonds and is low on cash). Fear does the opposite, making us exaggerate risks and minimize benefits. In fearful times, more people gravitate toward bank CDs.

To see how two negative emotions, disgust and sadness, affect economic decision making, Prof. Lerner and her colleagues recruited 199 volunteers, age 16 to 49. Some watched a scene from the 1979 tearjerker “The Champ,” in which a boy’s father dies. Others watched the infamous filthy-toilet clip from the 1996 Gen-X hit “Trainspotting.” A third group watched an emotionally neutral clip of coral reef fish. All wrote down how they felt afterward.

Half the volunteers, drawn equally from the three film audiences, then got a set of highlighter pens (a hot commodity at CMU) and the chance to sell it back at any price from 50 cents to $14. The other half were just shown the set and asked if they would rather receive it or get cash. This was akin to a purchase, because volunteers who opted for the pens had to forgo money for them.

Disgust, the researchers suspect, makes people want to get rid of things; they seem to feel everything is tainted. Sadness, in contrast, often reflects loss and helplessness, and so makes people want to change their circumstances. These effects carried over into the experimental marketplace.

Disgust cut people’s selling prices, as the “yuck” factor made them eager to get rid of the pens. Volunteers who felt disgust were willing to unload the pens for only $2.74, on average, compared with the $4.58 demanded by the emotionally neutral fish-watchers. Disgust also reduced buying prices. Reluctant to take on anything new, the volunteers would do so only at a rock-bottom price. Yet they had no idea their feelings were affecting their economic decisions.

Sadness, too, cut people’s selling price, to $3.06, compared with what emotionally neutral volunteers demanded for their pens. Feeling blue made people so desperate for change, even one as inconsequential as getting rid of a few pens, that they held a fire sale. Sadness also raised, to $4.57, the price people would pay for the very pens they were willing to sell for just $3.06. Overpaying seemed a small price for change.

This was a 180-degree reversal of one of the core tenets of behavioral economics. Called the endowment effect, it is the tendency for people to demand a higher price for something they own than they are willing to pay to buy the same item. Psychologically, we place greater value on what we already have. Yet if you’ve ever overpaid for something, you know there are exceptions.

The CMU results may explain why. “Sadness reverses the endowment effect, making people willing to pay a higher price for something than they were willing to sell it for,” says Prof. Lerner. That fits with the common observation that compulsive shoppers tend toward depression and that having a really bad day can trigger a shopping spree.

Real-World Labor Issues Too Much for MTV

Thursday, March 18th, 2004

MTV’s “The Real World” was coming to Philadelphia in just three short weeks. Then the unions started picketing. From Yahoo! News – Real-World Labor Issues Too Much for MTV:

Bunim/Murray Productions said Tuesday it had given up plans to tape the 15th season of ‘The Real World’ in Philadelphia. Taping had been set to begin in three weeks.

The production company had angered labor unions by hiring a nonunion company to renovate the former Seamen’s Church Institute in Old City, where it planned to have seven strangers live together and have their lives videotaped. Members of the building trades unions picketed outside the building.

[...]

“I’ve got kids looking at me like I killed Santa Claus,” Pat Gillespie, president of the powerful Building Trades Council, said Wednesday. “Look, they come into our town and make a decision to avoid union workers. Whether they were prepared for what would happen, it was a conscious decision that they made.”

So the unions cut off their nose to spite their face, and MTV wasn’t prepared for what would happen?

Mr. Invisible and the Secret Mission to Hollywood

Thursday, March 18th, 2004

The more I see and hear about Sky Captain, the more I think it’s right up my alley. From Mr. Invisible and the Secret Mission to Hollywood:

Set in 1939, the movie stars Jude Law as the daring flying ace Sky Captain, who teams up with his former flame, the intrepid reporter Polly Perkins, played by Gwyneth Paltrow, as they track down a mysterious mad scientist named Totenkopf. It is in part a nostalgic homage to the movies of the 30′s and 40′s: the hammy fisticuffs and golly-inspiring proto-technology of sci-fi cliffhangers like ”Flash Gordon” alongside the snappy patter (and even snappier clothes) of the era’s noir thrillers.

I may have to try this:

But like the old serials it emulates, ”Sky Captain” is mainly preoccupied with the strange promises of the future. The astonishing things you will see in the world of tomorrow include: an immense, silvery zeppelin docking at the Empire State Building; an elephant that fits in the palm of your hand; a troop of giant robots marching down Sixth Avenue and the carpet at Radio City Music Hall. None of these things actually exist, though. Conran has not constructed a single set or miniature. Rather, they are computer images, built and animated in a virtual 3-D environment, or stitched together from photographs, which are then draped around the flesh-and-blood actors, who have been shot separately on an empty set in front of a blank ”blue-screen” background, along with those few minimal props with which they actually interact (a ray gun, a robot blueprint, a bottle of milk of magnesia). The film, in other words, is one long special effect with Jude-Law-size holes in it.

”The goal was to make a live-action film, but to use conventions of traditional animation,” Conran said. The reason? ”First and foremost, to do it cheaper.” It’s a model that would appeal to anyone who, like Conran, does not seem entirely comfortable spending other people’s money; to anyone who might dream of shooting in Nepal or Paris (or in the 1930′s) but doesn’t have the means to get there; to anyone who is shy.

For Conran, the question, as he put it, was ”Could you be ambitious and make a film of some scope without ever leaving your room?” And so 10 years ago, Kerry Conran went into a room in his apartment to make a movie. In some ways, he is just now beginning to come out of it.

[...]

He realized he could build whatever he wanted, and what’s more, it could be gigantic. Rockets that dwarfed skyscrapers. Airplane hangars so large that you could not see someone on the other side. Because, he explained, ”what does it cost to hit the scale button and make something enormous? Nothing.”

And it didn’t matter whether the actors were on a big expensive sound stage or in Conran’s tiny apartment. By 1994, he had struck upon the idea of filming an entire movie by himself, at home, with a blue screen set up right in his apartment. He began to create what he was calling ”the World of Tomorrow.”

If I may geek out for a moment, this sounds awesome:

Together, Kerry and Kevin [his brother] filigreed the film with cathedral-like touches that only they and the angels will see: the ship that carried King Kong in the 1933 movie, lying on the ocean floor; a line of deactivated robots, leaning against a wall in the exact same positions the Fleischer brothers had them in their moody 1941 Superman cartoon, ”The Mechanical Monsters.”

How bestsellers have changed

Monday, March 15th, 2004

How bestsellers have changed lists some “facts of import” from a USA Today article on the book business:

  1. Never have so many books been published: in the U.S. more than 1,000 new titles a week, nearly double the rate in 1993.

  2. Aggregate book sales are flat.
  3. ‘[L]ast year the average American spent more time on the Internet (about three hours a week) than reading books (about two hours a week). And…the average American adult spent more money last year on movies, videos and DVDs ($166) than on books ($90).’
  4. Bestsellers (top ten in the major categories) account for only 4% of book sales.
  5. Amazon, Barnes&Noble.com and BookSense.com account for 8% of U.S. book sales.
  6. Discount stores and price clubs account for 11% of U.S. book sales.
  7. Humor books have fallen from 5.3% of the bestsellers market in 1995 to 0.6% today.
  8. The Cliff Notes version of The Scarlet Letter outsells the real thing by 3 to 1.
  9. In August dictionaries are 77% of all reference book sales. Otherwise they run less than five percent of the total.

A journey through genocide

Monday, March 8th, 2004

In A Journey Through Genocide, John Pilger discusses a new documentary, S21: The Khmer Rouge Killing Machine. He starts by describing Cambodia in the summer of 1979, in the wake of Pol Pot’s genocidal regime:

In the silent, grey humidity, Phnom Penh, the size of Manchester, was like a city that had sustained a nuclear cataclysm which had spared only the buildings. Houses, flats, offices, schools, hotels stood empty and open, as if vacated that day. Personal possessions lay trampled on a path; traffic lights were jammed on red. There was almost no power, and no water to drink. At the railway station, trains stood empty at various stages of interrupted departure. Several carriages had been set on fire and contained bodies on top of each other.

When the afternoon monsoon broke, the gutters were suddenly awash with paper; but this was money. The streets ran with money, much of it new and unused banknotes whose source, the National Bank of Cambodia, had been blown up by the Khmer Rouge as they retreated before the Vietnamese army. Inside, a pair of broken spectacles rested on an open ledger; I slipped and fell hard on a floor brittle with coins. Money was everywhere. In an abandoned Esso station, an old woman and three emaciated children squatted around a pot containing a mixture of roots and leaves, which bubbled over a fire fuelled with paper money: thousands of snapping, crackling riel, brand-new from the De La Rue company in London.

With tiny swifts rising and falling almost to the ground the only movement, I walked along a narrow dirt road at the end of which was a former primary school called Tuol Sleng. During the Pol Pot years it was run by a kind of gestapo, “S21″, which divided the classrooms into a “torture unit” and an “interrogation unit”. I found blood and tufts of hair still on the floor, where people had been mutilated on iron beds. Some 17,000 inmates had died a kind of slow death here: a fact not difficult to confirm because the killers photographed their victims before and after they tortured and killed them at mass graves on the edge of the city. Names and ages, height and weight were recorded. One room was filled to the ceiling with victims’ clothes and shoes, including those of many children.

Unlike Belsen or Auschwitz, Tuol Sleng was primarily a political death centre. Leading members of the Khmer Rouge movement, including those who formed an early resistance to Pol Pot, were murdered here, usually after “confessing” that they had worked for the CIA, the KGB, Hanoi: anything that would satisfy the residing paranoia. Whole families were confined in small cells, fettered to a single iron bar. Some slept naked on the stone floor. On a school blackboard was written:

1. Speaking is absolutely forbidden.
2. Before doing something, the authorisation of the warden must be obtained.

“Doing something” might mean only changing position in the cell, and the transgressor would receive 20 to 30 strokes with a whip. Latrines were small ammunition boxes labelled “Made in USA”. For upsetting a box of excrement the punishment was licking the floor with your tongue, torture or death, or all three.

Gruesome.

At the end of his article, Pilger makes a rather fantastic claim:

The genocide in Cambodia did not begin on April 17 1975, “Year Zero”. It began more than five years earlier when American bombers killed an estimated 600,000 Cambodians. Phosphorous and cluster bombs, napalm and dump bombs that left vast craters were dropped on a neutral country of peasant people and straw huts. In one six-month period in 1973, more tons of American bombs were dropped on Cambodia than were dropped on Japan during the second world war: the equivalent of five Hiroshimas. The regime of Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger did this, secretly and illegally.

Nixon and Kissinger killed 600,000 Cambodians? Secrectly?

Beyond the Valley of the Dolls

Monday, March 8th, 2004

Yesterday, I noticed that Beyond the Valley of the Dolls was playing on IFC — and since I knew that Roger Ebert wrote the screenplay, I had to finally watch it. Ebert’s own quasi-review, “written for Film Comment magazine on the occasion of the movie’s 10th anniversary in 1980″ expresses my feelings fairly well:

Remembered after 10 years, ‘Beyond the Valley of the Dolls’ seems more and more like a movie that got made by accident when the lunatics took over the asylum.

If you’ve ever watched it — or tried to watch it — you’ve probably asked, how did this get made? Ebert explains:

At the time Russ Meyer and I were working on BVD I didn’t really understand how unusual the project was. But in hindsight I can recognize that the conditions of its making were almost miraculous. An independent X-rated filmmaker and an inexperienced screenwriter were brought into a major studio and given carte blanche to turn out a satire of one of the studio’s own hits. And BVD was made at a time when the studio’s own fortunes were so low that the movie was seen almost fatalistically, as a gamble that none of the studio executives really wanted to think about, so that there was a minimum of supervision (or even cognizance) from the Front Office.

We wrote the screenplay in six weeks flat, laughing maniacally from time to time, and then the movie was made.

In some sense, Meyer’s vision comes through:

Meyer wanted everything in the screenplay except the kitchen sink. The movie, he theorized, should simultaneously be a satire, a serious melodrama, a rock musical, a comedy, a violent exploitation picture, a skin flick and a moralistic expose (so soon after the Sharon Tate murders) of what the opening crawl called “the oft-times nightmarish world of Show Business.”

Ebert did seem unusually prescient in one respect:

The character of teenage rock tycoon Ronnie “Z-Man” Barzell, for example, was supposed to be “inspired” by Phil Spector — but neither Meyer nor I had ever met Spector.

Z-Man goes on a murderous killing spree at the end of the movie — a few decades before the real Phil Spector.

Before that spree, the movie’s almost unwatchable. In fact, I stopped watching it and came back later, when things more than picked up:

But the last hour has a real kinetic energy, and the scenes beginning with Z-Man’s psychedelic orgy and ending with his death are, I must say on Meyer’s behalf, as exciting, terrifying and dynamic as any such sequence I can remember. That stretch of BVD is pure cinema, combining shameless melodrama, highly charged images of violence, sledgehammer editing and musical overkill. It works.

Ebert hardly mentions the awful, awful epilogue, with it’s not-quite-funny moral message, shared with us via voice-over.

Passion in the Desert

Saturday, March 6th, 2004

For a while now, the Independent Film Channel has been holding “Samurai Saturdays” — so, naturally, I’ve been watching IFC most Saturdays. Today I turned on IFC and immediately found myself fascinated by the image of a Napoleonic soldier, by a fire, in a cave…with a leopard. It turns out I was watching Passion in the Desert, based on the short story, A Passion in the Desert, by Honoré de Balzac.

When the movie moved outside the cave, I thought, that looks an awful lot like Petra, Lost City of Stone — which I recognized from the American Museum of Natural History exhibit I visited a few weeks ago. Then, a few scenes later, I thought, that looks an awful lot like Arizona. It turns out the movie was filmed on location in Petra, Jordon, and Moab, Utah. (The story itself takes place in Egypt, by the way.)

I mentioned a leopard earlier, and I should emphasize that the leopard interacts with the soldier a lot. From the production notes:

While in most films with wild cats the actors and animals appear together on screen, they never make physical contact. In Passion in the Desert, however, not only do man and beast touch, but the animal involved is the least predictable of all the big cats, with a short attention span, a deadly burst of speed and great sensitivity to change. As the film’s animal trainer Rick Glassey states, “We didn’t hold back on the information that leopards can do major damage and the fact that they don’t care whether or not you’re afraid of them. In the wrong circumstances, they’ll kill you anyway.”

Currier’s best chance was to use animals who had been raised for the job from birth, so in 1992 she selected veteran animal handler Glassey to buy suitable cubs, raise them and train them. By the time shooting began, twin three-year-olds Mowgli and Bagheera, along with younger sister Akela, were as accustomed to their human companions as could be hoped for.

The film came out in 1997. In 1992 they started raising cubs for the movie. Wow.