Frank Frazetta 1928-2010

Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

Legendary pulp artist Frank Frazetta has passed away:

In recent years, as reported here and elsewhere, the Frazetta estate had been much in dispute among his four children, following the death of his wife, Ellie. After some family squabbles that could only be called stressful and embarrassing, peace was made, however, and the sale of some of Frazetta’s most iconic paintings had begun, notably with the $1,000,000 sale of one of his paintings to a buyer believed to be Metallica’s Kirk Hammett. Another Frazetta painting was recently put up for auction, although it was not owned by the family.

Below is one of the last known public photos of Frazetta, shown in February at a family barbeque in Florida with his daughters and grand­daughter.

Two-Minute Twilight Zones

Sunday, May 9th, 2010

Episodes of The Twilight Zone compress down remarkably well to two minutes.

(Hat tip to Chris Moody.)

Werner Herzog on the Obscenity of the Jungle

Wednesday, May 5th, 2010

Please watch the first minute or so of Werner Herzog on the obscenity of the jungle to familiarize yourself with the art-house film-maker’s world view and way of speaking:

Now, fully familiarized, enjoy this reading of a classic:

The rise of content farms

Tuesday, May 4th, 2010

The Economist describes the rise of content farms:

Clever software works out what internet users are interested in and how much advertising revenue a given topic can pull in. The results are sent to an army of 7,000 freelancers, each of whom must have a college degree, writing experience and a speciality. They artfully pen articles or produce video clips to fit headlines such as “How do I paint ceramic mugs?” and “Why am I so tired in winter?”

Although an article may pay as little as $5, writers make on average $20-25 an hour, says Mr Kydd. The articles are copy-edited and checked for plagiarism. For the most part, they are published on the firm’s 72 websites, including eHow, answerbag and travels.com. But videos are also uploaded onto YouTube, where the firm is by far the biggest contributor. Some articles end up on the websites of more conventional media, including USAToday, which runs travel tips produced by Demand Media. In March, Demand Media churned out 150,000 pieces of content in this way. The company is expected to go public later this year, if it is not acquired by a big web portal, such as Yahoo!, first.

The problem with content farms, ASU journalism professor Dan Gillmor says, is that they swamp the internet with mediocre content.

The upside is that “the firm is at least interested in what people want to know — which is nothing to sneer at.”

Just the Good Parts

Monday, May 3rd, 2010

I’m beginning to wish William Goldman had been brought on to produce The Pacific, just the good parts:

They’re kissing again, do we have to hear the kissing part?

Skip on to the Fire Swamp, I say.

Ultimate Parkour Challenge

Thursday, April 29th, 2010

MTV’s Ultimate Parkour Challenge doesn’t seem quite ready for prime time, but the spectacular moments are quite spectacular — and scary:

Would You Like to Play a Game?

Monday, April 26th, 2010

Scott Brown looks back at WarGames, the film that turned geeks and phreaks into stars — and notes that it didn’t even start off as a film about hacking into NORAD’s computer system:

In 1979, Walter Parkes, the future head of DreamWorks Pictures, was a young screenwriter with the outlines of an idea he’d developed with Lawrence Lasker, a script reader at Orion Pictures. Called The Genius,it was a character film about a dying scientist and the only person in the world who understands him — a rebellious kid who’s too smart for his own good. The idea of featuring computers and computer networks would come later.

Walter Parkes, Screenwriter: WarGames is looked upon as technologically prescient, but we actually started off with a concept that had nothing to do with technology.

Lawrence Lasker, Screenwriter: We were complete newbies. In 1979, we didn’t even know that home computers could hook up to other computers.

Peter Schwartz, Futurist and creative consultant: I spent 10 years at the Stanford Research Institute, from 1972 to the end of 1981. That’s where all this began. Walter and Larry came to SRI with a script idea called The Genius. And it was about a boy and a relationship he had with a great scientist named Falken, who was basically Stephen Hawking.

Lasker: For me, the inspiration for the project was a TV special Peter Ustinov did on several geniuses, including Hawking. I found the predicament Hawking was in fascinating — that he might one day figure out the unified field theory and not be able to tell anyone, because of his progressive ALS. So there was this idea that he’d need a successor. And who would that be? Maybe this kid, a juvenile delinquent whose problem was that nobody realized he was too smart for his environment. That resonated with Walter. So I said, let’s actually go talk to people about how a kid could get in trouble and get discovered by a brainy scientist and take it from there.

Parkes: Before our conversation, the Falken character was just a way to access the adult side of the movie. It wasn’t even much about computers yet.

Schwartz made the connection between youth, computers, gaming, and the military — and The Genius began its long morph into WarGames.

Schwartz: There was a new subculture of extremely bright kids developing into what would become known as hackers. SRI was in Palo Alto, and all the computer nerds were around: Xerox PARC, Apple just starting — it was all happening right there. SRI was node number two of the Internet. We talked about the fact that the kinds of computer games that were being played were blow-up-the-world games. Space war games. Military simulations. Things like Global Thermonuclear War. SRI was one of the main players in this. SRI was, in fact, running computerized war games for the military.

The Only Thing That Can Stop This Asteroid is Your Liberal Arts Degree

Friday, April 23rd, 2010

The only thing that can stop this asteroid is your liberal arts degree:

I don’t need some pencilneck with four Ph.D’s, one-thousand hours of simulator time, and the ability to operate a robot crane in low-Earth orbit. I need someone with four years of broad-but-humanities-focused studies, three subsequent years in temp jobs, and the ability to reason across multiple areas of study. I need someone who can read The Bell Jar and make strong observations about its representations of mental health and the repression of women. Sure, you’ve never even flown a plane before, but with only ten days until the asteroid hits, there’s no one better to nuke an asteroid.

I’ve seen your work and it’s damn impressive. Your midterm paper on the semiotics of Band of Outsiders turned a lot of heads at mission control. Your performance in Biology For Non-Science Majors was impressive, matched only by your mastery of second-year Portuguese. And a lot of the research we do here couldn’t have happened without your groundbreaking work on suburban malaise and its representation and repression in John Hughes’ films.

I don’t know who Michael Lacher, the writer, is, but I like the cut of his jib.

Paying for Channels You Never Watch

Monday, April 19th, 2010

Erick Schonfeld shares an estimate from the hardly disinterested Convergence Consulting Group that 800,000 US households have abandoned their TVs — or, rather, their cable and satellite TV subscriptions — for Net-based options, like Hulu, Netflix, etc.

He introduces the idea with a common complaint:

Have you had enough of paying your cable company through the nose for 800 channels, when all you really watch is maybe 20 or 30?

MG Siegler shares a similar sentiment:

Most people pay in excess of $50 a month (and some much more) to the cable companies. For what? Mostly for a bunch of crap they don’t want and will never watch (nor would they even have time to). The problem is that the cable companies have refused to move towards an a-la-carte offering, even though there is a clear demand for it.

I hate to break this to everyone, but, no, you’re not paying for hundreds of cable channels you never watch. Yes, you are paying for a package that includes hundreds of cable channels, and, yes, you rarely if ever watch most of them, but, no, that does not mean that you’re paying for hundreds of cable channels you never watch.

Confused? I’ll explain.

Most of us have a very strong instinct that if, say, we’re paying $40 a month for 400 channels, then we really should only have to pay that $0.10 per channel for the dozen or so channels we really watch — maybe a bit more. Heck, even $1 per channel we really watch would seem like a bargain.

Wait, what just happened there? Did you notice? We assumed that one channel would cost one-four-hundredth as much as 400 channels — and that the cable company should pass along the savings to us, the consumers. But there are no savings.

If the cable company could send you just the dozen channels you want — or even just the dozen specific shows you watch — it wouldn’t save them a dime. It wouldn’t save the networks creating the shows a dime either. It doesn’t cost your provider money for you to watch a show the networks have already created and that they’re already broadcasting over their cable or satellite network.

Was it expensive to create the show? Yes, very. Was it expensive to lay cable or to shoot satellites into space? Yes, very. Is it less expensive if you decide not to watch Bravo, ever? No.

Ordinary people’s economic intuitions assume that a product is a commodity like grain. It should cost the consumer just a bit more than it costs the middle-man, to cover some small amount of overhead. But the networks and the cable and satellite providers are running enterprises with enormous up-front sunk costs that they need to recoup and very low variable costs that give them the high margins to make that possible. They’re all overhead.

How does a producer charge for a product that costs an enormous amount to develop but a negligible amount to share? That’s hard to do. He can’t typically charge the first guy $100 million, to cover his costs, and then charge everyone else a penny, or give it away, or whatever — although that’s not too far from the Renaissance Italian model for commissioning great works of art.

The cable company might ask you which one channel you really, really like and then charge you $40 per month for that one channel — or more realistically just $30, or $20, or $10, or whatever. How much they can get depends how much you like ESPN, or SyFy, or whatever.

But then they have (a) less revenue and (b) a bunch of channels — and all that cable bandwidth — they’ve paid for going to waste, earning nothing.

They’d be happy to sell you a second channel. In fact, they more or less have to, because they can’t support their business on $10 per month from die-hard ESPN fans, plus $10 per month from die-hard SyFy fans, etc. But what price do they charge?  If they go à la carte and charge $8 per channel, they lose $2 per die-hard fan who would have happily paid $10, but they presumably sell more subscriptions. If they charge $5 per channel, they have to sell twice as many channel subscriptions as at $10 per channel — and they’re still missing out on all the sales they could make to people who wouldn’t mind getting Animal Planet for $1 per month.

So what do they do? They give you a bundle of channels — which is like charging you $10 for your favorite channel, $8 for your second-favorite, $5 for your third-favorite, and so on, down to pennies for the channels you watch when “nothing’s on”. And the dozens of channels you never watch are in fact free.

And they never had to figure out which channels were whose favorites, so they didn’t have to charge different people different amounts for the same channels, which would really upset them — if it were explicit.

Race Riots 2.0

Saturday, April 17th, 2010

I recently mentioned how the tech-savvy hipster fad of forming flash mobs has been picked up by a less ironic demographic. Richard Spencer dubs the movement Race Riots 2.0:

If you live in one of America’s “vibrant” big cities, you’ve probably become aware of an alarming new trend in violent marauding — flash mobs. If you’re a tech geek, you’ve also probably become aware of this term, though in a far more benign context. More on that below — but first to the kinds of flash mobs that threaten your life.

This is one of those social phenomena, like immigrant crime, that the national media either ignores or else treats with heavy doses of misdirection and euphemism. One must thus turn to the less refined local news for the raw footage — such as these image from last summer captured by a Philadelphia drugstore’s surveillance camera.

The original flash mobs weren’t so mob-like:

Philadelphia: rioting. Antwerp: musical theater.

Arcade Game Propaganda Posters

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

Steve Thomas has produced a number of arcade game propaganda posters.

House Season Finale Filmed Entirely with Canon 5D Mark II

Tuesday, April 13th, 2010

The season finale of House, which will air on May 17th, was “filmed” entirely on a digital SLR “still” camera.

Greg Yaitanes, the director of the show, confirmed this via Twitter and answered some questions:

@MVRamunno: What is the difference in how it looks on a TV screen compared to a regular camera?

Greg Yaitanes: richer. shallow focus pulls the actors faces to forground [sic]

@oamad0101: How many frames per second and why a Canon 5D Mark II?

GY: 24p and wanted it for ease of use in tight spaces.

@unikissa: Ok, seriously. Can you tell us something about the lenses you used?

GY: all the canon primes and the 24-70 and the 70-200 zoom

@sarabury: Did you have to change any of your working practices to fit in with differences between the 5D and a typical setup?

GY: some. focus was hard with these lenses but more “cine-style” lenses are being made as we speak.

@marykir: were you using CF cards for storage or some sort of mass storage mod? seems like you would need a lot of cards :)

GY: some 18gb or something like that card. gave us 22 min of footage.

@Drdiagnostic: How was the quality as compared 2 the traditional camera used in shooting?

GY: i loved it and feel it’s the future. cameras that can give you these looks

@klizma: How did you manage to stabilize the camera in tight spaces? Any special kind of brackets?

GY: no. mostly gave it a hand held feel. or on a small tripod

Oprah Winfrey in 1986

Tuesday, April 13th, 2010

In 1986, right before her Chicago talk show went national and made television history, Oprah Winfrey spoke with David Mills — and it’s abundantly clear how she got where she was, and how she kept on going:

Mills: I hope people don’t take it wrong when you say that race is not an issue to you. “Is she forgettin’ about us now that she’s making —”

Winfrey: Oh, that’s such a — You know, I have people call me up and say there are not enough black people on the show. You don’t do this for blacks, you don’t do that. You’re not black enough.

And I say: I look in the mirror every morning, just as my ancestors did, who came and worked in the factories for pennies-per-day labor, and they graced their mirrors every morning, and no one had to tell them they were black.

When I was 14 years old, I heard Rev. Jesse Jackson say that excellence is the best deterrent to racism. And it was a truth that resonated with me. And it is what I have always believed. Even before I heard him speak, it’s what I believed. It had not been articulated for me.

And the doctrine that I have followed has been: If you are the best at what you do — there’s nobody else better in the class than you are — then the teacher better have a damn good excuse for putting you back. I mean, there are no excuses when you’re the best. So my goal is always to be the absolute best, period.

If something goes wrong in my life, I don’t say it’s because I’m a woman, because I’m black. I say, well, first let me check out what I did or didn’t do.

I was taken off the air as an anchorwoman in Baltimore in 1977. I was taken off the 6 o’clock news. Friends of mine said, “It happened to you because you’re black. It wouldn’t have happened if you weren’t black.” I knew — this was what I knew — that if I had been the best, if I had been ready for it, they couldn’t have done it to me. They could not have done it.

I wasn’t ready. I was still very immature… and wasn’t seasoned enough for that market. And now I’m seasoned. Now I’m ready. Had nothing to do with race. So when I say it’s not an issue, I mean that I have never used my race to defend my ability or inability to do or not do something.

I certainly recognize that racism exists, and has to be fought. People have different ways of fighting it. Mine is to be the best that I am. …

Even during the whole Black Power movement when everybody was saying “Black is beautiful, black is beautiful,” trying to convince themselves, it had never occurred to me that it wasn’t beautiful. It never occurred to me that this was something I now had to tell myself, because I always thought I was.

It never occurred to me that I was less than any other white person because in every class, in every competition, I was always the No. 1 kid.

David Simon on The Wire

Monday, April 12th, 2010

A few years ago, David Mills interviewed his friend David Simon, right after Simon had collected his AFI award for The Wire:

If you look at the outcomes for these gangsters — we devoured the Barksdales. They’re either all in jail or dead. Basically what we’ve said was, “If it seemed like they were controlling events, look again. This is a Greek tragedy. All their hubris, all of their vanity, all their sound and fury, it amounted to death and marginalization.” Much like the longshoremen, much like the cops who buck the system. The thing is a Greek tragedy.

So much of American drama — look at The Shield. Not to get into The Shield specifically, but nothing is more the quintessential American dramatic impulse than to make the individual bigger than the institutions which he serves. Vic Mackey, he is the id that rages well beyond the LAPD. It’s “What is he capable of? What is he not capable of?”

The Wire has not only gone the opposite way, it’s resisted the idea that, in this post-modern America, individuals triumph over institutions. The institution is always bigger. It doesn’t tolerate that degree of individuality on any level for any length of time. These moments of epic characterization are inherently false. They’re all rooted in, like, old Westerns or something. Guy rides into town, cleans up the town, rides out of town.

There’s no cleaning it up anymore. There’s no riding in, there’s no riding out. The town is what it is.

Malcolm McLaren, RIP

Monday, April 12th, 2010

Malcolm McLaren, the infamous promoter of the Sex Pistols — and of himself, of course — recently passed away at the age of 64, from cancer.

Steve Sailer has quite a bit to say about McLaren and his sense of humor:

I always liked best Malcolm’s own 1983 minor hit single Buffalo Gals, which pointed out explicitly what I’d been saying since about 1979: rapping sounds an awful lot like that most uncool of all musical forms: square dance calling.

McClaren took the 1840s minstrel show song Buffalo Gals, which had evolved into a square dance call, and had some some New York rappers back him up while he rapped it (this was back in the early days before the racial wall hardened, when white people, such as Blondie, Talking Heads, and the Clash, were allowed to rap):

Buffalo Gals go round the outside,
Round the outside, round the outside
And dozey-do your partners

To make sure nobody missed his point, McClaren’s Buffalo Gals video features footage of square dancing. (Here’s an even better video of a Buffalo Gals square dance on the Lawrence Welk Show.)

I assumed that the world would now get the joke: rap was descended from minstrel shows and the dorkiest of all white forms of music: square dance calling. What more could shame black people, after four years of hip-hop, into going back to something they do very well, singing? Perhaps popular music would finally climb out of the rut of rap, the novelty music gimmick that had refused to die?

I was wrong.

And that was one of Malcolm’s better ideas.

Speaking of McLaren’s better ideas:

Around 1980, McClaren came up with the good idea of building pop music on top of tribal rhythms from Burundi, first for Adam Ant, and then he took Ant’s backing band away, including the prodigious drummer David Barbarossa, to form Bow Wow Wow. There was always speculation that Barbarossa’s album tracks had to be multilayered in the studio, but when I saw Bow Wow Wow around 1981, he was moving his hands faster than any drummer I’d seen.

But Malcolm could never have too much controversy, so he hired a 14-year-old girl to be a lead singer and promoted her as a sex kitten. At the show I attended in LA, she blew her voice out painfully on the second song, suggesting to me that 14-year-old girls shouldn’t be on rock band world tours.

Sailer, of course, always looks for a racial or ethnic angle — and tends to find one:

Anyway, when I was reading McClaren’s obituaries yesterday, being reminded of how far he’d gotten in the garment and entertainment industries on sheer chutzpah, I decided to look up more about McClaren because I thought it was striking that he could have the most stereotypically Jewish career imaginable, yet be a Scotsman named Malcolm Robert Andrew McLaren. Pointing this out would be good way to shatter stereotypes!

But, then I worried that I ought to check his maternal line and his upbringing before saying this in public. To my surprise (although I shouldn’t have been surprised), when I looked up McClaren on Wikipedia yesterday, I found:

McLaren was born to Pete McLaren, a Scottish teenaged war deserter, and Emmy (née Isaacs) in the suburbs of post-World War II London. His father left when he was two and he was raised by his maternal grandmother, Rose Corre Isaacs, the formerly wealthy daughter of Portuguese Sephardic Jewish diamond dealers, in Stoke Newington. McLaren told Andrew Denton on Enough Rope, that his grandmother always said to him, “To be bad is good… to be good is simply boring”…. When he was six, McLaren’s mother married Martin Levi, a man working in London’s rag trade.