The Man Who Crashed the World

Sunday, July 12th, 2009

Michael Lewis (or his editor) calls Joseph Cassano, the former head of A.I.G. F.P., the man who crashed the world — but it’s not a simple story of fraud for personal financial gain:

And yet the A.I.G. F.P. traders left behind, much as they despise him personally, refuse to believe Cassano was engaged in any kind of fraud. The problem is that they knew him. And they believe that his crime was not mere legal fraudulence but the deeper kind: a need for subservience in others and an unwillingness to acknowledge his own weaknesses. “When he said that he could not envision losses, that we wouldn’t lose a dime, I am positive that he believed that,” says one of the traders. The problem with Joe Cassano wasn’t that he knew he was wrong. It was that it was too important to him that he be right. More than anything, Joe Cassano wanted to be one of Wall Street’s big shots. He wound up being its perfect customer.

Read the whole thing; an excerpt does not do it justice.

It’s not off the top

Sunday, July 12th, 2009

In his speech in Ghana, President Obama said:

No business wants to invest in a place where the government skims 20 percent off the top.

David Henderson couldn’t help but comment on the irony:

Of course, Obama presides over a government that skims much more than 20 percent of net business income and he has done nothing to cut this percent. Maybe he would argue that the difference is that this is not off the top — that it is not a tax on gross revenue.

The Ascent of Money

Friday, July 10th, 2009

Despite the fact that almost all productive human activity is tied up in commerce, we as a society go to great lengths to look the other way, particularly in our educational system. Niall Ferguson’s The Ascent of Money helps to remedy the situation by looking at history through the lens of finance.

Episode 1 is online now — but not available to embed, it would appear.

I highly recommend it, but I do have a couple quibbles.

In simplifying the history of banking, Ferguson describes the Medici family as moving banking out of the Jewish ghetto by inventing a clever means of disguising usurious interest: they hid interest payments in foreign exchange contracts as a commission. The Templars were doing this a couple hundred years earlier. They would take local currency in return for a demand note, which was good at any one of their castles spread from Europe to the Holy Land. Because they were performing a service — safely moving your money a great distance without losing it to bandits — they could charge a hefty commission.

Later in the episode, Ferguson describes the rise of bond markets and how city-states would issue bonds to fund mercenary armies. If a city-state’s odds seemed slim, their bonds would trade at a deep discount, perhaps yielding 50 percent. So far, so good, but he then implies that these rates would set the rate for the whole market, and all borrowers would then need to pay high interest rates — which doesn’t make much sense unless all borrowers are facing the same risk as the city-state. If they are, the problem is that the city-state can’t protect its people and their businesses, not that it’s somehow setting rates too high.

Episode 2 is also online now.

Bringing your child up to survive the next World War

Thursday, July 9th, 2009

Somehow I stumbled across an Amazon Listmania! list by a fellow calling himself Kiwi, in which he explains how to bring your child up to survive the next World War. The premise sounded… extreme — but when I read his comments on The Basics of Pistol Shooting, it became clear that his life experience diverged from mine:

When I lived in South Africa, a school bus load of elementary school kids was attacked by two terrorists with AK47′s. The kids had pistols, they pinned the terrorists down in a cornfield until the local commando unit could get there. Score — 2 dead terrorist, one bus load of live kids. Teach your kids to shoot. Here ends the lesson.

What kind of field trip has elementary school kids carrying pistols?

What stuntmen think are the best stunt films of all time

Thursday, July 9th, 2009

Kevin Conley asked stuntmen what they considered the best stunt films of all time:

The Matrix Trilogy: Hard to put a Keanu vehicle at the top of any list, but the film changed the business for stuntmen. As they explain it, producer Joel Silver traveled to China to beg a reluctant Yuen Wo-Ping, the action director for such kung fu classics as Iron Monkey and Fist of Legend, to choreograph the fighting in this movie, and Wo-Ping set ridiculous demands in the hopes that Silver would just go away: a huge budget, a ridiculous salary, and six months of training with the actors and stuntmen. Much to his surprise, Silver agreed to everything, and when the series became a blockbuster, the practice of hiring stuntmen for lengthy training and rehearsal periods took off.

Stagecoach: Stunt folk don’t watch the whole movie anymore, since now you can just check out the most famous and dangerous stunt ever on the Internet. Yakima Canutt, doubling an Apache, rides up to a team of horses, leaps over the lead horse onto the hitch between them, gets shot off, falls to the ground, slides between the hooves of the running horses and under the axles of the stagecoach wheels. In Zorro’s Fighting Legion and Idaho, Yak catches onto the back of the wagon then climbs up and over it and gets into a fistfight with the driver, but in Stagecoach, the most successful of the three movies, he skips that part and just lies dead on the dry bed of Monument Valley.

Read the whole list.

When Money Buys Happiness

Thursday, July 9th, 2009

Maybe consumers aren’t so irrational after all, John Tierney realizes, when a survey reveals that some of their most expensive purchases are also some of the purchases that brought them the most happiness:

  • Houses. Everybody loved their house. A major source of comfort, stability, good family times, aesthetic autonomy.
  • Higher education: Most remembered college very fondly as an intellectual and social high point of their lives.
  • Travel, especially foreign holidays, family vacations, visits to siblings and friends, living abroad, and sabbaticals.
  • Electronics and entertainment media: large-screen HDTVs, DVD/Blu-Ray players, audio equipment, computers, internet.
  • Some particular brands and models of cars: BMW 325, 535, M3, and X3, Audi A4, Jaguar, Mazda Miata, Subaru WRX, Toyota Matrix, Prius, and Corolla, Honda Civic.

Some items appeared on the happy lists even though they weren’t expensive:

  • Sharing meals with friends, “jolly dinner parties”, eating out socially. The networking necessities for the hyper-social primate.
  • Alcohol: beer, wine, rum, “bar tabs”, “Château d’Yquem (Vintage 1967)”.
  • Bicycles of all sorts: commuting bikes, street bikes, time-trial bikes, mountain bikes. Much more happiness-provoking than most cars.
  • Camping gear, summer camps for kids, sports equipment (especially running, tennis, skiing, swimming, surfing). Physical activity is the most potent anti-depressant, and outdoor activities are the most natural forms of fun.
  • Pets, especially dogs and horses; vet care, animal charities, “free orange kitten”, “organic food for cats”, aquaria, bird feeders. Very high happiness for the money — especially dogs, which have been selectively bred to be good human companions for 15,000 years.
  • Hobbies: equipment for cooking, gardening, sewing, knitting, woodworking, pottery, photography, art, etc. Natural ways to enjoy and display skills and creativity.
  • Adult education classes (art, music, dance, foreign languages, gymnastics, massage)
  • Church, congregation membership, charity. Spirituality and altruism were cheap and rewarding.
  • Books: High information density per pound; excellent value.
  • Music: CDs, iPods, stereo systems, speakers, live concerts, instruments, lessons.
  • Artwork, including paintings, prints, lithographs, especially from local artists.
  • Leisure software, especially for social networking (email, Facebook) and computer games.
  • Quality beds, “excellent mattress”. Sleep quality is a major predictor of night-time comfort and day-time energy.

Roots of Language Run Deeper Than Speech

Thursday, July 9th, 2009

Researchers found that speakers of subject-verb-object languages — “Bill eats cake” — reverted to a subject-object-verb form when asked to communicate with their hands, which implies that the roots of language run deeper than speech:

Goldin-Meadow’s team asked forty people — ten speakers apiece of English, Mandarin Chinese and Spanish, each of which follows the SVO order, and ten speakers of Turkish, which follows an SOV order — to describe a series of simple actions, such as a girl turning a knob, with gestures.

Regardless of their native language, the subjects almost universally preceded object with verb: girl knob turns.

“We expected that the language they spoke would influence the language of their gestures, but it didn’t,” said Goldin-Meadow.

To test whether the subjects used subject-object-verb as a communicative strategy, they were given a series of illustrated transparencies, each depicting one element of a scene, and told that order was irrelevant: the final layered montage would look the same regardless of its assembly. The subjects still put object before verb.

“It almost speaks to the independence of language from thought,” said Goldin-Meadow.

The creative destruction of copper

Wednesday, July 8th, 2009

Perhaps Francisco d’Anconia should have engineered the creative destruction of copper from outside the industry:

Back in 1932, the real price of copper (in constant 2007 dollars) was $1.97. By 1974 it was $7.26 (again in 2007 dollars), an almost four-fold increase. The main reason for this huge increase was the demand from the growing network of copper telephone wires that encircled the globe. But it was also because an industry cartel was controlling the supply.

Economists tell us that high profits are supposed to encourage additional capacity, with new facilities opening to increase production and meet rising demand. The people who run cartels, however, love their rising profits, so why would they reduce them? They work to defy economic principles and to maintain the status quo. That’s exactly what the copper cartel did, restricting the number of mines and factories to constrain supply and maximize the profits of the copper companies — pushing the price up even further.

But high profits attracted competition from outside the copper industry. From the 1950s onwards, scientists started exploring the possibilities of fiber optics. But the theoretical problems weren’t solved until 1970, when three scientists, Robert Maurer, Donald Keck and Peter Schultz found a way of using fused silica (a material of extreme purity with a high melting point and low refractive index) to transmit more than 65,000 times more information than copper wires — and with much better transmission quality.

Fiber optics transformed the telecoms industry and heralded the coming of the information age. Since the 1980s over 35 million kilometers of telecommunications lines have been installed worldwide and nearly all of them involved fused silica. Today, technical improvements mean that a single hair’s-breadth fiber is enough to carry tens of thousands of phone calls, transmitting more than 10 billion digital bits per second. That’s equivalent to 20,000 books the size of this one.

Poor old copper. In less than a decade, the vast superiority of fiber optics made copper wire virtually obsolete. Demand for the metal collapsed, most copper companies went bankrupt and employment in the industry fell by 70% in some countries. To save itself from liquidation, Anaconda, once the fourth largest company in the world, was sold to ARCO in 1977. Prices continued to fall, and ARCO ceased all copper-mining activities in 1983. C. Jay Parkinson, the former president of Anaconda, must have regretted what he said in 1968: “This company will still be going strong 100 and even 500 years from now.” Not that anyone can blame him. At that time, the copper cartel was controlling the market, and prices — not to mention profits — had been on the rise for over 35 years. Parkinson had underestimated the incredible power of the market to drive prices down (more about this soon) and thus wreak revenge on the few companies that previously controlled the market. It’s small consolation that plumbers still like to use copper.

The key to understanding this tragic tale of an industry that got its just desserts lies in the fact that Maurer, Keck and Schultz came from another world entirely. They worked for Corning Glass, a company that had no connections whatsoever with the telecommunications industry, let alone the copper business. It produced ordinary, everyday glass products. In other words, the threat to copper came from outside and, with absolutely no warning, took an entire industry down. Corning Glass didn’t care if the copper industry was destroyed. On the contrary: the faster the destruction, the bigger its own revenues and profits.

Administrative Costs

Wednesday, July 8th, 2009

Alex Tabarrok notes that arguments about health-care administrative costs bear a shocking resemblance to arguments for socialism:

  • “Think of how much money we will save on advertising!”
  • “Socialism will lower costs by maximizing economies of scale!”
  • “Money will be used for production not profits!”

As he says, “color me unimpressed.”

Chessboxing

Wednesday, July 8th, 2009

Chessboxing? Seriously?

For the benefit of the uninitiated, chessboxing combines the ultimate mental sport and the ultimate physical sport, with alternating rounds of chess and boxing so that a single chess game is fought in parallel with a boxing match. Checkmate or knockout wins, whichever comes first! You start with a round of chess, followed by a round of boxing, then another round to continue the same chess game, and so on and so forth. Each player has twelve minutes on his clock for all moves, so there is a maximum of six four-minute chess and five three-minute boxing rounds. The same people box and play chess, a common misconception is that there is a handover between a chessplayer and a separate boxer.

Perhaps I can be the first to suggest really mixed martial arts — or Go-MMA?

The Longevity Experiment

Wednesday, July 8th, 2009

Dan Buettner traveled to four locales — Sardinia; Okinawa; Costa Rica; and Loma Linda, California, USA — where the number of centenarians vastly exceeds the statistical average. He calls these four locales — and now a fifth, the Greek island of Ikaría in the Aegean Sea — Blue Zones and argues that the people in these zones share nine common practices that contribute to their long lives. The Power Nine:

  1. Move: Find ways to stay active
  2. Plan de Vida: Discover your purpose in life
  3. Downshift: Take a break
  4. 80% Rule: Don’t overheat
  5. Plant Power: Choose greens
  6. Red Wine: A glass a day
  7. Belong: Stay social
  8. Beliefs: Get ritualistic
  9. Your Tribe: Family Matters

I’m not sure that these qualify as nine separate points. Many of them fall under the umbrella of stay active, but not too active.

His advice to get ritualistic comes from what he observed in Loma Linda, California — amongst the Seventh Day Adventists:

Ellen White is the primary architect of the Adventist religion, and she was way ahead of her time with her ideas. She ritualized at least one period of the week where you de-stress and do community building. You have lunch on Saturday with your family and friends. And she ritualized physical activity. She actually called for nature walks. Look at what they do on Saturday — they stop everything; they focus on their god; they cut the stress out of what they need to do; they all go to luncheons with really good friends, and then they’re off on the nature walk. And the payoff is six extra years of life for an Adventist female and nearly ten extra years for an Adventist male.

The Adventists do much more than visit friends on the Sabbath and then go on a walk. (They consider Saturday the Sabbath by the way.) Health is a major focus of their religion. They eat a vegetarian diet and keep kosher, they avoid smoking and drinking, etc. So they do follow some of the Power Nine and break with at least one.

How driving a car into Manhattan costs $160

Tuesday, July 7th, 2009

Felix Salmon had Charles Komanoff walk him through his Byzantine Balanced Tranportation Analyzer to explain how driving a car into Manhattan costs $160 — not to the driver, but to everyone else:

After crunching the numbers, he calculates that on a weekday, the average car driven into Manhattan south of 60th Street causes a total of 3.26 hours of delays to everybody else. (At weekends, the equivalent number is just over 2 hours.) No one car is likely to suffer excess delays of more than a few seconds, of course, but if you add up all those seconds for the thousands of affected cars and trucks, it comes to a significant amount of time.

Many of those hours are very valuable things, especially when you consider big trucks, staffed with two or three professionals, just idling in traffic. Komanoff calculates (check out the “Value of Time” tab) that the average vehicle has 1.97 people in it, and that the average value of an hour of saved vehicle time south of 60th Street in Manhattan on a weekday is $48.89. Which means, basically, that driving a car into Manhattan on a weekday causes about $160 of negative externalities to everybody else.

Of course there are lots of variables here; for one thing, the externalities associated with driving your car into Manhattan go up with the total amount of traffic in the CBD. If you think there’s 5% less traffic in New York now than there was a year or two ago, for instance, the cost imposed goes down by 14%, from 3.26 hours to 2.79 hours. Or, to put it another way, if you could somehow implement a policy which resulted in 10% fewer vehicles driving into Manhattan, any given vehicle would impose “only” 2.38 hours of externalities — an improvement of about $43 over the base case.

Komanoff, of course, isn’t just analyzing the present, he also has a plan for the future. First of which, necessarily, involves congestion pricing. To drive into Manhattan south of 60th Street, you pay a toll: on weekdays, the toll is $3 at night, then rises to $6 for most of the day, and for peak periods (6am to 10am, and 2pm to 8pm) goes up to $9. At weekends, there’s a similar but smaller toll, at $1/$3/$5 prices.

Then there’s the subway fare: that too changes according to the time of day. At night subways are free; sometimes they’re 50 cents, and most of the time they’re $1. At ultra-peak hours (between 8am and 9am, and between 5pm and 6pm) a subway fare rises to $2, dropping to $1.50 the following hour.

One of the most interesting parts of Komanoff’s plan is the bus fare: always $0, all the time. That speeds up buses considerably, since it basically eliminates long lines at the fare box as people hunt for their MetroCard. In turn that makes buses more attractive, and a lot of people, attracted by the free fare and faster speeds, will start taking the bus rather than driving or taking a taxi or a subway. In-city commuter rail, on Metro-North and the LIRR, also goes free.

Medallion taxis do not pay the congestion charge, but there is a 33% taxi-fare surcharge. One tenth of that (around 3%) goes to the taxi drivers and owners; the rest (30%) goes to the MTA; the taxi surcharge alone raises enough money to make in-city commuter rail free.

Add it all up, and it’s pretty much revenue-neutral, says Komanoff: the biggest line items are that you lose $1.46 billion in transit fares, while gaining $1.31 billion in congestion charges. But total time savings are the biggie: implement this plan and New Yorkers get over $2.5 billion of time back which would otherwise be spent wasted in traffic. Vehicle speeds in general rise about 20%, and as much as 25% between 9am and 10am.

All in all (see the “Cost-Benefit” tab), Komanoff sees $5.3 billion in gains and just $2 billion in losses.

Simple Forecasts Best

Tuesday, July 7th, 2009

Robin Hanson shares a fascinating tale from Spyros Makridakis’s Dance with Chance, which goes to show that simple forecasts are best:

As an expert in statistics, working in a business school during the 1970s, one of the authors (who also, as it happens, can’t sing a note) couldn’t fail to notice that executives were deeply preoccupied with forecasting. Their main interest lay in various types of business and economic data: the sales of their firm, its profits, exports, exchange rates, house prices, industrial output… and a host of other figures. It bugged the professor greatly that practitioners were making these predictions without recourse to the latest, most theoretically sophisticated methods developed by statisticians like himself. Instead, they preferred simpler techniques which — they said — allowed them to explain their forecasts more easily to senior management. The outraged author decided to teach them a lesson. He embarked on a research project that would demonstrate the superiority of the latest statistical techniques. Even if he couldn’t persuade business people to adopt his methods, at least he’d be able to prove the precise cost of their attempts to please the boss.

Every decent statistician knows the value of a good example, so the professor and his research assistant collected many sets of economic and business data over time from a wide range of economic and business sources. In fact they hunted down 111 different time series which they analyzed and used to make forecasts — a pretty impressive achievement given the computational requirements of the task back in the days when computers were no faster than today’s calculators. They decided to use their trawl of data to mimic, as far as possible, the real process of forecasting. To do so, each series was split into two parts: earlier data and later data. The researchers pretended that the later part hadn’t happened yet and proceeded to fit various statistical techniques, both simple and statistically sophisticated, to the earlier data. Treating this earlier data as “the past”, they then used each of the techniques to predict “the future”, whereupon they sat back and started to compare their “predictions” with what had actually happened.

Horror of horrors, the practitioners’ simple, boss-pleasing techniques turned out to be more accurate than the statisticians’ clever, statistically sophisticated methods. To be honest, neither was particularly great, but there was no doubt that the statisticians had served themselves a large portion of humble pie.

Piracy is an indication that things are good

Tuesday, July 7th, 2009

Robert Kaplan notes that piracy is an indication that things are good, in a way:

We’re going to see a more maritime world. We may live in an era of globalization, but 90 percent of all goods travel by sea in containers. It’s container shipping that allows for the whole globalization, the clothes we wear, the prices we pay for them, etc. Those who control the sea lanes are going to be crucial.

Now, we’ve seen a little of this already in the news with the piracy issue. When does piracy thrive when you read about piracy historically? It thrives when trade is thriving. Pirates are parasites. The more international trade is thriving, the more hosts are available for parasites. So piracy is an indication that things are good, in a way.

Passenger fixes faulty airliner

Tuesday, July 7th, 2009

Passengers on Thomas Cook flight TCX9641 from Menorca were told to expect an eight-hour wait while an engineer was flown out from the UK. Then a passenger identified himself as an aircraft engineer and fixed the problem himself — so the plane landed in Glasgow only 35 minutes late:

A spokeswoman for Thomas Cook said the company followed strict procedures to ensure the man was qualified to work on the aircraft, a Boeing 757-200, during the incident on Saturday.

The passenger worked for another airline, Thomsonfly, which has a reciprocal maintenance agreement with Thomas Cook.

I’d be inclined to trust an engineer who was going to fly on the plane with me.