Where Were CDC’s Planes?

June 6th, 2007

Where Were CDC’s Planes? I didn’t know they had their own planes:

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta has three private jets to use in case of an emergency. They cost $7 million a year for taxpayers, and in the last year, they were used nine times.

That has some people asking why one of those planes was not used to bring Speaker home when he was in Rome last month with a drug-resistant strain of tuberculosis.

Why does the CDC even have planes?

The CDC planes cost $3,000 an hour to operate and are usually only used to carry CDC staff to emergency situations, but they have been used for other business. One was used regularly for political travel by Health and Human Services Secretary Mike Leavitt, until Congress started asking questions.

I don’t think that really answers the question though. If they’re used to carry CDC staff — who, presumably, aren’t the ones with dangerous, contagious diseases — why don’t those staff members just rent a private jet when they need it?

Ron Paul at the New Hampshire GOP Debate

June 6th, 2007


I did not catch Ron Paul at the New Hampshire GOP Debate on TV. He certainly isn’t a modern Bush Republican.

Rare condition gives toddler super strength

June 6th, 2007

It’s not just Belgian Blue cattle, Flex Wheeler, and a German toddler who have muscle-building myostatin-related mutations. Now a similar rare condition gives a toddler super strength in Michigan, and he’s eating his adoptive parents out of house and home:

Liam Hoekstra was hanging upside down by his feet when he performed an inverted sit-up, his shirt falling away to expose rippled abdominal muscles.

It was a display of raw power one might expect to see from an Olympic gymnast.

Liam is 19 months old.

But this precocious, 22-pound boy with coffee-colored skin, curly hair and washboard abs is far from a typical toddler.

“He could do the iron cross when he was 5 months old,” said his adoptive mother, Dana Hoekstra of Roosevelt Park. She was referring to a difficult gymnastics move in which a male athlete suspends himself by his arms between two hanging rings, forming the shape of a cross.

“I would hold him up by his hands and he would lift himself into an iron cross. That’s when we were like, ‘Whoa, this is weird,’” Hoekstra said.

Liam has a rare genetic condition called myostatin-related muscle hypertrophy, or muscle enlargement. The condition promotes above-normal growth of the skeletal muscles; it doesn’t affect the heart and has no known negative side effects, according to experts.

Liam has the kind of physical attributes that bodybuilders and other athletes dream about: 40 percent more muscle mass than normal, jaw-dropping strength, breathtaking quickness, a speedy metabolism and almost no body fat.

In fitness buffs’ terms, the kid is ripped.

All this despite being born premature:

Liam was born four weeks early and had a small hole in his heart. He also had eczema, enlarged kidneys, was lactose intolerant and had severe stomach reflux that made him vomit several times each day, his mother said.

No one knew then that the baby was among the few people known to have myostatin-related muscle hypertrophy.

Dana Hoekstra said her suspicion that Liam was physically different quickly intensified. Two days after he was born, Liam could stand up and support his weight if someone held his hands to provide balance, she said.

His heart and kidneys healed within a few months, but it took 18 months before he stopped throwing up daily.

Liam’s muscular thighs at 5 months of age gave him the appearance of a miniature Lance Armstrong. By 8 months, Liam was doing pull-ups and, a month later, climbing up and down stairs, his mother said.

What really amazed his parents was the way Liam fell.

“When he fell backward, he would land on his butt, but he never hit his head on the ground,” Dana Hoekstra said. “His stomach would tense up and he would catch himself before his head hit the ground. You could see his stomach muscles. He had a little six-pack.”

Amsterdam Bicycles

June 6th, 2007

An American tourist named Brian took 82 pictures of Amsterdam Bicycles over the course of 73 minutes and discovered some startling differences between Dutch bicyclists and Americans — who don’t bicycle as a practical form of transportation:

  1. Formally Dressed Bicyclists
  2. Multiple Riders on One Bike
  3. No Helmets EVER
  4. Dogs on Bikes
  5. Human Powered Generator (Dynamo) Bicycle Lights
  6. Spectacular Gigantic Unbreakable Security Chains
  7. And More…

The Most Overrated Novel of the Twentieth Century

June 5th, 2007

I must agree with Lester Hunt that Catch-22 — one of the few books I’ve started and could not finish — is The Most Overrated Novel of the Twentieth Century. I think his fourth point really hits home:

There is less than meets the eye. Some works of literature present themselves to you as pure entertainment and, once you are pulled into them, expand your mind with interesting and challenging ideas. There is more in them than initially meets the eye. Catch-22 proceeds in the opposite direction. It presents itself as dealing with great issues – and has nothing interesting to say about them.

Take the title for instance. Bomber pilots have a a good reason to not want to fly any more missions – after all, the people you are trying to kill are shooting at you! And you don’t have to fly any more missions if it so happens that the pressures of combat have destroyed your sanity. However, if you ask to be excused from flying more missions on the grounds that you are insane, this exception does not apply to you, because not wanting to fly more missions is evidence of sanity.

That’s the “catch.” Pretty clever, huh? Really tells you something about the twisted workings of the military mind, doesn’t it? Well, no, it doesn’t. All it means is that the judgement of whether you are sane is not left up to you. Isn’t that obvious in the first place? After all, these people are forcing you to do something that no one wants to do. If they let you decide whether you are fit to do it, you just won’t do it. So the decision of whether you are sane or not has to be up to your superior officers.

But Heller doesn’t pursue this matter even the this pitifully low level of abstraction. He leaves it at the pretty clever, huh? level, leaving careless readers with an impression that there is something clever and deep here, whereas in fact there isn’t.

His list of reasons:

  1. It is a one-trick pony.
  2. It’s a bad argument.
  3. The tone is wrong.
  4. There is less than meets the eye.
  5. It is ignoble.

Scientists find 24 species in Suriname

June 5th, 2007

Scientists find 24 species in Suriname:

Among the species found were the atelopus frog, which has distinctive purple markings; six types of fish; 12 dung beetles, and one ant species, he said.

The scientists called for better conservation management in the unprotected, state-owned areas, where hunting and small-scale illegal mining is common.

The study was financed by Suriname Aluminum Company LLC and BHP Billiton Maatschappij Suriname. Suriname Aluminum, which has a government concession to explore gold in the area, will include the data in its environmental assessment study, said Haydi Berrenstein, a Conservation International official in Suriname, which borders Brazil, Guyana and French Guiana.

Fahrenheit 451 Misinterpreted

June 4th, 2007

Ray Bradbury recently became the first science fiction writer to receive a Pulitzer Prize, and he took the opportunity of his interview to reiterate that Fahrenheit 451 has been misinterpreted:

He says the culprit in Fahrenheit 451 is not the state — it is the people. Unlike Orwell’s 1984, in which the government uses television screens to indoctrinate citizens, Bradbury envisioned television as an opiate. In the book, Bradbury refers to televisions as “walls” and its actors as “family,” a truth evident to anyone who has heard a recap of network shows in which a fan refers to the characters by first name, as if they were relatives or friends.

In a video interview on his site, he says:

Fahrenheit is not about censorship. It’s about the moronic influence of popular culture through local TV news.

100 Science Words Every College Graduate Should Know

June 4th, 2007

The editors of the American Heritage® dictionaries previously compiled a list of 100 Words Every High School Graduate Should Know. Now they have compiled a list of 100 Science Words Every College Graduate Should Know:

agoraphobia
algorithm
alternating current
anaphylaxis
apoptosis
artesian well
bandwidth
big bang
Brownian motion
capacitor
centripetal force
cognitive dissonance
cryptography
cyclone
echolocation
estivation
Fibonacci sequence
fundamental force
genome
heliocentrism
hominin
imaginary number
ischemia
junk DNA
KT boundary
kwashiorkor
magnetosphere
melanoma
monotreme
Munchausen syndrome
Neanderthal
obligate
pahoehoe
phenotype
photoelectric
piezoelectric effect
prion
protein folding
quantum mechanics
rain shadow
REM sleep
roentgenium
sociobiology
superposition
teratogen
tidal force
Universal Time
vestigial
xerophyte
zero

(I have provided links to definitions — via the Merriam-Webster dictionary.)

Words in code

June 3rd, 2007

Words in code notes that “speakers of tonal and non-tonal languages have genetic differences”:

First, Dr Dediu and Dr Ladd checked that their two genes of interest really are unusual. They combined a database of 983 alleles that are known to vary across human groups with another enumerating how 26 discrete linguistic features (such as whether consonants aggregate at the beginnings and ends of words) are either used or not used in conversation by 49 populations. Picking apart a thicket of possible correlations, Dr Dediu and Dr Ladd found no general links between human genetic and linguistic characters.

But one feature — whether a language uses pitch as well as vowels and consonants to convey word meanings — stood apart. Those, such as Chinese, that encipher meaning in pitch are called “tonal languages”. Those that do not, like English, are “non-tonal”. And it was versions of Dr Dediu’s and Dr Ladd’s two microcephaly-related genes that matched the 49 populations along tonal and non-tonal lines.

Dr Dediu and Dr Ladd believe the evolution of tonal and non-tonal languages interacted with the evolution of these genes.

Mouse Ears Over Moscow

June 3rd, 2007

While we shouldn’t expect to see Mouse Ears Over Moscow, Disney is moving into Russia:

Now, Walt Disney Co. is getting ready to do just that. The creator of Mickey Mouse and Cinderella is planning to sprinkle its moviemaking fairy dust in the land of Dostoyevsky and Tolstoy. By yearend, Disney expects to start shooting its first film in Russia with Russian-speaking actors, likely based on traditional children’s stories. “We want Russian families to go to the cinema to watch a Disney movie, but this movie need not be produced in Hollywood,” says Marina Jigalova-Ozkan, managing director of Disney’s Russian operation.

The film—the first of many, the company says, though it’s not revealing details—is part of Disney’s new push in Russia. The entertainment giant opened its Moscow office just over a year ago and now employs more than 50 people. A new Russian-language Disney TV channel is due to be launched this autumn. In January the company teamed up with Sony Pictures Entertainment to create a joint venture for distributing Disney films in Russia. And Disney on Ice, a skating show featuring the likes of Snow White and Sleeping Beauty, came to Russia for the first time in May, selling out shows in Moscow and St. Petersburg. “Russia is a priority country,” says Andy Bird, president of Walt Disney International. “We see the potential for growth for several years down the line.”
[...]
Today, Disney is making real money in Russia. Overall box office sales in former Soviet lands are expected to hit $590 million this year, up from just $18 million in 1999. Disney has benefited more than most from that jump. Its box-office receipts last year climbed to $50 million as Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest became Russia’s best-selling foreign film ever, with sales of $31 million. The latest installment promises to do even better: Helped by a barrage of prerelease publicity, including billboards four stories high, the swashbuckler attracted 2.3 million viewers and $14 million in sales on its opening weekend, a Russian record.

When Should a Kid Start Kindergarten?

June 3rd, 2007

When Should a Kid Start Kindergarten?, Elizabeth Weil asks:

According to the apple-or-coin test, used in the Middle Ages, children should start school when they are mature enough for the delayed gratification and abstract reasoning involved in choosing money over fruit. In 15th- and 16th-century Germany, parents were told to send their children to school when the children started to act “rational.” And in contemporary America, children are deemed eligible to enter kindergarten according to an arbitrary date on the calendar known as the birthday cutoff — that is, when the state, or in some instances the school district, determines they are old enough. The birthday cutoffs span six months, from Indiana, where a child must turn 5 by July 1 of the year he enters kindergarten, to Connecticut, where he must turn 5 by Jan. 1 of his kindergarten year. Children can start school a year late, but in general they cannot start a year early.

More and more children are being redshirted — held back a year — so they’ll excel, and schools, which are increasingly judged by test scores, keep pushing the birthday cutoffs to get older — and better-scoring — students:

In response to this testing, kindergartens across the country have become more demanding: if kids must be performing on standardized tests in third grade, then they must be prepping for those tests in second and first grades, and even at the end of kindergarten, or so the thinking goes. The testing also means that states, like students, now get report cards, and they want their children to do well, both because they want them to be educated and because they want them to stack up favorably against their peers.

Affluent families are most likely to redshirt their kids:

Fred Morrison, a developmental psychologist at the University of Michigan who has studied the impact of falling on one side or the other of the birthday cutoff, sees the endless “graying of kindergarten,” as it’s sometimes called, as coming from a parental obsession not with their children’s academic accomplishment but with their social maturity. “You couldn’t find a kid who skips a grade these days,” Morrison told me. “We used to revere individual accomplishment. Now we revere self-esteem, and the reverence has snowballed in unconscious ways — into parents always wanting their children to feel good, wanting everything to be pleasant.” So parents wait an extra year in the hope that when their children enter school their age or maturity will shield them from social and emotional hurt.

Does this redshirting bring any lasting advantage though?

For years, education scholars have pointed out that most studies have found that the benefits of being relatively older than one’s classmates disappear after the first few years of school. In a literature review published in 2002, Deborah Stipek, dean of the Stanford school of education, found studies in which children who are older than their classmates not only do not learn more per grade but also tend to have more behavior problems. However, more recent research by labor economists takes advantage of new, very large data sets and has produced different results. A few labor economists do concur with the education scholarship, but most have found that while absolute age (how many days a child has been alive) is not so important, relative age (how old that child is in comparison to his classmates) shapes performance long after those few months of maturity should have ceased to matter. The relative-age effect has been found in schools around the world and also in sports. In one study published in the June 2005 Journal of Sport Sciences, researchers from Leuven, Belgium, and Liverpool, England, found that a disproportionate number of World Cup soccer players are born in January, February and March, meaning they were old relative to peers on youth soccer teams.
[...]
After crunching the math and science test scores for nearly a quarter-million students across 19 countries, Bedard found that relatively younger students perform 4 to 12 percentiles less well in third and fourth grade and 2 to 9 percentiles worse in seventh and eighth; and, as she notes, “by eighth grade it’s fairly safe to say we’re looking at long-term effects.” In British Columbia, she found that the relatively oldest students are about 10 percent more likely to be “university bound” than the relatively youngest ones. In the United States, she found that the relatively oldest students are 7.7 percent more likely to take the SAT or ACT, and are 11.6 percent more likely to enroll in four-year colleges or universities. (No one has yet published a study on age effects and SAT scores.) “One reason you could imagine age effects persist is that almost all of our education systems have ability-groupings built into them,” Bedard says. “Many claim they don’t, but they do. Everybody gets put into reading groups and math groups from very early ages.” Younger children are more likely to be assigned behind grade level, older children more likely to be assigned ahead. Younger children are more likely to receive diagnoses of attention-deficit disorder, too. “When I was in school the reading books all had colors,” Bedard told me. “They never said which was the high, the middle and the low, but everybody knew. Kids in the highest reading group one year are much more likely to be in the highest reading group the next. So you can imagine how that could propagate itself.”

How do you assess whether a child is ready for kindergarten?

To gauge kindergarten readiness, Andersen and another kindergarten teacher each sat the children down one by one for a 20-minute test. The teachers asked the children, among other things, to: skip; jump; walk backward; cut out a diamond on a dotted line; copy the word cat; draw a person; listen to a story; and answer simple vocabulary questions like what melts, what explodes and what flies.

The Troll Whisperer

June 3rd, 2007

Cory Doctorow explains How To Keep Hostile Jerks From Taking Over Your Online Community with a metaphor:

Discussion groups are like uranium: a little pile gives off a nice, warm glow, but if the pile gets bigger, it hits critical mass and starts a deadly meltdown. There are only three ways to prevent this: Make the pile smaller again, spread the rods apart, or twiddle them to keep the heat convecting through them.

Making the group smaller is easy in theory, hard in practice: just choose a bunch of people who aren’t allowed in the discussion anymore and section them off from the group. Split. Or just don’t let the groups get too big in the first place by limiting who can talk to whom. This was Friendster’s strategy, where your ability to chat with anyone else was limited by whether that person was your friend or your friend’s friend. Users revolted, creating “fakesters” like “New York City,” whom they could befriend, forming ad-hoc affinity groups. Friendster retaliated by killing the fakesters, and a full scale revolt ensued.

Spreading the group apart is a little easier, with the right technology. Joshua Schachter, founder of del.icio.us, tells me that he once cured a mailing-list of its flame-wars by inserting a ten-minute delay between messages being sent to the list and their delivery. The delay was enough to allow tempers to cool between messages. A similar strategy is to require you to preview your post before publishing it. Digg allows you to retract your messages for a minute or two after you post them.

But neither of these strategies solves the underlying problem: getting big groups of people to converse civilly and productively among themselves. Spreading out the pile reduces the heat — but it also reduces the light. Splitting the groups up requires the consent of the users, a willingness to be segregated from their peers.

The holy grail is to figure out how to twiddle the rods in just the right fashion so as to create a festive, rollicking, passionate discussion that keeps its discourse respectful, if not always friendly or amiable.

The “holy grail” is occasionally grasped by those he calls troll-whisperers:

Teresa is a troll-whisperer. For some reason, she can spot irredeemable trolls and separate them from the merely unsocialized. She can keep discussions calm and moving forward. She knows when deleting a troll’s message will discourage him, and when it will only spark a game of whack-a-mole.

Teresa calls it “having an ear for text” and she is full of maddeningly unquantifiable tips for spotting the right rod to twiddle to keep the reactor firing happily without sparking a meltdown.

How do you harness a troll-whisperer?

O’Reilly built his empire by doing something incredibly smart: Watching what geeks did that worked and writing it down so that other people could do it too. He is a distiller of Internet wisdom, and it’s that approach that is called for here.

If you want to fight trolling, don’t make up a bunch of a priori assumptions about what will or won’t discourage trolls. Instead, seek out the troll whisperer and study their techniques.

Troll whisperers aren’t necessarily very good at hacking tools, so there’s always an opportunity for geek synergy in helping them to automate their hand-crafted techniques, giving them a software force-multiplier for their good sense. For example, Teresa invented a technique called disemvowelling — removing the vowels from some or all of a fiery message-board post. The advantage of this is that it leaves the words intact, but requires that you read them very slowly — so slowly that it takes the sting out of them. And, as Teresa recently explained to me, disemvowelling part of a post lets the rest of the community know what kind of sentiment is and is not socially acceptable.

When Teresa started out disemvowelling, she removed the vowels from the offending messages by hand, a tedious and slow process. But shortly thereafter, Bryant Darrell wrote a Movable Type plugin to automate the process. This is a perfect example of human-geek synergy: hacking tools for civilian use based on the civilian’s observed needs.

Raise a glass to Adam Smith

June 3rd, 2007

Raise a glass to Adam Smith, say Eamonn Butler:

Adam Smith, the great economist, philosopher, and author of The Wealth of Nations, was born on this day in 1723.

Are You a Good Liar?

June 3rd, 2007

Are You a Good Liar?, Alex Tabarrok asks. He then cites Richard Wiseman on The truth about lying and laughing:

Are you a good liar? Most people think that they are, but in reality there are big differences in how well we can pull the wool over the eyes of others. There is a very simple test that can help determine your ability to lie. Using the first finger of your dominant hand, draw a capital letter Q on your forehead.

Some people draw the letter Q in such a way that they themselves can read it. That is, they place the tail of the Q on the right-hand side of their forehead. Other people draw the letter in a way that can be read by someone facing them, with the tail of the Q on the left side of their forehead. This quick test provides a rough measure of a concept known as “self-monitoring”. High self-monitors tend to draw the letter Q in a way in which it could be seen by someone facing them. Low self-monitors tend to draw the letter Q in a way in which it could be read by themselves.

High self-monitors tend to be concerned with how other people see them. They are happy being the centre of attention, can easily adapt their behaviour to suit the situation in which they find themselves, and are skilled at manipulating the way in which others see them. As a result, they tend to be good at lying. In contrast, low self-monitors come across as being the “same person” in different situations. Their behaviour is guided more by their inner feelings and values, and they are less aware of their impact on those around them. They also tend to lie less in life, and so not be so skilled at deceit.

Wiseman has a lot of interesting discoveries to share:

Other researchers have explored the development of deception in children. Some of the most interesting experiments have involved asking youngsters not to take a peek at their favourite toys. During these studies, a child is led into a laboratory and asked to face one of the walls. The experimenter then explains that he is going to set up an elaborate toy a few feet behind them. After setting up the toy, the experimenter says that he has to leave the laboratory, and asks the child not to turn around and peek at the toy. The child is secretly filmed by hidden cameras for a few minutes, and then the experimenter returns and asks them whether they peeked. Almost all three-year-olds do, and then half of them lie about it to the experimenter. By the time the children have reached the age of five, all of them peek and all of them lie. The results provide compelling evidence that lying starts to emerge the moment we learn to speak. Perhaps surprisingly, when adults are shown films of their children denying that they peeked at the toy, they are unable to detect whether their offspring are lying or telling the truth.

Ron Paul is blowing up real good

June 3rd, 2007

Michael Scherer of Salon notes that libertarian Ron Paul is blowing up real good:

The rambunctious GOP candidate wants to drag the U.S. out of Iraq, can the war on drugs, and overturn the Patriot Act. No wonder Republican power brokers want to boot him off the stage.

He explains “why Paul is running”:

He’s the only Republican candidate who wants to end U.S. involvement in Iraq and withdraw the U.S. Navy from the waters off the Iranian coast. He wants America to pull out of the United Nations, NATO, the International Criminal Court, and most international trade agreements. He wants to abolish FEMA, end the federal war on drugs, get rid of the Department of Homeland Security, send the U.S. military to guard the Mexican border, stop federal prosecutions of obscenity, eliminate the IRS, end most foreign aid, overturn the Patriot Act, phase out Social Security, revoke public services for illegal immigrants, repeal No Child Left Behind, and reestablish gold and silver as legal tender.

Of course, it’s not like he could do much of that, even if elected president…