Bureaucracy, Armed

Saturday, March 1st, 2014

A huge ATF operation was launched 21 years ago with the transparent goal of garnering media attention — and the bureau got what it asked for, good and hard:

A raid that was planned for television effect was initiated with a rattle of suppressed fire as ATF agents killed the residents’ dogs: an Alaskan Malamute bitch and her four puppies. They didn’t kill them clean, and the agonized yelps of wounded dogs would continue for several minutes. That was the opening round; supposedly, it was written into the operations order, but nobody knows for sure, for as we’ll see, the operations order did not survive.

Then — according to all non-ATF witnesses — the ATF opened up on the building. Few had targets; they were just blazing away at windows and walls. Sometime in these mad minutes, some dog-loving agent put the crippled dogs out of their mewling agony. The ATF kept firing for two hours, until they were out of ammunition, then pulled back. Pulling back wasn’t the right term, really; they bugged out, undisciplined, and some of their men — particularly the dead and the wounded — were left behind by the fleeing agents. The wounded and bodies would be recovered when FBI negotiators established a truce with the apocalyptic cult inside, an extremist breakaway faction of the Seventh Day Adventists.

They cult, who called themselves Branch Davidians, had been stockpiling guns. ATF agents fabricated a nonexistent “confidential source” to say they were dealing drugs, to get helicopter and heavy-weapons support from the National Guard. (Later, the FBI would use the same tactic, a phony “confidential source,” to push the Attorney General’s child-abuse button, in order to get the second, firestorm raid greenlighted).

The cult members would almost all be killed in the later FBI raid, which involved destroying all egresses with armored vehicles, covering them with sniper fire, and launching incendiaries into the building. (Weren’t we just talking about Njal’s Saga in some other context? History repeats itself).

The surviving cultists, most of whom fled before the final holocaust, were tried for various crimes, in a courtroom in San Antonio; and while some charges stuck, all of the murder and conspiracy-to-murder charges ended in acquittal. The fact-finders, the jury, found that the killings of ATF agents were self-defense. That finding is infuriating to this day to the officers who were there in 1993.

[...]

That very day, senior ATF managers ordered the destruction of certain evidence, including all copies of the raid plan. Video shot by ATF videographers was destroyed; the ATF tried to seize and destroy video shot by media that they’d invited to the raid. (At least one cameraman palmed the exposed tape and gave ATF a blank one, which is the only reason any visual evidence of that raid survives).

[...]

Some people call ATF all kinds of names, stormtroopers, whatever, but that sentence, “No one was fired…” tells you the reality of it: bureaucracy, armed.

Sequel Song

Saturday, March 1st, 2014

Enjoy the Muppets performing their Sequel Song:

No one expects the Stormfront hordes!

Saturday, March 1st, 2014

With notably few exceptions, so-called “HBD” (or “human biodiversity”) is a movement that exists largely within the confines of the Internet, Misdreavus notes:

This, of course, has done absolutely no favors to its dispersal within society at large, because if technology has taught us anything, it is that the anonymity of the web tends to bring out the crazy and stupid in everyone, Surely there was a time when people actually tried to research certain topics before launching a slurry of half-baked and inchoate opinions with an audacious (and entirely unwarranted) degree of self-confidence — not so much because people were any better informed in yesteryear than they are today, but because certain structural barriers posed an impediment to the crazy and incompetent expressing their ideas in lofty places. Now that (most of) these have been safely dismantled, we’ve got nutters from Stormfront sparring tête-à-tête with anthropology professors over elementary facts that anybody can look up in a linguistics textbook. How splendid is that.

As Jay Man adds, “If the facts about heritable human differences are to be ever taken seriously, it needs to be extricated from such utter nonsense, as well as from the mean-spirited sentiment.”

Too many blogs are being dragged down by ignoramuses, T. Greer says:

There are smart people among the Neoreactionaries. Many of them are very, very smart. I don’t always support their politics, but some are interesting to read and others even a pleasure to engage with.

But beneath these intellectuals lies a mob. It used to be that the reactionary rank and file was a bunch of computer scientists and engineers who had nothing better to do with their spare time than play around with the EconLib. But now the reactionaries have breached the public consciousness and achieved the sort of ‘critical mass’ to keep the movement from sizzling out. A pity. With few exceptions (say, the commentators at Isegoria), the reactionary masses are crude, savage, and just as caught up in mindless groupthink as the “Cathedral” ever was. (And the folks from Chateu Heariste/Red Pill group are all of this but worse.)

And now they spread. It has been sad to watch the comment sections of several different blogs I follow fall apart over the last month. Over at Gene Expression Razib is accused of the Lewtonian fallacy; over at Slate Star Codex Alexander Scott is closing comment threads and introducing mods to keep the place under control; at the West Hunter discussion mentioned above one must wade through 10 posts of utter intellectual muck just to find the participants who actually know what they are talking about.

One of the major reasons I have never written anything explicitly HBD or in response to reactionary ideas (some of which I sympathize with) is that I know that will summon the hordes. I just don’t want to deal with that.

We do try to avoid being crude, savage, and mindlessly groupthinky.

The (Dirty) Joke’s on Researchers

Saturday, March 1st, 2014

The joke’s on a generation of human-sexuality researchers:

Adolescent “pranksters” responding to the widely cited National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health in the mid-1990s may have faked “nonheterosexuality.”

Preliminary results from the landmark study — known as “Add Health” — stunned researchers, parents and educators alike, recalls Cornell’s Ritch C. Savin-Williams, professor of human development: “How could it be that 5 to 7 percent of our youth were homosexual or bisexual!” Previous estimates of homosexuality and bisexuality among high schoolers had been around 1 percent.

So imagine the surprise and confusion when subsequent revisits to the same research subjects found more than 70 percent of the self-reported adolescent nonheterosexuals had somehow gone “straight” as older teens and young adults.

“We should have known something was amiss,” says Savin-Williams. “One clue was that most of the kids who first claimed to have artificial limbs (in the physical-health assessment) miraculously regrew arms and legs when researchers came back to interview them.”

Steve Sailer remembers getting handed a sex-survey in college in the 1970s and passing it on to his roommate, who filled it in with lewd, self-contradictory double entendres:

For example, while most of his answers consisted of implausible boasting about his heterosexual exploits derived mostly from old jokes about traveling salesmen and farmers’ daughters, I recall that his answer to the question “What kind of contraception do you use?” was “100% oral: Girls always tell me “No.”