The Great Secession

Sunday, July 13th, 2014

Self-described “homosexual atheist” Jonathan Rauch argues that culturally conservative Christians should not turn toward social secession:

When religion isolates itself from secular society, both sides lose, but religion loses more.

Over the decades, religious traditionalists’ engagement with American secular life has waxed and waned. After the public-relations disaster of the Scopes evolution trial in the 1920s, many conservative Christians recoiled from politics, only to come out swinging in the 1970s, when the Moral Majority and other elements of what came to be called the religious right burst onto the scene. If you believe in cultural cycles, perhaps we’re due for another withdrawal. Certainly, the breakthrough of gay marriage has fed disillusionment and bewilderment. “I suspect the initial reaction among evangelicals is going to be retreat and hope to be left alone,” Maggie Gallagher, a prominent gay-marriage opponent, recently told The Huffington Post.

Still, the desire to be left alone takes on a pretty aggressive cast when it involves slamming the door of a commercial enterprise on people you don’t approve of. The idea that serving as a vendor for, say, a gay commitment ceremony is tantamount to “endorsing” homosexuality, as the new religious-liberty advocates now assert, is a far-reaching proposition, one with few apparent outer boundaries in a densely interwoven mercantile society. It suggests a hair-trigger defensiveness about religious identity that would have seemed odd just a few years ago. As far as I know, during the divorce revolution it never occurred to, say, Catholic bakers to tell remarrying customers, “Your so-called second marriage is a lie, so take your business elsewhere.” That would have seemed not so much principled as bizarre.

Why the hunkering down? When I asked around recently, a few answers came back. One is the fear that traditional religious views, especially about marriage, will soon be condemned as no better than racism, and that religious dissenters will be driven from respectable society, denied government contracts, and passed over for jobs — a fear heightened by well-publicized stories like the recent one about the resignation of Mozilla’s CEO, who had donated to the campaign against gay marriage in California. After a talk I gave recently in Philadelphia on free speech, a woman approached me claiming that the school system where she works harasses and fires anyone who questions gay marriage. I wanted to point out that in most states it’s perfectly legal to fire people just for being gay, whereas Christians enjoy robust federal and state antidiscrimination protections, but the look in her eyes was too fearful for convincing. Perhaps it is natural for worried people to daydream about some kind of escape. One Christian acquaintance told me, “I say half jokingly to my wife, ‘Where do we move?’?”


  1. Dave says:

    Gee, when the deal is “you can pay your taxes to fuel the engine that wants to wipe your beliefs from living memory” I wonder why Christians are thinking of leaving…

  2. Space Nookie says:

    Now that the tables have turned the rules have changed:

    “It suggests a hair-trigger defensiveness about… identity that would have seemed odd just a few years ago”

    LOL hair-trigger defensiveness about identity now bad? dbl LOL.

  3. RL says:

    “Robust federal and state antidiscrimination protections”? That’s so idiotic as to amount to bad faith. And you’ll pardon me if I don’t take advice from people who would like to annihilate me and take my children away because my moral views include the view that morality doesn’t really change that much.

  4. Hostem Populi says:

    I fail to see what’s in it for the Christians, or anyone who objects to decadence, to stay, aside from all the toys.

  5. James James says:

    You’re living in a country full of immovable capital (lots of buildings), but you don’t like the government. Do you (a) leave, leave all that lovely capital in the hands of your enemies, and start from scratch, or (b) capture the government and drive out your enemies?

  6. Marc Pisco says:

    Reminds me of the Martians in Mars Attacks, rampaging around a flaming street shooting everybody in sight, while announcing “Don’t run! We are your friends!”

  7. Toddy Cat says:

    Yes, why any sane Christian, or any other kind of theist, would give a crap what Rauch thinks is beyond me. His advice seems to boil down to, “Just shut up and relax while we destroy your culture, debauch your children, and deny you the right to live as your faith dictates”. Boy, sign me up for some of that.

  8. Marc Pisco says:

    James James,

    How much immovable capital did Massachusetts have in 1600? Or for that matter the Axis powers in September, 1945? If you’ve got the right people, and your laws don’t forbid it, you just make more.

Leave a Reply