Back in October, 2018, John Robb looked at an insurgency at the crossroads:
Trump’s open source #insurgency often appears unstoppable. All of the traditional methods of political opposition have proven unable to damage it for more than a few days (at most). However, in late October, we saw the outlines of a dynamic that suggests that may not be true for much longer.
[...]
In the last few weeks of October, we saw the following pattern:
An uptick in domestic terrorism connected to Trump’s #insurgency. The Florida Van Man Mail Bomber targeted vocal political opponents. The Kentucky Kroger Terrorist killed 2. The Pittsburgh Synagogue Terrorist killed 11.
To minimize the damage to the insurgency, Trump rapidly shifted the national conversation through something best termed a fast transient. In this case, the fast transient was a proposal to end birthright citizenship through Presidential edict. On cue, the insurgency and the resistance immediately began to battle over the proposal.
However, something new happened. Technology companies, from Facebook to Paypal to GoDaddy, took the opportunity to rapidly deplatform (physically disconnect) many of the people (Proud Boys, etc.) and companies (Gab, etc.) it deemed to be potentially violent.
This new dynamic may be the beginning of the end for the insurgency since it turns a strength of the insurgency into a debilitating weakness.
[...]
The big technology companies represent the third major force in this conflict — in addition to the insurgency and the resistance. Currently, their main source of power is in the physical dimension (attrition warfare). They have the ability to disconnect the insurgency at scale and they just demonstrated they are willing to do that. These violent attacks have provided the technology companies with the justification they need to enter this online war on the side of #resistance.
If this dynamic of violence continues, the global technology companies will join this online war. Here’s what this would mean:
The technology companies would begin to treat the language and the symbology of #insurgency as signs of online terrorism. This would give them the green light to ruthlessly censor it (within seconds of it being posted) and deplatform the people who post it. Moreover, this would be done at scale (tens of thousands a day if necessary) and at the level of individual conversations.
The social AIs being built at the major networks would inevitably end up oriented towards dampening the #insurgency. Slowly at first, but more aggressively as the AIs mature. This capability would likely become exportable, and provide a stealth means of redirecting countries like Brazil, the Philippines, Italy, etc. away from insurgent politics and towards corporate standards.
Efforts by the big technology companies to actively maintain social stability through social AIs, makes us extremely vulnerable to a long night. A world dominated by a system that through naive utopianism or through an aggressive takeover by populist leaders, narrows public thought down to a single, barren, ideological acceptable framework. A ruling system that prevents dissent and locks the world into stagnation and inevitable failure as it runs afoul of reality and human nature.
“…The social AIs being built at the major networks would inevitably end up oriented towards dampening the #insurgency. Slowly at first, but more aggressively as the AIs mature…”
“…Efforts by the big technology companies to actively maintain social stability through social AIs, makes us extremely vulnerable to a long night…”
Fuck them. I’ve been talking about this for a while now and as the crack down continues people have been hard at work. It’s finally coming together.
Aether. A reddit type forum where all the data is decentralized and encrypted so normal users can not be doxed. Not only is each part stored on the users computers they all link up and duplicate like the Usenet. Even better anyone can make a forum and then be the moderator BUT… and here’s the good part, moderated material can be seen and the moderators kicked out if a plurality of the readers decide the moderator is taking the wrong path. YES!
We are coming upon an inflection point just as great as the internet itself. A distributed unregulated printing press where the price of entry is close to zero. If people like what you say you can be heard no matter what the PTB say or do. The only way to shut these down is to destroy the net completely and I don’t think that’s going to happen.
This group has specifically not designed it for a threat from a government but say that it has good enough crypto to protect from commercial or ISP type attacks. They also say it can be used with Tor. That also means it can be used with I2P with a little work on the interface to I2P which means it can be fairly secure.
https://getaether.net/docs/
And this is just the beginning. People are working on tying Interplanatary File System (IPFS) into I2P and I think Tor. This means a serious mass storage of anything including large files.
Notice the people doing this in this case are not rightist. They are the left. The left doesn’t like censorship any more than the right. I can see how much faster than you could possibly imagine the complete abandonment of all the big data Oligarchs. All they will be left with is old ladies posting pictures of cats.
Another site already has a forum that spans the internet, I2P and Tor all accessing the same forum so it can not be shut off.
Nobody likes being censored, but everybody wants to censor the other guy.
When normalcy is criminalized, normies will be forced to go where criminals go. That means hanging out on the dark web with the drug dealers and pedos and anarchists. Get used to it. Slumming as recon and acclimatization.
The ancient Egyptians had dynasties where some kings ruled for decades. Same ruler, same cronies, same procedures, ideas and policies, etc. Most always too as noted by those that study ancient Egypt those rulers and dynasties a time of decline.