The Diversity Scam

Wednesday, June 20th, 2007

David Friedman pulls no punches in discussing The Diversity Scam:

“Diversity,” in the academic context, is usually a euphemism for affirmative action, itself a euphemism for discrimination — variously racial, ethnic, gender or sexual preference based — in favor of groups viewed as disadvantaged. In the employment context, a diversity hire is someone hired in part because he is black, or she is female, or …

What I find particularly irritating about this usage is that those who adopt it are typically opponents of actual diversity. In the academic context, what matter are ideas. Two professors with different gender or skin color but the same views provide less relevant diversity than two professors of the same gender or skin color but sharply opposed views.

Supporters of “diversity” try to obscure this by arguing that a different racial or gender background leads to a different viewpoint. There may be cases where this is true, although it is hard to see its relevance to most academic fields. But in such cases, favoring prospective hires whose work shows a different and original viewpoint is surely more sensible than favoring members of minorities in the hope that they will turn out to provide a different viewpoint.

In fact, at least in my observation, the people and departments most inclined to favor “diversity” in the conventional sense are among those least likely to want to hire professors whose viewpoints differ from the consensus. What they want are people of the desired gender or skin color who agree with them.

How’s this for a thought experiment?

My standard thought experiment to demonstrate this is to imagine that, at some late stage in the search process, it is discovered that a prospective hire regarded as a strong candidate is a supporter, an intelligent supporter, of South African apartheid. Does the probability of hiring him go up or down as a result? I can predict, with little data but some decades of experience of the academy, that in any elite university and almost any department it goes sharply down. Yet that is a viewpoint to which almost no faculty member or student has been, or expects to be, exposed. Someone who actually believes in intellectual diversity should thus regard the additional fact as a plus, not a minus.

Another interesting point:

Academic hiring is not the only example of hostility to diversity by people who claim to favor it. Consider the issues of home schooling and education vouchers. It’s pretty clear, I think, to anyone involved in the controversy, that one of the main objections to both is that they foster diversity.

The objection is not, of course, put in those terms. It is rather that both make it possible for parents with the wrong views — in particular fundamentalist Christians — to indoctrinate their children with those views. The clear implication is that it is desirable to make sure that all children get exposed to, perhaps even indoctrinated with, the current consensus views — the ones that they will be taught in the public schools.

The Greenest Green Fuel

Wednesday, June 20th, 2007

Algae may become The Greenest Green Fuel — if researchers can get it to work:

Algae seems a strange contender for the mantle of World’s Next Great Fuel, but the green goop has several qualities in its favor. Algae, made up of simple aquatic organisms that capture light energy through photosynthesis, produces vegetable oil. Vegetable oil, in turn, can be transformed into biodiesel, which can be used to power just about any diesel engine. (There are currently 13 million of them on American roads, a number that’s expected to jump over the next decade.)

Algae has some important advantages over other oil-producing crops, like canola and soybeans. It can be grown in almost any enclosed space, it multiplies like gangbusters, and it requires very few inputs to flourish — mainly just sunlight, water and carbon dioxide. “Because algae has a high surface-area-to-volume ratio, it can absorb nutrients very quickly,” Sears says. “Its small size is what makes it mighty.”

The proof is in the numbers. About 140 billion gallons of biodiesel would be needed every year to replace all petroleum-based transportation fuel in the U.S. It would take nearly three billion acres of fertile land to produce that amount with soybeans, and more than one billion acres to produce it with canola. Unfortunately, there are only 434 million acres of cropland in the entire country, and we probably want to reserve some of that to grow food. But because of its ability to propagate almost virally in a small space, algae could do the job in just 95 million acres of land. What’s more, it doesn’t need fertile soil to thrive. It grows in ponds, bags or tanks that can be just as easily set up in the desert — or next to a carbon-dioxide-spewing power plant — as in the country’s breadbasket.

How to make fuel from algae:

As the colonies mature, starve them of nitrogen [2]. The cells react to the low nutrient supply by entering survival mode and producing extra fats. When they’ve created enough fat, collect the cells and break them apart [3]. Filter out the large organelles and cell membranes, and then use solvents like methanol to separate out the fats from the water-soluble proteins and sugars [4]. Purify the collected fats, and evaporate the solvent [5]. Finally, put the fats in a chemical reactor to transform them into biodiesel (a process called transesterification) [6].

Let the Segregation Commence

Tuesday, June 19th, 2007

Let the Segregation Commence, John Leo says — quite sarcastically — as he looks at UCLA’s many graduation ceremonies:

The women’s studies graduation and the Chicana/Chicano studies graduation are both set for 10 AM Saturday. The broader Hispanic graduation, “Raza,” is in near-conflict with the black graduation, which starts just an hour later.

Planning was easier before a new crop of ethnic groups pushed for inclusion. Students of Asian heritage were once content with the Asian–Pacific Islanders ceremony. But now there are separate Filipino and Vietnamese commencements, and some talk of a Cambodian one in the future. Years ago, UCLA sponsored an Iranian graduation, but the school’s commencement office couldn’t tell me if the event was still around. The entire Middle East may yet be a fertile source for UCLA commencements.

Not all ethnic and racial graduations are well attended. The 2003 figures at UCLA showed that while 300 of 855 Hispanic students attended, only 170 out of 1,874 Asian-Americans did.

Leo makes his point:

Promoters of ethnic and racial graduations often talk about the strong sense of community that they favor. But it is a sense of community based on blood, a dubious and historically dangerous organizing principle. [...] But the core reason for separatist graduations is the obvious one: on campus, assimilation is a hostile force, the domestic version of American imperialism. [...] Administrations tend to foster separatism by arguing that bias is everywhere, justifying double standards that favor identity groups.

(Hat tip to John.)

The Science of Gaydar

Tuesday, June 19th, 2007

The Science of Gaydar looks at “New Research on Everything From Voice Pitch to Hair Whorl” and asks, “If sexual orientation is biological, are the traits that make people seem gay innate, too?”:

Statistically, for instance, gay men and lesbians have about a 50 percent greater chance of being left-handed or ambidextrous than straight men or women. The relative lengths of our fingers offer another hint: The index fingers of most straight men are shorter than their ring fingers, while for most women they are closer in length, or even reversed in ratio. But some researchers have noted that gay men are likely to have finger-length ratios more in line with those of straight women, and a study of self-described “butch” lesbians showed significantly masculinized ratios. The same goes for the way we hear, the way we process spatial reasoning, and even the ring of our voices. One study, involving tape-recordings of gay and straight men, found that 75 percent of gay men sounded gay to a general audience. It’s unclear what the listeners responded to, whether there is a recognized gay “accent” or vocal quality. And there is no hint as to whether this idiosyncrasy is owed to biology or cultural influences — only that it’s unmistakable.

Hair whorl, which may be linked to right- or left-handedness, is another predictor:

About 23 percent [of men tested at a gay-pride event] had counterclockwise hair whorls. In the general population, that figure is 8 percent.

Other indicators:

A string of other studies, most of them conducted quietly and with small budgets, has offered up a number of other biological indicators. According to this research, for instance, gay men, like straight women, have an increased density of fingerprint ridges on the thumb and the pinkie of the left hand; and overall their arms, legs, and hands are smaller relative to stature (among whites but not blacks). There are technical differences in the way most men and most women hear, except among lesbians, whose ears function more like men’s. And there are gender-based cognitive differences in which gay men appear more like women. One involves mentally rotating a 3-D object, something males tend to do better than females — except gay men score more like straight women and lesbians function more like straight men. In navigational tasks and verbal-fluency tests, gay men and lesbians tend to have sex-atypical scores.

From these findings, it might be tempting to conclude that lesbians are universally masculinized and gay men are somehow feminized — the classic “inversion model” of homosexuality advanced by Freud. But the picture is more complicated than that. There is also evidence — some more silly-sounding than serious — that homosexuals may be simultaneously more feminine and more masculine, respectively. The stereotypes — that lesbians tend to commit to relationships early and have little interest in casual sex; that gay men have more sexual partners than their counterparts — turn out to be true.

What causes gayness? It doesn’t seem genetic or environmental — at least in not in a simple way:

One of the riddles still vexing geneticists is why only 50 percent of gay identical twins share a sexual orientation with their sibling, despite being genetically identical. “We know from all sorts of research that it’s not your upbringing, not relationship with parents or siblings, not early-childhood sexual experiences and whether you go to a Catholic school or not,” says Sven Bocklandt, a geneticist at UCLA. “What I believe is that it is the ‘epigenetics environment,’ meaning the environment on top of our DNA — meaning the way that the gene is regulated. If you have identical twins, the genes are identical, but they are used differently. Every man and every woman has all the genes to make a vagina and womb and penis and testicles. In the same way, arguably, every man and woman has the genetic code for the brain networks that make you attracted to men and to women. You activate one or the other — and if you activate the wrong one, you’re gay.”

The current theory invokes the environment in the womb:

Immunological response is the ascendant theory, in fact. We know from a string of surveys that in any family, the second-born son is 33 percent more likely than the first to be gay, and the third is 33 percent more likely than the second, and so on, as though there is some sort of “maternal memory,” similar to the way antibodies are memories of an infection. Perhaps she mounts a more effective immunological response to fetal hormones with each new male fetus. To determine whether the fraternal birth order might also suggest that baby brothers are treated differently in a way that impacts their sexual expression, researchers have studied boys who weren’t raised in their biological families, or who may have been firstborn but grew up as the youngest in Brady Bunch–type homes. In every permutation, the results were the same: What mattered was only how many boys had occupied your mother’s uterus before you.

This theory may explain some things from other cultures:

Dean Hamer sees one possible answer in the fraternal-birth-order studies. “In Polynesian cultures, where you’re talking about very big families, it was typical to have the last-born son be mahu, or gay,” he says. Explorers described young boys who looked after the family and sometimes dressed as girls. “They suspected that their families had made them that way. But you just can’t take a guy and make him clean up and have him become gay. He’s got to have some gayness inside. Maybe that’s the biological purpose to the mahu: taking care of Mom.”

He says this half in jest, I think, but some other evidence bolsters his argument, including the appearance of transgender younger sons among Native Americans (the so-called two-spirits) and in premodern corners of India, Samoa, and Indonesia. A survey published this year suggested that transgender fa’afafines in Samoa are more “avuncular” than heterosexuals — that is, more likely to care for kin. Another study says that female relatives of gay men may have more children; perhaps the very thing that makes their brothers and sons gay makes them more fertile, an ideal situation with extra babysitters on hand. You can slice this stuff any way you want.

Running Guns to Gaza: A Living in the Desert

Tuesday, June 19th, 2007

Running Guns to Gaza: A Living in the Desert shares what Michael Slackman learned by interviewing Gaza residents:

They said, almost without exception, that the business of ferrying weapons was more about profit than ideology. Working with small construction tools like jackhammers, people here said they dug a tunnel to Gaza in about six months. The shoulder-width passages were often strung with lights and a mechanized pulley system — like a tow rope at a ski lift — to deliver the merchandise.

One person said that most of the weapons smuggled into Gaza were Russian- and Chinese-made. Others said that the guns, often AK-47s, may have come from Sudan and moved through Egypt.

Dogbert the Green Consultant

Tuesday, June 19th, 2007

I got a kick out of Dogbert the Green Consultant.

Siberian Tigers in China

Tuesday, June 19th, 2007

The Chinese are successfully breeding Siberian Tigers:

Eighty-four Siberian tigers, among the world’s rarest animals, have been born since March 2007 at the Hengdaohezi Feline Breeding Center in the suburbs of Harbin, capital of Heilongjiang province, an official said Sunday, June 17, 2007. Fewer than 400 Siberian tigers — also known as Amur, Manchurian or Ussuri tiger — are believed to survive in the wild, about 20 of them in China and the rest in Russia.

Where do Hollywood babies come from?

Tuesday, June 19th, 2007

Where do Hollywood babies come from?

In California, infants can start working when they’re 15 days old, provided that they (or their parents) have a work permit and a note from a licensed physician. According to the California labor code, the note must attest that the child was not born prematurely, was of normal birth weight, and is, in the doctor’s opinion, “physically capable of handling the stress of filmmaking.” Also, the child’s lungs, eyes, heart, and immune system must be “sufficiently developed to withstand the potential risks.”
[...]
Where do these babies come from? Like everyone else in Tinseltown, babies have agents and managers. The most desirable infant actors come in sets of two or three—using twins or triplets means a production can film for 40 or 60 minutes a day instead of 20, or that a cranky baby can be swapped out for a more compliant twin. And what are these young pups paid? According to a SAG spokesperson, infants are typically hired as “background actors” and receive a day rate of $126. If an agent or parent bargains for the child to be paid as a principal performer, the rate increases to $737 per day.

Hurray For High Gas Prices!

Tuesday, June 19th, 2007

Steven Levitt says Hurray For High Gas Prices!, because “there are all sorts of costs associated with my driving that I don’t pay”:

Three possible externalities associated with driving are the following:
  1. My driving increases congestion for other drivers;
  2. I might crash into other cars or pedestrians;
  3. My driving contributes to global warming.

If you had to guess, which of those three considerations provides the strongest justification for a bigger tax on gasoline?

The answer, at least based on the evidence I could find, may surprise you.

Romancing the snow

Tuesday, June 19th, 2007

Romancing the snow looks at the $4.7 billion Plan Columbia:

In 1999, Washington launched “Plan Colombia,” with the promise that the anti-drug program would halve Colombian cocaine production.

The law of unintended consequences rules in this drug war. Plan Colombia has not delivered.

U.S. crop dusters have sprayed an area the size of Delaware and Rhode Island. U.S. taxpayers have forked over some $4.7 billion. Yet cocaine is abundant and cheap on the streets of America. As Ken Dermota wrote in the July/August issue of the Atlantic, the price of a gram of cocaine in Los Angeles fell from $50 to $100 per gram in 1999 to $30-$50 in 2005. Prices are down in New York, Seattle and Atlanta. White House Drug Czar John Walters recently admitted that street cocaine prices fell by 11 percent from February 2005 to October 2006.

Demand isn’t the issue. Demand remains steady. Supply is the issue: Growers produce far more cocaine than the world consumes.

Despite Plan Colombia, Colombian cocaine farming grew 9 percent in 2006, the Los Angeles Times reported, the third straight year with an increase. Peru produced an estimated 165 tons of cocaine in 2005, Bolivia another 70 tons, according to The Atlantic. It’s almost as if America is spending billions to eradicate weeds — the coca just comes back, bigger and more abundant than before.

Congressional Democrats are considering decreasing the program’s annual $700-million budget by 10 percent.

But why only 10 percent?

That’s a good question. Why only 10 percent?

Hitchens Is Not Great

Thursday, June 14th, 2007

In Hitchens Is Not Great, Karl Reitz responds to Christopher Hitchens’ God is not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything with “an atheist’s defense of religion”:

Realistically, atheists (and we atheists take pride in only thinking realistically) may only have a choice between living in societies that are traditionally religious or ones that have adopted secularized religions.

So, far from “not counting,” secular religions must be taken very seriously, and their implications understood, before we preach the benefits of godless society.

The obvious examples of secularized religions are communism, socialism, and fascism, each of which generally involves worshipping government by slightly different rituals or for slightly different reasons. As these convictions faded, faith in the welfare state, and especially environmental protection, has risen to take their place for reasons government should be worshipped. Environmentalist devotees claim that we will experience the apocalypse disasters, for which some people are rebuilding Noah’s Ark. These disasters can be prevented if we take the advice of prophets people who understand, like Al Gore. Of course, if we sin pollute a little too much, well, we can always buy indulgences carbon offsets.

The fundamental difference between traditional religions and these secular religions is that secular religions promise us that perfection (heaven) is possible here, on earth, in present times.

19th-century weapon found in whale

Wednesday, June 13th, 2007

19th-century weapon found in whale:

A 50-ton bowhead whale caught off the Alaskan coast last month had a weapon fragment embedded in its neck that showed it survived a similar hunt — more than a century ago.

Embedded deep under its blubber was a 3 1/2-inch arrow-shaped projectile that has given researchers insight into the whale’s age, estimated between 115 and 130 years old.

I’m reminded of the Far Side cartoon, where they’re remarking on all the amazing things a giant old tree survived — as they look at the tree rings on the freshly cut stump.

Disney Films, TV Darken Elderly

Wednesday, June 13th, 2007

According to the Journal of Aging Studies, Disney films and TV “darken” the elderly by portraying them as old:

By the time children enter elementary school, they already hold a negative view of older adults — and Disney films, along with TV cartoons, may influence these negative stereotypes, according to a team of Brigham Young University researchers.

Last year, the team analyzed depictions of older characters in cartoons from public TV and cable networks. They discovered many of the characters were angry, senile, crazy, wrinkled, ugly and/or overweight.

What a terrible mischaracterization of old folks…

Teach the Controversy

Wednesday, June 13th, 2007


Teach the Controversy:

I Kings 7:23-26

He made the Sea of cast metal, circular in shape, measuring ten cubits from rim to rim and five cubits high. It took a line of thirty cubits to measure around it. Below the rim, gourds encircled it — ten to a cubit. The gourds were cast in two rows in one piece with the Sea. The Sea stood on twelve bulls, three facing north, three facing west, three facing south and three facing east. The Sea rested on top of them, and their hindquarters were toward the center. It was a handbreadth in thickness, and its rim was like the rim of a cup, like a lily blossom. It held two thousand baths. (NIV)

PG&E’s Battery Power Plans Could Jump Start Electric Car Market

Wednesday, June 13th, 2007

Green Wombat notes that PG&E’s Battery Power Plans Could Jump Start the Electric Car Market by providing a secondary market for used but not quite used up batteries:

Electric car batteries generally retain 80 percent of their capacity even after they’re no longer good for powering cars. Thesen envisions a time in the near future when banks of EV batteries are charged at night with electricity produced by wind farms, which tend to generate the most electricity in the evening when power demands are the lowest. Normally, that energy is just lost because it isn’t stored. During the day when air conditioners crank up and energy demand rises, electricity can be released from the batteries to take the load off the power grid.

I’m not sure the green spin is fully warranted. It’s really about building less new capacity, which is quite expensive:

In theory, that means PG&E won’t have to build as many planet-warming natural gas-fired power plants to meet peak demand or as an insurance policy against blackouts. It also allows the utility to do “load leveling.” Cranking up a power plant to supply electricity when demand suddenly spikes is expensive. EV batteries could release electricity to the grid to smooth fill in the gaps between supply and demand. The same is true if batteries are used at electrical substations. “If we can put in $5,000 worth of batteries and avoid putting in a $50,000 transformer and upgrading the lines then everyone is a winner,” says Thesen.