The Code that Killed the Golden Age

Wednesday, April 26th, 2006

Once Upon a Dime reprints The Code that Killed the Golden Age of comics, which was self-imposed in response to Fredric Wertham’s 1953 book, Seduction of the Innocent, a sensationalist attack on comics that claimed that Batman and Robin were “a wish dream of two homosexuals living together” and that Wonder Woman was a “lesbian counterpart of Batman”.

From General Standards Part A:

  1. Crimes shall never be presented in such a way as to create sympathy for the criminal, to promote distrust of the forces of law and justice, or to inspire others with a desire to imitate criminals.
  2. No comics shall explicitly present the unique details and methods of a crime.
  3. Policemen, judges, government officials, and respected institutions shall never be presented in such a way as to create disrespect for established authority.
  4. If crime is depicted it shall be as a sordid and unpleasant activity.
  5. Criminals shall not be presented so as to be rendered glamorous or to occupy a position which creates the desire for emulation.
  6. In every instance good shall triumph over evil and the criminal punished for his misdeeds.
  7. Scenes of excessive violence shall be prohibited. Scenes of brutal torture, excessive and unnecessary knife and gun play, physical agony, gory and gruesome crime shall be eliminated.
  8. No unique or unusual methods of concealing weapons shall be shown.
  9. Instances of law enforcement officers dying as a result of a criminal’s activities should be discouraged.
  10. The crime of kidnapping shall never be portrayed in any detail, nor shall any profit accrue to the abductor or kidnapper. The criminal or the kidnapper must be punished in every case.
  11. The letters of the word ‘crime’ on a comics magazine shall never be appreciably greater than the other words contained in the title. The word ‘crime’ shall never appear alone on a cover.
  12. Restraint in the use of the word ‘crime’ in titles or subtitles shall be exercised.

Bush on Gas Prices: Who’s He Kidding?

Wednesday, April 26th, 2006

James K. Glassman asks, Who’s He Kidding?:

Next, the President chided the companies that actually produce the energy. “We expect there to be strong re-investment [of] cash flows” in more energy production. Just what does he think these companies have been doing? Over the past 10 years, the large integrated oil companies have made capital expenditures roughly equal to their net earnings. In fact, between 1991 and 2005, ExxonMobil’s cumulative capital and exploration expenditures (some $210 billion) actually exceeded the company’s earnings. Chevron spent $11 billion last year alone.

Those expenditures involve enormous risk and long lead times. ExxonMobil, for example, spent 17 years and $3.5 billion on a deepwater development project in Angola. In 1988, when the company began its work, oil was about $15 a barrel.

But the oil price bounces up and down. Only a few years ago, it was less than $10 a barrel. It could be again. (In 2002, as the price of oil fell, Chevron’s sales dropped by $5 billion and its earnings by nearly $3 billion — in one year!)

Or politicians could decide to tax away profits, or further favor uneconomic fuels.

Thousands of Foxes Are Living in London And Making a Mess

Wednesday, April 26th, 2006

Coyotes are moving into American cities — including New York — and Thousands of Foxes Are Living in London And Making a Mess:

The fox has become a common feature of the city’s landscape like the gray squirrel and the pigeon, both also considered by many to be urban pests.

There are an estimated 10,000 foxes living in the London area, some of them very near the financial district, Buckingham Palace, and No. 10 Downing Street, the prime minister’s residence.

Opportunistic omnivores, foxes feed on pet rabbits and guinea pigs, as well as on worms, beetles, birds, rats and fruit. And they can get into spats with cats. Gardens are a particular problem.

Management à la Google

Wednesday, April 26th, 2006

Management à la Google describes Google’s “novel management system,” which “seems to have been designed to guard against the risk factors that so often erode an organization’s evolutionary potential”:

Evolutionary risk factor #1: A narrow or orthodox business definition that limits the scope of innovation. Google’s response: An expansive sense of purpose.

Evolutionary risk factor #2: A hierarchical organization that over-weights the views of those who have a stake in perpetuating the status quo. Google’s response: An organization that is flat, transparent, and non-hierarchical.

Evolutionary risk factor #3: A tendency to overinvest in “what is” at the expense of “what could be.” Google’s response: A company-wide rule that allows developers to devote 20% of their time to any project they choose.

Evolutionary risk factor #4: Creeping mediocrity. Google’s response: Keep the bozos out and reward people who make a difference.

Minding Our Manners

Wednesday, April 26th, 2006

Theodore Dalrymple writes about Minding Our Manners:

The argument goes something like this: formality is etiquette, and etiquette is a manifestation of an unjust, class-ridden, patriarchal society. The rejection of etiquette and the formality it entails is therefore a sign that one is on the side of the angels, that is to say, of the egalitarians. Modern egalitarians, at least in Britain, do not content themselves with the kind of abstract or formal equality before the law that allows any amount of difference in wealth, status, taste, and sensibility; they demand some progress towards equalization of everything, including manners.

Of course, egalitarians are just as attached as everyone else to their own material possessions and wealth and have no real intention of forgoing them by radical redistribution, at any rate, of their own money and possessions. The struggle for equality—of the actual rather than the formal kind—has therefore to be transferred to fields in which it will cost the egalitarian nothing, or nothing material and financial.

What better way to prove your egalitarian credentials than by adopting the supposedly free and easy, utterly informal manners of those at the bottom of the social scale? The freer and easier the better, for such informality demonstrates another quality beloved of, and praised by, intellectuals: a superiority to the dictates of convention. Thus you can never be quite informal or unconventional enough.

The evolution of clots

Wednesday, April 26th, 2006

Steve Jones explains the evolution of clots — after explaining why “intelligent design” is the “logic of ignorance”:

The ID crew, to use Darwin’s own phrase, “look at an organic being as a savage looks at a ship, as at something wholly beyond [their] comprehension”. The first Hawaiians to cast eyes on Europeans were so astonished by their great vessels that they thought their builders to be gods. The ID argument is just the same. It is the logic of ignorance, idleness and incuriosity: I am very smart, even I do not understand this, so why bother to explain it except by bringing in God (if necessary under an alias)?

How did clots evolve?

The clotting machinery is an icon of just how complex life may be. Designers love it: for to staunch the flow needs a cascade of a dozen or more enzymes that work like a row of toppling dominoes. Two interacting pathways meet at a crucial junction point.

One is set off by a change in acidity after a cut, while the other acts when it picks up chemical cues from damaged cells. An injury sets off a chain reaction until the job is done and, if any step goes wrong, the whole system collapses. How could such a complicated machine evolve from simple beginnings? What use is part of a clot?

Much better, in fact, than no clot at all. Plenty of animals manage with just a few parts of the machinery and DNA shows that — like the eye — the rickety apparatus that stops us from bleeding was assembled from random bits that just happened to be hanging around.

Humans as Prey

Wednesday, April 26th, 2006

Humans as Prey disabuses us of the notion that humans are — and always have been — at the top of the food chain:

The list of our ancestors’ fossils showing evidence of predation continues to grow. A 1.75-million-year-old hominid skull unearthed in the Republic of Georgia shows punctures from the fangs of a saber-toothed cat. Another skull, about 900,000 years old, found in Kenya, exhibits carnivore bite marks on the brow ridge. A six-million-year-old hominid, also found in Kenya, may well have been killed by a leopard. A fragment of a 1.6-million-year-old hominid skull was found in the den of an extinct hyena, in Spain. A cranium from 250,000 years ago, discovered in South Africa in 1935, has a depression on the forehead caused by a hyena’s tooth. Those and other fossils provide rock-hard proof that a host of large, fierce animals preyed on human ancestors.

It is equally clear that, outside the West, no small amount of predation occurs today on modern humans. Although we are not likely to see these facts in American newspaper headlines, each year 3,000 people in sub-Saharan Africa are eaten by crocodiles, and 1,500 Tibetans are killed by bears about the size of grizzlies. In one Indian state between 1988 and 1998, over 200 people were attacked by leopards; 612 people were killed by tigers in the Sundarbans delta of India and Bangladesh between 1975 and 1985. The carnivore zoologist Hans Kruuk, of the University of Aberdeen, studied death records in Eastern Europe and concluded that wolf predation on humans is still a fact of life in the region, as it was until the 19th century in Western European countries like France and Holland.

Peace Corp.

Wednesday, April 26th, 2006

As Peace Corp. notes, “private military companies say they’ve got what it takes to stop the carnage” at Darfur and around the world, “if only someone would hire them”:

The industry also claims that it’s far cheaper than its multilateral or military counterparts. ”We offer the ability to create a right-sized solution-which creates a cost savings right off the bat,” says Taylor. By contrast, Brooks notes, ”NATO is insanely expensive; it’s not a cost-effective organization. Neither is the [African Union]. Private companies would be much, much cheaper. When we compared their costs to most UN operations, we came up with 10 to 20 percent of what the UN would normally charge.”

But while many would agree that there’s an enormous need for the peacekeeping services that companies like Blackwater are willing and able to supply, that does not mean there’s a market. ”The question isn’t their operational ability,” says David Isenberg, senior analyst at the British American Security Information Council, ”they’ve demonstrated an ability at least equivalent to a decently run UN operation. It’s a question of political will.”

The Franklin Expedition

Wednesday, April 26th, 2006

The Franklin Expedition set off to the Arctic, to collect magnetic data, with a party of 128 men in May, 1845, in two ships, HMS Erebus and HMS Terror, with iron-reinforced bows and new-fangled steam-powered screw propellers. They never returned:

There are several things that contributed to the loss of the Franklin expedition. Franklin was of a breed of imperial officers who believed in the subjugation of nature by civilization. He and his men carried silver plates, crystal decanters, and many extraneous personal effects with them. They attempted to haul much of this heavy gear along with them even after abandoning the ships. They were unwilling or unable to learn survival techniques from the natives. Moreover, their expedition was a naval one, not equipped for hiking over land, so none of the sailors had thick boots or jackets. Their ships were locked in the ice for two winters running as a result of an unsually cold period that did not allow the icebound passages to melt in the summer of 1846. The party’s morale and cohesion was damaged by psychological effects of lead poisoning from the solder that sealed their tinned food supply. This has been confirmed by lead found in both skeletal and soft tissue remains of expedition sailors conducted by Dr. Owen Beattie of the University of Alberta. They also were weakened by internal bleeding from scurvy after the first two years when the preventive lemon juice they carried lost its potency. The Inuit witnesses had reported that crew members exhibited the blackened mouth and bruised skin typical of that disease. There is evidence of cut marks found on bones from some of the crew, that suggests conditions were so dire that some resorted to cannibalism. In the end, it was likely a combination of poor planning, bad weather, poisoned food, and ultimately starvation that killed them.

Because the expedition was so well stocked — they had 8,000 tins of food — it was assumed that they could survive comfortably amidst the ice, and the large reward for their rescue was not offered for two years.

Illusionist Tricks Armed Robbers

Wednesday, April 26th, 2006

I have to wonder whether this is true or not, but it is amusing. Illusionist Tricks Armed Robbers:

Copperfield says he turned his pockets inside out to reveal nothing in them, even though he was carrying his passport, wallet and cell phone.

African Cheetah Cub

Wednesday, April 26th, 2006

Today’s dose of cute comes from this African Cheetah Cub:

An orphaned eight-week-old African cheetah cub licks its lips inside its enclosure at the Wilson airport in Nairobi, Kenya April 23, 2006. The male cub was rescued by the Kenya Wildlife Services (KWS) wardens in Mandera district, 1500 km (932 miles) northeast of Nairobi, and is currently being held at the Nairobi animal orphanage.

There Is No Energy Crisis

Wednesday, April 26th, 2006

Virginia Postrel says, There Is No Energy Crisis. Actually, she said it a decade ago:

In 1994 and ’95, paper prices skyrocketed. The cost of magazine paper rose by about 10 percent a month, hardly the sort of hike you can simply pass on to subscribers. Most publishers, including REASON, dealt with the increase by printing fewer pages and adding fewer new subscribers than they’d planned. Newspapers were even harder hit: Escalating newsprint prices drove many to lay off hundreds of employees, raise prices, and, in some cases, go out of business. It was not a happy time in the publishing industry.

Yet as far as I know, no one in the Clinton administration ever called a press conference to address the “paper crisis.” Congress never held hearings on the subject. CNN never led the evening news with tales of how paper buyers were struggling. Newt Gingrich never posed for photos in front of giant rolls of newsprint. Bob Dole never denounced the president for his lack of “leadership” on the matter.

And that’s as it should be. There was no crisis, nothing requiring an emergency response from government. By historical standards, paper wasn’t even that expensive; its price was just higher than expected, and rising rapidly. Government policy had exacerbated things–in this case, through recycling mandates that led paper companies to invest in converting, rather than expanding, capacity–but the main cause of the price jump was plain old ordinary tight supply hit by expanding demand. The higher prices gave both consumers and producers important information about the state of the market. In response, buyers bought less. Sellers started to produce more. And prices eventually crept down.

That’s how prices work. They convey information. They give people feedback about what’s happening in the world. They produce responses. They go up and down. And while sellers may experiment with different levels, always seeking the most profitable ones, no one in particular gets to decide where prices will end up. They are out of control.

Recently, we’ve had a “gas crisis.” From February through the end of April, retail gasoline prices jumped about 12 percent nationally, 21 percent in California. What’s interesting about the latest “gas crisis” is how, despite a brief flurry of media attention and political pontificating, it looks a lot more like the “paper crisis” than like the real gas crises of the 1970s. There are no long lines at the pump or threats of “odd-even” rationing based on your license plate number. You can fill your tank on Sunday, and every station has gas — for a price. The government interventions that distorted energy markets in the 1970s, and put drivers through hell, have disappeared.

This crisis isn’t a crisis. It’s just a price increase, the sort of signal consumers adjust to every day. No hysteria is called for.

Her recent epilogue:

Anyway, I thought we were supposed to be using less gasoline — to save the planet, annoy the Saudis, whatever. But I guess that was just talk.

Urban thinker Jane Jacobs dies

Tuesday, April 25th, 2006

Urban thinker Jane Jacobs died today, at age 89.

Remembering Jane Jacobs presents an old CBS interview with her:

With her astute observations about the way we live, Jane Jacobs dynamically changed the urban landscape. The author, activist and theorist has passed away at the age of 89. Jacobs, a self-taught philosopher, challenged the establishment with her ideas about cities and the economy. In this CBC Television clip from 1969, Jacobs, a new immigrant to Canada, discusses Toronto’s quirks and Montreal’s creativity.

Infantry transformed by new tools, training

Tuesday, April 25th, 2006

Sydney Freedberg opens Infantry transformed by new tools, training with a scenario from the 14-week course at Fort Benning’s Infantry Training Brigade:

The Army drill sergeant rebuked a group of recruits who had fired their rifles too hastily in a mock ambush. “You know we’ve got civilians on the battlefield,” said 1st Sgt. Dennis Williams. “Just because your buddy fires, doesn’t mean you fire.”

You’ve got to be aware of exactly what you’re shooting at, Williams told the soldiers. Be aware of what you’re not shooting at, too; don’t focus on the first target that pops up and forget your flank. “Everybody wants to kill that same guy, but those guys over there,” he said gesturing to the side, “would’ve wiped us all out!”

It’s not all that different from youth soccer practice.

The infantry’s changing:

Today, however, the soldiers at Fort Benning are visibly different from their predecessors of just three years ago. They wear Kevlar jackets reinforced with rigid breast and back plates, 16 pounds per man, the first mass-produced bulletproof armor in history and all but unknown in the U.S. military before the invasion of Iraq. The soldiers carry rifles with sophisticated optical sights, tools that, before the insurgency, were reserved for snipers and commandos. They practice treating casualties with a new first-aid kit — tourniquet, gloves, and an Israeli-developed pressure dressing — that was derived from last year’s battlefield lessons.

And these are just the tools, the visible surfaces of far more fundamental changes in how human beings are being taught to fight.
[...]
“I didn’t do half of this,” said Lt. Col. Ricardo Mitchell after he and the recruits finished the exercise. Mitchell did his basic training in the peacetime Army of the 1980s. Today, as commander of one of Benning’s training battalions, he said, “We are teaching things to privates comparable to what, five or six years ago, we were asking lieutenants to do.”

I recommend reading the whole article.

The Future of Programming: An Interview with Paul Graham

Tuesday, April 25th, 2006

In The Future of Programming: An Interview with Paul Graham, he gives his opinion on outsourcing — which is the same opinion I came to years ago:

In any case, I don’t think outsourcing per se is much of a threat. I bet much of the time it’s just a symptom of using a language that’s not abstract enough. In effect you’re using the programmers in India or wherever as human compilers.