Integration and “Savage Liberalism”

Monday, February 20th, 2006

Theodore Dalrymple discusses Integration and “Savage Liberalism”:

My mother arrived in Britain penniless, but fortunately for her—and for Britain—no one sought to persuade her that she need not learn English, and no one set up expensive and ineffective services for her in case she did not. She was not obliged to give up her tastes or conform in private respects, but she was expected (de facto) to blend into society as much as possible, rightly and reasonably, in my opinion. There was no ideology seeking to Balkanize the sensibilities of the population, enclose people in ghettoes and so forth, in the process acting as an employment opportunity for hordes of officials and bureaucrats.

Although it is not a complete answer, a flexible labor market is very important, because there is nothing like work to integrate people.

How to Get Condi to Power

Monday, February 20th, 2006

In How to Get Condi to Power, Uriah Kriegel explains how “the notion of a Rice presidency is appealing to three different groups within the GOP”:

First and foremost is the moderate wing of the party. Secretary Rice combines an unwavering hawkish foreign policy with socially moderate positions on abortion, race relations, etc. She is a deeply religious person who is nonetheless not, politically speaking, guided by religion. And as such, she appeals to Republicans worried about the rise of Evangelicals evident during the Bush presidency.

Obviously, Rice not only represents, but also embodies, the socially inclusive element in the Party of Lincoln.
[...]
This is also part of her appeal to a second Republican group — the libertarian/meritocratic wing headed by anti-regulation, small-government Republicans and associated Big Business interests. Despite the challenges presented by her racial and socioeconomic background, Rice ascended to her current stature on the merit of her intellectual and moral character.
[...]
This also ties to the third group Rice appeals to, the “Emerging Majority” Republicans and the pragmatically-oriented apparatchiks and wonks in conservative think-tanks throughout the country. This wing may value Rice’s moderation (and competence) not only for its own sake, but also for its political potential.

There are obstacles though:

First of all, successful presidential candidates who have never been previously elected to office are extremely rare in American history, and tend to be retired generals (e.g. Eisenhower).

Second, Rice has been able to sustain her unblemished integrity precisely because she has never run for office. As long as she speaks in favor of freedom and democracy, she is bound to look dignified; once she speaks in favor of herself, sustaining the image of integrity would require some political skill we simply don’t know whether she has.

Third, personal facts about Secretary Rice are likely to present a challenge to her candidacy. Rice is a strong and independent single woman in her fifties who has never been married.

Holy Flying Cow!

Monday, February 20th, 2006

In Holy Flying Cow!, Nick Schulz interviews Randy Cerveny, author of Shattered Consensus: The True State of Global Warming, about man’s effect on the weather, starting with the “heat island” effect:

Right, the urban heat island effect. Here in Phoenix, Arizona for example, the temperature that we have in the airport which is in the center of town, is generally about five to seven degrees warmer at night than it is out at the surrounding areas. And that’s due to the fact that the concrete and the asphalt absorb all of this heat and then release it during the night, so that that central part of the city becomes much warmer. Now, that’s solely due to us, I mean, that’s not a natural type phenomenon.
[...]
That’s at the local level. I also, as I started to say, had done some research with a colleague of mine where we demonstrated that people are apparently having an impact at a regional level. That off the coast of the United States, the Eastern seaboard of the United States, we demonstrated pretty conclusively, that it rains more on the weekends than it does on the week days. And this is due to human activity.

And the reason is because in nature there is no such thing as a seven day cycle. The seven day cycle is manmade. It’s something that we created as part of our civilization.

So, if you find seven day cycles in nature, the likelihood is that it’s something that we’ve done. Well, we’ve found seven day cycles in rainfall off the Eastern seaboard. We were able to link it back to pollution. That as pollution during the week builds up and reaches a maximum towards Friday and Saturday and then gets pushed off into the Atlantic Ocean, that pollution acts to produce more rainfall, so it’s kind of odd, but at a regional scale, all along the Eastern seaboard we tend to find that just off shore, weekends are going to be rainier.

At the global level, things aren’t so clear.

Inigo Montoya On Broadway

Sunday, February 19th, 2006

David Hornik says we may see Inigo Montoya On Broadway. From Guettel and Goldman to Team on Princess Bride Musical:

Composer Adam Guettel and screenwriter William Goldman will collaborate on a musical version or the hit fairy tale film ‘The Princess Bride,’ the New York Post reported.

Candy Makers Cater to the Health-Conscious

Sunday, February 19th, 2006

Candy Makers Cater to the Health-Conscious with flavanol-rich dark chocolate:

Mars Inc., maker of Milky Way, Snickers and M&M’s candies, next month plans to launch nationwide a new line of products made with a dark chocolate the company claims has health benefits.

Called CocoaVia, the products are made with a kind of dark chocolate high in flavanols, an antioxidant found in cocoa beans that is thought to have a blood-thinning effect similar to aspirin and may even lower blood pressure. The snacks also are enriched with vitamins and injected with cholesterol-lowering plant sterols from soy.

Saint Valentine

Sunday, February 19th, 2006

According to The Golden Legend (Aurea Legenda), which records many fanciful stories of the lives of the saints, Saint Valentine was a martyr, executed by Emperor Claudius for denying the Roman gods.

According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, there were at least three such Saint Valentines, all martyrs, all “mentioned in the early martyrologies under date of 14 February.”

None of them had any particular relevance to lovers — except for that date:

The popular customs associated with Saint Valentine’s Day undoubtedly had their origin in a conventional belief generally received in England and France during the Middle Ages, that on 14 February, i.e. half way through the second month of the year, the birds began to pair. [...] For this reason the day was looked upon as specially consecrated to lovers and as a proper occasion for writing love letters and sending lovers’ tokens. Both the French and English literatures of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries contain allusions to the practice.

The Politics of Economic Nationalism

Sunday, February 19th, 2006

Arnold Kling decries The Politics of Economic Nationalism:

As Boudreaux points out, debts accumulated by our government are indeed collective debts. But if someone from the private sector borrows from overseas, that is his debt, not your debt or our debt. In and of itself, a trade deficit — or a Capital Account Surplus, as the Economic Report refers to it — would have no collective implications. With private transactions, those who borrow are in debt, and those who don’t — aren’t.

On “our” oil dependence:

The United States gets much of its oil from Canada and Mexico. Still, we are “dependent” on Middle Eastern oil, because oil is traded in a world market. Any time there is a shock to demand or supply, the price is affected.

“We” are not doing anything wrong by using oil instead of a more-expensive fuel. “We” are not funding terrorism. If you think that Saudi Arabia and Iran are doing bad things with the money they earn, then the place to go to get that fixed is the State Department or the Pentagon, not the Department of Energy. The Energy Department only affects our collective interests by increasing government indebtedness.

On “our” health care:

Nearly all discussions of health care policy are framed in the rhetoric of economic nationalism. We spend too much on health care. Our system emphasizes acute care rather than preventive care. We have too many uninsured.

When we hear this litany, we should ask skeptical questions. Who spends too much on health care? If I choose to spend a lot on my health care, how does that hurt anyone else? How is the “system” stopping me from getting preventive care? Isn’t prevention my personal responsibility? Why don’t the uninsured buy catastrophic health insurance? Is it because health insurers won’t take them, or is it because the individuals don’t really want health insurance unless someone else gives it to them?

Tucker took winding road to "Transamerica"

Sunday, February 19th, 2006

From Tucker took winding road to “Transamerica”:

New York-based Tucker had always wanted to direct movies. After years of odd jobs as a starving photographer/painter and a stint in business with his financial whiz of a brother, he wrote ‘Transamerica,’ a story about Bree, a preop transsexual woman who finds out right before her scheduled surgery that she once sired a son. She rescues the troubled teenager from a lockup, and together they drive cross-country, where he eventually learns her secret and meets her family. ‘Transamerica’ is more of a healing family comedy than a threatening exploration of transgender issues. ‘I know what it feels like to be an outsider,’ Tucker says. ‘I have felt misunderstood. Bree feels so unloved and born into the wrong body.’

At first the project met with nothing but slamming doors, but Tucker finally raised a little less than $1 million from family, friends and his credit cards. ‘Once I took the risk of being in debt for the next 15 years, the gates opened in a nice way,’ he says.

“Once I took the risk of being in debt for the next 15 years, the gates opened in a nice way.” I’d love to see interviews with the dozen daring young filmmakers for whom the gates did not open in a nice way.

Who We Are & Why

Sunday, February 19th, 2006

Judith Rich Harris, author of The Nurture Assumption, explains Who We Are & Why, in her new book, No Two Alike:

Basically, Mrs. Harris believes there are three ‘perpetrators’ at work in the formation of the human personality, each associated with an aspect of a modular brain. One is the ‘relationship system,’ designed to maintain favorable relationships in society.Another is the ‘Socialization System,’ where the goal is to be a member of a group. The third is the ‘Status System,’ where we compete with our peers for status.

The interplay among these systems accounts for the emergence of differences between individuals. So it is that even identical twins develop different personalities because the members of their community see them as unique individuals and treat them differently. Their individual striving for status propels them into different modes of competing, which in turn differentiates their personalities.

Men, Women, and Ghosts in Science

Sunday, February 19th, 2006

Peter Lawrence, a biologist and fellow of the Royal Society, accused Science of being “gutless” after it went back on its plan to publish his Men, Women, and Ghosts in Science:

Some have a dream that, one fine day, there will be equal numbers of men and women in all jobs, including those in scientific research. But I think this dream is Utopian; it assumes that if all doors were opened and all discrimination ended, the different sexes would be professionally indistinguishable. The dream is sustained by a cult of political correctness that ignores the facts of life—and thrives only because the human mind likes to bury experience as it builds beliefs. Here I will argue, as others have many times before, that men and women are born different. Yet even we scientists deny this, allowing us to identify the “best” candidates for jobs and promotions by subjecting men and women to the same tests. But since these tests favour predominantly male characteristics, such as self-confidence and aggression, we choose more men and we discourage women. Science would be better served if we gave more opportunity and power to the gentle, the reflective, and the creative individuals of both sexes. And if we did, more women would be selected, more would choose to stay in science, and more would get to the top.

Muhammad on museum walls

Sunday, February 19th, 2006

From Muhammad on museum walls:

While lethal riots persist in the Middle East and American cartoonists and editors wring their hands over what it means to publish pictures of Muhammad, the Western world’s curators of Islamic art whisper and wonder.

As they understand it, the Koran does not forbid representations of Muhammad, though other revered texts have led millions of Muslims to scorn the idea. They know that many Islamic artists have taken on the subject. And they know that pictures of Muhammad — not caricatures, but respectful representations, executed by and for Muslims, sometimes with the prophet’s face shrouded by a veil, sometimes not — can be found in museums throughout Europe and North America.

(Hat tip to Virginia Postrel.)

Toyota in Nascar

Saturday, February 18th, 2006

The last thing that GM or Ford needed to see — Toyota in Nascar:

As if the Big Three automakers didn’t already have enough competition from Toyota, this Sunday will mark the last all-American Daytona 500.

Starting with the 2007 season Toyota will have cars in the nation’s premier Nascar auto race, as the Japanese automaker tries to make further gains in U.S. auto sales. To date, only Chevrolet, Ford and Dodge have had cars in the race.

The Most Important Nielsen Rating

Friday, February 17th, 2006

You can only eat so many Danish butter cookies in support of Denmark and its cartoonists. In The Most Important Nielsen Rating, Lee Harris recommends “a simple and less fattening way of standing firm with Denmark”:

Buy one of the marvelous symphonies of the Danish composer, Carl Nielsen (1865-1931).

Are Russian male figure skaters as gay as American ones?

Friday, February 17th, 2006

Steve Sailer publically asks questions many Americans privately ask in their own living rooms — like Are Russian male figure skaters as gay as American ones?

Wealthy African-Americans are using DNA kits to trace their roots

Friday, February 17th, 2006

Gary Younge explains that Wealthy African-Americans are using DNA kits to trace their roots:

Oprah is a Zulu. Never mind that she was born and raised in Mississippi and her great grandparents hailed from no further away than Georgia and North Carolina, Ms Winfrey, the queen of the televised confessional, is not just suggesting her lineage might stretch back thousands of years to a specific African tribe. She is asserting it as a definitive fact. “I always wondered what it would be like if it turned out I am a South African. I feel so at home here … Do you know that I actually am one?” she told an audience of 3,200 in Johannesburg last year. “I went in search of my roots and had my DNA tested, and I am a Zulu.”
[...]
Whatever Oprah’s belief about her ancestry, her assertion that she is Zulu is no less misleading [than James Frey's fictionalized memoir].

According to most historical accounts, the Zulu nation was consolidated only after the departure of slaves from West Africa to the Americas. Moreover, there is little in the way of genetic lineage that comes close to matching a particular linguistic group such as the Zulu nation. When Oprah had her DNA tested for the programme, the results suggested her most likely match was from the Kpelles tribe of Liberia. Indeed she was told that she could not have come from South Africa. None of this is likely to stop her claiming the Zulus as her kith and kin. “I’m crazy about the South African accent,” she said. “I wish I had been born here.”