We can’t defeat “global extremism” without discrediting the ideology behind it, T. Greer argues:
At the turn of the twentieth century, China, Japan, and Korea saw vast changes in the shape of their society because the old Neo-Confucian world view that had upheld the old order had been discredited. In Europe both communism and fascism rose to horrific heights because the old ideology of classical liberalism that had hitherto held sway was discredited. As a global revolutionary force communism itself withered away because the events that closed the 20th century left it discredited. If Americans do not worry about communist revolutionaries anymore it is because communism was so thoroughly discredited that there is no one left in the world who is willing to pick up arms in its name.
We cannot “win” this fight, in the long term, unless we can discredit the ideology that gives this fight teeth.
Luckily for us, this does not require discrediting a fourteen hundred year old religion held by one fifth of the world’s population. It is worth reminding ourselves that the ideology we seek to discredit is a comparatively new one. It was born in the sands of Najd shortly before Arabia became “Saudi,” crystallized in its present form only in the 1960s, and was not exported abroad until the late 1980s. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict excepted, almost all “Islamist” terrorist attacks can be linked directly to this new Salafi-Jihadist ideology and the madrassas and proselytizing media used to spread it. It is an ideology that directly threatens the sovereign rulers of every country in the Near East, and one whose interpretations are not only opposed by the majority of Islamic theologians, but have little relation to the way Islam was practiced in most places a mere 30 years ago.
That an ideology is new or rebels against established world views does not make it less dangerous. Novelty also says little about a movement’s future success–once upon a time Protestantism was a novel ideology. I encourage people to use this analogy. Think of these Salafi reformers as you do the first wave of Protestant reformers back in the 16th century. The comparison is apt not only because the goal of the Salafi-Jihadists is, like the original Protestants, to bring religious practice back to a pure and original form, or because the savagery displayed by many of the Protestant reformers was quite comparable to ISIS at its worst, but because this comparison gives you a sense of the stakes that are at play. This is a game where the shape of entire civilizations are on the table. The Salafi-Jihadists want to change the way billions of people worship, think, and live out their daily lives. ISIS’s success in the Near East gives us a clear picture of exactly what kind of society the Salafi-Jihadists envision for the Ummah.
I will not mince words: humankind faces few catastrophes more terrible than allowing Salafi-Jihadist reformers to hijack Islamic civilization. Theirs is an ideology utterly hostile to human progress and prosperity, and their victory, if attained, will come at great human cost. The Protestants secured their Reformation with one of the most destructive wars of European history; there is little reason to think Salafi-Jihadist victories will be any less disastrous. Not every ‘great game’ of international power politics is played for civilization-level stakes. But that is exactly what is at stake here. We must plan accordingly.
1. Salafi theology is highly conservative and anti-jihadi, anti-political, so it is a central error to equate it with ISIS ideology. This is the Saudi-funded theology of many mosques throughout the West.
2. ISIS is not a grassroots movement. It was created in response to Iran-Syria issues by the Gulf States, much like they created the legions of OBL against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. In both cases, the Syrian rebels or Afghan jihadis had logistical and funding support from the Gulf States, with intelligence acquiescence, if not support, from elements in NATO and Israel. Most of the fighters are criminal elements released from Gulf prisons or mercenaries fighting for money and adventure. Hostages relate that ISIS leaders have little knowledge of Islamic theology or practice. Officially, the Gulf States oppose this ideology as critical of monarchical rule.
The Salafi sect, mainstream in most American cities, is non-violent, supportive of the Gulf monarchies, and opposed to ISIS jihadism as a form of apostasy.
The presence of ISIS has hurt the conservative social salafi sect through confusion of the two. ISIS has damaged political religiosity in Islam much like the Islamic brotherhood did.
Political islam has been hurt for at least a generation, which is a benefit to opponents of westernization of Islamic societies.
Finally, for religious Christians and Jews, the demise of political Islam discredited by ISIS is of great harm and a weapon to bludgeon social conservatives of any faith, who resist social justice warriors, political correctness, and increasing international dependence — neoliberal IMF economics.