Evading the Japanese

Thursday, September 12th, 2013

Oliver RasmussenIn the run up to the Allied invasion of the Japanese home islands, Task Force 38 struck coastal targets and shipping on Hokkaido, where it lost eight Curtiss SB2C Helldivers:

One of the Helldivers lost was flown by Lt.(jg) Howard Eagleston, who descended too low under the overcast and struck a mountain in rural Hokkaido. He was killed on impact, but his gunner, 23-year old radioman Oliver Rasmussen, survived. With only the clothes he wore and an empty backpack, Rasmussen knew all too well what the Japanese did to their prisoners and decided he’d chance it in the Hokkaido wilderness. Being part Chippewa Indian from Minnesota, Rasmussen had come from an impoverished family (he referred to them as “the second generation right out of the teepee”) but had spent his youth in the great outdoors. Having only a vague idea of his general location, Rasmussen spent seventeen days trekking to the coast, living off the land and avoiding any Japanese residents he came across. On 31 July upon reaching the coast, Rasmussen found his first source of significant food — a farmer’s cow near his hideout would provide the sailor fresh milk for nine straight nights — each night he’d creep out to the cow and help himself to the milk and return to his hideout. The farmer never figured out what was going on, eventually turning to cow lose figuring she was longer able to produce any milk.

Rasmussen then built a small boat and tried to head out to sea, but the breakers on that particular stretch of coastline proved hazardous. He retreated back up into the mountains of Hokkaido and set up quarters in an abandoned railroad shack where he kept himself fed with raw onions, birds’ eggs, uncooked rice and frog legs. On 16 August, the day after the Japanese surrender, he was spotting by a Japanese civilian, but not aware the Japan had surrendered, Rasmussen abandoned his hideout and sought new refuge. After several days of exploring, he found a site well-hidden that was within easy reach of five farms. He scavenged some scrap lumber to build a small shelter and helped himself to the produce and milk from the five farms each night. As he hadn’t bathed in weeks, one of the farms’ dogs got his scent on 5 September and the owners went to investigate. He managed to knock over some of the farmers as he made a narrow escape back into the wilderness. Each day he noted more and more American aircraft flying overhead, but he was unable to get their attention. He did find it odd, though, that they attracted no defensive fire and it didn’t appear that they were conducting any offensive strikes.

Frustrated that he wasn’t able to attract any passing aircraft and growing weary of being in the wilderness, he opted for the direct approach on 19 September and walked into the port city of Tomakomai and presented himself to the local police station to surrender. To Rasmussen’s surprise, the police chief treated him as a guest with his first real meal in ten weeks and a bath. It was then that he found out about Japan’s unconditional surrender on 15 August. Rather amusingly, the police chief asked Rasmussen if he knew anything about the rash of milk and produce thefts from local farms over the past several weeks- to which Rasmussen denied any knowledge. After an astonishing sixty-eight days in the Japanese wilderness, he was returned to the USS Shangri-La to a hero’s welcome.

Al Fin Next Level

Wednesday, September 11th, 2013

Al Fin’s blogs did not go gentle into that good night, he explains:

Google made the decision to block all administrative access to the Al Fin blogs back in January. So far I have not been able to get them to reverse their decision. I cannot access the blogs in order to redirect readers to the new site. I will continue to leave comments at particular sites where former Al Fin readers might congregate.

I have been busy with other projects, while trying to get better at using WordPress so that I can produce informative and timely articles with little effort.

He calls his new blog Al Fin Next Level.

(Hat tip to our Slovenian guest.)

Left-Handedness in the Ultimate Fighting Championship

Wednesday, September 11th, 2013

Left-handedness isn’t good for you — it’s “associated with fitness-lowering traits” — but being a southpaw yields a certain advantage in many sports — and in fighting, which is why it has persisted so long, the evolutionary story goes.

So, researchers decided to look at left-handedness in the Ultimate Fighting Championship:

The finding that left-handers are overrepresented in many combat sports is interpreted as evidence for this hypothesis. However, few studies have examined sports that show good similarity with realistic fights and analysed winning chances in relation to handedness of both fighters. We examined both, in a sample of the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC), a fierce fighting sport hardly constrained by rules. Left-handers were strongly overrepresented as compared to the general male population but no advantage for left-handers when facing right-handers was found, providing only partial evidence for the fighting hypothesis.

I would say that finding left-handers overrepresented is rather strong evidence that being left-handed is helpful, since anyone fighting competitively is in the top fraction of one percent of fighters.

Conversely, not winning more often suggests very little, once the pool of competitors has already been selected for fighting ability — and matched up by fighting ability.

We Almost Had a Giant Robot Spy Blimp

Wednesday, September 11th, 2013

We almost had a giant robot spy blimp, but the project was mismanaged, and now we may never get a cool airship:

Airships fought on the front lines for nearly a century. Hundreds were built for use in World Wars I and II. The U.S. Navy, one of the last major military airship users, finally retired its fleet of patrol blimps in the 1960s and replaced them with airplanes and helicopters. For nearly 50 years the idea of lighter-than-air weaponry lay dormant, giant abandoned hangars in California, New Jersey and North Carolina the only evidence of its glorious past.

Then the U.S. invaded Afghanistan and Iraq and found itself hunting elusive insurgents in crowded Iraqi cities and the vast Afghan countryside. Bad guys could hide out for days or weeks before striking. Planes, copters and even unmanned drones lacked the endurance to wait out these patient attackers.

So the Army installed video cameras on simple, tethered balloons and sent them thousands of feet into the air to watch over combat outposts. It was a small conceptual leap to untether the airship, add motors and remote controls and use them to patrol vast swaths of hostile territory for potentially weeks at a time — far longer than any manned aircraft or winged drone can manage.

And cheaper, too. Because of their buoyancy and relative simplicity, airships are highly fuel efficient and easy to maintain and thus cheaper than heavier-than-air craft, in many cases. A jet fighter like an F-16 can cost $20,000 or more per flight hour for fuel and repairs. Large airships generally cost as little as a third as much per hour.

Blue Devil Blimp in Hanger

With a budget of more than $200 million, JIEDDO teamed up with the Air Force and Mav6, a Virginia-based aerospace start-up, to develop the Blue Devil II unmanned airship starting in 2010. Blue Devil would be a traditional blimp, its lift provided entirely by light, expansive helium gas. But on the inside, Blue Devil would pack some of the most sophisticated — and expensive — sensors and communications hardware ever developed.

By contrast, the Army wanted a somewhat more complex airship with less complex gear. The LEMV would be a so-called “hybrid airship,” which gets its lift from a combination of helium and also a flattened body that acts somewhat like a wing. Starting out, the LEMV’s cameras and radios would be roughly the same as those already used by Army drones.

LEMV and Blue Devil had similar technology and aims and began at around the same time; they couldn’t help but compete for funding. Moreover both new airships were supposed to be ready for combat trials in Afghanistan in 2011. The frontline testing would be expensive: $190 million for a year’s flying for just a single airship, according to one estimate. It wasn’t at all clear that Congress and the Pentagon would be willing to fund both.

LEMV Airship Floating Low

After two years of work costing more than $200 million, Blue Devil was 95 percent complete, inflated with $350,000 worth of helium, gently bobbing in Mav6′s North Carolina hangar awaiting the installation of cameras and radios.

That March the Air Force abruptly pulled the plug on Blue Devil, citing weight growth, schedule delays and cost overruns. “It doesn’t make sense,” one Mav6 employee mourned. The tiny company would later divest all its aerospace activities.

Blue Devil’s demise left LEMV as the military’s only major airship program. But the Army airship was suffering all the same problems that had plagued the Air Force model, albeit in near-total secrecy. The Air Force had publicly criticized Blue Devil’s troubled development. By contrast, the Army and Northrop cheerily reported only steady progress on LEMV despite repeated delays. “We’re about to fly the thing!” Northrop spokesman K.C. Brown, Jr., crowed in May 2012.

Six tons overweight, tens of millions over-budget and months late, the first LEMV took off for its debut flight that August. For 90 minutes the football-field-length airship motored at low altitude over the forests and fields of central New Jersey, returning as the sun was setting. Although meant to be robotic, for the initial flight LEMV had a pilot aboard.

“LEMV was designed, built and flown in a short 24 months, a considerable accomplishment for a vehicle of this scale and complexity,” Northrop boasted in a statement — as though a mere six-month delay (it was actually nine months) weren’t a total disaster for a program sold on the promise of an 18-month development.

Couldn’t you prototype this concept with a cheap hydrogen blimp, existing surveillance package, and off-the-shelf R/C components?

Project West Ford

Tuesday, September 10th, 2013

In 1963, the United States launched half a billion whisker-thin copper wires into orbit as part of Project West Ford:

The Air Force and Department of Defense envisioned the West Ford ring as the largest radio antenna in human history. Its goal was to protect the nation’s long-range communications in the event of an attack from the increasingly belligerent Soviet Union.

During the late 1950’s, long-range communications relied on undersea cables or over-the-horizon radio. These were robust, but not invulnerable. Should the Soviets have attacked an undersea telephone or telegraph cable, America would only have been able to rely on radio broadcasts to communicate overseas. But the fidelity of the ionosphere, the layer of the atmosphere that makes most long-range radio broadcasts possible, is at the mercy of the sun: It is routinely disrupted by solar storms. The U.S. military had identified a problem.

A potential solution was born in 1958 at MIT’s Lincoln Labs, a research station on Hanscom Air Force Base northwest of Boston. Project Needles, as it was originally known, was Walter E. Morrow’s idea. He suggested that if Earth possessed a permanent radio reflector in the form of an orbiting ring of copper threads, America’s long-range communications would be immune from solar disturbances and out of reach of nefarious Soviet plots.

Each copper wire was about 1.8 centimeters in length. This was half the wavelength of the 8 GHz transmission signal beamed from Earth, effectively turning each filament into what is known as a dipole antenna. The antennas would boost long-range radio broadcasts without depending on the fickle ionosphere.

[...]

On October 21, 1961, NASA launched the first batch of West Ford dipoles into space. A day later, this first payload had failed to deploy from the spacecraft, and its ultimate fate was never completely determined.

“U.S.A. Dirties Space” read a headline in the Soviet newspaper Pravda.

Ambassador Adlai Stevenson was forced to make a statement before the UN declaring that the U.S. would consult more closely with international scientists before attempting another launch. Many remained unsatisfied. Cambridge astronomer Fred Hoyle went so far as to accuse the U.S. of undertaking a military project under “a façade of respectability,” referring to West Ford as an “intellectual crime.”

On May 9, 1963, a second West Ford launch successfully dispersed its spindly cargo approximately 3,500 kilometers above the Earth, along an orbit that crossed the North and South Pole. Voice transmissions were successfully relayed between California and Massachusetts, and the technical aspects of the experiment were declared a success. As the dipole needles continued to disperse, the transmissions fell off considerably, although the experiment proved the strategy could work in principle.

Concern about the clandestine and military nature of West Ford continued following this second launch. On May 24 of that year, the The Harvard Crimson quoted British radio astronomer Sir Bernard Lovell as saying, “The damage lies not with this experiment alone, but with the attitude of mind which makes it possible without international agreement and safeguards.”

[...]

Because the copper wires were so light, project leaders assumed that they would re-enter the atmosphere within several years, pushed Earthward by solar wind. Most of the needles from the failed 1961 and successful 1963 launch likely met this fate. Many now lie beneath snow at the poles.

But not all the needles returned to Earth. Thanks to a design flaw, it’s possible that several hundred, perhaps thousands of clusters of clumped needles still reside in orbit around Earth, along with the spacecraft that carried them.

The copper needles were embedded in a naphthalene gel designed to evaporate quickly once it reached the vacuum of space, dispersing the needles in a thin cloud. But this design allowed metal-on-metal contact, which, in a vacuum, can weld fragments into larger clumps.

In 2001, the European Space Agency published a report that analyzed the fate of needle clusters from the two West Ford payloads. Unlike the lone needles, these chains and clumps have the potential to remain in orbit for several decades, and NORAD space debris databases list several dozen still aloft from the 1963 mission. But the ESA report suggests that, because the 1961 payload failed to disperse, thousands more clusters could have been deployed, and several may be too small to track.

Please note that prominent opponents of the project included Pravda and The Harvard Crimson.

(Hat tip to our Slovenian guest.)

Your New Tech Bro Nightmare

Tuesday, September 10th, 2013

So, ValleyWag finds @paxdickinson, declares him “your new tech bro nightmare”, and gets him fired — but that’s not enough.

Nobody expects the Progressive Inquisition.

AA-12

Tuesday, September 10th, 2013

If you’ve been keeping up with Breaking Bad, then you recently saw — spoiler alert! — the AA-12 fully-automatic shotgun in action:

(I can’t be the only one who finds that macho-yet-breathless delivery grating.)

A Bullet with Wings

Tuesday, September 10th, 2013

In 1945, when the Bell X-1 was on the drawing board, there wasn’t a large body of technical knowledge on supersonic flight:

Bell’s engineers tried to fill in the data gaps on supersonic flight by observing objects known to fly at supersonic speeds — in this case, the .50 caliber round. Discussions with ballistics experts concluded that little was known about the aerodynamics of the round after it was fired, but since there was no question that it was stable at high speeds, its shape formed the basis for the X-1′s fuselage.

Bell X-1

In Syria, America Loses if Either Side Wins

Monday, September 9th, 2013

In Syria, America loses if either side wins, Edward Luttwak suggests:

Indeed, it would be disastrous if President Bashar al-Assad’s regime were to emerge victorious after fully suppressing the rebellion and restoring its control over the entire country. Iranian money, weapons and operatives and Hezbollah troops have become key factors in the fighting, and Mr. Assad’s triumph would dramatically affirm the power and prestige of Shiite Iran and Hezbollah, its Lebanon-based proxy — posing a direct threat both to the Sunni Arab states and to Israel.

But a rebel victory would also be extremely dangerous for the United States and for many of its allies in Europe and the Middle East. That’s because extremist groups, some identified with Al Qaeda, have become the most effective fighting force in Syria. If those rebel groups manage to win, they would almost certainly try to form a government hostile to the United States. Moreover, Israel could not expect tranquillity on its northern border if the jihadis were to triumph in Syria.

Luttwak recently wrote about China’s lack of strategic thought and shared his thoughts on Conversations with History:

(Hat tip to our Slovenian guest.)

Cognitive Science Meets Pre-Algebra

Monday, September 9th, 2013

If you need to practice multiple skills, you’ll do better and your practice will go more smoothly if you give each skill it’s own block of time — but you’ll improve more if you interleave skills into the same training session.

Finally this bit of cognitive science meets pre-algebra in a Tampa experiment sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences in the Department of Education:

The students were split into two groups. Half got interleaved assignments on the first two problem types — linear equations and word problems — and regular, blocked assignments on the second two types. The other half got the reverse: blocked homework for linear equations and word problems, and interleaved for graphs and slopes. The students scored near zero on these kinds of problems at the beginning of the study.

For the teachers involved in the study, the mixed assignments seemed, essentially, like review work. “Sometimes we do what we call ‘bell work,’ which is where we give them a little review before each class,” said Brendan Paul, another Liberty math teacher who helped run the study. “The difference here is that the review is built into the homework, every day.”

Though the interleaved homework took longer at first, most of the students adjusted. “I usually need a lot of time to study for tests,” said Marigny Duga, who was a student in Mr. Paul’s class, “but doing this mixed homework, I felt like, when the test was coming I needed less time than usual, because everything was still pretty fresh in my head.”

Over nine weeks, each student in the study got 10 assignments with 12 problems each. Same students, same problems. But each student got half a semester of mixed homework, and half a semester of blocked.

Two weeks after the last homework assignment, the researchers gave a surprise cumulative test.

The results were striking. Students scored 72 percent, on average, on the interleaved material. They scored 38 percent on the homework-as-usual problems. This is a large difference, but it’s not unheard of in laboratory studies of interleaved practice, experts said.

Similar Mind, Brain and Education methods include spaced repetition and retrieval practice.

Next War: Korea

Monday, September 9th, 2013

Looking at the map that comes with the war game Next War: Korea tells you a number of things about a potential second Korean War:

First, the mountain ranges in the middle of the peninsula split any conflict into two different wars, a west coast war and an east coast one. Second, there are barriers to invading the South, rivers such as the Han and the mountain ranges that run across the center of the country. These make formidable obstacles.

Next War Korea Map

Seoul is only a day’s march (or an hour’s drive) from the DMZ, which makes defending it hard. To top it off, the low, flat plain between Seoul and the DMZ, although fortified, is like a shotgun barrel pointed at the South Korean capital.

Wargames can also be great for data visualization. Quoting numbers of infantry, tanks and aircraft stationed on the Korean peninsula is one thing, but seeing individual units in their actual defensive locations, or stacked up in attack echelons just north of the border, has a way of illustrating just how dangerous the situation on the Korean peninsula really is, and what each side’s chances of survival actually are.

Run all that information through a simulation, and things start to happen that look like a real war.

It turns out North Korea could win:

The war starts with a combination of North Korean missile strikes, Special Operations Forces raids and sabotage targeting allied air bases across South Korea. These asymmetrical attacks have cripple the allies’ high-tech fighters and attack jets, and what helicopter units remain flyable are limited in the overcast weather. It could be a week before allied planes are in the air in meaningful numbers.

In the meantime, South Korea’s standing army and the Americans of the 2nd Infantry Division are on their own.

Lessons learned:

  • The U.S. is putting too much faith in air power
  • Reservists are great, but a bigger standing South Korean army is better
  • As janky as it is, the North Korean Air Force still has value
  • Seoul is crazy close to the border
  • Turning Seoul into a ‘sea of fire’ is a bad idea
  • The longer it takes the North to win, the more likely it will lose
  • The North Korean bomb is impractical in an invasion scenario
  • South Korea’s expensive, new blue-water navy is not at all helpful
  • The next Korean war doesn’t need stealth fighters, unless…

Automation Paradox

Sunday, September 8th, 2013

Aircrew call it the automation paradox:

A growing body of evidence indicates that while cockpit automation may be relieving pilots of mundane chores when their workload is actually low (ie, while climbing to altitude and cruising), it is causing bigger headaches than ever when the workload is particularly high (ie, during take-off, descent, approach and landing).

This has taken its toll on their “stick-and-rudder” skills:

Instead of flying their planes, flight crew now spend most of their time in the air programming and monitoring various pieces of equipment (a typical airliner has around 90 automated systems on board), inputting data and checking that everything is working correctly.

Many of today’s younger pilots (especially in the rapidly expanding markets of Asia and the Middle East) have had little opportunity to hone their airmanship in air forces, general aviation or local flying clubs, allowing them to amass long hours of hand-flying various aircraft in all sorts of weather conditions and emergencies. As a result, the tendency among pilots today is to trust a plane’s automation more than their own skill and judgment.

I’ve mentioned Korean pilots before.

Masterful pilots are slowly disappearing:

Pilots with Chesley “Sully” Sullenberger III’s background are becoming the exception rather than the rule. Captain Sullenberger, readers will recall, carefully ditched his Airbus A320 close to a jetty in the Hudson River in January 2009 without loss of a single life, after the plane had been disabled by a flock of geese while climbing out of LaGuardia airport. It should be pointed out that Sully learned to fly at the age of 16, flew F-4 Phantoms in the air force, and had 40 years and 20,000 hours of mostly hands-on experience when he performed his heroics on the Hudson.

The problem today is that aircrew may log thousands of hours on the flight decks of modern airliners, but their actual hands-on flying experience may amount to mere minutes per flight. When things get frantic — whether through a mistaken input or a sudden runway change by air-traffic control during descent — aircrew can be so preoccupied punching fresh instructions into the flight-management computer that they may fail to notice their airspeed and altitude are falling precipitously.

This reduction in situation awareness, along with the degradation of basic piloting skills and a huge increase in cognitive workload on flight crew are all part of the unintended consequences of cockpit automation. Combined, such human factors can quickly lead to disaster.

America’s two recent fatal air crashes — the Asiana Boeing 777 passenger jet on final approach into San Francisco international airport on July 6th and the United Parcel Service Airbus A300 freighter coming into land at Birmingham airport in Alabama on August 14th — are cases in point. Though investigations have barely begun, both situations point to distractions the pilots faced while trying to take control of the aircraft. In both instances, the pilots seem to have been unaware, until the last few minutes, of their proximity to the ground and of how slowly their planes were flying. Both finished up crashing short of the runway.

In both instances, federal investigators have found little evidence of equipment failure before the crash.

(Hat tip to Jonathan Jeckell.)

Something Better Than a Parachute

Sunday, September 8th, 2013

As the Vietnam War escalated and the USAF saw more air crews shot down, thoughts turned toward something better than a parachute:

The USAF began to discuss with aircraft manufacturers and designers if there wasn’t a way to package an ultralight aircraft or glider into part of the ejection seat and cockpit that would give shot-down air crew more options on bail out. Proposals were issued to the industry in 1967 and Bensen Aircraft Corporation, a well-known builder of homebuilt autogyro aircraft, submitted an unpowered version of one of their autogyros to be used as an autogyro glider. Bensen’s proposals easily won the USAF over and contracts were issued in 1968 and the program received the X-plane designation of X-25A (a powered version) and X-25B (unpowered glider version). A third version called the DDV (Discretionary Descent Vehicle) was an even lighter and simpler version of the X-25B designed for one time use with automatic blade deployment to become a rotor chute even from a supersonic ejection.

X-25 Autogyro

The USAF took delivery of the X-25A and X-25B on 16 February 1968 and immediately embarked on a series of flights to determine the length of a pilot training cycle necessary to master the autogyro controls. [...] All 20 pilots were able to master the X-25B within 30 minutes.

The winding down of the Vietnam War ended interest in the autogyro solution.

How hard is English?

Saturday, September 7th, 2013

How hard is it to learn a language? It depends on how close it is to your native tongue. But is it possible to describe a language’s difficulty in the abstract?

English-speakers often point to a language like Latin or Ancient Greek. Next to them, in one important respect, English is easy. The distinction involves a language’s “inflectional morphology”, or the bits and pieces added to a noun or adjective or verb to make it match up with other pieces in a sentence. An English verb has a maximum of five forms (speak, speaks, speaking, spoke, spoken), whereas verbs in Spanish or Latin can take dozens of forms. An English noun usually has only two forms (singular and plural), whereas the Greek or Russian noun takes numerous forms showing grammatical gender, number and case.

This kind of inflection is not a terrible proxy for that slippery idea of “difficulty”. Where are the world’s hardest languages, then? Is English one of them? One study, by Gary Lupyan and Rick Dale in 2010, looked closely at inflection. It found that highly inflected languages tend to be spoken by a small number of speakers, and have few neighbours. But languages with big groups of speakers, or many neighbouring languages, systematically tend to have fewer inflections. Why is that? The hypothesis is that as a language spreads over centuries, it is learned by many non-natives (trading partners, conquered subjects and the like). Adults, learning a foreign language imperfectly, avoid using non-necessary endings. And many endings in any language are non-necessary, if other clues (like word order in a sentence) can be recruited to do the same things that word endings do — say, distinguishing the subject of a sentence from its direct object. As languages spread and grow, they are more likely to rely on clues like word order than on word-endings. So “big” languages are “simple”. Under this schema, English fits both criteria: relatively big and relatively simple.

Of course, what’s hard about English is its irregularity, especially when it comes to spelling and pronunciation.

Oxysterol consumption and heart disease

Saturday, September 7th, 2013

Fred A Kummerow is a 98-year-old emeritus professor of comparative biosciences at the University of Illinois, and he has been studying heart disease for a long, long time:

There have been no fundamental advances in coronary heart disease since the meeting that Dr Page had in Cleveland in 1955, where he invited 103 lipid chemists to a symposium focusing on the role of lipids in heart disease, as he related in his book, The Chemistry of Lipids as Related to Atherosclerosis. In this meeting, it was established that high levels of cholesterol in the plasma were responsible for the development of atherosclerosis. Testing for cholesterol levels such as LDL, HDL and other lipid levels was established in 1961 by the American Heart Association.

Based on the misconception that cholesterol was the main cause of heart disease, pharmaceutical companies started developing drugs to lower the levels of cholesterol in patients with hyperglycemia. By the end of 1980s, doctors started prescribing statins and in my view, the biggest setback in heart disease treatment has been the overuse of statins for the treatment of high cholesterol. Statins work by reducing the 2 g of cholesterol per day produced by cells in the liver and can cause adverse effects in the body such as raised levels of liver enzymes and muscle issues such as rhabdomyolysis.

Sales of statin medications nearly tripled when the National Cholesterol Education Program revised its guidelines to recommend statins as a prophylactic for many heart issues. Although the Education Board cited randomized trials to back statin treatment for primary prevention of occlusive cardiovascular disease, a description in a paper from The Lancet states “not one of the studies provides such evidence”.

Atherosclerosis in modern humans is based on the biochemistry of three of the five phospholipids in the cell membranes of the coronary arteries:

My findings indicate fried foods, powdered egg yolk, excess vegetable oils, partially hydrogenated vegetable oils and cigarette smoke as the greatest culprits in heart disease. Fried foods and powdered food substitutes are dietary sources of oxysterols, which alter the phospholipid membranes of our arteries in ways that increase the deposition of calcium, a key hallmark of atherosclerosis. Consumption of excess polyunsaturated fats stimulates the formation of oxysterols within the human body. Cigarette smoke and trans fats from partially hydrogenated vegetable oils interfere with fatty acid metabolism, leading to the interruption of blood flow, a major contributor to heart attacks and sudden death. In my opinion, many of these factors have been largely ignored by the medical establishment, which has focused instead on using drugs to lower cholesterol levels.