A Handy Bunch

Wednesday, August 4th, 2010

Modern humans are a handy bunch — much handier than the first handy man, Homo habilis:

Handy man made tools, but they were crude. That could be because his wrists and hands were still pretty ape-like. Now, apes make tools. Scientists have trained a bonobo, called Kanzi, to do that. But Kanzi’s not much good at it.

“He just can’t get the motions down,” Williams says. That’s because he can’t grip the stones, his thumbs aren’t long enough and his fingers are too long and he’s clumsy. He can’t move his wrists — he can’t extend his wrist and get this important “snap.” He makes a mess.

An ape’s brain is up to the task, but his anatomy isn’t. He doesn’t have the hands. It took millions of years of evolution to produce the hands of a skilled flint-knapper like [Dennis Sandgathe, an archaeologist from Simon Fraser University in Canada].
[...]
On an office table, Orr has laid out the skeletal hands of three apes and a human. The apes’ hands are enormous — the orangutan’s is like a catcher’s mitt.

But their thumbs are tiny and splayed out to the side; the fingers are long and curved. They look powerful, but Orr says the strength runs vertically, from the wrist up through the fingers. That’s good for hanging on tree limbs, but not for much else.

The human hand is smaller, and it works differently. Orr hands me a two-foot-long club to illustrate.

“Here, try to hold this without using your little finger, and just using those other digits,” he says. That’s the way an ape might hold it. I make to swing it but realize it will fly out of my hand if I do.

The strength in my hand extends across my palm. My thumb is stronger, and so is my pinky. I can wrap that thumb over my other fingers and then secure the grip at the bottom with my pinkie. An ape can’t manage that very well.

And my opposed thumb and wider fingertips also mean I can grip a round stone — like a hammerstone — with more control than an ape can.
[...]
“When I flip the arm over so that the palm is up you can see, underneath these tendons, that we have just a ton of muscles that are just in our palms that help us finely move our fingers.”

It’s a spider’s web of muscles and tendons under the skin, many of them unique to the human hand. The hand’s exquisite architecture allows us to play Bach, shuffle a deck of cards, or write poetry — the things we often think of that define us as human. And all it took to get it was a few million years of whacking two rocks against each other.

The Human Edge

Tuesday, August 3rd, 2010

NPR has a “special series” on how evolution gave us the human edge.

Naturally the piece on shoulder anatomy and thrown weapons caught my attention:

Shea explains that the secret of the modern shoulder is its ability to move the arm in almost any direction, even behind the back. That, combined with other early human traits, enabled us to throw with power and accuracy.

“We have a wrist that can move like a whip, that can accelerate through throwing,” he explains. “And your gluteus muscles — you know, your rear end, your thighs, your calves — these are things that make for good running, but they also make for good throwing.”

Early humans first used rocks as weapons to kill prey. As our bodies evolved, we became more able to use advanced weapons like spears and bows and arrows.

It also caught my attention that NPR was presenting the case that a meat-based diet made us smarter:

Our earliest ancestors ate their food raw — fruit, leaves, maybe some nuts. When they ventured down onto land, they added things like underground tubers, roots and berries.

It wasn’t a very high-calorie diet, so to get the energy you needed, you had to eat a lot and have a big gut to digest it all. But having a big gut has its drawbacks.

“You can’t have a large brain and big guts at the same time,” explains Leslie Aiello, an anthropologist and director of the Wenner-Gren Foundation in New York City, which funds research on evolution. Digestion, she says, was the energy-hog of our primate ancestor’s body. The brain was the poor stepsister who got the leftovers.

Until, that is, we discovered meat.

“What we think is that this dietary change around 2.3 million years ago was one of the major significant factors in the evolution of our own species,” Aiello says.

That period is when cut marks on animal bones appeared — not a predator’s tooth marks, but incisions that could have been made only by a sharp tool. That’s one sign of our carnivorous conversion. But Aiello’s favorite clue is somewhat ickier — it’s a tapeworm. “The closest relative of human tapeworms are tapeworms that affect African hyenas and wild dogs,” she says.

So sometime in our evolutionary history, she explains, “we actually shared saliva with wild dogs and hyenas.” That would have happened if, say, we were scavenging on the same carcass that hyenas were.

But dining with dogs was worth it. Meat is packed with lots of calories and fat. Our brain — which uses about 20 times as much energy as the equivalent amount of muscle — piped up and said, “Please, sir, I want some more.”

Sibfox

Tuesday, August 3rd, 2010

When I first heard about the Siberian farm fox experiment, I thought, someone has to sell these domesticated silver foxes in America — and now someone is doing just that:

Are foxes expensive?

Just like some dog breeds, foxes are fairly expensive and are offered at $5,950.

Transportation from Russia and extensive paperwork is a significant part of the cost.

Can I breed tame foxes?

Institute of Cytology and Genetics is the only breeder for domesticated silver foxes that were selected for many generations. All foxes come neutered. It is illegal to breed Sibirian tame foxes bought from Siberian farm.

Morphosaurs

Sunday, August 1st, 2010

My childhood knowledge of dinosaurs is drifting away — not from senescence but from obsolescence. First they went from slow and cold-blooded to quick and warm-blooded. Then the brontosaur reverted to the apatosaur. Now the triceratops may be a torosaur:

Triceratops had three facial horns and a short, thick neck-frill with a saw-toothed edge. Torosaurus also had three horns, though at different angles, and a much longer, thinner, smooth-edged frill with two large holes in it. So it’s not surprising that Othniel Marsh, who discovered both in the late 1800s, considered them to be separate species.

Now [ John Scannella and Jack Horner at the Museum of the Rockies in Bozeman, Montana] say that triceratops is merely the juvenile form of torosaurus. As the animal aged, its horns changed shape and orientation and its frill became longer, thinner and less jagged. Finally it became fenestrated, producing the classic torosaurus form (see diagram, [left]).

This extreme shape-shifting was possible because the bone tissue in the frill and horns stayed immature, spongy and riddled with blood vessels, never fully hardening into solid bone as happens in most animals during early adulthood. The only modern animal known to do anything similar is the cassowary, descended from the dinosaurs, which develops a large spongy crest when its skull is about 80 per cent fully grown.

Robins can literally see magnetic fields

Monday, July 19th, 2010

Robins can literally see magnetic fields — but only if their right eye can see clearly:

Years of careful research have told us that the ability depends on light and particularly on the right eye and the left half of the brain. The details still aren’t quite clear but, for now, the most likely explanation involves a molecule called cryptochrome. Cryptochrome is found in the light-sensitive cells of a bird’s retina and scientists think that it affects just how sensitive those cells are.

When cryptochrome is struck by blue light, it shifts into an active state where it has an unpaired electron — these particles normally waltz in pairs but here, they dance solo. The same thing happens in a companion molecule called FAD. Together, cryptochrome and FAD, both with unpaired electrons, are known as a “radical pair”. Magnetic fields act upon the unpaired electrons and govern how long it takes for the radical pair to revert back to their normal, inactive state. And because cryptochrome affects the sensitivity of a bird’s retina, so do magnetic fields.

The upshot is that magnetic fields put up a filter of light or dark patches over what a bird normally sees. These patches change as the bird turns and tilts its head, providing it with a visual compass made out of contrasting shades.

To test the bounds of this ability, Stapput wanted to see what would happen if she blurred a robin’s vision. She outfitted her robins with somewhat unflattering goggles, with clear foil on one side and frosted foil on the other. Both allowed 70% of light to get through, but the frosted foil disrupted the clarity of the image.

The robins were kept in cages until they were ready to migrate and let loose in funnel-shaped cages lined with correction fluid. As they orientated themselves and changed course, they created scratches on the cage walls which told Stapput which direction they were heading in. These scratches revealed that with both eyes open, the robins flew straight north as they would normally do in the wild. If their left field of vision was frosted, they went the same way. But if their right eye was covered, they became disorientated, heading in completely random directions.

Jihad Monkeys

Friday, July 16th, 2010

When Next Media Animation’s CGI recreation of Tiger Woods’ car crash became an Internet sensation, we had to know they’d make more.

Now NMA has produced a video depicting the People’s Daily‘s ludicrous claim that the Taliban are training monkeys to shoot AK-47s:

Cats with Big Guns

Thursday, July 8th, 2010

Everyone knows that the sabertooth “tiger” (Smilodon fatalis) had massive fangs — I can’t bring myself to call the big cat’s teeth canines — but its secret weapon was exceptional forelimb strength:

The sabertooth cat, Smilodon fatalis, was an enigmatic predator without a true living analog. Their elongate canine teeth were more vulnerable to fracture than those of modern felids, making it imperative for them to immobilize prey with their forelimbs when making a kill. As a result, their need for heavily muscled forelimbs likely exceeded that of modern felids and thus should be reflected in their skeletons.
[...]
Using radiographs of the sabertooth cat, Smilodon fatalis, 28 extant felid [cat] species, and the larger, extinct American lion Panthera atrox, we measured cross-sectional properties of the humerus [upper arm bone] and femur [thigh bone] to provide the first estimates of limb bone strength in bending and torsion.

We found that the humeri of Smilodon were reinforced by cortical thickening to a greater degree than those observed in any living felid, or the much larger P. atrox. The femur of Smilodon also was thickened but not beyond the normal variation found in any other felid measured.

(Hat tip to io9.)

Chimpanzee Gangs Kill for Land

Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010

It should surprise  no one that chimpanzee gangs kill for land:

To understand this violence, researchers studied a large group of chimpanzees living in Ngogo, Kibale National Park in Uganda. After monitoring the group for over a decade, scientists counted 21 chimp-on-chimp murders.

Of those crimes, the researchers witnessed 18 directly, and deduced three from circumstantial evidence. They think as many as 13 of the victims belonged to a single neighboring group.

“The take-home is clear and simple,” said researcher John Mitani of the University of Michigan. “Chimpanzees kill each other. They kill their neighbors. Up until now, we have not known why. Our observations indicate that they do so to expand their territories at the expense of their victims.”

After some of these neighboring competitors were dispatched with, the researchers observed the Ngogo chimpanzees beginning to use a large portion of new territory to the northeast of their previous range. That piece of evidence allowed the researchers to link the murders with a motive — that of gaining new ground.

The scientists think the new land offers greater access to food, and potentially to females.

The attacks seem to be triggered when bands of chimpanzees go out patrolling into the territory of a neighboring chimpanzee group.

“Patrollers are quiet and move with stealth,” Mitani said. “They pause frequently to scan the environment as they search for other chimpanzees. Attacks are typically made only when patrolling chimpanzees have overwhelming numerical superiority over their adversaries.”

This tends to happen often for the Ngogo chimpanzees, who have a particularly large group of more than 150 individuals — about three times the number found in chimp communities studied elsewhere. That advantage may explain the surprisingly high level of violence observed, the researchers said.

Visual Dictionary Online

Wednesday, June 16th, 2010

Merriam-Webster has put its visual dictionary online — so I expect to see formerly obscure terms like flews, withers, and hocks gaining in popularity.

(Hat tip to noonanjo.)

Salties Off Shore

Tuesday, June 15th, 2010

Estuarine crocodiles (Crocodylus porosus) range from India to China to Australia — where the saltwater crocs are known as salties.

I like to think of them as sharks that will follow you onto the beach. While they predominantly live in rivers, mangrove swamps, and brackish estuaries, salties have also been found far off shore:

The researchers acoustically tagged 27 crocodiles from the Kennedy River in Australia. The team inserted small transmitters in the crocs and placed receptors along the river’s coastline.

Whenever a crocodile came within a quarter mile of the receptor, the movement was recorded. After a year of monitoring the reptiles along the river, the scientists discovered that they habitually travel from their home area to the river mouth, a distance upwards of 31 miles away.

Whenever the gigantic beasts traveled more than 6 miles a day, they surfed. The crocs always started their journey immediately after the tides turned, securing them a solid 6 to 8 hours of speedy travel.

Every time the tides changed to an unfavorable direction, the crocodiles took a rest stop. They retreated to the nearby shore for a period of hours to days.

As a short term solution to unfavorable tides, the animals would dive to the bottom of the river, where they can spend up to an hour lounging on the river floor, rather than moving back to land.

In a previous study, the researchers outfitted three crocodiles with satellite transmitters. This allowed the team to follow the “salties” — the Australian nickname for the predators — beyond the river mouth and into the ocean.

One of the crocodiles journeyed down the west Coast of Cape York Peninsula. The trip coincided with changes in seasonal currents. Over the course of 25 days, the salty moved a whooping 367 miles!

Similarly, two of its brethren also covered hundreds of miles in a few weeks.

Achieving these arduous journeys is made possible by the crocodiles’ acute sense of direction.

Estuarine crocodiles depend on an internal magnetic compass to reach their desired location, similar to birds and turtles.

Additionally, these reptiles can easily endure long trips and remain physically strong despite a lack of eating and drinking due to amazing internal engineering.

Saltwater crocodiles only drink fresh water and rely on ambushing prey, a strategy difficult to maintain during sustained ocean travel.

But the creatures developed the ability to maintain nutrients from ingested food long after feeding. As a result, they can last up to 4 months in the ocean without regular eating or drinking.

Platypus

Sunday, June 13th, 2010

The platypus is always good for a laugh.

Surfer punches shark then catches wave

Wednesday, June 9th, 2010

It’s hard not to enjoy a story like this. Surfer punches shark then catches wave:

Michael Bedford was knocked off his board by the shark, believed to have been a great white, which then came back for a second charge, witnesses said.

But he punched the animal and then caught a passing wave to the shore, where friends used the board’s rope as a tourniquet for bite wounds on his leg.

That was from the Sydney Morning Herald. The Australian Broadcast Company story took on a different tone:

A 41-year-old man is recovering in hospital after being attacked by a white pointer shark near Walpole, on Western Australia’s South Coast.

Michael Bedford was treated for deep wounds to his right knee and shock after the attack which happened at Conspicuous Cliffs 15 kilometres east of Walpole yesterday afternoon.

Mr Bedford was rescued by a fellow surfer and a group of local fishermen who were able to tie a tourniquet around his leg before the ambulance arrived.

Note how the dour story refers to the great white as a white pointer.

Natural Security

Tuesday, June 1st, 2010

Not long after 9/11, marine biologist Raphael Sagarin found himself working in DC, where there was clearly more security, but never varied security.

This led him to write Adapt or Die for Foreign Policy, subtitled, What Charles Darwin can teach Tom Ridge about homeland security:

The Cold War was a symmetric conflict in which the two rivals had enough weaponry to guarantee that a “hot” war would result in mutual destruction. Superpower tensions played out in what biologists call dominance displays. In evolutionary terms, the annual May Day parade of missiles in Moscow’s Red Square and former U.S. President Richard Nixon’s “madman” strategy — when he put the United States on secret nuclear alert in 1969 to rattle the Soviets — were no different than the ritualistic claw waving between competing male fiddler crabs.

Terrorist networks such as al Qaeda represent a decidedly asymmetric threat. Like a virus, al Qaeda is an infectious organism, capable of lying dormant for long periods of time. It then hijacks the critical machinery of its victims to weaken their evolutionary fitness. And just as the treatment for viruses is more complex than the remedy for blunt trauma, combating al Qaeda requires a more subtle approach than the chest puffing generally used to meet a symmetric challenge.

Sagarin recommends a number of lessons from Geerat Vermeij’s Evolution and Escalation: An Ecological History of Life — which nominally discusses snail and crab evolution:

  1. Form good relationships.
  2. Never stop adapting.
  3. Don’t put all your eggs in one basket.
  4. Be redundant.
  5. Be flexible.

(I guess lesson 4 means I shouldn’t quip that lessons 2 & 5 and 3 & 4 seem repetitive.)

Sagarin and his colleagues went on to write a book, Natural Security, and a Nature paper, on the same topic, which PhysOrg.com reviews:

“Terrorists figure out unexpected means of attack, hackers come up with new software to break through firewalls, and pathogens develop resistance to antibiotics.”
[...]
“About 1,500 soldiers had died from roadside bomb blasts between the time troops identified the threat and the time MRAPs (mine-resistant, ambush-protected vehicles) were deployed to deal with the situation.”

Even after the blast-resistant vehicles arrived, they proved only moderately effective against a quickly moving threat that is constantly changing and rapidly adapting to new challenges.

“These MRAPs are huge, lumbering things that weigh 16 tons,” Sagarin said, “The insurgents, on the other hand, drive around in small pickup trucks. They quickly figured out the MRAPs were limited to certain roads and started placing roadside bombs specifically along those routes.”

Animals’ alarm calls are more sophisticated than you might realize:

Hunting prey uses a lot of energy, Sagarin explained, which is why predators seek to ambush their prey. As soon as the prey is aware of their presence and ready to engage in defense, a pursuit might no longer be worth it.

Ground squirrels, for example, use alarm signals when a predator is lurking nearby, not only to warn their peers, but also to make it known to the attacker its cover is blown.

“When a prey species makes an alarm call of any kind, the game is up,” Sagarin said. Suddenly, things have become a lot harder – if you’re a hawk, you want to swoop down on a squirrel and not get scratched in the face.”

Remarkably, ground squirrels use alarm signals that are very specific to the threat. If the predator is a mammal (which can hear), they utter alarm calls. If it is a snake (which cannot) they use tail-flagging to signal its presence.

The less specific an alarm call is, the less efficient it is in eliciting an appropriate response, the authors argue and point to the U.S. Homeland Security’s threat advisory for national and international flights, which has remained at level orange (high) since August 2006. This static, ambiguous and nonspecific system creates uncertainty or indifference among the population that it is meant to help protect.

That conclusion misses the point. Yes, the blanket orange alert creates indifference among the population, but the point of the analogy is that a blanket alert doesn’t say to the terrorists, “Don’t even try it!”

Of course, it’s not clear that we should follow the squirrels’ strategy against snakes, because we can kill any “snakes” we spot.

Grizzlies, polar bears interbreeding

Monday, May 3rd, 2010

Researchers in the Northwest Territories say they may have found the first recorded offspring of a hybrid female polar-grizzly bear in the wild:

Government officials say an Inuvialuit hunter, David Kuptana, shot an unusual-looking bear during a hunting trip April 8 near Banks Island, in the Inuvik region.

He provided federal scientists with samples to see what type of bear it was.

Officials with the territorial government say those test showed that the dead bear was the offspring of another hybrid bear — a female polar-grizzly mix who had mated with a male grizzly.

Scientists confirmed this by comparing the dead bear’s DNA with that of local polar bear and grizzly populations, and that of a male polar-grizzly hybrid, which was shot on Banks Island in 2006.

How to Write about Africa

Monday, April 12th, 2010

Binyavanga Wainaina explains how to write about Africa:

Always use the word ‘Africa’ or ‘Darkness’ or ‘Safari’ in your title. Subtitles may include the words ‘Zanzibar’, ‘Masai’, ‘Zulu’, ‘Zambezi’, ‘Congo’, ‘Nile’, ‘Big’, ‘Sky’, ‘Shadow’, ‘Drum’, ‘Sun’ or ‘Bygone’. Also useful are words such as ‘Guerrillas’, ‘Timeless’, ‘Primordial’ and ‘Tribal’. Note that ‘People’ means Africans who are not black, while ‘The People’ means black Africans.
[...]
Remember, any work you submit in which people look filthy and miserable will be referred to as the ‘real Africa’, and you want that on your dust jacket. Do not feel queasy about this: you are trying to help them to get aid from the West. The biggest taboo in writing about Africa is to describe or show dead or suffering white people.

Animals, on the other hand, must be treated as well rounded, complex characters. They speak (or grunt while tossing their manes proudly) and have names, ambitions and desires. They also have family values: see how lions teach their children? Elephants are caring, and are good feminists or dignified patriarchs. So are gorillas. Never, ever say anything negative about an elephant or a gorilla. Elephants may attack people’s property, destroy their crops, and even kill them. Always take the side of the elephant. Big cats have public-school accents. Hyenas are fair game and have vaguely Middle Eastern accents. Any short Africans who live in the jungle or desert may be portrayed with good humour (unless they are in conflict with an elephant or chimpanzee or gorilla, in which case they are pure evil).

After celebrity activists and aid workers, conservationists are Africa’s most important people. Do not offend them.

(Hat tip to Graham’s Automatic Ballpoint.)