Why would a chimpanzee attack a human?

Friday, February 20th, 2009

Scientific American asks primate-expert Frans de Waal, Why would a chimpanzee attack a human?

Are captive chimpanzee attacks on humans common?
Yeah, definitely common. Most of the time they attack through cage bars. They bite off fingers. It happens more often with people they don’t know very well and people who aren’t familiar with chimpanzees. But it has happened to many of the best scientists and researchers, who are now missing digits. The reason we have them behind bars in zoos and research settings is because chimpanzees can be very dangerous — it’s to protect ourselves. This was a sort of free-ranging chimp, which is much more dangerous.

But chimps in the wild are not used to people — they’re afraid of them. That’s why Jane Goodall had to habituate them. So, really wild chimps don’t attack people. But in captivity, they have learned in the meantime that they are stronger than humans.

How strong are they?
The chimpanzee has strength for a human that is utterly incomprehensible. People watch pro wrestlers on TV and think they are strong. But a pro wrestler would not be able to hold a chimpanzee still if they wanted to. Chimpanzee males have been measured as having five times the arm strength as a human male. Even a young chimpanzee of four or five years, you could not hold it still if you wanted to. Pound-for-pound, their muscles are much stronger. And the adult males, like Travis — unless his were filed down — have big canine teeth. So you have a very dangerous creature in front of you that is impossible to control.

Do chimps in captivity show more aggressive behavior than those in the wild?
In the wild they’re pretty aggressive. They have warfare among groups, where males kill other males, and they have been known to commit infanticide. Aggression is a common part of the chimpanzee behavior, whether it’s between or within groups.

They can show tremendous mutilation. They go for the face; they go for the hands and feet; they go for the testicles. To outsiders, they have very nasty behaviors.

Are male chimpanzees more aggressive than females?
Yes, that’s for sure.

What might cause a chimp to attack someone it knows?
They’re very complex creatures. People must not assume that with someone they already know there’s not some underlying tension. It’s often impossible to figure out what reason they have for attacking.

Having a chimp in your home is like having a tiger in your home. It’s not really very different. They are both very dangerous.

Do you think Lyme disease or the Xanax might have been a factor in the attack?
It’s all possible. It’s possible it was the Xanax. In general, in chimpanzees — because they are so genetically close to us — they will react very similarly to drugs. It might be that the dosages are different, but it really should be pretty much the same.

A chimp in your home is like a time bomb. It may go off for a reason that we may never understand. I don’t know any chimp relationship that has been harmonious. Usually these animals end up in a cage. They cannot be controlled.

When a chimp is young, they’re very cute and affectionate and funny and playful. There’s a lot of appeal. But that’s like a tiger cub — they’re also a lot of fun to have.

I’m not sure why five times the arm strength of a (typical) human male is utterly incomprehensible. A pro wrestler should have four or five times the arm strength of a (typical) human male, after all — at a much higher body weight admittedly. Of course, a pro wrestler should have four or five times the leg strength of a typical human male, too, unlike a chimp.

Also, I’m not surprised that Professor de Waal and his colleagues consider it impossible to hold down a young chimp — but I don’t think they could hold down a lightweight wrestler either.

The real danger isn’t simply chimpanzees’ strength but their sharp teeth and their eagerness to maim. They go for the face; they go for the hands and feet; they go for the testicles.

Sprints may be best for diabetes prevention

Wednesday, February 18th, 2009

Fitness orthodoxy shifts slowly. New research demonstrates that sprints may be best for diabetes prevention:

Timmons and his team found that young sedentary men who did just 15 minutes of all-out sprinting on an exercise bike spread out over two weeks substantially improved their ability to metabolize glucose (sugar). Traditional aerobic exercise programs can boost sensitivity to the key blood-sugar-regulating hormone insulin. The high-intensity program did this too, but it also directly reduced the men’s blood sugar levels — something that standard exercise programs have not been shown to do.

New Procedure Uses Athletes’ Own Blood to Treat Injuries

Wednesday, February 18th, 2009

A new procedure uses athletes’ own blood to treat injuries by injecting the “growth-factor cocktail” right where it’s needed — including poorly vascularized tissues, like ligaments and tendons:

Platelet-rich plasma is derived by placing a small amount of the patient’s blood in a filtration system or centrifuge that rotates at high speed, separating red blood cells from the platelets that release proteins and other particles involved in the body’s self-healing process, doctors said. A teaspoon or two of the remaining substance is then injected into the damaged area. The high concentration of platelets — from 3 to 10 times that of normal blood — often catalyzes the growth of new soft-tissue or bone cells. Because the substance is injected where blood would rarely go otherwise, it can deliver the healing instincts of platelets without triggering the clotting response for which platelets are typically known.

“This could be a method to stimulate wound healing in areas that are not well-vascularized, like ligaments and tendons,” said Dr. Gerjo van Osch, a researcher in the department of orthopedics at Erasmus University Medical Center in the Netherlands. “I call it a growth-factor cocktail — that’s how I explain it.”

Dr. van Osch and several other experts said they had used the procedure as a first option before surgery for reasons beyond its early results. There is little chance for rejection or allergic reaction because the substance is autologous, meaning it comes from the patient’s own body; the injection carries far less chance for infection than an incision and leaves no scar, and it takes only about 20 minutes, with a considerably shorter recovery time than after surgery.

Because of those apparent benefits, the consensus among doctors is that the procedure is worth pursuing. However, several doctors emphasized that platelet-rich plasma therapy as it stands now appeared ineffective in about 20 to 40 percent of cases, depending on the injury. But they added that because the procedure costs about $2,000 — compared with $10,000 to $15,000 for surgery — they expected that with more refinement, insurance companies would eventually not only authorize the use of PRP therapy but even require it as a first course of treatment.

America’s Diet: Too Sweet by the Spoonful

Wednesday, February 11th, 2009

America’s diet is too sweet by the spoonful, Jane Brody says, but we shouldn’t be especially worried about high-fructose corn syrup, because it isn’t too terribly different from table sugar:

High-fructose corn syrup is made by converting the starch in corn to a substance that is about 90 percent fructose, a sugar that is sweeter than the sugar that fuels the body cells, called glucose, and processed differently by the body. The fructose from corn is then mixed with corn syrup, essentially pure glucose, to produce one of two mixtures called high-fructose corn syrup: 55 percent fructose and 45 percent glucose, which is used to sweeten soft drinks, and 42 percent fructose and 58 percent glucose, which is used in products like breads, jams and yogurt.

Neither substance is radically different from ordinary sugar, which is 50 percent fructose and 50 percent glucose. The main difference is that in high-fructose corn syrup, the two sugar molecules are chemically separated, and in sucrose they are linked. Whether this difference is meaningful to health is still debated.

The Tough Guy Challenge

Wednesday, February 4th, 2009

The 23rd Tough Guy challenge at Perton, south Staffordshire took place recently — and it does indeed look tough:

Want to get healthy? Exercise 7 minutes a week

Friday, January 30th, 2009

People still seem to associate exercise volume with health and fitness, when it really takes surprisingly little time in the gym — or outside — to get fit. Want to get healthy? Exercise 7 minutes a week:

Timmons and his team showed that just seven minutes of exercise each week helped a group of 16 men in their early twenties control their insulin.

The volunteers, who were relatively out of shape but otherwise healthy, rode an exercise bike four times daily in 30 second spurts two days a week.

After two weeks, the young men had a 23 percent improvement in how effectively their body used insulin to clear glucose, or blood sugar, from the blood stream, Timmons said.

The effect appears to last up to 10 days after the last round of exercise, he added in a telephone interview.

Stretching: The Truth

Thursday, November 6th, 2008

In Stretching: The Truth, the New York Times finally gets around to sharing a basic fitness fact — stretching is not the same as warming up:

Researchers now believe that some of the more entrenched elements of many athletes’ warm-up regimens are not only a waste of time but actually bad for you. The old presumption that holding a stretch for 20 to 30 seconds — known as static stretching — primes muscles for a workout is dead wrong. It actually weakens them. In a recent study conducted at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, athletes generated less force from their leg muscles after static stretching than they did after not stretching at all. Other studies have found that this stretching decreases muscle strength by as much as 30 percent. Also, stretching one leg’s muscles can reduce strength in the other leg as well, probably because the central nervous system rebels against the movements.

Instead, modern experts recommend dynamic stretches — which, years ago, we were all told were dangerous. Sigh.

A Passion for Physical Realms, Minute and Massive

Tuesday, October 21st, 2008

Physicist often show A Passion for Physical Realms, Minute and Massive — abstract and concrete:

At almost any physics workshop or conference there is likely to be a cluster of alpine adventurers whose passion for exploring the wilderness of abstractions also sends them off to ascend granite cliffs or scramble up fields of boulders at 14,000 feet.

“Climbing and physics both bring an intimacy with nature,” said Dr. Steven B. Giddings, a physicist at the University of California at Santa Barbara, who studies the peculiarities of black holes. “In physics this comes through unraveling the deepest secrets of how nature works, and in climbing by facing the unfolding challenges of an ascent through unknown territory.”
[...]
“When I was a student in Cambridge, about half the University Mountaineering Club was either mathematicians or physicists,” said Dr. John Cardy, a theoretical physicist at Oxford who recently joined a trek in the Himalayas. “In the present local club of which I am part, there is still a preponderance of people with a training in physics.”
[...]
“One of the difficulties of theoretical physics is the intangibility of the subject,” Dr. Giddings said. “In climbing, the challenges are tangible to the point that small decisions can dictate your survival.”
[...]
Over the years physicists have given their names not only to the phenomena of physics but also to routes up obstacles of rock. Theorists at CERN, the leading European particle physics laboratory, refer to the Sacherer frequency and the Sacherer method for computing something called “bunched-beam instabilities” in a particle accelerator. And climbers in Yosemite tackle the Sacherer Cracker, part of a route up the treacherous El Capitan. All these landmarks were named for Dr. Frank J. Sacherer, a theoretical physicist at CERN, who was a world-class expert on the behavior of particle accelerators.

Climbers in the Shawangunk Mountains north of New York City might find themselves trying to negotiate Shockley’s Ceiling, named for Dr. William B. Shockley, the Bell Laboratories researcher who shared a Nobel Prize for Physics in 1956 for the development of the transistor. Another enthusiastic Shawangunk climber, also at the laboratories, was Dr. Lester Germer, who collaborated with Dr. Clinton J. Davisson in 1927 to show that electrons can act like waves, as quantum theory predicted.

In his memoir “Mountain Passages,” Dr. Jeremy Bernstein, a physicist, remembered a close call when he was negotiating the Cosmic Spur, a challenging route up the south face of the Aiguille du Midi in the French Alps. It is named in honor of an old laboratory where, earlier in the century, experimenters — some of the first physicist-mountaineers — snatched cosmic rays falling from the sky to study the nature of particles.

With the help of his guide, Dr. Bernstein avoided a fall. But some physicists have lost their lives in the mountains. Dr. Sacherer and a young theorist, Dr. Joseph H. Weis, died in 1978 when a storm struck while they were descending a hanging ice field called the Shroud on the Grandes Jorasses near Chamonix.

In 1988 the Rockefeller University theorist Dr. Heinz R. Pagels fell to his death while hiking down 14,000- foot Pyramid Peak, near Aspen. Dr. David N. Schramm, a cosmologist/ physicist whose climbing exploits earned him the nickname Schrambo, did not die on a mountain; he was killed when the Cessna he was flying to Aspen in 1997 crashed into a Colorado wheat field. But he had survived close calls in treacherous ascents on four continents.

Who’s on Line? Even the Referees Don’t Know

Monday, October 20th, 2008

Who’s on line? Even the referees don’t know, when Piedmont High School plays its A-11 offense — which it considers the logical and inevitable next step in a game that is becoming faster and more spread out at all levels, but which other teams consider a gimmick that cleverly but unfairly takes advantage of a loophole in the rules:

By placing one of the quarterbacks at least seven yards behind the line of scrimmage, and no one under center to receive the snap, the A-11 qualifies as a scrimmage kick formation — the alignments used for punts and extra points. Thus interior linemen are granted an exception from having to wear jersey numbers 50 through 79. (The exception was intended to allow a team’s deep snapper not to have to switch to a lineman’s jersey if he was a back or an end.) Any player wearing jersey numbers 1 through 49 and 80 through 99 is potentially eligible to receive a pass.

Piedmont’s basic A-11 formation calls for a center flanked by two guards, who are essentially tight ends. Two quarterbacks, or a quarterback and a running back, line up behind the center, with three receivers split to each side.

Under football rules, seven players must begin each play on the line of scrimmage and only five are permitted to run downfield to receive a pass — the two players at the end of the line and three situated behind the line. The difficult task for a team defending against the A-11 is to quickly and accurately figure out who those five eligible receivers are.

Prior to each Piedmont play, only the center initially goes to the line of scrimmage. The two “guards” and the split receivers each stand one and a half yards off the line. Then, just before the ball is snapped, Piedmont shifts into formation for the signaled play. With this simple movement, the possibilities for eligible receivers become dizzying.

At higher levels, the rules are too strict for the A-11:

N.F.L. rules governing jersey numbering are more limiting than high school rules, and coaches fear leaving their million-dollar quarterbacks unprotected by a standard offensive line. College rules permit the scrimmage kick formation only when it is obvious that a kick may be attempted.

This is all reminiscent of Coach Leach’s work at Texas Tech, which I’ve commented on before.

Under Pressure

Tuesday, October 7th, 2008

Under Pressure describes the upbringing of a pair of golf prodigies:

Mr. Martin, who played soccer and tennis in high school, in addition to ping pong, says he wished he’d concentrated on a single sport growing up. Then he might have had a chance to play on a team in college at the University of North Carolina. When he became a parent, he wanted to see how good his children could become if they focused on a single sport and had top instruction.

When Zach was a toddler, his father hired a baseball coach at nearby Barton College to teach him the fundamentals of hitting and throwing. He paid women on the Barton College soccer team $20 an hour for kicking and dribbling lessons, turning the kids into top players on their travel and recreational league teams.

At 5, Zach attended tennis camp at North Carolina State University. The next year, when the boys were 4 and 6, Mr. Martin signed them up for weekly golf lessons with a friend who was an assistant pro at a local club. Both exhibited decent hand-eye coordination. Josh had that sweet, natural pendulum stroke.

With regular practice and lessons, their games improved, as did their results in local tournaments their father signed them up for. By the summer of 2003, both were state champions and top 10 finishers at the U.S. Kids World Championship in Virginia. “That’s when I said, ‘It’s on,’” Mr. Martin says.

The Martin boys’ baseball, soccer and tennis careers were officially over. “I was just excited we weren’t going to have to shuttle them around to all these different sports and practices anymore,” Mrs. Martin says. “We were getting pretty stressed.”

Zach Martin says he misses other sports, especially the camaraderie his friends enjoy in team sports. “I do love golf, though,” he adds. “Really, I do.”

Golf long ago ceased being a game in the Martin family. It is a way of life that sucks up nearly every penny of disposable income. Most weekends are spent traveling to tournaments or to other courses, perhaps in the Appalachians or down at Myrtle Beach, that expose the boys to new challenges. The Martins drive the carts or carry the clubs while the kids play.

Three years ago, the Martins decided to sell their four-bedroom home in Wilson and move two hours east to a two-bedroom, $289,000 townhouse in Pinehurst, a golf Mecca with thousands of retirees, towering pine trees and eight sprawling courses, including the legendary Pinehurst No. 2, host of the men’s 1999 U.S. Open Championship. Pinehurst offered proximity to a variety of courses and the best coaching available.
[...]
On a series of Excel spread sheets Mr. Martin keeps statistics on nearly every competitive round his children have played in the past five years. After the boys drop their final putts, the family goes out to lunch and the boys spend several minutes replaying each hole in their minds, writing down the number of fairways and greens hit, sand shots, saves and putts; or in other words, every calculation a pro golfer keeps.

Mr. Martin then processes the data so, for instance, he can show Zach he hit the fairway on just 70% of his drives this summer compared with 78% during his winter play, but his putts per round dropped from 31.6 to 30.2 for an average of 1.87 putts per hole compared with 1.93.
[...]
The boys play as many as five rounds each week. Most days they arrive home from school, wolf down a bowl of chicken noodle soup, and head out to the course. During the summer, they tee off for 18 holes at 7 a.m. nearly every day they are not at a tournament. They rest during the afternoon, then go back out at 5 p.m. and play until dusk.

The devotion comes with a steep price. The Martins paid $15,000 to join Pinehurst, and nearly $5,000 a year for their membership. Cart fees are $18 each time the boys play. Lessons with Pinehurst pro Eric Alpenfels, rated one of the country’s top 50 teachers by Golf Digest, cost another $2,500 annually.

The boys play 25 to 30 tournaments each year with entry fees that range from $100-$300 for each player. A five-day trip to the Callaway World Junior Championships near San Diego can cost more than $3,000 if they can’t use frequent flier miles. Gas for their minivan for a trip down and back to the two tournaments in Florida can run another $1,200. The boys’ custom clubs cost about $3,000 for each set and have to be changed every other year.

The Boxer Who Won’t Quit

Saturday, September 27th, 2008

Boxer Ricardo Mayorga has a media-savvy schtick that has led Reed Albergotti to call him The Boxer Who Won't Quit:

After one grueling workout last month in Florida, he toweled off and walked outside the gym. His coach handed him some fresh fruit to eat for recovery and an assistant produced a lighter. Soon Mr. Mayorga was taking a deep drag from a Marlboro, looking relieved and relaxed. “I’ve been smoking since I was 13,” he said. “It seems to be working for me, so why stop?”

Mr. Mayorga’s assistant, Anthony Gonzalez, says that when the boxer isn’t training, he smokes as many as three packs, or 60 cigarettes, a day.
[...]
As he ascended in boxing, Mr. Mayorga says he originally tried to hide his smoking habit for fear that promoters would scold him. After beating Mr. Lewis in 2002, Mr. Mayorga was sitting in the training room with his coach and smoking a cigarette when Alan Hopper, a publicist for promoter Don King, walked in. His coach frantically grabbed the cigarette and attempted to put it out, but instead of lecturing the fighter, Mr. Hopper told him to light up another one and found him a bottle of beer to take to the press conference. When Mr. Mayorga started taking questions from the media while drinking and smoking, an image was born.

Cool invention helps tired players bounce back

Wednesday, September 24th, 2008

Julian Guthrie of the San Francisco Chronicle reports on a cool invention that helps tired players bounce back:

The Glove works by cooling the body from inside out, rather than conventional approaches that cool from outside in. The device creates an airtight seal around the wrist, pulls blood into the palm of the hand and cools it before returning it to the heart and to overheated muscles and organs. The palm is the ideal place for rapid cooling because blood flow increases to the hands (and feet and face) as body temperature rises.

“These are natural mammalian radiators,” said Dennis Grahn, who invented the device with Stanford colleague Craig Heller.

Grahn and Heller also found that cooling overheated muscles dramatically improved physical performance, allowing athletes to work out harder and longer, and hold on to their gains.

“We learned that you can actually reverse that muscle fatigue in a short amount of time,” Heller said. “And if you cool muscles during rest, you get a much greater recovery than if you rested without cooling.”

In the early 1990s, Heller and Grahn first began looking at using controlled heat to halt tremors in patients coming out of anesthesia. When they put their device over the hand and arm of a patient at Stanford Medical Center, “The core temperature went up so fast,” Grahn said, “we thought our recording equipment had broken.” The tremors stopped.

Once the license for their heating technology was sold by Stanford, they shifted their focus to cooling. The two were interested in exploring therapeutic uses of lowering body temperature, particularly for people with cystic fibrosis and multiple sclerosis. They turned to exercise as a way to build up a person’s internal heat load and then worked to figure out how to “pull it out through vascular structures,” Grahn said.

Their first “aha” moment in cooling came after they talked their assistant Vinh Cao into doing his regular workouts in the lab instead of at the gym. His routine included 100 pull-ups. One day, Grahn and Heller started using an early version of the Glove to cool him for 3 minutes between rounds of pull-ups. They saw that with the cooling, his 11th round of pull-ups was as strong as his first. Within six weeks of training with the cooling breaks, Cao did 180 pull-ups a session. Six weeks later, he went from 180 to 616.

“I’ll never forget the number 616,” said Heller. “He tripled his capacity in six weeks. We were like, ‘Wait a minute, this is crazy!’”

Heller used the Glove to work up to 1,000 push-ups on his 60th birthday.

After their findings were published in the American Journal of Applied Physiology, they received a $3 million grant from DARPA. The Glove is now being distributed and redesigned by Avacore Technologies of Ann Arbor, Michigan:

Grahn and Heller are board members and working with the company to create a more user-friendly version of the coffee pot-shaped model — which they call “klutzy” — to make it look and feel like an actual glove. Avacore is in contract with the military to deliver the new, streamlined gloves by the end of the year. Some 100 units of the cooling device are in Iraq with the 101st Airborne Division.

It is also being used by other football teams, including the Oakland Raiders and the Miami Hurricanes, and by American cyclists who competed in this year’s Tour de France.
[...]
The Glove, formally known as Core Control, is available through Avacore Technologies of Ann Arbor, Mich. It retails for $2,500, but is available at select times throughout the year for less than $2,000. The price is expected to come down with the second generation of the Glove, now in development.

I first read about the Glove in Noah Shachtman’s piece for Wired, Be More Than You Can Be, back in March, 2007.

Gym Generates Energy from Pedal Power

Thursday, September 11th, 2008

Years ago I wondered how much energy an exercise bike could generate if re-purposed. Not much. Which is why I tossed away the idea of a gym generating its own energy from pedal power — but I ignored the potent “green” marketing potential:

Adam Boesel’s newly opened gym uses human-power to create real energy from four spin bikes at a rate of 200 to 600 watts per hour, depending on how fit the rider is. The energy produced is then stored in a battery that’s used to run the rest of the gym’s equipment, along with solar-power.

Green Microgym, which opened September 1, joins a growing number human-powered gyms and includes includes state-of-the-art elliptical trainers and treadmills, which currently use 30% human-power and 70% solar-power, a yoga room with a cork floor and energy-saving ceiling fans are also in place.

Exercise trumps obesity gene in study

Tuesday, September 9th, 2008

Three to four hours of exercise trump the FTO obesity gene, according to a recent study of Amish men:

Researchers focused their study on a group of 704 Old Order Amish men and women in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, a religious group whose members often do not drive cars or have electricity in their homes.

Snitker said the group offered a unique mix of activity levels, with some farmers in the community still using horse-drawn plows while others holding more conventional jobs, including factory work.

He and colleague Evadnie Rampersaud of the University of Miami were looking to see if physical activity in this group might offset the effects of the fat mass and obesity associated with the FTO gene, found in more than half of all people of European descent.

People with two copies of the FTO gene on average weigh nearly 7 pounds (3 kg) more and are about 70 percent more likely to be obese than those who do not have the gene.

The volunteers wore a device called an accelerometer to track motion for a week.

The researchers compared body mass index or BMI, a measure of weight to height, and found those who were less active and had the FTO gene variant were significantly more likely to be overweight or obese.

But among the most physically active, the FTO gene made no difference.

Snitker said the study gives some perspective on how the obesity epidemic has evolved, as modern conveniences have reduced the need and opportunity for physical activity.

People in the most physically active group expended about 900 more calories per day than the low-activity group. That would equal three to four hours of moderately intense physical activity such as brisk walking, house cleaning or gardening.

“We probably carry genes that 150 years ago were not risk factors for obesity, but because of changes in our environment, they become liabilities,” he said.

Gridiron Gear Goes to War

Wednesday, September 3rd, 2008

Gridiron Gear Goes to War to tackle head trauma:

Helmet manufacturer Riddell knows a bit about football and military helmets. Founder John Riddell helped invent the World War II suspension helmet and his company currently has an 84 percent market share in the NFL and approximately 40 percent in college. Asked by military personnel in February to improve the Army’s Advanced Combat Helmet (ACH), Riddell provided a prototype inner liner in just six months. Riddell was instructed to maintain the outer ballistic shell of the ACH and the offset distance from the head to the inside of the shell (3/4 inch). Adapting the dual density foam at the heart of its Revolution football helmet, Riddell claims the new padding reduces impact magnitudes by 50 percent.
[...]
Over the past 30 years few truly novel innovations have gained any real traction in the helmet industry. But, a former Harvard quarterback, intimately familiar with concussive impacts, and equipped with an MD and an MBA from Columbia hopes to change that. Vincent Ferrara, CEO of Xenith LLC (Lowell, MA), believes the technology in his X1 helmet can help better protect those on the gridiron and the battlefield. The X1 relies on eighteen thermoplastic shock absorbers filled with nothing but air that adapt depending how hard someone gets hit. A single hole allows the air to expel and the absorber to compress fully on all impacts. Ferrara uses a bicycle pump to explain how the X1 works. Push down lightly and the air flows out smoothly into the tire, but slam down on the pump and it resists compression. By churning the air into a turbulent state, the absorber similarly stiffens for big impacts but allows air to flow out more easily on smaller hits.

Traditional padding can only compress to its material thickness, but the shock absorber can expel all the air and fold completely flat. Like trying to stop a car in 100 yards instead of just 10, this additional distance reduces the dangerous acceleration the brain (or the car) withstands by providing more time to dissipate the energy (or stop the car). The chamber refills in approximately three milliseconds ensuring it’s ready for the next incoming linebacker. Ferrara claims the X1 provides reduced maximum acceleration as compared to competitors in low, medium and high energy impact testing. Developed over four years and with more than $10 million in financing, Xenith will provide 1,500 helmets to colleges and high schools this fall and plans a full launch in 2009. The helmets will retail at $350, as compared to leading competitors that range from $175 to $300. Ferrara has had early discussions with military brass and an active development for something customized to the battlefield could begin this fall.

(Hat tip to Wired. Also, I’ve discussed the Xenith X1 before.)