Dragging Bison

Saturday, July 1st, 2006

In More on Deadlifts, Art De Vany describes some old research on the strength of frontier soldiers and Indians:

I think back about the University of California, Berkeley anthropologist who did the testing of frontier soldiers and indians. Neither are likely to have done deadlifts as they might be done in a gym. Yet, both scored reasonable values relative to a more recent soldier or indian. And far better than a a modern male (who would be easily beaten by a male civilian of the time of the tests). Alas, the article is lost in time and I never could find it at the UCB library. I just recall the text from a book citation.

A truly strong person, who is generally strong not in the highly specific way that power lifters are, can usually do a double body weight dead lift. The Amerindians surely did not usually do anything like dead lifts, but they surely did a variety of things that gave them almost double the dead lift strength of frontier soldiers. Building structures, playing games, butchering and carrying food are among the things that would have contributed to their great strength. Don’t over look either the role of general fitness as a contributor to strength.

How might Plains Indians have built their strength? By dragging bison:

What they dragged were one ton bison out of pits they ran them into to kill them. I recall the story (the reference is back in a file I simply don’t have time to try to find) of 5 indians pulling bison out of a 10 foot pit they had run the animals into. They had lept into the pit to kill the animals. Then they pulled them out, somehow. Then they dragged them to a nearby butchering site to do the heavy work of butchering a large animal with stone knives and implements. Then they loaded the meat and took it to camp.

If there is a better exercise, I don’t know what it might be. Every major muscle group is engaged, trunk, hips, legs, arms, grip, back and shoulders. It combines dynamics and strength because you are moving the load, not just lifting it. Balance comes into play. There is maximal heaving to initiate movement of the heavy mass, followed by faster movement after initial friction is overcome. Then a brief rest and the process is repeated. They may have made as many as 100 of these sorts of movements over the course of their work. Each one a maximal effort, followed by a burst of speed and then a brief rest.

Given the amount of nutrition in a one or more animal kill, they would only do this sort of thing a few times a month. No more than once or twice a week. A great model of true power training.

Mark Sisson on Steroids in Sports

Sunday, June 25th, 2006

Art De Vany reprints a letter from Mark Sisson on Steroids in Sports, explaining why the notion of a fair playing field is a farce:

Hard training raises EPO and hematocrit, but drug companies also make artificial EPO which does the same thing without training (intended medical use is for recovery from chemotherapy which destroys RBCs). Artificial EPO is banned. Now here’s the irony: research confirms that if you train at sea level and sleep at 14,000 feet, your body makes red blood cells at an impressive rate and amount. Several companies have developed expensive “altitude chambers” for home use where you can now train at sea level and then retire to your room for the night, simulating an altitude of 14,000 feet or higher. The end result is that you have, within the letter of the law, manipulated your own EPO to artificially raise hematocrit, yet using artificial EPO to do the same thing is punishable by a 2-year suspension. Talk to an endurance athlete from a developing nation with $2 to his name about THAT level playing field.

Bulky man barely injured as car rolls over him

Tuesday, June 13th, 2006

From Bulky man barely injured as car rolls over him:

A 440 pound German man discovered that being overweight can be good for your health — if you get run over by a car.

German police said the extra body mass prevented the 30-year-old man from suffering potentially fatal injuries when a Volkswagen Polo drove over him after he braked suddenly on his bicycle at a crossroads and fell off in front of the car.

‘It certainly helped him in this case,’ said Sven-Marco Claus, a spokesman for police in the western town of Gifhorn on Monday. ‘Someone smaller would probably not have been so lucky.’

The man dislocated his hip, which local doctors put back in place, but otherwise suffered only scratches and a bloody nose from the underside of the vehicle, police said.

My first thought — after noting that the original German article almost certainly referred to him as a 200-kilogram man — was that he might not have had so much trouble braking and staying on his bike if he were leaner and more agile. Lance Armstrong never would have been hit.

In fact, the same concept holds for vehicles, where it’s called active safety. I cited Malcolm Gladwell’s Big and Bad on that topic a couple years ago:

Most of us think that S.U.V.s are much safer than sports cars. If you asked the young parents of America whether they would rather strap their infant child in the back seat of the TrailBlazer or the passenger seat of the Boxster, they would choose the TrailBlazer. We feel that way because in the TrailBlazer our chances of surviving a collision with a hypothetical tractor-trailer in the other lane are greater than they are in the Porsche. What we forget, though, is that in the TrailBlazer you’re also much more likely to hit the tractor-trailer because you can’t get out of the way in time. In the parlance of the automobile world, the TrailBlazer is better at “passive safety.” The Boxster is better when it comes to “active safety,” which is every bit as important.

Robertson says he leg-pressed 2,000 pounds

Sunday, May 28th, 2006

Muscular Christianity may have peaked a century ago, but at least one evangelical leader still clings to the notion. Pat Robertson says he leg-pressed 2,000 pounds:

Religious broadcaster Pat Robertson says he has leg-pressed 2,000 pounds. The feat is recounted on the Christian Broadcasting Network Web site, in a posting headlined, “How Pat Robertson Leg Pressed 2,000 Pounds.”

It’s a pretty stupid claim to make:

Clay Travis of CBS SportsLine.coms online magazine called the assertion impossible in a column this week, writing that the leg-press record for football players at Florida State University is 665 pounds less.

“Where in the world did Robertson even find a machine that could hold 2,000 pounds at one time?” Travis asked.

Perhaps — I’m being charitable here — his people thought the weight was in kilos and multiplied it by 2.2 to get pounds.

New way to treat obesity heralded

Thursday, April 27th, 2006

New way to treat obesity heralded:

Boosting oxyntomodulin limits appetite and raises activity levels at the same time — leading to speedy but healthy weight loss rates, a UK study suggests.

Sizing Up ‘Slim’ Shirts

Wednesday, April 26th, 2006

The Wall Street Journal sizes up ‘slim’ shirts:

But slim fits — called everything from tailored to modern fits by manufacturers — aren’t just for slim guys. Some are cut roomier on top to accommodate men who are muscular — or just bigger — in the chest. We compared 10 slim-fit shirts with 16-inch necks and found that chest measurements varied by as much as five inches. Some tapered from wide shoulders to narrow waists, while others had straighter, boxier cuts, including some with relatively wide waists. Some could be worn only by truly thin guys.

Their Best for Big Chest and Narrow Waist:

Arrow’s fitted shirt, with a 49-inch chest, is the widest on top and among the narrowest at the waist, where it measures 42 inches.

For a 16-inch neck, a 49-inch chest is pretty big — but so is a 42-inch waist.

By ancient Greek ideals, a 16-inch neck would go with a 43-inch chest and a 30-inch waist.

Animals love exercise… why don’t we?

Sunday, April 16th, 2006

Kathy Sierra says, Animals love exercise… why don’t we?:

Obviously my lifestyle is quite different from my dog and my horses. But of all the differences, two come to mind first:
  1. Dogs don’t do television.
  2. Horses don’t run for cardio health, weight loss, brain fitness, blood pressure, or anything else but the love of moving.

An interesting aside on Icelandic horses:

One of these days, remind me to tell you all about how cool and special Icelandic horses are. OK, if you insist…Iceland has no natural predators for horses, so they’re far less afraid than virtually every other breed (this is the same bloodline the Vikings brought to Iceland 1,000 years ago, and no horse has ever been allowed into Iceland since then). This lets them use their brains for thinking, so they’re shockingly smart and fascinating to be with. It was Tim O’Reilly who got me into these marvelous creatures; he and his family live on a hill overlooking an Icelandic farm, and over time they found themselves falling in love with these horses and getting several of their own. He introduced me to his horses, and it was love at first sight. I spent the entire year after that learning about them and searching for one of my own. They’re also the most comfortable horses to ride — they have a special gait called a “tolt” that you could ride carrying a full glass of wine and not spill a drop.

[My horses] remind me every day that I should get off my ass and run and leap and cause trouble.

The Truth

Monday, March 20th, 2006

Sports Illustrated‘s The Truth describes Victor Conte’s drug operation, which sold a useless supplement called ZMA to the masses while supplying elite athletes all sorts of potent drugs, in return for their endorsements — of ZMA:

Although Olympic athletes faced the toughest steroid policy in sports, Conte came to realize that beating the testers was not difficult. He worked to provide a broad menu of drugs that were hard to detect. Among those he ultimately offered were growth hormone; erythropoietin, or EPO, the oxygen-boosting drug; the diabetes drug insulin, which also was particularly potent when cocktailed with other substances; norbolethone, a.k.a. the Clear, a powerful anabolic developed by Wyeth Laboratories in the 1960s but never brought to market (possibly because of doubts about its safety); a testosterone-based balm that Conte called the Cream; and the narcolepsy drug modafinil, a powerful stimulant that athletes took directly before competing.

Growth hormone and insulin were completely undetectable. The EPO test couldn’t detect all forms of the drug. Testers wouldn’t screen for norbolethone, a drug that had never been marketed. And the Cream was a mixture of synthetic testosterone and epitestosterone that concealed what would otherwise be telltale signs of the use of an undetectable steroid.

Conte created a simple “alphabet” shorthand for his drugs — for example, “E” for EPO, “G” for growth hormone, “I” for insulin — to be used on calendars he and the athletes kept. The calendars would list when athletes were scheduled to take which drugs, and they also indicated the dates of competitions so that the drugs’ effects would be peaking at the right time. Conte also kept a ledger that detailed the types of drugs athletes were using, as well as the results of blood and urine tests conducted on the athletes. Conte engaged in this “pretesting” to make sure his athletes would pass drug tests.

Conte was very pleased to do business with Bonds’s trainer. It meant he could add the greatest baseball player of the modern era to the BALCO stable of athletes. At minimum it was another big name Conte could drop on the Internet chat boards, another celebrity whose name and photo could be exploited to promote his business and himself. “Barry takes ZMA every night without fail,” he would write on one board. “Barry is a big fan of ZMA.”

Anderson, meanwhile, sold Bonds on Conte by dropping the names of the Olympians and NFL stars already using BALCO. Of course the real BALCO program had little to do with ZMA — instead, it gave Bonds access to state-of-the-art drugs like the Clear, which other elite athletes had begun calling “Rocket Fuel” and “the magic potion.” A BALCO connection had additional value because it provided Bonds with a cover story for his radically transformed appearance.

Fruits, Veggies Not as Vitamin Rich as in Past, Says New Data

Wednesday, March 1st, 2006

Fruits, Veggies Not as Vitamin Rich as in Past, Says New Data:

Fruits and veggies aren’t what they used to be, new data suggests.

Of the 13 major nutrients found in fruits and vegetables, six have declined substantially, according to a study by Donald Davis, a biochemist at the University of Texas at Austin.

Using data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Davis concludes that recently grown crops have shown decreases of up to 38 percent in protein, calcium, vitamin C, phosphorus, iron and riboflavin when compared with produce from past decades.

What accounts for this negative trend? Like any other competitive industry, farmers’ attempts to drive up profits have led them to use new techniques to increase production, Davis said. The faster-grown fruits don’t have as much time to develop the nutrients.

‘Farmers get paid by the weight of a crop, not by amount of nutrients,’ Davis said. He called this the ‘dilution effect’: As fruits and vegetables grown in the United States become larger and more plentiful, they provide fewer vitamins and minerals.

Hottest Fitness Trends

Tuesday, February 21st, 2006

Some of the new year’s Hottest Fitness Trends:

  • The newest offering at Crunch Fitness Gyms across the U.S. not only makes their female members look good in high heels, they make them exercise in them. Recently introduced, ‘Stiletto Strength’ classes consist of a 30-minute routine of Pilates and strength training, with the last 15 minutes spent strutting around in 3-inch heels.
  • At Equinox Fitness, new offerings include a sword-wielding class called Forza.
  • At Clay Health Club in New York City, members can tighten their abs with an Indian dance called Masala Bhangra.
  • In Bikram yoga studios, clients follow a series of yoga techniques in a room of 90 to 120 degrees.

You’re Never Too Old for Dodgeball shares some more fitness trends:

  • Chelsea Piers’ 25,000-square-foot gymnastics facility advertises the largest adult gymnastics program in the country, attracting both first-timers and professionals. Classes are split nearly evenly between men and women, instructors said. Participants hail the sport’s almost meditative effects, but the regulars’ sharply defined muscles point up other benefits.
  • The Seattle-based group Underdog Sports offers adult leagues for elementary-school staples — dodgeball, kickball and flag football.
  • The Sports Clubs Network — which has 135 U.S. health centers — offers hip-hop dance, a ballet workout and “urban rebounding,” exercises on miniature trampolines.
  • The ballet class offered by the Sports Clubs Network, the NYC Ballet Workout, can be done at home, too. Since it was created in 1997, more than half a million copies of its videos and DVDs have been sold, along with 100,000 instructional books.
  • With the influence of the
    Winter Olympics and the Fox TV network show “Skating with Celebrities,” figure skating is becoming particularly popular among adults.

Welcome to the Winter Olympics

Sunday, February 12th, 2006

No one ever accused Steve Sailer of being politically correct. Welcome to the Winter Olympics:

Yes, I know lots of you couldn’t care less about figure skating, but from a human biodiversity perspective figure skating is hugely instructive because it is that rare sport (assuming it is a sport) that appeals more to women than to men and to gay men than to straight men. It is the exception that proves a lot of rules.

The Figure Skating Powers That Be have announced that they are going to try to make their sport’s judging more objective by giving credit for each move on a degree of difficulty scale. There’s only one problem with this. Figure skating, as we know it, is essentially about being a princess, not a jock. The more they make it more of a sport like gymnastics and less of an art form, the less feminine it will become and thus the less feminine its champions will be. The danger is not so much that skating will crown as winners more burly women like Tonya Harding, who are strong jumpers, but then so was Charles Barkley. No, the risk is that skating will be overrun by more pre-pubescent girls like Tara ‘The Human Drill Bit’ Lipinksi, the 15 year old who took the gold in 1998 with her high-RPM jumps.

The physical difference between a little girl and a woman is basically body fat. Women have higher body fat percentages than girls (more body fat is bad in just about any sport not involving massive heat loss like English Channel swimming or Iditarod dogsled mushing). And their weight is distributed farther from their vertical axis (i.e., they have T&A). Recall how skaters spin faster at the ends of their routines when they pull their arms in. It’s basic physics. The same applies with T&A. A womanly beauty like Katarina Witt could never attain the RPM necessary to jump like the stick insect-like Lipinski.

Gymnastics has been overrun by pre-pubescents for years (e.g., 14 year old Nadia Comaneci in 1976). That’s why they had to set a minimum age of 16 for Olympics ‘women’s’ gymnastics. Unfortunately, that just means girls try to delay puberty with dieting, exercise, and drugs, with God-knows-what long term health effects.

Ultimately, womanly grace is awfully hard to quantify, but we sure know it when we see it. It would be sad to penalize that in the name of making skating judging more objective.

Drug Test

Tuesday, January 3rd, 2006

In Drug Test, amateur cyclist and professional journalist Stuart Stevens describes his experiment with performance-enhancing drugs:

My plan was simple. I would train as I always do — about 15 to 20 hours a week — while taking various supplements under Dr. Jones’s supervision. I started in January 2003. In eight months, I intended to ride the 1,225-kilometer (761-mile) Paris-Brest-Paris bicycle race, a once-every-four-years sufferfest that’s popular among amateur ultracyclists. I would first have to qualify by completing a series of 200-, 300-, 400-, and 600-kilometer rides within certain time limits. The PBP was a quirky event, a ride rather than a real race, with no prizes, no ranking of finishers, no doping controls. So if the drugs helped me, I wouldn’t be knocking anybody else down in the standings. And since this was a monster ride — which I’d have to complete in less than 84 hours — it would serve as a real test of my augmented self.

Here’s what a little human growth hormone did:

After a few weeks of the HGH, I began to notice subtle changes. My skin started getting… better. Sun blotches that I’d had on my arms for a year faded away. One morning I woke up and a scar on my forehead — which I’d gotten from a mountain-bike endo two years earlier — was more or less gone. Even though I was training like a madman, I looked more rested. Younger. A little fresher.

Then I started to realize that my eyesight really was improving. I’d been thinking about getting glasses to read fine print on maps, but now there was no need. The glasses I used for night driving stayed in the glove compartment, unused, unnecessary.

A 200-milligram injection of testosterone and a pump vial full of Testocream didn’t do much:

I walked out of Dr. Jones’s office smiling broadly, then waited for a werewolf surge. And I waited. But the truth is, I didn’t feel much of anything. No irresistible bursts of lust or rage, no particular feelings of omnipotence. That afternoon I went home and celebrated my newfound energy and aggression with a long nap.

When he added EPO (erythropoetin) two weeks later, he felt the difference:

“You have to be careful with this stuff,” Dr. Jones warned after explaining the routine: three injections a week of 1,500 IU each. I was expecting a lecture on the dangers of thickened blood, but he meant something else: he wanted me to take it easy while racing, lest people catch on.

“One of my bike racers who isn’t really a climber went on a training ride and dropped the best climbers on his team,” he said. “They were like, ‘Um, what are you taking?’”

It wasn’t cheap — $2,000 for ten vials totaling 100,000 IU. At my prescribed dose, each vial would last two weeks. Before the first EPO shot, my base hematocrit level was 43.8 percent, well below that magical 50 percent disqualification level. That seemed like a reasonable goal — hematocrit levels high enough to be bounced from the Olympics. Sweet.

The morning after I took my first dose, I woke up with a strange headache, a very distinct kind of pain that I would come to associate with EPO. It defied all manner of ibuprofen and aspirin but gradually went away.

Within three weeks, my hematocrit level had risen to 48.3. By this time, my testosterone levels had shot up to 900 nanograms per decaliter, from a previous mark of 280. (My starting level was just below normal.) My HGH had increased only slightly, which Dr. Jones found unusual. He upped my HGH dosage to 1.2 IU a day, speculating that the long hours I spent training might be keeping the level down.

Despite these measurements, I remained skeptical about all the drugs until March 29, when I rode an event along the central coast of California, the Solvang Double Century, at what for me was a fast and hard pace, finishing in around 11.5 hours. About ten hours in, it dawned on me that something was definitely happening. Sure, I’d been training hard, but I’d done enough of that to know what to expect. All around me were riders — good, strong riders — who looked as worn out as you’d expect after ten hours in the saddle. I was tired, but I felt curiously strong, annoyingly talkative and fresh, eager to hammer the last 40 miles. The last time I’d ridden 200 miles, I felt awful the next day, like I’d been hit by a truck. After the Solvang race I woke up and felt hardly a touch of soreness. I also felt like I could easily ride another 200, and I realized that I’d entered another world, the realm of instant recovery. I’ll be frank: It was a reassuring kind of world, and I could see why people might want to stay there.

When I checked in with the good doctor soon after the race, he wasn’t surprised about what I’d experienced. “With your hematocrit levels higher, you don’t produce as much lactic acid, which means you can ride harder, longer, with less stress. The growth hormone and testosterone help you recover faster, since you’re stronger to start with and recover more quickly. All those little muscle tears repair much more quickly.”

He shrugged. “It works,” he said. “It always works.”

It all started to make sense. Feeling like I did after the 200-miler would be a huge advantage in a long stage race like the Tour de France. I understood what five-time Tour winner Jacques Anquetil meant back in 1967 when he said, “You’d have to be an imbecile or a hypocrite to imagine that a professional cyclist who rides 235 days a year can hold himself together without stimulants.”

Back then, “stimulants” mostly meant amphetamines, which kept riders going through day after day of hard stages. The new drugs had the same rejuvenating effects but simply worked much better, without the crash and depression of uppers.

I began to adjust my training schedule for harder rides and less rest and I felt fine. It wasn’t a huge difference — I added about 10 or 15 percent more effort to my training — but had I been competing at a top level, it would have represented a major advantage.

When he added Deca, an anabolic steroid, he felt like he’d “grabbed on to a car moving at 60 miles an hour”:

Once I started the Deca, I didn’t even think about lifting weights. I wanted to get stronger, not bigger. Within two weeks, the pain I felt in my left knee after 100 miles or so — 100 was now just a standard ride — went away, coming back only on the most brutal hills. My shoulder felt much better. And then one morning I stepped on the scale.

Two hundred and nine pounds.

I was stunned. I’d never weighed this much. When I first saw Dr. Jones, I weighed 195, which was high for me.

[…]

“What’s the problem?” Dr. Jones demanded when I told him I was freaking out over the weight gain. He had me stand on a machine that measured body weight and fat. I weighed 207, but my body fat had dropped to 6.5 percent, down from 10 percent.

“Don’t give me this you’re-getting-fat crap,” he said in an exasperated tone. “You sound like some teenage girl. You’ve lost six pounds of fat and gained 12 of muscle. That’s why you’re heavier. And like I told you, the Deca supersaturates the muscle cells with fluid. That’s one of the reasons your joints feel better.”

When he got back from his ride in France, he quit everything:

For me, it would be a quality-of-life question, not a performance issue. If the HGH weren’t so expensive, I’d probably continue with it, at least until I had a good reason not to, like some new evidence that it makes you grow extra ears. (The side effects of HGH are reportedly mild — one is fluid retention.) If nothing else, it helped my eyesight, and I had more energy. Lately, I’ve been reading studies about how endurance athletes suffer from low testosterone, which leads to early signs of osteoporosis, so I’m going to continue to monitor my levels and, if they drop too far, consider boosting them with the cream.

With the EPO, even if somebody gave it away, I wouldn’t go down that road. Using it is too much of a literal and figurative headache, and if you get sloppy there’s always the danger of nasty results. And I would never touch steroids again, unless I had some specific medical need. It’s all just too powerful, too strange, and it’s hard to read a list of the side effects and not feel like you’re playing Russian roulette.

Mightier Than the Pen

Thursday, December 15th, 2005

In Mightier Than the Pen, Matt Pottinger explains why he left his position as a Wall Street Journal correspondent in China to join the Marines:

It’s a cliché that you appreciate your own country more when you live abroad, but it happens to be true. Living in China for the last seven years, I’ve seen that country take a giant leap from a struggling Third World country into a true world power. For many people it still comes as a surprise to learn that China is chasing Japan as the second-largest economy on the globe and could soon own a trillion dollars of American debt.

But living in China also shows you what a nondemocratic country can do to its citizens. I’ve seen protesters tackled and beaten by plainclothes police in Tiananmen Square, and I’ve been videotaped by government agents while I was talking to a source. I’ve been arrested and forced to flush my notes down a toilet to keep the police from getting them, and I’ve been punched in the face in a Beijing Starbucks by a government goon who was trying to keep me from investigating a Chinese company’s sale of nuclear fuel to other countries.

When you live abroad long enough, you come to understand that governments that behave this way are not the exception, but the rule. They feel alien to us, but from the viewpoint of the world’s population, we are the aliens, not them. That makes you think about protecting your country no matter who you are or what you’re doing. What impresses you most, when you don’t have them day to day, are the institutions that distinguish the U.S.: the separation of powers, a free press, the right to vote, and a culture that values civic duty and service, to name but a few.

The Marines generally don’t take on 31-year-old desk-jockies as officers:

He said if I wanted a shot at this I’d have to ace the physical fitness test, where a perfect score consisted of 20 pull-ups, 100 crunches in two minutes, and a three-mile run in 18 minutes. Essentially he was telling me to pack it in and go home. After assuring him I didn’t have a criminal record or any tattoos, either of which would have required yet another waiver (my age already required the first), I took an application and went back to China.

Feeling Good Differs Between Men and Women

Wednesday, December 14th, 2005

While I’m not surprised that Feeling Good Differs Between Men and Women, I am a bit surprised by the particulars:

Researchers put 25 men and 16 women through a 12-week strength-training program. Participants were asked about their body image before and after, and were also given objective tests, such as bicep curls and body fat measurements.

Body images improved for both men and women, but the reasons were different between the sexes. Men tended to cite criteria like feeling thinner or stronger. That was important to women too, but they also were into numbers, such as measurements showing stronger arms and legs, according to the study being published in the journal Body Image.

Coach Leach Goes Deep, Very Deep

Tuesday, December 6th, 2005

Michael Lewis, author of Moneyball, looks at Texas Tech’s unorthodox football coach, in Coach Leach Goes Deep, Very Deep:

Looking for fresh coaching talent, Schwartz analyzed the offensive and defensive statistics of what he called the “midlevel schools” in search of any that had enjoyed success out of proportion to their stature. On offense, Texas Tech’s numbers leapt out as positively freakish: a midlevel school, playing against the toughest football schools in the country, with the nation’s highest scoring offense. Mike Leach had become the Texas Tech head coach before the 2000 season, and from that moment its quarterbacks were transformed into superstars. In Leach’s first three seasons, he played a quarterback, Kliff Kingsbury, who wound up passing for more yards than all but three quarterbacks in the history of major college football. When Kingsbury graduated (he is now with the New York Jets), he was replaced by a fifth-year senior named B.J. Symons, who threw 52 touchdown passes and set a single-season college record for passing yards (5,833). The next year, Symons graduated and was succeeded by another senior — like Symons, a fifth-year senior, meaning he had sat out a season. The new quarterback, who had seldom played at Tech before then, was Sonny Cumbie, and Cumbie’s 4,742 passing yards in 2004 was the sixth-best year in N.C.A.A. history.

Leach was not working with top talent, but his unorthodox strategies led them to set offensive records:

But when Schwartz studied videotape of the Texas Tech offense, what he saw unsettled him. The offensive linemen positioned themselves between three and six feet apart — on extreme occasions, the five linemen stretched a good 15 yards across the field. At times it was difficult to tell the linemen from the receivers. Strictly speaking, they were not a line at all, just a row of dots. “The offensive line splits — you look at them, and you’re just shocked,” Schwartz said. “It scares people to see splits that are that wide.”

The big gaps between the linemen made the quarterback seem more vulnerable — some defenders could seemingly run right between the blockers — but he wasn’t. Stretching out the offensive line stretched out the defensive line too, forcing the most ferocious pass rushers several yards farther from the quarterback. It also opened up wide passing lanes through which even a short quarterback could see the whole field clearly. Leach spread out his receivers and backs too. The look was more flag than tackle football: a truly fantastic number of players racing around trying to catch passes on every play, and a quarterback surprisingly able to keep an eye on all of them.

Leach sounds like a fascinating guy:

Each off-season, Leach picks something he is curious about and learns as much as he can about it: Geronimo, Daniel Boone, whales, chimpanzees, grizzly bears, Jackson Pollock. The list goes on, and if you can find the common thread, you are a step ahead of his football players. One year, he studied pirates. When he learned that a pirate ship was a functional democracy; that pirates disciplined themselves; that, loathed by others, they nevertheless found ways to work together, the pirate ship became a metaphor for his football team. Last year, after a loss to Texas A.&M. in overtime, Leach hauled the team into the conference room on Sunday morning and delivered a three-hour lecture on the history of pirates. Leach read from his favorite pirate history, “Under the Black Flag,” by David Cordingly (the passages about homosexuality on pirate ships had been crossed out). The analogy to football held up for a few minutes, but after a bit, it was clear that Coach Leach was just … talking about pirates. The quarterback Cody Hodges says of his coach: “You learn not to ask questions. If you ask questions, it just goes on longer.”

Coach Leach never played football — he rode the bench as a high school junior — and got a law degree before asking himself “”Why do I want to be a lawyer?”" and deciding to coach.

How he confounds the opposing defense:

What a defense sees, when it lines up against Texas Tech, is endless variety, caused, first, by the sheer number of people racing around trying to catch a pass and then compounded by the many different routes they run. A typical football offense has three serious pass-catching threats; Texas Tech’s offense has five, and it would employ more if that wasn’t against the rules. Leach looks at the conventional offense – with its stocky fullback and bulky tight end seldom touching the football, used more often as blockers – and says, “You’ve got two positions that basically aren’t doing anything.” He regards receivers as raffle tickets: the more of them you have, the more likely one will hit big. Some go wide, some go deep, some come across the middle. All are fast. (When Leach recruits high-school players, he is forced to compromise on most talents, but he insists on speed.) All have been conditioned to run much more than a football player normally does. A typical N.F.L. receiver in training might run 1,500 yards of sprints a day; Texas Tech receivers run 2,500 yards. To prepare his receivers’ ankles and knees for the unusual punishment of his nonstop-running offense, Leach has installed a 40-yard-long sand pit on his practice field; slogging through the sand, he says, strengthens the receivers’ joints. And when they finish sprinting, they move to Leach’s tennis-ball bazookas. A year of catching tiny fuzzy balls fired at their chests at 60 m.p.h. has turned many young men who got to Texas Tech with hands of stone into glue-fingered receivers.
[...]
“There’s two ways to make it more complex for the defense,” Leach says. “One is to have a whole bunch of different plays, but that’s no good because then the offense experiences as much complexity as the defense. Another is a small number of plays and run it out of lots of different formations.” Leach prefers new formations. “That way, you don’t have to teach a guy a new thing to do,” he says. “You just have to teach him new places to stand.”

It sounds like he’s been reading Boyd. In fact, this sounds straight out of the Marine playbook:

Leach is unusual in giving his quarterback the authority to change every play, wherever the line of scrimmage. “He can see more than I’ll ever see,” Leach says. “If I call a stupid play, his job is to get me out of it. If he doesn’t get me out of it, I might holler at him. But if you let him react to what he sees, there’s a ton of touchdowns to be had.”

The mentality he’s fighting:

From the beginning of football time, when there was no such thing as a forward pass and an offense did nothing but run, innovation has come from the passing attack. The last great shift was the so-called West Coast offense, developed by Bill Walsh during his time as a coach for Stanford University and then the San Francisco 49ers. Now widely imitated, it emphasizes controlling the game with lots of short passes. Still, football’s mixed feelings toward passing are ingrained. Bob Carroll, a leading football historian, summarizes the attitude of the game’s rule makers to the forward pass: “We’re going to allow it because we know it makes the game safer. But we’re going to make it difficult for you, because we don’t approve of it.” A whisper of the old antipass bigotry can be heard in football’s conventional wisdom: that a balanced offense means running as often as you pass; that you can’t pass all that effectively unless you first establish a running game; that a running game is necessary to “control the clock”; that passing is inherently riskier than running because a pass might be intercepted and give the other team good field position.

Leach and his offense are approaching the natural end of a path football strategy has been taking for 50 years. They are testing a limit. Synergy, in Leach’s view, doesn’t come from mixing runs with passes but from throwing the ball everywhere on the field, to every possible person allowed to catch a ball. “Our notion of balance,” Leach says, “is that the five guys who catch the ball all gain 1,000 yards in the season.”

I love this anecdote — any football fan should:

“Thinking man’s football” is a bit like “classy stripper”: if the adjective modifies the noun too energetically, it undermines the nature of the thing. “Football’s the most violent sport,” Leach says. “And because of that, the most intense and emotional.” Truth is, he loves the violence. (“Aw, yeah, the violence is awesome. That’s the best part.”) Back in the early 1980′s, when he was a student at B.Y.U., he spotted a poster for a seminar, “Violence in American Sports.” It was given by a visiting professor who bemoaned the influence of football on the American mind. To dramatize the point, the professor played a video of especially shocking blows delivered in college and pro football. “It had all the great hits in football you remembered and wanted to see again,” Leach recalls. “Word got around campus that this guy had this great tape, and the place was jammed. Everybody was cheering the hits. I went twice.”