The America of the 2020s is not the America of the 1970s

Monday, June 6th, 2022

The Invisible Bridge: The Fall of Nixon and the Rise of Reagan, by Rick Perlstein, is the sequel to Nixonland:

Where Nixonland roughly covered 1964-1972, The Invisible Bridge covers 1973-1976. It starts with Watergate, progresses through the bumbling missteps of the Ford administration, and ends with Ford’s narrow defeat of a right-wing insurgency by Ronald Reagan in the 1976 GOP primary.

There’s no throughline at all to this book — no coherent plot. Where Nixonland was a tight, coherent story about liberal rage and right-wing reaction, The Invisible Bridge is a chaotic, meandering tale of exhaustion, confusion, oddity and pointlessness. Which means it’s a book about the 70s. It’s a portrait of a grumpy, bitter country traumatized by social conflict but not yet ready to heal. And as such, it reminds me very much of 2021 and 2022.

Did you know that in 1976, there were two separate assassination attempts against President Gerald Ford in the space of three weeks, both by leftist radicals in northern California? I think I had heard that, but the bizarre reality of those episodes really stands out as the centerpiece of the book. Two wacky lefties tried to kill the President, one after another, and the country basically just shrugged and went on.

Anyway, as in Nixonland, the parallels to the modern day are not exact, but eerie nonetheless. Watergate feels a lot like the coup attempt of January 6, 2021 — an event that horrified people, and kept them glued to their screens for weeks, but where all the action ultimately remained confined to the ranks of the elite. The President being revealed as a crook — and then trying to cover up his criminality by claiming quasi-dictatorial powers, only to be rebuffed by resilient institutions — produced no riots, no mass wave of unrest, no repeat of 1968. Exhaustion had set in by 1973, and people were just kind of relieved to see Nixon go.

Reading this book, it’s possible to see the bumbling, nonthreatening Ford administration as the beginning of a sort of healing process. With a friendly old man in the White House, people could finally afford to tune out politics a little. The lefty radicals were still doing their thing, but they were getting fewer in number and their increasing extremism was turning off more and more Americans. Liberal Dems cruised to a huge midterm victory in 1974 off of Watergate backlash, but managed few legislative victories and ultimately saw their moment pass. Meanwhile, the angry White backlash that had powered Nixon to victory was also losing some of its energy, as White Americans fled the cities for burgeoning suburbs.

There was one group of Americans, however, who felt no exhaustion, and whose activism was just getting started — social conservatives. They wove together a slow-building backlash against libertine sex culture with the remnants of racial resentment, and turned it against abortion and gays. This story really reaches its apotheosis in Perlstein’s next book, Reaganland, but you can see it get its start in The Invisible Bridge. And the Reagan of this book is far from the cuddly, pro-immigration Reagan of the 80s — he’s seen as a genuinely dangerous right-wing radical.

The Invisible Bridge doesn’t tell a coherent story, but it teaches some important lessons about American politics. It suggests that episodes of lefty rage — where progressives expect a better world, don’t get it, and resolve to tear everything down — burn bright and hot but burn out fast. It was only 11 years from the Watts riots to Squeaky Fromme. Meanwhile, conservative America is slower to rouse, but has the stamina to secure gains when everyone else is exhausted.

The America of the 2020s is not the America of the 1970s; much will be different this time around. But many of the fundamental processes at work in that era are still at work today, and understanding them can help shine light on the stuff we see in the news.

Comments

  1. Another Dave says:

    So, Trump is a crook who tried to initiate a coup and was rebuffed by resilient institutions?

    And how many people were glued to their screens for weeks because of the “coup” on January 6th?

    I have a feeling only the author of this review and a few hundred other urban liberal pantywaists were caught up in the manufactured drama.

    Urban liberals live in a different universe.

  2. Faze says:

    After the assassinations of the late 1960s, the Ford assassination attempts were a relief in that they didn’t succeed. Also, one of the assassins was nicknamed “Squeaky”, and the other was a middle-aged woman. Neither was possible to take seriously.

    Those who did not live through the 1970s will have trouble believing how quickly chaos, craziness, and black crime became normalized. Every norm was overturned. I was a young man at the time and was not particularly distressed. I had no money and no stake in the current order. Society appeared to have fallen apart. My hope was that I might get a break in whatever replaced it.

  3. Altitude Zero says:

    The problem with guys like Perlstein is that when it came to the great contest in the 1960′s and 1970′s between order and chaos, they were rooting for chaos, and they are still infuriated that Nixon opposed them, and that Reagan managed to pull the country back into some semblance of normality, despite never really being able to repair the damage. The Left hates their enemies with the intensity of a thousand suns, and they never forget. Also, as for Leftist energy burning itself out, if you count the current spasm as starting in about 2006, with the “Bush Lied!” hysteria, this most recent tantrum has lasted longer that the “Sixties” did (what we call “The Sixties” started in 1964, and ended in about 1978, give or take a year or so). In the late 1970′s, you could feel normality starting to re-assert itself. If anything like this is happening now, I can’t see it…

  4. longarch says:

    Quote:
    the parallels to the modern day are not exact, but eerie nonetheless. Watergate feels a lot like the coup attempt of January 6, 2021 — an event that horrified people, and kept them glued to their screens for weeks, but where all the action ultimately remained confined to the ranks of the elite.
    end quote.

    I could scarcely believe that anyone could write such drivel, and then I realized that Perlstein was the original perpetrator of this frippery. Isegoria, you are made to read better writers than Perlstein. Perlstein is no friend of the USA.

  5. Jim says:

    “Man named Rick Perlstein, yes, you heard that right, Rick Perlstein, claims the coup attempt of January 6th failed, social conservatives have been winning since the 1970′s, and Nixon didn’t have overwhelming popular support until well after he abandoned his post and fled.”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SECVGN4Bsgg

  6. Jim says:

    Few will understand this.

Leave a Reply