Highest-Paid Athlete Hailed From Ancient Rome

Sunday, September 12th, 2010

Our modern sports superstars make a tremendous amount of money, but the highest-paid athlete of all time may have been a Roman charioteer:

According to Peter Struck, associate professor of classical studies at the University of Pennsylvania, an illiterate charioteer named Gaius Appuleius Diocles earned “the staggering sum” of 35,863,120 sesterces (ancient Roman coins) in prize money.
[...]
Diocles, “the most eminent of all charioteers,” according to the inscription, was born in Lusitania, in what is now Portugal and south-west Spain, and started his spectacular career in 122 A.D., when he was 18.
[...]
Diocles won his first race two years after his debut with the Whites, four years later, he briefly moved with the great rivals the Greens. But had the most success with the Reds, with whom he remained until the end of his career at the age of “42 years, 7 months, and 23 days.”

He is said to have won 1,462 of his 4,257 races and finished second 861 times, making nine horse “centenari” (100-time winners) and one horse, Pompeianus, a 200-time winner.

The inscription details his winning tactics: he “took the lead and won 815 times,” took the competitors by surprise by “coming from behind and winning 67 times,” and “won in stretch 36 times.”

Although other racers surpassed him in the total number of victories — a driver called Pompeius Musclosus collected 3,599 winnings — Diocles became the richest of all, as he run and won at big money events. For example, he is recorded to have made 1,450,000 sesterces in just 29 victories.

Struck calculated that Diocles’ s total earnings of 35,863,120 sesterces were enough to provide grain for the entire population of Rome for one year, or to fund the Roman Army at its height for more than two months.

“By today’s standards that last figure, assuming the apt comparison is what it takes to pay the wages of the American armed forces for the same period, would cash out to about $15 billion,” wrote Struck.

That last comparison strikes me as far from apt. One sestertius had the purchasing power of roughly $1.50, making Diocles’s total earnings closer to $54 million — not bad, but he still couldn’t buy an Escalade, a flat-screen TV, or a copy of Scarface on Blu-ray.

Comments

  1. Borepatch says:

    It’s enormously difficult to compare purchasing power across long time periods — and thus the margin of error of plus or minus 99%.

    But this is very cool indeed.

Leave a Reply