CMOT: You may remember Caitlin from such hits as “Inside the ‘manosphere’ that inspired Santa Barbara shooter Elliot Rodger?” where she amanged to get just about every verifiable fact wrong. http://wapo.st/TRQNLF
Candide III: He’s making a completely unwarranted assumption that the effect of additional alleles on IQ will be linear. Given the universal applicability of the law of diminishing returns, I’d be very surprised if this turned out the case.
Bert E.: 50 percent of all gunfights involving handguns occur at a range of six feet [2 meters] or less. The tactics and techniques you use at that range are not the same as you use to engage a target at longer range. Even at that short range of six feet most persons firing at one another MISS. Witness and see the Youtube video of the Chevie Kehoe shootout.
Bert E.: The Chinese are at the forefront of this reputedly. They do not have moral restrictions on selective breeding of humans for positive traits. This doctor on talk radio a number of years ago suggested that this has been going on for some time or has been contemplated for some time. Breed two types of humans. One very smart and the other not so smart but docile enough to be controllable.
Toddy Cat: Orwell was not an advocate of free love — quite the contrary, in fact. And if his personal life didn’t live up to his own standards, well, who does? Orwell had high standards, and tried to live up to them, and failed, but didn’t drop his standards. Where I come from, that’s called “Christianity̶ 1;
Toddy Cat: It’s remarkable how all those lefties who were screaming that the whole “Duck Dynasty” thing was not about free speech because boycotts are all about free consumer choice have suddenly changed their tune now that they are on the receiving end. Of course, this shouldn’t be surprising — for the left, it’s always about “Who, Whom?” Anyone who thinks that these people have any actual principles is mad — it’s all about winning. Almost...
Alrenous: “Orwell was simply expressing the national character better than we ourselves could have done.” Including elite character, who were all like, “Oh yeah, that’s exactly where we’re going with this.”
Bruce: Europe already had a lot of bulk trade on rivers — not as much as China’s, no Grand Canal, but lots. From 1000 they were eating the fish out of the Baltic and heading farther and farther across the North Atlantic. Bulk trade that could handle the North Atlantic was capable of travelling around the world — there’s a comment in John McPhee’s Looking for a Ship. According to Dorothy Dunnett’s sources, the Saracens managed a big slave raid on Iceland in the early...
Dan Kurt: Reminds me of my college course Western Civilization circa 1959-60. The professor let this Pearl out at some point and I have never forgotten his words on why the West broke out to dominate the world: During the so called Dark ages there were three developments embraced by the Western Europeans: 1) Horse Collar, 2) Crop Rotation, and 3) Cost Accounting. All followed from those developments. I could elaborate, but he was quite convincing.
Bob Sykes: This is probably why Russia, with all its resources, is perennially impoverished.