<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The key was clearly its general-purpose, algorithmic nature</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2026/09/the-key-was-clearly-its-general-purpose-algorithmic-nature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2026/09/the-key-was-clearly-its-general-purpose-algorithmic-nature/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 10:09:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phileas Frogg</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2026/09/the-key-was-clearly-its-general-purpose-algorithmic-nature/comment-page-1/#comment-3762745</link>
		<dc:creator>Phileas Frogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 14:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=54677#comment-3762745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fact that they both arrived at a general method is interesting, and naturally begs the age old philosophical question: &quot;Is reality a mathematical structure? Or, is reality necessarily instantiated with mathematical properties? Or, is reality simply able to be modeled via mathematics?&quot;

I lean towards the 2nd, but I can&#039;t wholly dismiss the 1st and 3rd, though this tidbit does seem to argue against the 3rd indirectly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that they both arrived at a general method is interesting, and naturally begs the age old philosophical question: &#8220;Is reality a mathematical structure? Or, is reality necessarily instantiated with mathematical properties? Or, is reality simply able to be modeled via mathematics?&#8221;</p>
<p>I lean towards the 2nd, but I can&#8217;t wholly dismiss the 1st and 3rd, though this tidbit does seem to argue against the 3rd indirectly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Sykes</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2026/09/the-key-was-clearly-its-general-purpose-algorithmic-nature/comment-page-1/#comment-3762735</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Sykes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 14:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=54677#comment-3762735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In modern American textbooks, Newton’s notation for derivatives (f’) has displaced Leibniz’ (df/dx). A step backwards, in my opinion.

As much as I found the calculus interesting and useful (I am an engineer.), complex numbers and the vast simplifications that follow from them were an astonishment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In modern American textbooks, Newton’s notation for derivatives (f’) has displaced Leibniz’ (df/dx). A step backwards, in my opinion.</p>
<p>As much as I found the calculus interesting and useful (I am an engineer.), complex numbers and the vast simplifications that follow from them were an astonishment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
