Comments on: Reality becomes input, not a corrective signal

By: T. Beholder

T. Beholder — Tue, 13 Jan 2026 19:07:45 +0000

Makes sense. Until the first “[…]“. At which point it goes into an eye-watering catechism.

They form what I call managed antagonism. [. . .] This is equilibrium.

Antagonism of the radical is aimed at anyone but Grey Government. So not a good fit without extra footnotes.
Why not just «permanent revolution»?

By: Phileas Frogg

Phileas Frogg — Mon, 12 Jan 2026 16:59:25 +0000

Godel’s Incompleteness Theorem wins again. No system can explain itself, and so, no system in terminal systemic decline can save itself, because it can’t understand why it’s declining, and if it could, then the problem would fall within the parameters of the system’s purview and be corrected. Extra-systemic (read extra-Constitutional) action becomes a irresistible necessity to survival.

The only question left is whether we’re still interested in surviving.

By: Bruce

Bruce — Sun, 11 Jan 2026 18:11:23 +0000

The older words are pious fraud and orthodoxy-sniffing. The people in the D party who make decisions came up with a pious fraud — innocent Minnesota mom shot by Gestapo cop — and threw it at the wall to see if it stuck. Sniff, sniff, are you a good D loyalist? You will respond as if you believe the D party line.

Without social media this worked great. With 60 Minutes editing the video in the 1970s, only a few disregardable cynics easily suppressed, I might have believed it myself.

The D party right to import another hundred million ringers would be shored up some more.