<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why are female intellectuals crazy?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2025/02/why-are-female-intellectuals-crazy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2025/02/why-are-female-intellectuals-crazy/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 16:05:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Beholder</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2025/02/why-are-female-intellectuals-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-3742150</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Beholder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2025 08:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=52607#comment-3742150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;…it is hard to argue with the definition I once heard a French diplomat offer at a dinner party: &quot;An intellectual is a person knowledgable in one field who speaks out only in others.&quot;
— Tom Wolfe, “In the Land of the Rococo Marxists”
&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;i&gt;But before and before, and ever so long before any such contrivances were used&lt;/i&gt;, Lao Tzu wrote: «Those who know do not talk. Those who talk do not know».

So when in “Intellectuals and Socialism” by Friedrich A. Hayek we read:
&lt;blockquote&gt;The term “intellectuals,” however, does not at once convey a true picture of the large class to which we refer, and the fact that we have no better name by which to describe what we have called the secondhand dealers in ideas is not the least of the reasons why their power is not understood.
&lt;/blockquote&gt; (raising a hand and jumping on the seat) Ooh! Teacher! I know this one! There is a better name for «secondhand dealer in ideas», a very old one. 6 letters, starts with P and ends with T.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>…it is hard to argue with the definition I once heard a French diplomat offer at a dinner party: &#8220;An intellectual is a person knowledgable in one field who speaks out only in others.&#8221;<br />
— Tom Wolfe, “In the Land of the Rococo Marxists”
</p></blockquote>
<p> <i>But before and before, and ever so long before any such contrivances were used</i>, Lao Tzu wrote: «Those who know do not talk. Those who talk do not know».</p>
<p>So when in “Intellectuals and Socialism” by Friedrich A. Hayek we read:</p>
<blockquote><p>The term “intellectuals,” however, does not at once convey a true picture of the large class to which we refer, and the fact that we have no better name by which to describe what we have called the secondhand dealers in ideas is not the least of the reasons why their power is not understood.
</p></blockquote>
<p> (raising a hand and jumping on the seat) Ooh! Teacher! I know this one! There is a better name for «secondhand dealer in ideas», a very old one. 6 letters, starts with P and ends with T.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2025/02/why-are-female-intellectuals-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-3741392</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Feb 2025 18:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=52607#comment-3741392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the before time it was accepted that mental work caused mental strain.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the before time it was accepted that mental work caused mental strain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike in Boston</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2025/02/why-are-female-intellectuals-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-3741386</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike in Boston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Feb 2025 18:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=52607#comment-3741386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two of the sanest, most down-to-earth women I know are not at all intellectual. And yet their views on politics, sexuality, and gender roles would be considered extremely right wing and retrograde by most of their female American contemporaries.

That&#039;s because they grew up in developing countries (one in Europe, one in Asia) where those views are mainstream.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two of the sanest, most down-to-earth women I know are not at all intellectual. And yet their views on politics, sexuality, and gender roles would be considered extremely right wing and retrograde by most of their female American contemporaries.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s because they grew up in developing countries (one in Europe, one in Asia) where those views are mainstream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McChuck</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2025/02/why-are-female-intellectuals-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-3741352</link>
		<dc:creator>McChuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Feb 2025 15:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=52607#comment-3741352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Easier answer - female intellectuals are crazy because most women are crazy, and because most &quot;intellectuals&quot; are crazy, unintelligent leftists.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easier answer &#8211; female intellectuals are crazy because most women are crazy, and because most &#8220;intellectuals&#8221; are crazy, unintelligent leftists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
