<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A helicopter is necessarily a complex, delicate, and expensive piece of equipment</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2024/03/a-helicopter-is-necessarily-a-complex-delicate-and-expensive-piece-of-equipment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2024/03/a-helicopter-is-necessarily-a-complex-delicate-and-expensive-piece-of-equipment/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 16:05:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roo_ster</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2024/03/a-helicopter-is-necessarily-a-complex-delicate-and-expensive-piece-of-equipment/comment-page-1/#comment-3662849</link>
		<dc:creator>Roo_ster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=50780#comment-3662849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Multis do have those advantages, no doubt, but a fixed-wing aircraft of similar weight can generally be propelled by ONE of the quad&#039;s motors and stay aloft for over 4x the time.  And fixed-wings generally handle adverse weather better than a multi.  That adverse-weather advantage is even greater for a flying wing.  And the same tech that keeps a multi stable can be used on FW.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Multis do have those advantages, no doubt, but a fixed-wing aircraft of similar weight can generally be propelled by ONE of the quad&#8217;s motors and stay aloft for over 4x the time.  And fixed-wings generally handle adverse weather better than a multi.  That adverse-weather advantage is even greater for a flying wing.  And the same tech that keeps a multi stable can be used on FW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
