<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dispersing energy on impact rather than shattering</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2024/02/dispersing-energy-on-impact-rather-than-shattering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2024/02/dispersing-energy-on-impact-rather-than-shattering/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 22:16:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adept</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2024/02/dispersing-energy-on-impact-rather-than-shattering/comment-page-1/#comment-3654188</link>
		<dc:creator>Adept</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2024 00:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=51443#comment-3654188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But they protect against fragmentation from artillery munitions — airbursts, mortars, etc.  This was indeed their original function.  The modern helmet was first developed and popularized during WWI, which was the definitive artillery war.

When it comes to stopping power, we&#039;ve come a long way since then.  The ECH/IHPS/NG-IHPS can stop a 17-grain steel fragment at &gt;4000 feet per second.  (Which comes pretty close to the velocity of similarly-sized fragments at the very point of munition detonation.)  The best of the WWI helmets might stop that same fragment at a little bit over 1000 feet per second.  So the modern helmet is a &gt;10x better kinetic energy sink, at least against steel fragments.  

(Against heavier lead handgun bullets, the picture is less clear.  Steel helmets tend to over-perform, as they present a hard ricochet surface for soft lead bullets, and modern composite helmets don&#039;t do a very good job of managing shell deformation, even against fairly low-energy handgun threats.)

Against blast waves, it&#039;s true that there has been no significant improvement.  Really, the only way to manage that problem would be to implement closed-face helmets, like motorcycle helmets, which is a deeply unpopular notion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But they protect against fragmentation from artillery munitions — airbursts, mortars, etc.  This was indeed their original function.  The modern helmet was first developed and popularized during WWI, which was the definitive artillery war.</p>
<p>When it comes to stopping power, we&#8217;ve come a long way since then.  The ECH/IHPS/NG-IHPS can stop a 17-grain steel fragment at &gt;4000 feet per second.  (Which comes pretty close to the velocity of similarly-sized fragments at the very point of munition detonation.)  The best of the WWI helmets might stop that same fragment at a little bit over 1000 feet per second.  So the modern helmet is a &gt;10x better kinetic energy sink, at least against steel fragments.  </p>
<p>(Against heavier lead handgun bullets, the picture is less clear.  Steel helmets tend to over-perform, as they present a hard ricochet surface for soft lead bullets, and modern composite helmets don&#8217;t do a very good job of managing shell deformation, even against fairly low-energy handgun threats.)</p>
<p>Against blast waves, it&#8217;s true that there has been no significant improvement.  Really, the only way to manage that problem would be to implement closed-face helmets, like motorcycle helmets, which is a deeply unpopular notion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Sykes</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2024/02/dispersing-energy-on-impact-rather-than-shattering/comment-page-1/#comment-3654076</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Sykes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2024 13:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=51443#comment-3654076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Improved resistance to impacts is always desirable, but most casualties are due to artillery, and helmets in general do not protect against shock waves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Improved resistance to impacts is always desirable, but most casualties are due to artillery, and helmets in general do not protect against shock waves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
