The Great Distortion of the 20th century was the bucking of this trend, where The Man of The Hour was sadly unequal to the task of steering the Ship of State through the rocks of Fortuna.

In absence of any significant external competition to impose discipline, the gnostic underlordship went all in on their number one objective, liquidating their neighbors, in the form of Legacy Americans, and all peoples of relation to them elsewhere on the globe. This, of course, has been an unmitigated catastrophe for said Legacy Americans. The upshot though is that such were also the peoples said gnostic underlordship depended on for the power to achieve supremacy. By actually succeeding in doing what they always and already wanted to do, our incumbent solipsists and their later-day ‘inheritors’ have at the same stroke rendered themselves powerless to do aught else. A vacuum in which resurgent powers grow and expand into.

The recent boondoggle in Ruthenia represents a return to the historical norm. The GAE can inflate however many numbers it likes in its digital accounts; but it has nothing to buy with it.

The AV character is a joke. I could understand you putting up clickbait if you had ads, but you don’t.

It remains difficult to imagine one nuclear power engaging in an invasive totalenkrieg against another, as did the merchant United States in 1939 conduct of the martial Germany and Japan. It remains substantially less difficult to imagine a proliferation of metaphorical Ukraines, in which two nuclear powers go about grinding each other down in mutual honest demonstration of purely attritive logistical supremacy. It becomes especially easy to imagine this sort of conflict playing out on the high seas, on whose world maritime stage a vast fleet of globalist tankers presently crisscross unmolested.

We may yet live to find that the existential logic of nuclear weaponry does not, as has been commonly assumed since 1945 or so, necessarily preclude the possibility of intermittent or continual, low- to medium-grade, sub-existential, military-industrial “jousting”.

Will history remember that between 2022 and 2024, in the Ukraine of Russia, an Eternal Anglo-Jewess and Slav implicitly conspired to break, and did break, the True Nuclear Taboo (T.N.T.)?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiJeSSzu9Bo

Show me this Military Industrial Complex. Show me.

The “Big 5″ Defense Firms earned total $246B in 2020. Walmart alone earned $523B. Alone.

60% at least of DOD’s budget is personnel, Gavin. And with all that it’s 15% of the budget, and no baseline they must fight for every penny. Would you claim the military personnel then are the beneficiaries? The soldiers, marines, sailors?

It’s tertiary remark in Eisenhower’s farewell speech of a *possible* problem, that never quite happened. The closest was WW2 when the war cost 37% of GDP.

It’s a MYTH, and Eisenhower regretted every saying MIC, far more real was the warning about government co-opting science, or deficit spending.

https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/president-dwight-d-eisenhowers-farewell-address#:~:text=This%20evening%20I%20come%20to,peace%20and%20prosperity%20for%20all.

I can. They’re idiots.

Their weird fantasies about war with China are only the latest examples of their catastrophic stupidity.

Think about the geographic realities. Our Political Class would be sending US girls, transgenders, and (occasionally) boys to fight on the other side of the planet with very long, easily disrupted supply lines. There would be no assurance of local allies — Japan & South Korea would likely choose to sit on the sidelines rather than face their immediate consequences from a destructive war with China. Would Vietnam or Burma choose to fight for the US?

China, on the other hand, would be fighting on its home territory with short supply lines, four times the US population, an incomparably larger industrial base, a larger well-trained military, and commanders selected for competence rather than for Woke DIE necessity (Diversity, Inclusion, Equity).

The outcome of US Political Class conventional aggression on China’s coastline could hardly be in doubt. And if China decided not to play by Our Betters’ rules and responded to a conventional attack with nuclear strikes on the Continental US, remember Mao’s old saying — China could lose half its population in a nuclear war and still be twice the size of the US now.

The only beneficiaries of our Political Class’s desire for war is the Military-Industrial Complex.