Pseudo-Chrysostom, are you Jewish?

(For this purpose, “Jewish” means one or more of: one-quarter or more ethnically Jewish, implicitly or explicitly affiliated with any overtly secular or religious Jewish organization, or now or previously a non-Jewish convert to any flavor of religious Judaism.)

With maybe a little bit of ‘no’ in the middle depending on how you define ‘competent to capably wield institutional power against their enemies’.

All species of humanoids that develop more advanced forms of civilization are occasions that also generally see increasingly large subsets of that population given to leftish behaviors as a form of defection for contingent advantage in terms of social status at the expense of neighbors, the future, the potency of the larger social organisms they nominally inhere in.

The unique quality of the modern khazar is in having a greater exacerbation of leftist phenotypicality than perhaps any other humanoid species in history. The genesis of this historical spandrel lies primarily in fact that, over the past millennia, ‘society’ for the wandering who was always something ‘ready made’, something that was always *someone else’s* problem; forms of being what would be incoherent with the providence of civilization were never especially selected against, while forms of being adaptive to parasitizing off of it were selected for. Any parts of the clade that would be even halfway eusocial or otherwise compatible with other populations of the broader societies they may have squatted in, long since also have sublimated into such larger populations, leaving only the most inveterately fractious, antisocial, irascible examples possible as the ones left to carry on the name ‘jew’.

In other words, much of the same ‘selection dynamics’ that tend to see the proliferation of human-shaped cancers in old civilizations in general, were, by historical contingency, especially concentrated in such khazar demographic(s) in particular.

They are defectors. An impulse to be subversive to others is an impulse to be subversive, tout court. A level of defectiveness on each other that is only slightly exceeded by defectiveness on other thedes – so much so that not even nominal racial enemies can match the levels of treachery they mete out on each other.

The greatest threats a leftist will ever meet in its life, are its ‘fellow travelers’; noone in history has ever killed more communists, than other communists (facts which good Godly men may ought endeavor to change); noone has spent more resources on instigating globohomoism in Israel than Soros himself. They are always shitting where they eat.

One may find him as a lawyer, but not a Law Man; he may be stockbroker, but not a Steward; he may be preacher, but not a Pastor.

He may, in a more sophisticated example of the species, view the social organisms in which he is embedded as like a complexified mechanism, with many levers and pulleys which, if manipulated the right way, produce desirable outputs. But he does not possess a *proprietary instinct* towards this ‘mechanism’. He might view what it can do for him as good, but he does not view it *in of itself* as a good. He is not a mechanic for such a machine, for he lacks the will to do so. He is not an architect for such a machine, for he lacks the ability to do so.

Are you insinuating that Jews aren’t capable of effective organization, that Jews aren’t competent to capably wield institutional power against their enemies, or that Jews aren’t white?

Noone gets anywhere in a white society without a group of white men standing behind them facilitating everything. Not even skypes are an exception to this, and they don’t get a pass any more than basketballs do either.

Oy, gevalt! Such victim-blaming!

Did you also believe that Robert Mueller was running the “Mueller Investigation”?

What else is there to say? The judeo-bolsheviks were simply not capable of prevailing on their own without the whole-hearted support of bluetribe hwhites who saw them as fellow travelers. If someone can’t recognize Teddy’s runty cousin as a traitor to America then they are the same kind of traitor tbqhwyrnfam (to be quite honest with you right now family).

(I’m partial to the theory that he was deliberately set up by the glow-n______s as a sacrificial ‘face’ to rightist sentiment in America, an easy target which could then be knocked down to collectively discredit opposition to whiggism, securing the dominion of the Wilsonian order in totality. They use this kind of play all the time.)

The rhetoric of liberalism is always used in a one-way direction; when the gnostic is out of power, he insists on his ‘rights’ to constrain the power of others (his targets); and when he is in power, he makes sure not to make the same mistake of extending that same leniency to his potential rivals.

He says ‘do not interfere with our organizing to increase in power’; and at the same rate makes sure to interfere with the ability of other men to organize; for power especially, but also for anything in general; because any group of men capable of working together has assabiyah, and can always threaten to turn into sovereignty.