Caption:

“Honey, you know I would never say that word!”

…

“Your parents are dead.”

Say it. Say, “Literally everything is a corporation, nigga.”

Isn’t it funny how you can make my point for me exactly and still not see to get it?

If ‘literally everything is a corporation’, then you also no longer have any grounds for critiquing anything as abberations that are deleteriously divergent from some presumed alternate state or states of being, in the first place.

How does it feel, dear Pseud, to be so reliably given so thorough a drubbing? I almost feel bad for you.

https://i.ibb.co/6YrjqMy/cake.gif

Almost.

The audience may take note of the slipperiness of definitions that is customary when dealing with wordcels: take a word with certain connotations in a certain parochial context, expand that definition to a new context, but without updating the connotations in accordance with the new use-case, in hopes of taking advantage of the old connotations in application in the new context for rhetorical advantage.

Much like how an atheist attempting to deal with natural law will engage in word games to say anything except the word ‘god’ when describing the proceeding of Being, a marxist will define armies, warrior aristocracies, academies, churches, preachers, theocracies, all as ‘merchants’, in order to shoehorn epicycles into the marxist framework of power relations.

Once you’ve organized yourself out of a wet paper bag (your email job), be sure to let me know.

I’ll congratulate you on your successful absconsion from another man’s corporate plantation to find safe harbor on your own corporate plantation, and I’ll mean it, too.

News at 11.

Schools are for slaves. I don’t mean this derogatorily, I mean this clinically. It is essential to understand that school by its very nature breeds (heh) the social dysfunctions characteristic of slave populations.

Some varieties of school are more dissolutive than others, but all in greater or lesser inculcate the same slavish tendencies of personality. The most explicit admission of this is to be found in the General Education Board’s literature:

“In our dream, we have limitless resources and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hand. The present educational conventions fade from their minds; and, unhampered by tradition, we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive rural folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning, or men of science. We have not to raise up from among them authors, editors, poets or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians nor lawyers, doctors, preachers, politicians, statesmen, of whom we have an ample supply…The task we set before ourselves is very simple as well as a very beautiful one, to train these people as we find them to a perfectly ideal life just where they are… So we will organize our children into a little community and teach them to do in a perfect way the things their fathers and mothers are doing in an imperfect way, in the homes, in the shops and on the farm.” – General Education Board, Occasional Papers, No. 1 “The country school of to-morrow” (General Education Board, New York, 1913) p. 6.

As John Taylor Gatto ably documents in his superb writings, not here cited, the capitalists brought in obligate public schooling in order to solve the problem of “overproduction”. Overproduction is when there is so much manly competition and such a proliferation of material production of goods and services that the ordinary man is no longer dependent on the corporate state for his material essentials. (The other half of the solution to the problem of overproduction is the regulatory nanny-state, which erects a competitive moat around large corporations and their absentee shareholders.)

Now, of course, the public school system is mostly irrelevant, because the common man is now fully manageably stupefied, pacified, and enfattened. The international banking cartel now wish to replace the fiat system (founded ultimately on paper) with a system of “zero trust” founded directly on omnipresent network connectivity and centralized databases. The great advantage of the zero-trust system, from the administrative state’s point of view, is that it embeds the Internet security model of continuous verification into every commercial transaction.

Pray for a miracle lest you see Aaron Russo’s prophecy come to life.

It has been said that the sexual revolution didn’t start with the Pill, that the Pill only kicked things up a notch, but what got it started in the first place was antibiotics.