Of course Gavin Longmuir is gas-lighting the f— out of us. A perennial genetic tic of the J–s. They can’t even help themselves. In this case he pretends Whites run the US.

Sometimes they tell the truth though.

When the GDJs Take Over America 1, 2, 3

This is the truth, except the last panel. We don’t need to nuke the country to change it. Even R. Crumb is gaslighting us, because all we need do is get rid of the J—-s and we can take care of this situation handily.

I’m sorry, did you mistake a blog comment section for the Supreme Court? Or maybe the Goldman Sachs boardroom? The Yale admissions office? We’re not setting policy here, and you’re just as powerless to change society as I am.

“You can’t even face up to the most obvious fact — the people you rightly accuse of discriminating against ‘Whites’ are themselves ‘White’.”

How can you tell? Wasn’t “white” such a murky and nonsensical category that you couldn’t make heads or tails of it?

Then all you are doing is whining on the Internet, and wasting everyone’s time, including your own. Sad!

You can’t even face up to the most obvious fact — the people you rightly accuse of discriminating against “Whites” are themselves “White”. That is the truth.
Open your eyes!

b) Obviously class is involved in the demonization of white identity. That part of the official narrative is very clear: while there are some white racists at the top and we must remain tirelessly vigilant against their evil, white racial identity is a marker of the lowest of the low, and all sensible whites should avoid it lest they be mistaken for toothless inbreds with decaying cars on their lawns and opioid addictions.

c) I have no plan of action. My only proposal is that we recognize the truth. Your two lies that I took issue with are high status, and they are comfortably in-tune with what we’ve all been taught, but I propose that you consider what I wrote in points 1) and 2) above; not what “you heard me say,” but the words I actually wrote, and think for yourself about whether they make sense.

a) There is active government discrimination against US citizens of certain European heritages. (eg discriminate against those of Portugese heritage — “White”, but not against those of Spanish heritage — “Non-White”). No disagreement there.

b) The US Political Class (politicians, media, academia, bureaucracy) spend a lot of effort castigating those whom they deem “White” — but do not want those castigated people to think of themselves as “White” and identify with other “White” people as a group.

That point is more debatable. Some would argue that behavior on the part of the Political Class is class-driven rather than race-driven. For example, an Ivy League credential frees a person from the stigma of looking like an older Michael Jackson.

But OK, for now let’s accept your arguments. What is your plan? What do you propose to do about it?

I have stated them perfectly clearly above; you’re confused because I haven’t made the strawman arguments that you keep trying to put into my mouth. You expect me to be the cartoon racist that you’ve been taught to despise by decades of propaganda, and because I haven’t read from your script, you think I’m being evasive. Still, I’ll do you more courtesy than you’ve done me and repeat them here one last time:

1) It is not confusing, or murky, or unclear who is white and who is not in a modern American context. This is demonstrated by the fact that the myriad organizations that discriminate against whites have no difficulty at all determining against whom to discriminate.

2) The people at the top of American society certainly do not encourage whites to identify with their race, either to “divide and rule” or for any other reason. This is easily demonstrated by the strong discouragement and demonization of white racial identity all throughout entertainment, education, and the press.

>You have a willing audience ready to attend to your “arguments” and give them a fair hearing.

Oh yes, your sneering scare quotes assure me of your “open” “mind” and “fair” “hearing.”

Now you are dodging the question! Come on, it is a simple question. You talk about your “arguments”, but you seem very reluctant to state just what those “arguments” are.

Last chance. You have a willing audience ready to attend to your “arguments” and give them a fair hearing. Maybe you will even change some minds and win some support. Make your case, or forever hold your peace.

You’re dodging the question. Yes, you’re a smart, sophisticated, and enlightened person and far too good for TV; I’m very impressed. But that doesn’t change the fact that TV exists, that millions upon millions of people do watch it, and that it is an incredibly powerful propaganda tool. Why then do the powerful, sinister, shadowy forces that rule us consistently use this tool to denigrate the very narrative you claim they want us buy into?

Some of us don’t watch TV, Conned. We learned long ago that the media serve only the interests of the powerful.

Let me ask you a serious question — what is your “argument”?

It seems like you are saying that all “White” people should put aside their historic differences with each other and join together to fight against their “White” overlords? Is that it?

You keep recommending I “think for myself.” Perhaps you should try it, too. I suggest you start by considering why, if my position is a trap our rulers use to control us and yours is a bold and independent break from their power, will you never see my arguments made on television, while yours are repeated to us so often they’ve become cliches.