<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The revolution in women&#8217;s education and work since the 1960s</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2020/02/the-revolution-in-womens-education-and-work-since-the-1960s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2020/02/the-revolution-in-womens-education-and-work-since-the-1960s/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 16:37:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JR</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2020/02/the-revolution-in-womens-education-and-work-since-the-1960s/comment-page-1/#comment-3588123</link>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2023 04:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=46247#comment-3588123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Women are already parasitic. They produce very little of value, and most of the jobs they do are better done by men. Women and their ever increasing standards and competition with men price themselves out of the dating market and are demographically pushing us off of a cliff all western governments are trying to fill with immigrants.

Why? Because single women spend money on stupid shit and can be convinced to go along with anything, making them the perfect voter and consumer aka useful idiot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Women are already parasitic. They produce very little of value, and most of the jobs they do are better done by men. Women and their ever increasing standards and competition with men price themselves out of the dating market and are demographically pushing us off of a cliff all western governments are trying to fill with immigrants.</p>
<p>Why? Because single women spend money on stupid shit and can be convinced to go along with anything, making them the perfect voter and consumer aka useful idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2020/02/the-revolution-in-womens-education-and-work-since-the-1960s/comment-page-1/#comment-3051286</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2020 19:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=46247#comment-3051286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Word.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2020/02/the-revolution-in-womens-education-and-work-since-the-1960s/comment-page-1/#comment-3050560</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2020 00:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=46247#comment-3050560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reason I class most women as parasites is the general attitude that &quot;most&quot; have towards all this. You tell your average chick that &quot;Hey, Mary&#039;s boinking Ted, and the kid isn&#039;t Don&#039;s...&quot;? They&#039;ll immediately close ranks, and Don ain&#039;t never going to know from their lips. They&#039;ll stab each other in the back, intramurally, but unless one of them has set her cap for Don, and wants him, precisely none of them are going to let him know that kid ain&#039;t his.

Doubt me on this? Ask ten women how they feel about mandatory paternity tests in the maternity ward, and then ask them to justify their positions. You might, maybe, get one that sees it as reasonable that the male involved might deserve some truth in this regard, but the vast majority are going to stick their pointy little noses in the air and say something to the effect of &quot;We have to think of children...&quot;. Yeah, never mind the poor bastard whose cuckoldry you want to cover up, let&#039;s think of those kids he&#039;s gonna be forced to support for the next ten years.

Ever notice how you can&#039;t sue some bitch for pulling that on you, and recover for it? Nope; all that money and time is gone, irrecoverable for the male involved. In most cases, you can&#039;t even sever responsibility for the kid, if your name was on the marriage license or the birth certificate.

And, if you were to ever suggest that the change in DNA science means that we can now know for sure who Daddy was? LOL... Get serious. Every woman in the land will deny, deny, deny. You&#039;d have about as much chance of getting laws through on that count as you would of reaching orbit by tucking your head in between your legs and farting hard.

Face it--As a sex, they&#039;re parasites. If they weren&#039;t, they&#039;d look at things as they are and say &quot;This is unfair to men, and we need to change this...&quot;. Precisely zero women are fighting to change the Selective Service laws, and zero are fighting to make paternity fraud a criminal act.

Parasites, the lot of them. That&#039;s the mentality they have, and until that changes, they should not be granted equal civil rights.

This is just one of the things I&#039;m talking about when I say that the necessary social adaptations haven&#039;t come in. My guess is that if the trends continue, the advent and widespread uptake of sexbots and artificial wombs are going to lead to women being forced into making things equal, simply by virtue of the fact that they&#039;ve really got nothing to offer, and men are going to be tired of being exploited. Ain&#039;t no piece of ass worth that sort of grief.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason I class most women as parasites is the general attitude that &#8220;most&#8221; have towards all this. You tell your average chick that &#8220;Hey, Mary&#8217;s boinking Ted, and the kid isn&#8217;t Don&#8217;s&#8230;&#8221;? They&#8217;ll immediately close ranks, and Don ain&#8217;t never going to know from their lips. They&#8217;ll stab each other in the back, intramurally, but unless one of them has set her cap for Don, and wants him, precisely none of them are going to let him know that kid ain&#8217;t his.</p>
<p>Doubt me on this? Ask ten women how they feel about mandatory paternity tests in the maternity ward, and then ask them to justify their positions. You might, maybe, get one that sees it as reasonable that the male involved might deserve some truth in this regard, but the vast majority are going to stick their pointy little noses in the air and say something to the effect of &#8220;We have to think of children&#8230;&#8221;. Yeah, never mind the poor bastard whose cuckoldry you want to cover up, let&#8217;s think of those kids he&#8217;s gonna be forced to support for the next ten years.</p>
<p>Ever notice how you can&#8217;t sue some bitch for pulling that on you, and recover for it? Nope; all that money and time is gone, irrecoverable for the male involved. In most cases, you can&#8217;t even sever responsibility for the kid, if your name was on the marriage license or the birth certificate.</p>
<p>And, if you were to ever suggest that the change in DNA science means that we can now know for sure who Daddy was? LOL&#8230; Get serious. Every woman in the land will deny, deny, deny. You&#8217;d have about as much chance of getting laws through on that count as you would of reaching orbit by tucking your head in between your legs and farting hard.</p>
<p>Face it&#8211;As a sex, they&#8217;re parasites. If they weren&#8217;t, they&#8217;d look at things as they are and say &#8220;This is unfair to men, and we need to change this&#8230;&#8221;. Precisely zero women are fighting to change the Selective Service laws, and zero are fighting to make paternity fraud a criminal act.</p>
<p>Parasites, the lot of them. That&#8217;s the mentality they have, and until that changes, they should not be granted equal civil rights.</p>
<p>This is just one of the things I&#8217;m talking about when I say that the necessary social adaptations haven&#8217;t come in. My guess is that if the trends continue, the advent and widespread uptake of sexbots and artificial wombs are going to lead to women being forced into making things equal, simply by virtue of the fact that they&#8217;ve really got nothing to offer, and men are going to be tired of being exploited. Ain&#8217;t no piece of ass worth that sort of grief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2020/02/the-revolution-in-womens-education-and-work-since-the-1960s/comment-page-1/#comment-3050556</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2020 00:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=46247#comment-3050556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, that went a different way than I thought it would.

I was all set to ask WTH- how can producing and raising the next gen be considered parasitism, unless one has a really reductionist, libertarian, cash-economy view of things?

Then I read a little farther. 

Yeah, that kind of woman is a world-class parasite as far as her husband is concerned. Not so much for the other men for whom she has performed a huge free service of transmitting their DNA forward at no cost, to them she&#039;s actually a public service. Practically a charity. 

But to her husband, big time. And to the state and society in those cases where living at public expense.

Razib Khan has lately posted some studies that suggest according to DNA that non-paternity events vary from culture to culture, and across time, but are not and may not have been all that common in either Western societies or Middle Eastern ones.

I read that and I am willing to believe it, but it clearly does happen.

Then I though about it some more and came to three conclusions-

1. I bet it is starting to happen a lot less now and will keep happening less. The advent of cheaper and easier and multiple times repeatable paternity testing really changes the dynamic for those men with the smarts to question it when there is any grounds and the guts to have the test done.

2. I&#039;ll bet that&#039;s why there&#039;s ever more pressure to downgrade the idea of naturally sired offspring and men&#039;s desire to father their own children.

3. I&#039;ll bet it&#039;s not that common in Middle Eastern societies. If it were, there&#039;d be hell to pay for all sorts of people involved in the events.

On that #2, I seem to have lived through a period when all sorts of conceptual changes have come about in this area-

From the 1970s at least, removal of the stigma around adoption. This is pretty good. I am amazed at how much secrecy, shame, and paranoia surrounded this timeless and laudable, civic minded act until recently, albeit only for a time. It&#039;s not as though it hadn&#039;t always been a reality in every society. I genuinely don&#039;t know what that was all about. i can&#039;t think of any horrible repressive Christian notions that would cause it. Some sort of Progressive trope? Like temperance or eugenics? 

About the only thing I would have objected to in the realm of adoption is the closed one. I would have considered myself entitled to know my true origins, at least at 18-21 or so. Fortunately, this practice seems to have also declined. Though the increased societal unhappiness with people who think their natural parentage matters a lot might see it come back.

End of the stigma around illegitimacy. Yeah, OK, there&#039;s no need to get all spazzed about that sort of thing, let alone make anyone&#039;s life difficult over it, and certainly, again, earlier eras of Western history were not as oppressive on it as the early industrial era. Still, I&#039;m less cheered by this one. Seems like a concession to bad behaviour, at least at the margins. Maybe stigmatizing the parents.

But somehow, we have just about reached the point at which a man confronted with an NPE [non-paternity event] and a wife that wants to stay married to him, is just about morally and socially obligated to stay with her because [Reasons? Feminism? Sexual Freedom?]. I have seen it written and heard it argued that this is the honourable act and a desire to stand on traditional honour by expecting to raise only his own children or, at least, kids freely adopted by him, is selfish. Not quite beyond the pale yet, but I for one see it coming.

I would not want to deny any man the right to stay with his wife and work it out, even if I myself cringe at the idea of forgiving a betrayal that went so far as to produce a child not mine. 

I&#039;m even prepared to respect that as a form of courage, though I have some trouble with that. Taking an insult and not complaing can be an act of courage, or not.

But we&#039;re not long short of the time when any other choice will be socially disrespected and my aforementioned cringe condemned. What kind of a selfish coward would abandon his wife and a child just because she betrayed him and it isn&#039;t his? Horrors. Or words to that effect.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that went a different way than I thought it would.</p>
<p>I was all set to ask WTH- how can producing and raising the next gen be considered parasitism, unless one has a really reductionist, libertarian, cash-economy view of things?</p>
<p>Then I read a little farther. </p>
<p>Yeah, that kind of woman is a world-class parasite as far as her husband is concerned. Not so much for the other men for whom she has performed a huge free service of transmitting their DNA forward at no cost, to them she&#8217;s actually a public service. Practically a charity. </p>
<p>But to her husband, big time. And to the state and society in those cases where living at public expense.</p>
<p>Razib Khan has lately posted some studies that suggest according to DNA that non-paternity events vary from culture to culture, and across time, but are not and may not have been all that common in either Western societies or Middle Eastern ones.</p>
<p>I read that and I am willing to believe it, but it clearly does happen.</p>
<p>Then I though about it some more and came to three conclusions-</p>
<p>1. I bet it is starting to happen a lot less now and will keep happening less. The advent of cheaper and easier and multiple times repeatable paternity testing really changes the dynamic for those men with the smarts to question it when there is any grounds and the guts to have the test done.</p>
<p>2. I&#8217;ll bet that&#8217;s why there&#8217;s ever more pressure to downgrade the idea of naturally sired offspring and men&#8217;s desire to father their own children.</p>
<p>3. I&#8217;ll bet it&#8217;s not that common in Middle Eastern societies. If it were, there&#8217;d be hell to pay for all sorts of people involved in the events.</p>
<p>On that #2, I seem to have lived through a period when all sorts of conceptual changes have come about in this area-</p>
<p>From the 1970s at least, removal of the stigma around adoption. This is pretty good. I am amazed at how much secrecy, shame, and paranoia surrounded this timeless and laudable, civic minded act until recently, albeit only for a time. It&#8217;s not as though it hadn&#8217;t always been a reality in every society. I genuinely don&#8217;t know what that was all about. i can&#8217;t think of any horrible repressive Christian notions that would cause it. Some sort of Progressive trope? Like temperance or eugenics? </p>
<p>About the only thing I would have objected to in the realm of adoption is the closed one. I would have considered myself entitled to know my true origins, at least at 18-21 or so. Fortunately, this practice seems to have also declined. Though the increased societal unhappiness with people who think their natural parentage matters a lot might see it come back.</p>
<p>End of the stigma around illegitimacy. Yeah, OK, there&#8217;s no need to get all spazzed about that sort of thing, let alone make anyone&#8217;s life difficult over it, and certainly, again, earlier eras of Western history were not as oppressive on it as the early industrial era. Still, I&#8217;m less cheered by this one. Seems like a concession to bad behaviour, at least at the margins. Maybe stigmatizing the parents.</p>
<p>But somehow, we have just about reached the point at which a man confronted with an NPE [non-paternity event] and a wife that wants to stay married to him, is just about morally and socially obligated to stay with her because [Reasons? Feminism? Sexual Freedom?]. I have seen it written and heard it argued that this is the honourable act and a desire to stand on traditional honour by expecting to raise only his own children or, at least, kids freely adopted by him, is selfish. Not quite beyond the pale yet, but I for one see it coming.</p>
<p>I would not want to deny any man the right to stay with his wife and work it out, even if I myself cringe at the idea of forgiving a betrayal that went so far as to produce a child not mine. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m even prepared to respect that as a form of courage, though I have some trouble with that. Taking an insult and not complaing can be an act of courage, or not.</p>
<p>But we&#8217;re not long short of the time when any other choice will be socially disrespected and my aforementioned cringe condemned. What kind of a selfish coward would abandon his wife and a child just because she betrayed him and it isn&#8217;t his? Horrors. Or words to that effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2020/02/the-revolution-in-womens-education-and-work-since-the-1960s/comment-page-1/#comment-3050551</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 23:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=46247#comment-3050551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;&quot;Motherhood and wifery are the farthest things from parasitism as you can get...&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Bullshit. They&#039;re the essence of it, especially when the &quot;mother and wife&quot; is f**king some other, prettier man she has chosen, and the man who pays for her upkeep and raising her kids is not the father of them.

Women are parasites, by role and inclination. You can&#039;t do a damn thing to guarantee fidelity, and most of them lie their asses off about who the father was, if they feel the need. If you doubt me, go spend some time in Family Court in your locale--The number of cases where women pull off stunning frauds and betrayals of their husbands are legion.

Granted, there are males that do similar things, but the difference is that the males have nowhere near the ability to pull off such frauds--Women &lt;i&gt;know&lt;/i&gt; who the fathers are, in most cases.

I really love listening to people go on and on and on about their family history, and the genealogy of it all. Reality? All you really know is what the records say, and without doing a trip back to check the actual genetics, you have no way in hell of knowing who your actual ancestors are. The records are sweet-smelling lies told to keep things peaceful.

It&#039;s like the family I knew, growing up--Six different kids, all of whom looked nothing alike. Dad was profoundly trusting and stupid, and none of those kids were his. The poor bastard thought they were, but the truth came out a few years back, after he was dead. Someone needed a kidney transplant, and when the testing got done, none of those six kids were close enough kin to be able to donate. Mom had some &#039;splainin to do, and they weren&#039;t too pleased with her. She was a slut--The kids were fathered by most of her husbands friends, and a couple of passing strangers.

So, yeah... Some women aren&#039;t parasites. A not inconsiderable number are consummate parasites, however, leaching off the resources, labor, and energies of their husbands/lovers, and never returning honest value for effort. How&#039;d you like to find out that you&#039;d raised and paid for kids from six different men, and none of your own? Think that&#039;d sting, just a little?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Motherhood and wifery are the farthest things from parasitism as you can get&#8230;&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Bullshit. They&#8217;re the essence of it, especially when the &#8220;mother and wife&#8221; is f**king some other, prettier man she has chosen, and the man who pays for her upkeep and raising her kids is not the father of them.</p>
<p>Women are parasites, by role and inclination. You can&#8217;t do a damn thing to guarantee fidelity, and most of them lie their asses off about who the father was, if they feel the need. If you doubt me, go spend some time in Family Court in your locale&#8211;The number of cases where women pull off stunning frauds and betrayals of their husbands are legion.</p>
<p>Granted, there are males that do similar things, but the difference is that the males have nowhere near the ability to pull off such frauds&#8211;Women <i>know</i> who the fathers are, in most cases.</p>
<p>I really love listening to people go on and on and on about their family history, and the genealogy of it all. Reality? All you really know is what the records say, and without doing a trip back to check the actual genetics, you have no way in hell of knowing who your actual ancestors are. The records are sweet-smelling lies told to keep things peaceful.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like the family I knew, growing up&#8211;Six different kids, all of whom looked nothing alike. Dad was profoundly trusting and stupid, and none of those kids were his. The poor bastard thought they were, but the truth came out a few years back, after he was dead. Someone needed a kidney transplant, and when the testing got done, none of those six kids were close enough kin to be able to donate. Mom had some &#8216;splainin to do, and they weren&#8217;t too pleased with her. She was a slut&#8211;The kids were fathered by most of her husbands friends, and a couple of passing strangers.</p>
<p>So, yeah&#8230; Some women aren&#8217;t parasites. A not inconsiderable number are consummate parasites, however, leaching off the resources, labor, and energies of their husbands/lovers, and never returning honest value for effort. How&#8217;d you like to find out that you&#8217;d raised and paid for kids from six different men, and none of your own? Think that&#8217;d sting, just a little?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2020/02/the-revolution-in-womens-education-and-work-since-the-1960s/comment-page-1/#comment-3050275</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=46247#comment-3050275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among the rules my sons need to learn: Don&#039;t shit where you eat, and don&#039;t date or flirt with women in a place that has any connection to your present or future livelihood (e.g. STEM college). Men with much better &quot;social skills&quot; than I have been destroyed by vengeful women.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Among the rules my sons need to learn: Don&#8217;t shit where you eat, and don&#8217;t date or flirt with women in a place that has any connection to your present or future livelihood (e.g. STEM college). Men with much better &#8220;social skills&#8221; than I have been destroyed by vengeful women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2020/02/the-revolution-in-womens-education-and-work-since-the-1960s/comment-page-1/#comment-3049825</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 21:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=46247#comment-3049825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The issue here is that we&#039;re living in the liminal space between what was, and what will be.

The essential bargain between men and women used to be one thing, based on the biological imperatives. The conditions those were negotiated under no longer obtain, and the spoiled little girls are going to find out the hard way that &quot;male privilege&quot; is mostly the privilege to suffer. Also, that as they move in on male &quot;prerogatives&quot;, they&#039;re going to find that they&#039;re mostly imaginary.

Precisely none of the crap they bitch about is due to some male &quot;patriarchal conspiracy&quot;, any more than what women used to get in the deal was due to a matriarchal one. All it came down to was a set of social values and mores, mechanisms, that were in place to deal with the conditions then obtaining. Those conditions don&#039;t obtain, therefore there must be a shift in all that ancient bargain between the sexes.

I&#039;m not sure that the girls are going to like it, when they have to grow up and be women beside the men. The little boys won&#039;t care for it at all, either.

The end state of where this shift is taking us, I believe, is going to be a true egalitarian state of affairs, where neither men nor women have any sort of &quot;advantage&quot; over one another in any aspect of life. The ladies and the lads ain&#039;t gonna like that, at all. The rest of us, I suspect, are going to have a ring-side seat to the accompanying angst and anger over it all--I really, really look forward to it all, when the miserable bitches of the world have to sign up for the draft, and get to do their share at the coal face. All I can say is, it&#039;s about Goddamn time they got their share of the shitty end of the stick.

Ever read the story &quot;The White Feather&quot;? I read that once, and the whole thing just filled me with rage; what right does some flippant little twat have, to shame anyone, anyone at all, into going off to war? She has no risk; she has no moral right to so much as say a word to any man on the issue.

And, yet... That feminine mentality still holds sway to this day. They won&#039;t pay the price, but they think they can call the piper&#039;s tune.

F**k them. F**k them all. The time is coming when they&#039;re going to have to pay to dance, and I think it&#039;s long, long overdue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue here is that we&#8217;re living in the liminal space between what was, and what will be.</p>
<p>The essential bargain between men and women used to be one thing, based on the biological imperatives. The conditions those were negotiated under no longer obtain, and the spoiled little girls are going to find out the hard way that &#8220;male privilege&#8221; is mostly the privilege to suffer. Also, that as they move in on male &#8220;prerogatives&#8221;, they&#8217;re going to find that they&#8217;re mostly imaginary.</p>
<p>Precisely none of the crap they bitch about is due to some male &#8220;patriarchal conspiracy&#8221;, any more than what women used to get in the deal was due to a matriarchal one. All it came down to was a set of social values and mores, mechanisms, that were in place to deal with the conditions then obtaining. Those conditions don&#8217;t obtain, therefore there must be a shift in all that ancient bargain between the sexes.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure that the girls are going to like it, when they have to grow up and be women beside the men. The little boys won&#8217;t care for it at all, either.</p>
<p>The end state of where this shift is taking us, I believe, is going to be a true egalitarian state of affairs, where neither men nor women have any sort of &#8220;advantage&#8221; over one another in any aspect of life. The ladies and the lads ain&#8217;t gonna like that, at all. The rest of us, I suspect, are going to have a ring-side seat to the accompanying angst and anger over it all&#8211;I really, really look forward to it all, when the miserable bitches of the world have to sign up for the draft, and get to do their share at the coal face. All I can say is, it&#8217;s about Goddamn time they got their share of the shitty end of the stick.</p>
<p>Ever read the story &#8220;The White Feather&#8221;? I read that once, and the whole thing just filled me with rage; what right does some flippant little twat have, to shame anyone, anyone at all, into going off to war? She has no risk; she has no moral right to so much as say a word to any man on the issue.</p>
<p>And, yet&#8230; That feminine mentality still holds sway to this day. They won&#8217;t pay the price, but they think they can call the piper&#8217;s tune.</p>
<p>F**k them. F**k them all. The time is coming when they&#8217;re going to have to pay to dance, and I think it&#8217;s long, long overdue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kornja</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2020/02/the-revolution-in-womens-education-and-work-since-the-1960s/comment-page-1/#comment-3049733</link>
		<dc:creator>Kornja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 17:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=46247#comment-3049733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave, it sounds like you&#039;d be better off helping them learn those social skills that they&#039;ll need no matter what, and understand why its important. Female attention doesn&#039;t deluge upon passive men in any circumstance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, it sounds like you&#8217;d be better off helping them learn those social skills that they&#8217;ll need no matter what, and understand why its important. Female attention doesn&#8217;t deluge upon passive men in any circumstance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2020/02/the-revolution-in-womens-education-and-work-since-the-1960s/comment-page-1/#comment-3049729</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 17:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=46247#comment-3049729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Sexual Revolution made life far worse for men with sub-par social skills. In the old days, women needed husbands, and were willing to tolerate a socially awkward man if he could earn a decent living.

When they reach puberty, I must teach my nerdy sons to avoid all unnecessary interaction with women in first-world countries because one accusation can destroy a man&#039;s life. Not sure how to prepare them for the deluge of female attention they&#039;ll receive in second- and third-world countries.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Sexual Revolution made life far worse for men with sub-par social skills. In the old days, women needed husbands, and were willing to tolerate a socially awkward man if he could earn a decent living.</p>
<p>When they reach puberty, I must teach my nerdy sons to avoid all unnecessary interaction with women in first-world countries because one accusation can destroy a man&#8217;s life. Not sure how to prepare them for the deluge of female attention they&#8217;ll receive in second- and third-world countries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 'umble 'arrier</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2020/02/the-revolution-in-womens-education-and-work-since-the-1960s/comment-page-1/#comment-3049722</link>
		<dc:creator>'umble 'arrier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 16:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=46247#comment-3049722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Indian men are hopeless at dating because their families have always arranged marriages for them. Might be worth considering, because for nerds go extinct, everyone else has to go back to pencil and paper when their computers mysteriously stop working.&quot;

If Indians go extinct, computers are likely to begin working significantly better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Indian men are hopeless at dating because their families have always arranged marriages for them. Might be worth considering, because for nerds go extinct, everyone else has to go back to pencil and paper when their computers mysteriously stop working.&#8221;</p>
<p>If Indians go extinct, computers are likely to begin working significantly better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
