Not a lot in those examples, mind you, but also affecting US citizens and, in the 1916 case, in members of the Union.

Still, the US has done well by luck and its own efforts to keep it to the margins.

They were a territory instead of a state, but they were still American citizens on US passports.

There were probably regions -meaning here already settled by Europeans- of the 13 colonies and of the then-US that not only saw no fighting in either the revolution or civil war, but saw little disruption to their way of life. Maybe even no one went off to war, although that would narrow it down. Whereas those same regions might have been torn up by some local intercolonial war or land dispute and seen villages burn and families killed off. Or Indian war with the same effect.

Same goes for other large continent-states like ancient Rome, various Chinese and Indian empires. Some people in some areas might have to go to the mattresses while others, under the same broad political umbrella, experience little to nothing.

Alternatively, there’s the overthrow of the state at the center that, from time to time, happens without too much disruption even in other cities, let alone the provinces. I’m not sure America is set up to allow that, but maybe. It’s happened in other systems often enough.

Aaron Burr had a thing going on.

Andrew Jackson was kind-of a thing: ramping up the Indian wars into an existential struggle.

The Progressive era that gave us suffrage and prohibition.

FDR?

The sixties…

Mainstreaming of gay marriage, transgenderism.

_________________

Maybe not a direct gov’t overthrow, but they significantly changed the mission of gov’t.