<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: He never intended to become a political dissident</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2019/11/he-never-intended-to-become-a-political-dissident/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2019/11/he-never-intended-to-become-a-political-dissident/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 12:05:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaikokumaniakku</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2019/11/he-never-intended-to-become-a-political-dissident/comment-page-1/#comment-3004481</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaikokumaniakku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2019 00:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=45749#comment-3004481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the one hand, I have great indignation against martial arts teachers who pretend that they are teaching fighting styles when they are really just teaching qigong stretches that improve your circulation but are useless in combat.

On the other hand, I have great indignation for prize-fighting thugs who feed their narcissistic egos by violating the customs and courtesies of organized fights.

In my opinion, there are no good guys in this story.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the one hand, I have great indignation against martial arts teachers who pretend that they are teaching fighting styles when they are really just teaching qigong stretches that improve your circulation but are useless in combat.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I have great indignation for prize-fighting thugs who feed their narcissistic egos by violating the customs and courtesies of organized fights.</p>
<p>In my opinion, there are no good guys in this story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2019/11/he-never-intended-to-become-a-political-dissident/comment-page-1/#comment-3002772</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2019 17:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=45749#comment-3002772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Things like this are how you know that a totalitarian system is under stress, significant stress. Under normal circumstances, someone like Xu would be an ephemeral phenomenon, unimportant to official notice. With the Chinese government as involved as it is in things, far past the point where a government should be engaged, Xu is a mortal danger.

Not necessarily because of who he is, but what he represents--An alternative view of the situation.

The more control you reach for, the less you will actually have. The Chinese Communist Party has yet to grasp the implications of this, which will become increasingly important as time goes on. My guess is that we&#039;re not too far off from the next big disengagement from the world, similar to what happened with Zheng Ho. Rather than face the challenges and realities of being a world player on an even stage, which is what the rest of the world will demand of China, they&#039;re going to throw the whole thing up and move towards insular autarky, quite probably not long after they get their fingers burned in some international adventure. The Chinese keep throwing up these totalitarian governments, and then suborning them from within, which is what really does the whole system in, when you get down to it. My guess is that the whole demographic/economic situation in China is going to reach a crisis of internal inconsistency sometime in the next 20-30 years, perhaps sooner. Where they go, afterwards? Who knows, but I doubt it will be &quot;world domination&quot;. That&#039;s going to prove to be about as likely as the previous bug-a-boo, the one we had going about &quot;Japan, Inc.&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things like this are how you know that a totalitarian system is under stress, significant stress. Under normal circumstances, someone like Xu would be an ephemeral phenomenon, unimportant to official notice. With the Chinese government as involved as it is in things, far past the point where a government should be engaged, Xu is a mortal danger.</p>
<p>Not necessarily because of who he is, but what he represents&#8211;An alternative view of the situation.</p>
<p>The more control you reach for, the less you will actually have. The Chinese Communist Party has yet to grasp the implications of this, which will become increasingly important as time goes on. My guess is that we&#8217;re not too far off from the next big disengagement from the world, similar to what happened with Zheng Ho. Rather than face the challenges and realities of being a world player on an even stage, which is what the rest of the world will demand of China, they&#8217;re going to throw the whole thing up and move towards insular autarky, quite probably not long after they get their fingers burned in some international adventure. The Chinese keep throwing up these totalitarian governments, and then suborning them from within, which is what really does the whole system in, when you get down to it. My guess is that the whole demographic/economic situation in China is going to reach a crisis of internal inconsistency sometime in the next 20-30 years, perhaps sooner. Where they go, afterwards? Who knows, but I doubt it will be &#8220;world domination&#8221;. That&#8217;s going to prove to be about as likely as the previous bug-a-boo, the one we had going about &#8220;Japan, Inc.&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
