<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Her creepy imaginary friend is called Captain Howdy</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2019/09/her-creepy-imaginary-friend-is-called-captain-howdy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2019/09/her-creepy-imaginary-friend-is-called-captain-howdy/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 19:08:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alistair</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2019/09/her-creepy-imaginary-friend-is-called-captain-howdy/comment-page-1/#comment-2975476</link>
		<dc:creator>Alistair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 20:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=45591#comment-2975476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[McChuck;

I&#039;d heard...slightly less extreme numbers, but along the same lines; do you have a link?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McChuck;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d heard&#8230;slightly less extreme numbers, but along the same lines; do you have a link?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McChuck</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2019/09/her-creepy-imaginary-friend-is-called-captain-howdy/comment-page-1/#comment-2975418</link>
		<dc:creator>McChuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=45591#comment-2975418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allstair, 

Research has shown that over the long course of history, 90% of women reproduce, but less than 20% of men.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allstair, </p>
<p>Research has shown that over the long course of history, 90% of women reproduce, but less than 20% of men.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alistair</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2019/09/her-creepy-imaginary-friend-is-called-captain-howdy/comment-page-1/#comment-2975192</link>
		<dc:creator>Alistair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 08:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=45591#comment-2975192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[....I mean it looks like wine, and the bottle is a familiar shape....but....you know...Canada...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;.I mean it looks like wine, and the bottle is a familiar shape&#8230;.but&#8230;.you know&#8230;Canada&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alistair</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2019/09/her-creepy-imaginary-friend-is-called-captain-howdy/comment-page-1/#comment-2975191</link>
		<dc:creator>Alistair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 08:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=45591#comment-2975191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think monogamy is vastly under-rated. 

Polygamous societies have some very nasty features. Firsly, all those surplus males. Secondly is the need for unmarried men to take crazy risks to get into the minority of married men. Thirdly, the huge rise in the value of females turns them into a commodity.

It&#039;s not a co-incidence that the Arabic world is a Patriachy, with women as cattle. It follows directly from 4-wives. 

I ran some simple social models for polygamous pair-matching, just to see how that would differ from a monogamous rule. I assumed a composite measure of &quot;attractiveness&quot; (looks, fitness, wealth etc) that was lognormally distributed for both genders, that woman shared the value of their male partner whilst men summed the value of all their female partners. The results were a hugely unequal distribution of mating opportunities; Gini coefficients of 0.7 or higher. Between 30% and 70% of men didn&#039;t typically get a look in, depending on the sd of the attractiveness distribution.  

Monogamy: good for Alpha females and Beta males. Polygamy: the reverse.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think monogamy is vastly under-rated. </p>
<p>Polygamous societies have some very nasty features. Firsly, all those surplus males. Secondly is the need for unmarried men to take crazy risks to get into the minority of married men. Thirdly, the huge rise in the value of females turns them into a commodity.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a co-incidence that the Arabic world is a Patriachy, with women as cattle. It follows directly from 4-wives. </p>
<p>I ran some simple social models for polygamous pair-matching, just to see how that would differ from a monogamous rule. I assumed a composite measure of &#8220;attractiveness&#8221; (looks, fitness, wealth etc) that was lognormally distributed for both genders, that woman shared the value of their male partner whilst men summed the value of all their female partners. The results were a hugely unequal distribution of mating opportunities; Gini coefficients of 0.7 or higher. Between 30% and 70% of men didn&#8217;t typically get a look in, depending on the sd of the attractiveness distribution.  </p>
<p>Monogamy: good for Alpha females and Beta males. Polygamy: the reverse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2019/09/her-creepy-imaginary-friend-is-called-captain-howdy/comment-page-1/#comment-2975068</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Sep 2019 17:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=45591#comment-2975068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anything requiring hard work and self-sacrifice is always a hard sale. Self-indulgence and gratification is always easier, and that&#039;s the gist of what no-fault divorce actually implies on both sides of the line between men and women.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anything requiring hard work and self-sacrifice is always a hard sale. Self-indulgence and gratification is always easier, and that&#8217;s the gist of what no-fault divorce actually implies on both sides of the line between men and women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bomag</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2019/09/her-creepy-imaginary-friend-is-called-captain-howdy/comment-page-1/#comment-2975059</link>
		<dc:creator>Bomag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Sep 2019 15:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=45591#comment-2975059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Data I&#039;ve come across suggests that monogamy is one of the better strategies:  more reports of life satisfaction; countries get more economic and social success.

The thing is a harder sell than it should be.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Data I&#8217;ve come across suggests that monogamy is one of the better strategies:  more reports of life satisfaction; countries get more economic and social success.</p>
<p>The thing is a harder sell than it should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
