<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More British than Britain itself</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2019/06/more-british-than-britain-itself/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2019/06/more-british-than-britain-itself/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 17:19:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2019/06/more-british-than-britain-itself/comment-page-1/#comment-2850552</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2019 19:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=45250#comment-2850552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This.

We actually have quite a large Irish ancestry population, even those who still self-identify, but the relative Scottishness of British settlement in Canada versus the relative Irishness of Australia was actually a quite long-in-use way of describing Canadian history to ourselves. I think I have encountered Australians who do the same comparison, so the idea had legs for many generations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This.</p>
<p>We actually have quite a large Irish ancestry population, even those who still self-identify, but the relative Scottishness of British settlement in Canada versus the relative Irishness of Australia was actually a quite long-in-use way of describing Canadian history to ourselves. I think I have encountered Australians who do the same comparison, so the idea had legs for many generations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2019/06/more-british-than-britain-itself/comment-page-1/#comment-2850537</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2019 18:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=45250#comment-2850537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The British Empire made a point of sending Irish to Australia and Scots to Canada, right down to the regiments stationed there. Australia being as far away as practical and all those Doug Campbells being unlikely to team up with the Irish in America.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The British Empire made a point of sending Irish to Australia and Scots to Canada, right down to the regiments stationed there. Australia being as far away as practical and all those Doug Campbells being unlikely to team up with the Irish in America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TRX</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2019/06/more-british-than-britain-itself/comment-page-1/#comment-2850519</link>
		<dc:creator>TRX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2019 15:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=45250#comment-2850519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Australia probably got the largest number of transportees, many also got sent to other colonies, including British America.

There are a number of documented cases of transportees sent to America who simply bought a ticket and sailed right back to England.  Australia was a bit harder to return from...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Australia probably got the largest number of transportees, many also got sent to other colonies, including British America.</p>
<p>There are a number of documented cases of transportees sent to America who simply bought a ticket and sailed right back to England.  Australia was a bit harder to return from&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alrenous</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2019/06/more-british-than-britain-itself/comment-page-1/#comment-2850418</link>
		<dc:creator>Alrenous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2019 04:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=45250#comment-2850418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;However, 32 years later, in 1820, Australia’s European population still consisted of 84% of convicts and former convicts, and convict transport from Britain to Australia did not cease until 1868&lt;/blockquote&gt;Tendentious.
Australian population in 1868 was 1.5 million, and total convicts transported topped out at 167 thousand. The reason it could be 80% convict in 1820 was because the population was 34 thousand.
Of note, the usual proportion of criminal families in European populations is ~10%.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>However, 32 years later, in 1820, Australia’s European population still consisted of 84% of convicts and former convicts, and convict transport from Britain to Australia did not cease until 1868</p></blockquote>
<p>Tendentious.<br />
Australian population in 1868 was 1.5 million, and total convicts transported topped out at 167 thousand. The reason it could be 80% convict in 1820 was because the population was 34 thousand.<br />
Of note, the usual proportion of criminal families in European populations is ~10%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
