<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finlandization is not for export</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2019/06/finlandization-is-not-for-export/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2019/06/finlandization-is-not-for-export/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 23:08:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2019/06/finlandization-is-not-for-export/comment-page-1/#comment-2806127</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2019 18:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=45220#comment-2806127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On some level it may not have been for domestic consumption, as there were a lot of revelations about the presence of Soviet agents and influencers in Cold War Finland in the past decade or so. Their neutrality was recoloured a bit.

But it&#039;s hard to argue with what works, especially if it works under the most dire circumstances. They got to stay independent, out of a Soviet military or [formal] economic bloc, and more or less govern themselves. Few nations manage a situation like they had half as well.

I have earlier mentioned that Canadian wild card political commentator Gwynne Dyer once advocated Finlandization for Canada. Toward the United States, mind you, but still.

It&#039;s hard to remember now but the term had surprisingly wide currency in the early to mid 80s and was being thrown about as an option for a lot of countries that were emphatically not in comparable situations to Finland.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On some level it may not have been for domestic consumption, as there were a lot of revelations about the presence of Soviet agents and influencers in Cold War Finland in the past decade or so. Their neutrality was recoloured a bit.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s hard to argue with what works, especially if it works under the most dire circumstances. They got to stay independent, out of a Soviet military or [formal] economic bloc, and more or less govern themselves. Few nations manage a situation like they had half as well.</p>
<p>I have earlier mentioned that Canadian wild card political commentator Gwynne Dyer once advocated Finlandization for Canada. Toward the United States, mind you, but still.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to remember now but the term had surprisingly wide currency in the early to mid 80s and was being thrown about as an option for a lot of countries that were emphatically not in comparable situations to Finland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
