<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bismarck was realistic enough to understand that he had achieved the most that was possible</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2019/06/bismarck-was-realistic-enough-to-understand-that-he-had-achieved-the-most-that-was-possible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2019/06/bismarck-was-realistic-enough-to-understand-that-he-had-achieved-the-most-that-was-possible/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 16:19:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Jones</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2019/06/bismarck-was-realistic-enough-to-understand-that-he-had-achieved-the-most-that-was-possible/comment-page-1/#comment-2847590</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 17:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=45248#comment-2847590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone who bothers to write has an agenda, and the agenda isn&#039;t necessarily to get the facts right. Poorly researched books are mainly a problem because some people believe everything they read.

No, I haven&#039;t researched this. It&#039;s just my impression.

I generally suspend disbelief even when reading nonfiction titles. Think of a pundit&#039;s books as extended op-eds and enjoy them as such. Diamond, Taleb, Gladwell, Peterson... they make me think, but I&#039;ll never let them do my thinking for me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone who bothers to write has an agenda, and the agenda isn&#8217;t necessarily to get the facts right. Poorly researched books are mainly a problem because some people believe everything they read.</p>
<p>No, I haven&#8217;t researched this. It&#8217;s just my impression.</p>
<p>I generally suspend disbelief even when reading nonfiction titles. Think of a pundit&#8217;s books as extended op-eds and enjoy them as such. Diamond, Taleb, Gladwell, Peterson&#8230; they make me think, but I&#8217;ll never let them do my thinking for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam J.</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2019/06/bismarck-was-realistic-enough-to-understand-that-he-had-achieved-the-most-that-was-possible/comment-page-1/#comment-2841474</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 03:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=45248#comment-2841474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kirk&#039;s mention of &quot;Technology and Empire&quot; reminded me of two excellent books I read that are on just this sort of thinking in the large about history.

William H. McNeill 

About technology and power. Very good. Don&#039;t miss.

&quot;The Pursuit of Power: Technology, Armed Force, and Society since A.D. 1000&quot;

About, of course, plagues and the effect on history.

&quot;Plagues and Peoples&quot;

Both are excellent classics.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kirk&#8217;s mention of &#8220;Technology and Empire&#8221; reminded me of two excellent books I read that are on just this sort of thinking in the large about history.</p>
<p>William H. McNeill </p>
<p>About technology and power. Very good. Don&#8217;t miss.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Pursuit of Power: Technology, Armed Force, and Society since A.D. 1000&#8243;</p>
<p>About, of course, plagues and the effect on history.</p>
<p>&#8220;Plagues and Peoples&#8221;</p>
<p>Both are excellent classics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2019/06/bismarck-was-realistic-enough-to-understand-that-he-had-achieved-the-most-that-was-possible/comment-page-1/#comment-2841057</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2019 23:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=45248#comment-2841057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Y&#039;all might want to make a quick scan over this post over at Powerline Blog...

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/06/embarrassing-liberals.php

I&#039;ve contended that Diamond is full of shiite, and apparently much smarter people than I agree with that assessment. In the comments, there&#039;s a book mentioned that I need to go look up, called &lt;i&gt;Technology and Empire&lt;/i&gt;, which may be where Diamond cribbed his notes.

I&#039;d also point out another comment that suddenly clarified something for me: There are no footnotes in &lt;i&gt;Guns, Germs, and Steel&lt;/i&gt;. I&#039;d missed that one, which leads into the general rule I&#039;ve established when reading something like that: If it ain&#039;t footnoted and the data&#039;s not attributed to places I can check, then it&#039;s almost certainly bullshit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Y&#8217;all might want to make a quick scan over this post over at Powerline Blog&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/06/embarrassing-liberals.php" >https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/06/embarrassing-liberals.php</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve contended that Diamond is full of shiite, and apparently much smarter people than I agree with that assessment. In the comments, there&#8217;s a book mentioned that I need to go look up, called <i>Technology and Empire</i>, which may be where Diamond cribbed his notes.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also point out another comment that suddenly clarified something for me: There are no footnotes in <i>Guns, Germs, and Steel</i>. I&#8217;d missed that one, which leads into the general rule I&#8217;ve established when reading something like that: If it ain&#8217;t footnoted and the data&#8217;s not attributed to places I can check, then it&#8217;s almost certainly bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
