<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Russians are considering a semi-catamaran aircraft carrier</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2018/10/the-russians-are-considering-a-semi-catamaran-aircraft-carrier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2018/10/the-russians-are-considering-a-semi-catamaran-aircraft-carrier/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 11:51:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam J.</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2018/10/the-russians-are-considering-a-semi-catamaran-aircraft-carrier/comment-page-1/#comment-2684962</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 06:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=43970#comment-2684962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I ran across this article on the Hickman Sea Sled. The hull looks like an inverted regular hull.

https://boats-from-usa.com/sites/default/files/boats/not-specified/56181/not-specified-model-16-618723.jpg

http://cdn.c.photoshelter.com/img-get/I0000tc2nSgLRYR0/s/750/600/sea-sled1.jpg

Below has links to articles about this type boat.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hickman_Sea_Sled

 They were of course banned from being considered as PT boats during WWII. The guy was Canadian. There&#039;s several advances that I know of that have been stopped because of politics or someone who just didn&#039;t like someone else. Here&#039;s another that was tested and tested better than other designs but politically it was a no starter because one of the backers plotted against Roosevelt the Burnelli plane.

http://www.aircrash.org/burnelli/index.htm

That&#039;s why I&#039;m suspicious of experts telling us that the only options are the ones we have now. There&#039;s just massive amounts of stuff that&#039;s sub optimal. Someone chooses some technological path that in many cases in not related to the actual capabilities or trade offs of the technology but for political or status reasons. Then everyone just follows along.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ran across this article on the Hickman Sea Sled. The hull looks like an inverted regular hull.</p>
<p><a href="https://boats-from-usa.com/sites/default/files/boats/not-specified/56181/not-specified-model-16-618723.jpg" >https://boats-from-usa.com/sites/default/files/boats/not-specified/56181/not-specified-model-16-618723.jpg</a></p>
<p><a href="http://cdn.c.photoshelter.com/img-get/I0000tc2nSgLRYR0/s/750/600/sea-sled1.jpg" >http://cdn.c.photoshelter.com/img-get/I0000tc2nSgLRYR0/s/750/600/sea-sled1.jpg</a></p>
<p>Below has links to articles about this type boat.</p>
<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hickman_Sea_Sled" >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hickman_Sea_Sled</a></p>
<p> They were of course banned from being considered as PT boats during WWII. The guy was Canadian. There&#8217;s several advances that I know of that have been stopped because of politics or someone who just didn&#8217;t like someone else. Here&#8217;s another that was tested and tested better than other designs but politically it was a no starter because one of the backers plotted against Roosevelt the Burnelli plane.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.aircrash.org/burnelli/index.htm" >http://www.aircrash.org/burnelli/index.htm</a></p>
<p>That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m suspicious of experts telling us that the only options are the ones we have now. There&#8217;s just massive amounts of stuff that&#8217;s sub optimal. Someone chooses some technological path that in many cases in not related to the actual capabilities or trade offs of the technology but for political or status reasons. Then everyone just follows along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam J.</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2018/10/the-russians-are-considering-a-semi-catamaran-aircraft-carrier/comment-page-1/#comment-2674466</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 12:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=43970#comment-2674466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t why anyone buys a mono-hull for the Ocean. Unless it&#039;s cheap. If you get a hole in it, the ballast will take the whole thing to the bottom of the ocean in minutes.

My first rule in boating: &quot;Don&#039;t let the boat sink.&quot;

You know you could build a big flat deck on two hulls and have them pivot. The one hull would go forward and one back making it narrower at the waterline. I wouldn&#039;t do this but it could be done. My ideas about building boats are so different from what I&#039;ve heard anyone else come up with, I hesitate to make it public.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t why anyone buys a mono-hull for the Ocean. Unless it&#8217;s cheap. If you get a hole in it, the ballast will take the whole thing to the bottom of the ocean in minutes.</p>
<p>My first rule in boating: &#8220;Don&#8217;t let the boat sink.&#8221;</p>
<p>You know you could build a big flat deck on two hulls and have them pivot. The one hull would go forward and one back making it narrower at the waterline. I wouldn&#8217;t do this but it could be done. My ideas about building boats are so different from what I&#8217;ve heard anyone else come up with, I hesitate to make it public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Tint</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2018/10/the-russians-are-considering-a-semi-catamaran-aircraft-carrier/comment-page-1/#comment-2673833</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Tint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 03:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=43970#comment-2673833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;d have to build an enormous drydock for the thing, for one, one many times the size of the largest you have.  That&#039;s far from a small issue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d have to build an enormous drydock for the thing, for one, one many times the size of the largest you have.  That&#8217;s far from a small issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Jones</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2018/10/the-russians-are-considering-a-semi-catamaran-aircraft-carrier/comment-page-1/#comment-2673728</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 23:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=43970#comment-2673728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How would an outrigger do?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would an outrigger do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucklucky</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2018/10/the-russians-are-considering-a-semi-catamaran-aircraft-carrier/comment-page-1/#comment-2673292</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucklucky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 14:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.isegoria.net/?p=43970#comment-2673292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Catamarans have shown to have been less stable in heavy seas.

But, looking at images does not seem to be even a &quot;semi-catamaran&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Catamarans have shown to have been less stable in heavy seas.</p>
<p>But, looking at images does not seem to be even a &#8220;semi-catamaran&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
