<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Absolute thinking predicts mental illness</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2018/07/absolute-thinking-predicts-mental-illness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2018/07/absolute-thinking-predicts-mental-illness/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 01:10:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wang Wei Lin</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2018/07/absolute-thinking-predicts-mental-illness/comment-page-1/#comment-2636006</link>
		<dc:creator>Wang Wei Lin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 12:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=43640#comment-2636006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So much for the truth....which tends to be absolute.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So much for the truth&#8230;.which tends to be absolute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Jones</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2018/07/absolute-thinking-predicts-mental-illness/comment-page-1/#comment-2635940</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 14:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=43640#comment-2635940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are we setting up a correlation-causation fallacy here?

Also, I question whether bounded rationality fully explains bias and unreasonableness. Certainly it&#039;s behind some of it, but what about when people expend huge amounts of energy and anger to cling to untenable positions? I daresay that denial and intellectual narcissism have a far greater role.

Bounded rationality is, at least, rational. Within bounds. It&#039;s a cut-rate, corner cutting rationality, which is the very opposite of an overinvested and deliberate anti-rationality.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we setting up a correlation-causation fallacy here?</p>
<p>Also, I question whether bounded rationality fully explains bias and unreasonableness. Certainly it&#8217;s behind some of it, but what about when people expend huge amounts of energy and anger to cling to untenable positions? I daresay that denial and intellectual narcissism have a far greater role.</p>
<p>Bounded rationality is, at least, rational. Within bounds. It&#8217;s a cut-rate, corner cutting rationality, which is the very opposite of an overinvested and deliberate anti-rationality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
