<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What they can’t see yet is that something happened</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2018/04/what-they-cant-see-yet-is-that-something-happened/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2018/04/what-they-cant-see-yet-is-that-something-happened/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 14:29:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2018/04/what-they-cant-see-yet-is-that-something-happened/comment-page-1/#comment-2627779</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 15:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=43340#comment-2627779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harold,

You have to read those things with the eyes of someone whose eyes are contemporary to the era. I found Burroughs and Howard as a kid, conducting archaeology in my grandparent&#039;s library. As I was reading through all that, when I look back at it, I was more-or-less doing so as someone whose eyes were fresh to the material, and that had been exposed to what was contemporary (mostly...) to the era. From that standpoint? Both Howard and Burroughs are amazing. Compared to the most of the &quot;state of the art&quot; today? Turgid, archaic, and only interesting as a read-through to see where the original ideas were ripped off from. Everybody seems to think that modern SF and fantasy stuff is something new, but it ain&#039;t. &lt;i&gt;Jirel of Joiry&lt;/i&gt;, anyone? C.L. Moore vastly predates any of the various contemporary female SJW writers, and did far better at her work than they can every dream. And, most of them deny that women like her even existed, let alone got published.

You have to look at those works through the eyes of a contemporary--We, who know Tolkien, and have seen the screen interpretations of the tropes in endless B-movies over the years...? We see that stuff as dated and trite, but when it came out? Lord... You have no idea what a huge, mind-expanding thing it was, when all you&#039;d ever seen was endless piles of Hardy Boys and the usual turgid &quot;young adult&quot; fare of the late 19th and early 20th Centuries.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harold,</p>
<p>You have to read those things with the eyes of someone whose eyes are contemporary to the era. I found Burroughs and Howard as a kid, conducting archaeology in my grandparent&#8217;s library. As I was reading through all that, when I look back at it, I was more-or-less doing so as someone whose eyes were fresh to the material, and that had been exposed to what was contemporary (mostly&#8230;) to the era. From that standpoint? Both Howard and Burroughs are amazing. Compared to the most of the &#8220;state of the art&#8221; today? Turgid, archaic, and only interesting as a read-through to see where the original ideas were ripped off from. Everybody seems to think that modern SF and fantasy stuff is something new, but it ain&#8217;t. <i>Jirel of Joiry</i>, anyone? C.L. Moore vastly predates any of the various contemporary female SJW writers, and did far better at her work than they can every dream. And, most of them deny that women like her even existed, let alone got published.</p>
<p>You have to look at those works through the eyes of a contemporary&#8211;We, who know Tolkien, and have seen the screen interpretations of the tropes in endless B-movies over the years&#8230;? We see that stuff as dated and trite, but when it came out? Lord&#8230; You have no idea what a huge, mind-expanding thing it was, when all you&#8217;d ever seen was endless piles of Hardy Boys and the usual turgid &#8220;young adult&#8221; fare of the late 19th and early 20th Centuries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Greer</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2018/04/what-they-cant-see-yet-is-that-something-happened/comment-page-1/#comment-2627772</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Greer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 12:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=43340#comment-2627772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I, um, &lt;strong&gt;liked&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;em&gt;Those Who Walk Away From Omelas&lt;/em&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, um, <strong>liked</strong> <em>Those Who Walk Away From Omelas</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2018/04/what-they-cant-see-yet-is-that-something-happened/comment-page-1/#comment-2627760</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=43340#comment-2627760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[‘Even watershed books like A Princess of Mars.’

I haven’t read Howard, but I have read Burroughs; I had to double-check that I was reading the right thing, since it seemed unbelievable that something so famous could be so bad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>‘Even watershed books like A Princess of Mars.’</p>
<p>I haven’t read Howard, but I have read Burroughs; I had to double-check that I was reading the right thing, since it seemed unbelievable that something so famous could be so bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isegoria</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2018/04/what-they-cant-see-yet-is-that-something-happened/comment-page-1/#comment-2627741</link>
		<dc:creator>Isegoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 01:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=43340#comment-2627741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Wave science-fiction author Michael Moorcock famously attacked the popular works of Tolkien (&lt;em&gt;Lord of the Rings&lt;/em&gt;), C.S. Lewis (&lt;em&gt;Chronicles of Narnia&lt;/em&gt;), and Richard Adams (&lt;em&gt;Watership Down&lt;/em&gt;) as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.isegoria.net/2005/10/epic-pooh-and-into-the-woods/&quot;&gt;Epic Pooh&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Wave science-fiction author Michael Moorcock famously attacked the popular works of Tolkien (<em>Lord of the Rings</em>), C.S. Lewis (<em>Chronicles of Narnia</em>), and Richard Adams (<em>Watership Down</em>) as <a href="http://www.isegoria.net/2005/10/epic-pooh-and-into-the-woods/">Epic Pooh</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isegoria</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2018/04/what-they-cant-see-yet-is-that-something-happened/comment-page-1/#comment-2627739</link>
		<dc:creator>Isegoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=43340#comment-2627739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;s important to note that most Conan stories aren&#039;t good, because most Conan stories are bad pastiches of the Robert E. Howard originals.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s important to note that most Conan stories aren&#8217;t good, because most Conan stories are bad pastiches of the Robert E. Howard originals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Edwards</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2018/04/what-they-cant-see-yet-is-that-something-happened/comment-page-1/#comment-2627734</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2018 23:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=43340#comment-2627734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Problem with the author&#039;s proposal is that tastes vary so much. 

If I thought the Conan stories were typical of &quot;good&quot; F&amp;SF, I wouldn&#039;t be reading F&amp;SF. But I&#039;ve read quite a lot of much-better stuff, so now I&#039;m trying to *write* F&amp;SF.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Problem with the author&#8217;s proposal is that tastes vary so much. </p>
<p>If I thought the Conan stories were typical of &#8220;good&#8221; F&amp;SF, I wouldn&#8217;t be reading F&amp;SF. But I&#8217;ve read quite a lot of much-better stuff, so now I&#8217;m trying to *write* F&amp;SF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2018/04/what-they-cant-see-yet-is-that-something-happened/comment-page-1/#comment-2627710</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2018 15:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=43340#comment-2627710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not accidental that &quot;science fiction&quot;, such as it is, became unreadable dreck about the time the SJW types discovered it and colonized the genre.

Which is tragic, because before they showed up, the genre was probably the most likely one to have subversive ideas about the things most of the SJW types mouth their pious words in theoretical support of. Hypocrites all, they deny that there were any authors in the genre who were saying the things they claim they believe in, before they arrived to &quot;reform&quot; the genre.

Most of what they call &quot;science fiction and fantasy&quot; is entirely unentertaining and unreadable, these days. That ain&#039;t accidental.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not accidental that &#8220;science fiction&#8221;, such as it is, became unreadable dreck about the time the SJW types discovered it and colonized the genre.</p>
<p>Which is tragic, because before they showed up, the genre was probably the most likely one to have subversive ideas about the things most of the SJW types mouth their pious words in theoretical support of. Hypocrites all, they deny that there were any authors in the genre who were saying the things they claim they believe in, before they arrived to &#8220;reform&#8221; the genre.</p>
<p>Most of what they call &#8220;science fiction and fantasy&#8221; is entirely unentertaining and unreadable, these days. That ain&#8217;t accidental.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2018/04/what-they-cant-see-yet-is-that-something-happened/comment-page-1/#comment-2627708</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2018 13:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=43340#comment-2627708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;...the supposed “golden age” of exemplified by Asimov, Heinlein, and Clarke...&quot;

He kind of lost me here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;the supposed “golden age” of exemplified by Asimov, Heinlein, and Clarke&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>He kind of lost me here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
