<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Communists overthrew Salazar&#8217;s regime in Portugal</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2017/07/how-communists-overthrew-salazars-regime-in-portugal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2017/07/how-communists-overthrew-salazars-regime-in-portugal/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 16:05:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ATP</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2017/07/how-communists-overthrew-salazars-regime-in-portugal/comment-page-1/#comment-2569688</link>
		<dc:creator>ATP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 16:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=42139#comment-2569688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kirk, did the Venetian Republic have a coherent grand strategy?  Why or why not, and how?  I do not know, but suspect they may have, at least part of the time, and am genuinely curious.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kirk, did the Venetian Republic have a coherent grand strategy?  Why or why not, and how?  I do not know, but suspect they may have, at least part of the time, and am genuinely curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2017/07/how-communists-overthrew-salazars-regime-in-portugal/comment-page-1/#comment-2567805</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2017 17:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=42139#comment-2567805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, then there&#039;s the fact that the US really had and still doesn&#039;t possess a coherent, over-arcing &quot;grand strategy&quot;. That sort of thing is the purview of tyrants and oligarchs, not more-or-less democratic empires that come into existence more through misadventure than some grand planning on the part of the people running the place.

The US just doesn&#039;t have the mindset--Witness the active sabotage, against even common sense, that Obama conducted of the Bush administrations Middle East policy. Blew up in his face, it did, did it not? If we had some sort of coherent national policy set, well... That would be a lick on us as a nation. But--The US is manifestly not your classic empire, &lt;i&gt;a la&lt;/i&gt; the Soviets, the British Empire, or anyone else. You want a somewhat reasonable likeness from world history, you kinda-sorta have to go back to the Phoenicians and/or later Carthaginians. The US is not Rome, I&#039;m afraid: It&#039;s more like a Carthage or any of the other major city-states that the Phoenicians set up.

As such, decrying the lack of a coherent &quot;national strategy&quot; just isn&#039;t something that you can or should expect from a phenomenon like the United States. Someone a few hundred or a thousand years from now may be able to make out some such thing, but I seriously doubt it. We&#039;re too damn incoherent, and then there&#039;s also the ease with which various foreign interests have been able to influence US national policy, going back to when the UK sucked us into their little war in Europe, and going right up to the present day, where we find ourselves under the malign influence of Islamists from Saudi Arabia and other oil-tick nations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, then there&#8217;s the fact that the US really had and still doesn&#8217;t possess a coherent, over-arcing &#8220;grand strategy&#8221;. That sort of thing is the purview of tyrants and oligarchs, not more-or-less democratic empires that come into existence more through misadventure than some grand planning on the part of the people running the place.</p>
<p>The US just doesn&#8217;t have the mindset&#8211;Witness the active sabotage, against even common sense, that Obama conducted of the Bush administrations Middle East policy. Blew up in his face, it did, did it not? If we had some sort of coherent national policy set, well&#8230; That would be a lick on us as a nation. But&#8211;The US is manifestly not your classic empire, <i>a la</i> the Soviets, the British Empire, or anyone else. You want a somewhat reasonable likeness from world history, you kinda-sorta have to go back to the Phoenicians and/or later Carthaginians. The US is not Rome, I&#8217;m afraid: It&#8217;s more like a Carthage or any of the other major city-states that the Phoenicians set up.</p>
<p>As such, decrying the lack of a coherent &#8220;national strategy&#8221; just isn&#8217;t something that you can or should expect from a phenomenon like the United States. Someone a few hundred or a thousand years from now may be able to make out some such thing, but I seriously doubt it. We&#8217;re too damn incoherent, and then there&#8217;s also the ease with which various foreign interests have been able to influence US national policy, going back to when the UK sucked us into their little war in Europe, and going right up to the present day, where we find ourselves under the malign influence of Islamists from Saudi Arabia and other oil-tick nations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Sykes</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2017/07/how-communists-overthrew-salazars-regime-in-portugal/comment-page-1/#comment-2567752</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Sykes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=42139#comment-2567752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or perhaps early 15th-Century Byzantium.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or perhaps early 15th-Century Byzantium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
