What’s new and different here?

I mean, yes, loyalty to one’s people, historical knowledge, ethnic pride, and other assorted virtues. And maybe if that’s all there was to it, it wouldn’t be notable — but the underlying pattern is always the same: Jew decides other people don’t think Jews are important enough and “corrects” the “problem”.

When it does not matter that he has done this, except to other Jews, and it is not made any sort of big deal except to other Jews, and that standard of behavior gets applied everywhere else (such as in writing history books or discussing political philosophies) — when Jews don’t argue that everything everywhere all the time is at all times and places centered on Jews — then it will stop being an issue. Not before.