<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gun Control Is Tax-Subsidized Marketing for Illegal Submachine Guns</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2016/11/gun-control-is-tax-subsidized-marketing-for-illegal-submachine-guns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2016/11/gun-control-is-tax-subsidized-marketing-for-illegal-submachine-guns/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 23:08:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: L. C. Rees</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2016/11/gun-control-is-tax-subsidized-marketing-for-illegal-submachine-guns/comment-page-1/#comment-2512952</link>
		<dc:creator>L. C. Rees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 23:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=41072#comment-2512952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.constitution.org/mil/mil_act_1792.htm&quot;&gt;Militia Act of 1792&lt;/a&gt; explicitly assumes a secondary market in military grade firearms and ammunition e.g...

&lt;blockquote&gt;
That every citizen, so enrolled and notified, shall, within six months thereafter, &lt;strong&gt;provide himself&lt;/strong&gt; with a good musket or firelock, a sufficient bayonet and belt, two spare flints, and a knapsack, a pouch, with a box therein, to contain not less than twenty four cartridges, suited to the bore of his musket or firelock, each cartridge to contain a proper quantity of powder and ball; or with a good rifle, knapsack, shot-pouch, and powder-horn, twenty balls suited to the bore of his rifle, and a quarter of a pound of powder; and shall appear so armed, accoutred and provided, when called out to exercise or into service, except, that when called out on company days to exercise only, he may appear without a knapsack. &lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.constitution.org/mil/mil_act_1792.htm">Militia Act of 1792</a> explicitly assumes a secondary market in military grade firearms and ammunition e.g&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>
That every citizen, so enrolled and notified, shall, within six months thereafter, <strong>provide himself</strong> with a good musket or firelock, a sufficient bayonet and belt, two spare flints, and a knapsack, a pouch, with a box therein, to contain not less than twenty four cartridges, suited to the bore of his musket or firelock, each cartridge to contain a proper quantity of powder and ball; or with a good rifle, knapsack, shot-pouch, and powder-horn, twenty balls suited to the bore of his rifle, and a quarter of a pound of powder; and shall appear so armed, accoutred and provided, when called out to exercise or into service, except, that when called out on company days to exercise only, he may appear without a knapsack. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheldon</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2016/11/gun-control-is-tax-subsidized-marketing-for-illegal-submachine-guns/comment-page-1/#comment-2512856</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheldon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=41072#comment-2512856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 2nd Amendment according to T. Jefferson covers weapons in no way inferior to those carried by the common soldier. A sub machine gun would therefore not qualify as &quot;arms&quot; under the 2nd Amendment protections? The assault rifle that features the selective fire switch is close however.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2nd Amendment according to T. Jefferson covers weapons in no way inferior to those carried by the common soldier. A sub machine gun would therefore not qualify as &#8220;arms&#8221; under the 2nd Amendment protections? The assault rifle that features the selective fire switch is close however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
