<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OkCupid Study Reveals the Perils of Big-Data Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2016/05/okcupid-study-reveals-the-perils-of-big-data-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2016/05/okcupid-study-reveals-the-perils-of-big-data-science/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 12:42:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slovenian Guest</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2016/05/okcupid-study-reveals-the-perils-of-big-data-science/comment-page-1/#comment-2471930</link>
		<dc:creator>Slovenian Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 10:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=40242#comment-2471930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update: The Open Science Framework removed the OkCupid data posting after OkCupid filed a Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) complaint on May 13.

Denmark has strict privacy laws, you are not even allowed to enumerate products because it could identify a customer... So they got off easy with just a DMCA complaint. The &quot;it was already stolen&quot; defense would certainly not hold water in a court of law, not a chance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update: The Open Science Framework removed the OkCupid data posting after OkCupid filed a Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) complaint on May 13.</p>
<p>Denmark has strict privacy laws, you are not even allowed to enumerate products because it could identify a customer&#8230; So they got off easy with just a DMCA complaint. The &#8220;it was already stolen&#8221; defense would certainly not hold water in a court of law, not a chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
