Comments on: A Conversation with Jonathan Haidt

By: Lucklucky

Lucklucky — Wed, 11 May 2016 19:36:16 +0000

For example what are todays priests and proselytizers?:

Journalists.

What are the churches?:

TV the so called “news”.

By: Slovenian Guest

Slovenian Guest — Wed, 11 May 2016 15:55:50 +0000

No it’s liberalism, or whatever you want to call this leftist secular progressive religion slash modern doomsday cult.

Which is essentially a re-branded offshoot of Christianity, guilt, penance, flogging and all.

Don’t be a denier, the SCIENCE is IN!

By: Mike in Boston

Mike in Boston — Wed, 11 May 2016 15:44:43 +0000

Once you make something a religion, you’re not open to evidence. Eh? Christianity tells us that evidence, in fact, is a pretty good way to judge the post-1960s secular establishment: Every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.

By: Cassander

Cassander — Wed, 11 May 2016 15:43:13 +0000

Haidt exhibits the highest possible virtue of a scientist, when he discovers new evidence, his views change.

By: Lucklucky

Lucklucky — Wed, 11 May 2016 15:12:10 +0000

“What’s the best replacement for religion in modern, secular society?”

False question. The religion of XX and XXI century in Western world is Politics. It replaced Judeo-Christian religion.