<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Surprise Torpedo Attack</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2016/03/surprise-torpedo-attack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2016/03/surprise-torpedo-attack/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 21:33:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cassander</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2016/03/surprise-torpedo-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-2462912</link>
		<dc:creator>cassander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 02:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=39907#comment-2462912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US navy spent almost 50 years expecting, and planning for, a surprise attack against the Philippines, because for most of that period, an attack against hawaii was simply not possible.  It became possible in the late 30s, but 5 years was a small time period to absorb a change of that magnitude sort of change.  that part of the fleet was in atlantic waters, though, made absolutely no difference.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US navy spent almost 50 years expecting, and planning for, a surprise attack against the Philippines, because for most of that period, an attack against hawaii was simply not possible.  It became possible in the late 30s, but 5 years was a small time period to absorb a change of that magnitude sort of change.  that part of the fleet was in atlantic waters, though, made absolutely no difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isegoria</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2016/03/surprise-torpedo-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-2462906</link>
		<dc:creator>Isegoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 00:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=39907#comment-2462906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll get to the open secret of Nationalist China momentarily, and now that I have that draft copy of the whole text I can get to Korea, etc. Thank you!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll get to the open secret of Nationalist China momentarily, and now that I have that draft copy of the whole text I can get to Korea, etc. Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grurray</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2016/03/surprise-torpedo-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-2462849</link>
		<dc:creator>Grurray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 14:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=39907#comment-2462849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They learned too much from the Russian war and developed their doctrine of Kantai Kessen, which was Japanese for &#039;putting all your eggs in one basket&#039;

American Carriers, leap frogging, diversionary tactics, and good old Yankee ingenuity proved that flexibility and maneuverability could defeat Japanese concentrated power.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They learned too much from the Russian war and developed their doctrine of Kantai Kessen, which was Japanese for &#8216;putting all your eggs in one basket&#8217;</p>
<p>American Carriers, leap frogging, diversionary tactics, and good old Yankee ingenuity proved that flexibility and maneuverability could defeat Japanese concentrated power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slovenian Guest</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2016/03/surprise-torpedo-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-2462846</link>
		<dc:creator>Slovenian Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 13:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=39907#comment-2462846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A draft copy pdf version of &quot;Open Secrets of American Policy&quot; can be &lt;a href=&quot;http://mason.gmu.edu/~gtulloc1/OpenSecretsofAmericanPolicy.pdf&quot;&gt;downloaded&lt;/a&gt; from Tullocks official website.

I like chapter 3 on the collapse of nationalist China, which was summarized on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/10/us-aid-chinese.html&quot;&gt;Overcoming Bias&lt;/a&gt; as: 

&quot;Tullock goes on to describe how US diplomats in China personally favored the communists. Even if the truth is somewhere between these pictures, it seems quite at odds with the usual US-fighting-communism story.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A draft copy pdf version of &#8220;Open Secrets of American Policy&#8221; can be <a href="http://mason.gmu.edu/~gtulloc1/OpenSecretsofAmericanPolicy.pdf">downloaded</a> from Tullocks official website.</p>
<p>I like chapter 3 on the collapse of nationalist China, which was summarized on <a href="http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/10/us-aid-chinese.html">Overcoming Bias</a> as: </p>
<p>&#8220;Tullock goes on to describe how US diplomats in China personally favored the communists. Even if the truth is somewhere between these pictures, it seems quite at odds with the usual US-fighting-communism story.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
