<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: History is Fundamentally Tragic</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2016/01/history-is-fundamentally-tragic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2016/01/history-is-fundamentally-tragic/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 09:00:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candide III</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2016/01/history-is-fundamentally-tragic/comment-page-1/#comment-2452980</link>
		<dc:creator>Candide III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 14:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=39636#comment-2452980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a bit rich for Valls to say that history is fundamentally tragic after his ilk has done so much to create the tragedy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a bit rich for Valls to say that history is fundamentally tragic after his ilk has done so much to create the tragedy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slovenian Guest</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2016/01/history-is-fundamentally-tragic/comment-page-1/#comment-2452661</link>
		<dc:creator>Slovenian Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2016 06:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=39636#comment-2452661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This made me think of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cato-unbound.org/2009/04/13/peter-thiel/education-libertarian&quot;&gt;Peter Thiel&lt;/a&gt;, who said:

&quot;The future of technology is not pre-determined, and we must resist the temptation of technological utopianism — the notion that technology has a momentum or will of its own, that it will guarantee a more free future, and therefore that we can ignore the terrible arc of the political in our world.&quot;

He is quite fatalistic even: &quot;I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.&quot;

Fun fact, the official slogan of the European Union is &quot;united in diversity,&quot; which is of course an oxymoron. It should be corrected to &quot;divide et impera&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This made me think of <a href="http://www.cato-unbound.org/2009/04/13/peter-thiel/education-libertarian">Peter Thiel</a>, who said:</p>
<p>&#8220;The future of technology is not pre-determined, and we must resist the temptation of technological utopianism — the notion that technology has a momentum or will of its own, that it will guarantee a more free future, and therefore that we can ignore the terrible arc of the political in our world.&#8221;</p>
<p>He is quite fatalistic even: &#8220;I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fun fact, the official slogan of the European Union is &#8220;united in diversity,&#8221; which is of course an oxymoron. It should be corrected to &#8220;divide et impera&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2016/01/history-is-fundamentally-tragic/comment-page-1/#comment-2452440</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 23:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=39636#comment-2452440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m going to assume the author is unaware that Churchill did not expect Britain to be part of that Europe, at least not as part of some sort of federal union. He&#039;d have had to give up his empire or turn it over to collective administration. 

Now as a tradition-minded Briton and Englishman of the upper class, Churchill also knew that his country was a part of European civilization and took pride in it, but that is a distinction the Euroclass cannot seem to understand at all.

Note that reference to Europe&#039;s &#039;tranquil sway&#039;. Churchill said all that at a time when, even in ruins, Europe still had a large position in the world and in which its overawing rivals were both [troublesome] offshoots of European civilization. I doubt he envisioned a Chinese hegemony, the current troubles of Islam, the demographic waves therefrom, the population of Africa, or the demographic collapse of Europe.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to assume the author is unaware that Churchill did not expect Britain to be part of that Europe, at least not as part of some sort of federal union. He&#8217;d have had to give up his empire or turn it over to collective administration. </p>
<p>Now as a tradition-minded Briton and Englishman of the upper class, Churchill also knew that his country was a part of European civilization and took pride in it, but that is a distinction the Euroclass cannot seem to understand at all.</p>
<p>Note that reference to Europe&#8217;s &#8216;tranquil sway&#8217;. Churchill said all that at a time when, even in ruins, Europe still had a large position in the world and in which its overawing rivals were both [troublesome] offshoots of European civilization. I doubt he envisioned a Chinese hegemony, the current troubles of Islam, the demographic waves therefrom, the population of Africa, or the demographic collapse of Europe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
