<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Totally Unserious SF Film</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2015/12/first-totally-unserious-sf-film/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2015/12/first-totally-unserious-sf-film/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 14:48:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rollory</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2015/12/first-totally-unserious-sf-film/comment-page-1/#comment-2447731</link>
		<dc:creator>Rollory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2015 22:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=39485#comment-2447731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The quoted article is some of the most complete nonsense I&#039;ve ever seen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The quoted article is some of the most complete nonsense I&#8217;ve ever seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thales</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2015/12/first-totally-unserious-sf-film/comment-page-1/#comment-2446885</link>
		<dc:creator>Thales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 16:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=39485#comment-2446885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oddly enough, I was able to enjoy both Star Wars and The Martian without any hint of cognitive dissonance, nerdrage or any other mental malady.  Between this guy and other authors (that need not be mentioned) you&#039;d almost think that marginal writers were trying foment ersatz tribalism for their own benefit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oddly enough, I was able to enjoy both Star Wars and The Martian without any hint of cognitive dissonance, nerdrage or any other mental malady.  Between this guy and other authors (that need not be mentioned) you&#8217;d almost think that marginal writers were trying foment ersatz tribalism for their own benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2015/12/first-totally-unserious-sf-film/comment-page-1/#comment-2446759</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 20:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=39485#comment-2446759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That last excerpted paragraph is particularly amusing. In the past 20 years Quentin Tarantino has been critically lauded for producing movies that amount to gaudy mishmashes of the visual metaphors of his own movie-going youth. At least Lucas kept to a few themes per film and gave them comprehensible storylines.

On a broader level, partisans and authors from the hard-sf and social-sf or &quot;sf of ideas&quot; camps have often gone after one another, but just as often united to go after space opera or any of the lighter genres.

But sometimes there is a readership for simple, or even non-so-simple but very traditional, stories told in a vaguely SF milieu. These are not illegitimate. Indeed, there is room to believe that such futuristic settings might not always change humanity all that much. We aren&#039;t all that different from our own ancestors.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That last excerpted paragraph is particularly amusing. In the past 20 years Quentin Tarantino has been critically lauded for producing movies that amount to gaudy mishmashes of the visual metaphors of his own movie-going youth. At least Lucas kept to a few themes per film and gave them comprehensible storylines.</p>
<p>On a broader level, partisans and authors from the hard-sf and social-sf or &#8220;sf of ideas&#8221; camps have often gone after one another, but just as often united to go after space opera or any of the lighter genres.</p>
<p>But sometimes there is a readership for simple, or even non-so-simple but very traditional, stories told in a vaguely SF milieu. These are not illegitimate. Indeed, there is room to believe that such futuristic settings might not always change humanity all that much. We aren&#8217;t all that different from our own ancestors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2015/12/first-totally-unserious-sf-film/comment-page-1/#comment-2446757</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 20:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=39485#comment-2446757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Thing? A failure? It&#039;s clobberin&#039; time!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Thing? A failure? It&#8217;s clobberin&#8217; time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilbur Hassenfus</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2015/12/first-totally-unserious-sf-film/comment-page-1/#comment-2446716</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilbur Hassenfus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 12:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=39485#comment-2446716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I recall, as an SF-mad youngster back in the 70s, Ballard was the first totally unreadable SF author I encountered.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I recall, as an SF-mad youngster back in the 70s, Ballard was the first totally unreadable SF author I encountered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
