<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three Levels of Moral Beliefs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2015/11/three-levels-of-moral-beliefs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2015/11/three-levels-of-moral-beliefs/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 12:42:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucklucky</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2015/11/three-levels-of-moral-beliefs/comment-page-1/#comment-2431848</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucklucky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2015 00:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=39232#comment-2431848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;who manage to endorse his view of economics, deny evolution, and maintain a pious stance toward religion all at the same time.&quot;

Never heard of people like this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;who manage to endorse his view of economics, deny evolution, and maintain a pious stance toward religion all at the same time.&#8221;</p>
<p>Never heard of people like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abelard Lindsey</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2015/11/three-levels-of-moral-beliefs/comment-page-1/#comment-2431378</link>
		<dc:creator>Abelard Lindsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2015 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=39232#comment-2431378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The issue with Hayak&#039;s emphasis on evolutionary biology as a basis for economics is that many of the &quot;non-libertarian&quot; right wingers do not believe in evolution. Yet, simultaneous, they believe in innate biological differences between the races. its kind of hard to believe in innate differences between the races while rejecting evolution at the same time.

I guess logical consistency is lacking on the part of the (non-libertarian) right as it is for liberal-leftists.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue with Hayak&#8217;s emphasis on evolutionary biology as a basis for economics is that many of the &#8220;non-libertarian&#8221; right wingers do not believe in evolution. Yet, simultaneous, they believe in innate biological differences between the races. its kind of hard to believe in innate differences between the races while rejecting evolution at the same time.</p>
<p>I guess logical consistency is lacking on the part of the (non-libertarian) right as it is for liberal-leftists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2015/11/three-levels-of-moral-beliefs/comment-page-1/#comment-2430968</link>
		<dc:creator>R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2015 01:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=39232#comment-2430968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Wilson seems compelled to treat religion as primitive superstition and contrast it against the useful products of cultural evolution...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Religion may have started out as a primitive superstition, but it&#039;s evolved. Wilson makes that clear. We aren&#039;t &lt;em&gt;H. erectus&lt;/em&gt; either. 

He has an entire book on religion (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00DQMWSUY/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B00DQMWSUY&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=isegoria0e-20&amp;linkId=ZLSSA3RDAGTN7S64&quot;&gt;Darwin&#039;s Cathedral&lt;/a&gt;) and how it and other social entities are products of cultural evolution. Good read IMO. Should be thrown at every self-righteous know-it-all atheist.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Wilson seems compelled to treat religion as primitive superstition and contrast it against the useful products of cultural evolution&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Religion may have started out as a primitive superstition, but it&#8217;s evolved. Wilson makes that clear. We aren&#8217;t <em>H. erectus</em> either. </p>
<p>He has an entire book on religion (<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00DQMWSUY/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=B00DQMWSUY&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;tag=isegoria0e-20&#038;linkId=ZLSSA3RDAGTN7S64">Darwin&#8217;s Cathedral</a>) and how it and other social entities are products of cultural evolution. Good read IMO. Should be thrown at every self-righteous know-it-all atheist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
