<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Servants without Masters</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2015/11/servants-without-masters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2015/11/servants-without-masters/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 21:34:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael van der Riet</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2015/11/servants-without-masters/comment-page-1/#comment-3630426</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael van der Riet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 10:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=39265#comment-3630426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has always been a distinguishing trait of the upper class that they know how to treat servants.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has always been a distinguishing trait of the upper class that they know how to treat servants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thales</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2015/11/servants-without-masters/comment-page-1/#comment-2434958</link>
		<dc:creator>Thales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 14:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=39265#comment-2434958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does Harold Lee employ no one? Has he never served in uniform? Has he no children?

If the ability to function in a hierarchy, at an inter-personal level, with respect and dignity is such a rare talent these days, then we have truly lost something valuable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Harold Lee employ no one? Has he never served in uniform? Has he no children?</p>
<p>If the ability to function in a hierarchy, at an inter-personal level, with respect and dignity is such a rare talent these days, then we have truly lost something valuable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2015/11/servants-without-masters/comment-page-1/#comment-2434954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=39265#comment-2434954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When was the last time I &#039;made&#039; a barista or janitor faceless, or &#039;dehumanized&#039; them (whatever that means, precisely)?

Oh, that&#039;s right: never. 

Anyone who does anything for me...whether I am paying them directly and per transaction or whether they are paid weekly and by an intermediate organization, I greet and thank. This &quot;faceless and dehumanizing&quot; dribble smacks of bourgeois egalitarian virtue signaling.

The author gets it more right in talking about relationship, but misses the true differentiator of the Singaporean case, which is a direct, one-to-one relationship  ( which really disrupts the egalitarian signaling) as opposed to someone who works for many others, as well. 

It would be interesting to examine how this reaction differs depending on the type and skill-level of the work being done (e.g. Emptying my home trashbins and folding my laundry versus tutoring my children in classical languages)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When was the last time I &#8216;made&#8217; a barista or janitor faceless, or &#8216;dehumanized&#8217; them (whatever that means, precisely)?</p>
<p>Oh, that&#8217;s right: never. </p>
<p>Anyone who does anything for me&#8230;whether I am paying them directly and per transaction or whether they are paid weekly and by an intermediate organization, I greet and thank. This &#8220;faceless and dehumanizing&#8221; dribble smacks of bourgeois egalitarian virtue signaling.</p>
<p>The author gets it more right in talking about relationship, but misses the true differentiator of the Singaporean case, which is a direct, one-to-one relationship  ( which really disrupts the egalitarian signaling) as opposed to someone who works for many others, as well. </p>
<p>It would be interesting to examine how this reaction differs depending on the type and skill-level of the work being done (e.g. Emptying my home trashbins and folding my laundry versus tutoring my children in classical languages)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
